pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20039 · v1 · pith:7FXTX4ESnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Quantitative prediction of excitons in lattice-mismatched van der Waals heterostructures

Jakob Kj{\ae}rulff Svaneborg , Mikkel Ohm Sauer , Amalie Helena Svaneborg , Kristian Sommer Thygesen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 16:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords van der Waals heterostructuresexcitonsBethe-Salpeter equationdielectric screeningtransition metal dichalcogenidesoptical spectralattice mismatch
0
0 comments X

The pith

The mQEH-BSE framework predicts absorption spectra and exciton energies in lattice-mismatched van der Waals heterostructures in agreement with experiment.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces the microscopic Quantum Electrostatic Heterostructure (mQEH) method to model dielectric screening in van der Waals heterostructures with incommensurate lattices. mQEH uses a hierarchical basis set to describe potentials and induced densities accurately at all length scales without arbitrary cutoffs. It is combined with a layer-projected Bethe-Salpeter equation to calculate optical spectra and exciton energies. When applied to transition-metal dichalcogenide heterobilayers, the approach yields results that match experimental absorption spectra and momentum-indirect exciton energies. This provides an efficient computational route for designing heterostructures with specific optical properties.

Core claim

The mQEH method employs a hierarchical and systematically improvable basis set to describe potentials and induced densities, eliminating the need for arbitrary geometric cutoffs. Combined with a layer projected Bethe-Salpeter Equation, it enables accurate calculations of optical spectra for lattice-mismatched vdW heterostructures, achieving excellent agreement with experiment for TMD heterobilayers.

What carries the argument

The microscopic Quantum Electrostatic Heterostructure (mQEH) method, which uses a hierarchical basis set to accurately capture induced densities and potentials at all length scales.

If this is right

  • Absorption spectra of lattice-mismatched vdW heterostructures can be computed efficiently.
  • Momentum-indirect exciton energies are obtained in excellent agreement with experiment.
  • The method provides a computationally efficient route to predictive modeling of vdW heterostructures.
  • Arbitrary geometric cutoffs are no longer needed for accurate screening descriptions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framework may enable rapid screening of many possible heterostructure combinations for desired optical responses.
  • Extensions to other material classes beyond TMDs could follow from the same basis set approach.
  • Quantitative predictions could guide experimental fabrication of devices with tailored photonic properties.

Load-bearing premise

The hierarchical and systematically improvable basis set employed by mQEH accurately captures induced densities and potentials at all length scales without requiring arbitrary geometric cutoffs.

What would settle it

Experimental measurement of absorption spectra or exciton energies in a TMD heterobilayer that deviates substantially from the mQEH-BSE prediction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.20039 by Amalie Helena Svaneborg, Jakob Kj{\ae}rulff Svaneborg, Kristian Sommer Thygesen, Mikkel Ohm Sauer.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Eigenvalues of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. BSE@PBE absorption spectrum of a lattice-matched [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Absorption spectra and (negated) exciton density of states (DOS) for the four TMD monolayers considered in this [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Absorption spectrum of homobilayer H-MoS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Absorption spectra for the six TMD heterobilayers. The spectrum is colored according to the character of the exciton, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Calculated absorption spectra of MoSe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Electron-hole pair weights for the lowest exciton [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Convergence of the lowest BSE eigenvalue with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Accurate modeling of dielectric screening in van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures is essential for predicting photonic and optoelectronic properties - yet conventional first-principles methods are often hindered by incommensurate lattices and prohibitive computational costs. In this work, we introduce the microscopic Quantum Electrostatic Heterostructure (mQEH) method. mQEH employs a hierarchical and systematically improvable basis set to describe potentials and induced densities, eliminating the need for arbitrary geometric cutoffs and ensuring accurate screening descriptions at all length scales. The mQEH method is combined with a layer projected Bethe-Salpeter Equation (BSE) to enable calculations of optical spectra of experimentally relevant lattice-mismatched vdW heterostructures. Applying the mQEH-BSE framework to a series of transition-metal dichalcogenide (TMD) heterobilayers, we obtain absorption spectra and momentum-indirect exciton energies in excellent agreement with experiment. The framework provides a computationally efficient route to predictive modeling and design of vdW heterostructures with tailored optical properties.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the microscopic Quantum Electrostatic Heterostructure (mQEH) method, which employs a hierarchical and systematically improvable basis set to describe induced densities and potentials in van der Waals heterostructures without arbitrary geometric cutoffs. This is combined with a layer-projected Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) to compute optical absorption spectra and momentum-indirect exciton energies for lattice-mismatched transition-metal dichalcogenide heterobilayers, with the central claim being quantitative agreement with experimental data.

Significance. If the quantitative agreement holds under scrutiny, the framework offers a computationally efficient and systematically improvable route to predictive modeling of excitonic and optical properties in incommensurate vdW systems, which is a significant advance for materials design in this area. The absence of ad-hoc parameters and the focus on all length scales are strengths.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement of 'excellent agreement with experiment' lacks accompanying quantitative validation statistics (e.g., mean absolute deviation, R², or error bars on computed vs. measured exciton energies). Adding these would strengthen the central claim.
  2. The manuscript should include a dedicated validation section or table comparing mQEH-BSE results to experiment across the full series of TMD heterobilayers, with explicit discussion of any outliers or system-specific deviations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, recognition of the strengths of the mQEH approach (systematically improvable basis without ad-hoc cutoffs), and recommendation for minor revision. We are pleased that the significance for predictive modeling of incommensurate vdW heterostructures is acknowledged.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper introduces mQEH as a new method employing a hierarchical, systematically improvable basis for induced densities and potentials (eliminating geometric cutoffs), then combines it with layer-projected BSE to compute spectra and exciton energies for lattice-mismatched TMD heterobilayers. These quantities are compared directly to external experimental absorption spectra and energies rather than to any internally fitted or self-defined quantities. No equations or claims reduce by construction to prior inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes; the central results rest on the method's construction plus independent experimental benchmarks, rendering the derivation self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; full text unavailable so ledger entries are limited to statements explicit in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption A hierarchical and systematically improvable basis set can describe potentials and induced densities at all length scales without arbitrary geometric cutoffs.
    Directly stated in the abstract as the key property of mQEH.
invented entities (1)
  • microscopic Quantum Electrostatic Heterostructure (mQEH) method no independent evidence
    purpose: Accurate dielectric screening description in incommensurate vdW heterostructures
    New computational framework introduced in the paper.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5730 in / 1384 out tokens · 33289 ms · 2026-06-26T16:34:11.477059+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references

  1. [1]

    The measured position of the two low- est, optically active excitons (often referred to as the A and B excitons) are indicated by the second and third downward-pointing arrows

    Its experimentally measured position is indicated by the first downward- pointing arrow. The measured position of the two low- est, optically active excitons (often referred to as the A and B excitons) are indicated by the second and third downward-pointing arrows. The experimental data are provided in Table IV. Both the fullyab initio and the ML-AX corre...

  2. [2]

    In addition, we solve the mQEH-BSE at a finite center-of- mass momentum, Q, corresponding to the indirect band gap in the band structure

    To identify the lowest-lying, possibly dark, exciton,X d 0, we now consider the exciton energies, independently of their oscillator strengths. In addition, we solve the mQEH-BSE at a finite center-of- mass momentum, Q, corresponding to the indirect band gap in the band structure. The energy of the lowest singlet exciton is indicated by the dashed vertical...

  3. [3]

    6 from the good agreement between the vertical dashed lines and the first downward-pointing arrow

    This is evident in Fig. 6 from the good agreement between the vertical dashed lines and the first downward-pointing arrow. Indeed, with the exception of MoS2/WSe2, all calculated exciton energies lie within 0.1 eV of the average experimental value, represented by the arrow. For MoS2/WSe2, the agreement is less satisfac- tory, which we attribute to the pro...

    2022

  4. [4]

    The density induced by an exter- nal potential Vext(q, ω, z) is then ρind(q, ω, z) = X ij h ρi(q, z) χij(q, ω) Z ρ∗ j(q, z′) Vext(q, ω, z′)dz′ i

    Operator representation and the matrix Dyson equation We write the density response functionχ (and similarly eχ) in the operator representation χ(q, ω) = X ij |ρi(q)⟩ χij(q, ω) ⟨ρj(q)| , (A1) where i = (ℓ, α) and j = (ℓ′, β) are combined layer and basis function indices. The density induced by an exter- nal potential Vext(q, ω, z) is then ρind(q, ω, z) = ...

  5. [5]

    The color of the circles indicate the projection of the band onto each of the two layers

    in lattice-matched MoSe2/WSe2 (θ = 60◦). The color of the circles indicate the projection of the band onto each of the two layers. The hole is localized in the WSe2 layer, while the electron is hybridized with significant weight on both layers. matrix V I, on the other hand, couples different layers, so thesolution χofEq.(A5)isnotblock-diagonal, reflectin...

  6. [6]

    Mixed-space representation and in-plane diagonal approximation In practice,eχℓ is computed in a plane-wave basis using the GPAW [27] code. This plane-wave basis is related to the real-space representation by eχℓ(q, r, r′) = 1 Ωℓ X GG′ ei(G+q)·reχℓ GG′(q)e−i(G′+q)·r′ , (A6) where Ωℓ is the volume of the computational unit cell of monolayer ℓ, and eχℓ(r, r′...

  7. [7]

    Representation of eχℓ at finite frequency and long wavelengths The shape of the eigenfunctions ϕℓ α(q, z) and ρℓ α(q, z) changes only weakly with frequencyω. To avoid storing nearly identical basis functions at every frequency point, we diagonalize V (q)eχℓ(q, ω = 0) only at ω = 0 and use the resulting eigenfunctions as the density and potential basis at ...

  8. [8]

    A. K. Geim and I. V. Grigorieva, Van der waals het- erostructures, Nature499, 419 (2013)

    2013

  9. [9]

    W. Ren, P. Bøggild, J. Redwing, K. S. Novoselov, L. Sun, Y. Qi, K. Jia, Z. Liu, O. Burton, J. Alexander-Webber, et al. , The 2d materials roadmap, 2D Materials 13, 021501 (2026)

    2026

  10. [10]

    F. J. G. de Abajo, D. N. Basov, F. H. Koppens, L. Orsini, M. Ceccanti, S. Castilla, L. Cavicchi, M. Polini, P. A. D. Gonçalves, A. T. Costa, et al., Roadmap for photonics with 2d materials, ACS Photonics12, 3961 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    Withers, O

    F. Withers, O. Del Pozo-Zamudio, A. Mishchenko, A. P. Rooney, A. Gholinia, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. J. Haigh, A. Geim, A. Tartakovskii,et al., Light-emitting diodes by band-structure engineering in van der waals heterostructures, Nature materials14, 301 (2015)

    2015

  12. [12]

    M. Long, P. Wang, H. Fang, and W. Hu, Progress, chal- lenges, and opportunities for 2d material based pho- todetectors, Advanced Functional Materials29, 1803807 (2019)

    2019

  13. [13]

    Ciarrocchi, F

    A. Ciarrocchi, F. Tagarelli, A. Avsar, and A. Kis, Exci- tonic devices with van der waals heterostructures: val- leytronics meets twistronics, Nature Reviews Materials 7, 449 (2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E.Kaxiras,andP.Jarillo-Herrero,Unconventionalsuper- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture 556, 43 (2018)

    2018

  15. [15]

    Wang, E.-M

    L. Wang, E.-M. Shih, A. Ghiotto, L. Xian, D. A. Rhodes, C. Tan, M. Claassen, D. M. Kennes, Y. Bai, B. Kim, et al. , Correlated electronic phases in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides, Nature Materials 19, 861 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    Bistritzer and A

    R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moiré bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences108, 12233 (2011)

    2011

  17. [17]

    Cudazzo, I

    P. Cudazzo, I. V. Tokatly, and A. Rubio, Dielectric screening in two-dimensional insulators: Implications for excitonic and impurity states in graphane, Physical Re- view B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics84, 085406 (2011)

    2011

  18. [18]

    K. S. Thygesen, Calculating excitons, plasmons, and quasiparticles in 2d materials and van der waals het- erostructures, 2D Materials4, 022004 (2017)

    2017

  19. [19]

    Andersen, S

    K. Andersen, S. Latini, and K. S. Thygesen, Dielectric genome of van der waals heterostructures, Nano letters 15, 4616 (2015)

    2015

  20. [20]

    M. O. Sauer and T. G. Pedersen, Exciton absorption, band structure, and optical emission in biased bilayer graphene, Physical Review B105, 115416 (2022)

    2022

  21. [21]

    D. A. Leon, M. Kuisma, M. O. Sauer, J. K. Svaneborg, M.K.Svendsen, S.Americo, K.Berland, J.J.Mortensen, and K. S. Thygesen, Self-consistent layer-projected scis- sors operator for band structures of two-dimensional van der waals materials with large unit cells, Phys. Rev. B 112, 115128 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    M. Gjerding, L.Cavalcante, A.Chaves,andK.Thygesen, Efficient ab initio modeling of dielectric screening in 2d van der waals materials: Including phonons, substrates, and doping, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C124, 11609 (2020)

    2020

  23. [23]

    Macheda, F

    F. Macheda, F. Mauri, and T. Sohier, Ab initio van der waals electrodynamics: Polaritons and electron scatter- ing from plasmons and phonons in bn-capped graphene, Physical Review B110, 115407 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    Andersen, K

    K. Andersen, K. W. Jacobsen, and K. S. Thygesen, Spatially resolved quantum plasmon modes in metal- lic nano-films from first-principles, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics86, 245129 (2012)

    2012

  25. [25]

    P. S. Schmidt, C. E. Patrick, and K. S. Thygesen, Simple vertex correction improves gw band energies of bulk and two-dimensional crystals, Physical Review B96, 205206 (2017)

    2017

  26. [26]

    K. T. Winther and K. S. Thygesen, Band structure en- gineering in van der waals heterostructures via dielec- tric screening: the gδw method, 2D Materials4, 025059 (2017)

    2017

  27. [27]

    Shishkin and G

    M. Shishkin and G. Kresse, Self-consistent gw calcula- tions for semiconductors and insulators, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics75, 235102 (2007)

    2007

  28. [28]

    Hüser, T

    F. Hüser, T. Olsen, and K. S. Thygesen, Quasiparticle gw calculations for solids, molecules, and two-dimensional materials, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics87, 235132 (2013)

    2013

  29. [29]

    Deilmann and K

    T. Deilmann and K. S. Thygesen, Dark excitations in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides, Physical Re- view B96, 201113 (2017)

    2017

  30. [30]

    Pakdel, A

    S. Pakdel, A. Rasmussen, A. Taghizadeh, M. Kruse, T. Olsen, and K. S. Thygesen, High-throughput compu- tational stacking reveals emergent properties in natural van der waals bilayers, Nature Communications15, 932 16 System EA EB Substrate Temperature Technique MoS2[35] 1.85 1.98 SiO 2 Room temp. Refl./PL MoS2[36] 1.93–1.95 – hBN 4 K PL MoS2[37] 1.86 2.02 ...

    2024

  31. [31]

    Taniguchi, K

    N.Peimyoo, T.Deilmann, F.Withers, J.Escolar, D.Nut- ting, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, A. Taghizadeh, M. F. Craciun, K. S. Thygesen,et al., Electrical tuning of op- tically active interlayer excitons in bilayer mos2, Nature Nanotechnology 16, 888 (2021)

    2021

  32. [32]

    Deilmann and K

    T. Deilmann and K. S. Thygesen, Finite-momentum ex- citon landscape in mono-and bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides, 2D Materials6, 035003 (2019)

    2019

  33. [33]

    P. K. Nayak, Y. Horbatenko, S. Ahn, G. Kim, J.-U. Lee, K. Y. Ma, A.-R. Jang, H. Lim, D. Kim, S. Ryu, et al., Probing evolution of twist-angle-dependent inter- layer excitons in mose2/wse2 van der waals heterostruc- tures, ACS nano11, 4041 (2017)

    2017

  34. [34]

    J. J. Mortensen, A. H. Larsen, M. Kuisma, A. V. Ivanov, A. Taghizadeh, A. Peterson, A. Haldar, A. O. Dohn, C. Schäfer, E. Ö. Jónsson,et al., Gpaw: An open python package for electronic structure calculations, The Journal of Chemical Physics160 (2024)

    2024

  35. [35]

    Ismail-Beigi, Truncation of periodic image interactions for confined systems, Phys

    S. Ismail-Beigi, Truncation of periodic image interactions for confined systems, Phys. Rev. B73, 233103 (2006)

    2006

  36. [36]

    F. A. Rasmussen, P. S. Schmidt, K. T. Winther, and K.S.Thygesen,Efficientmany-bodycalculationsfortwo- dimensional materials using exact limits for the screened potential: Band gaps of mos 2, h-bn, and phosphorene, Physical Review B94, 155406 (2016)

    2016

  37. [37]

    A. M. Alvertis, A. Champagne, M. Del Ben, F. H. da Jor- nada, D. Y. Qiu, M. R. Filip, and J. B. Neaton, Impor- tance of nonuniform brillouin zone sampling for ab ini- tio bethe-salpeter equation calculations of exciton bind- ing energies in crystalline solids, Physical Review B108, 235117 (2023)

    2023

  38. [38]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradientapproximationmadesimple,Physicalreviewlet- ters 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  39. [39]

    Grimme, J

    S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, A con- sistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (dft-d) for the 94 ele- ments h-pu, The Journal of chemical physics132 (2010)

    2010

  40. [40]

    Enkovaara, C

    J. Enkovaara, C. Rostgaard, J. J. Mortensen, J. Chen, M. Dułak, L. Ferrighi, J. Gavnholt, C. Glinsvad, V. Haikola, H. Hansen, et al., Electronic structure cal- culations with gpaw: a real-space implementation of the projector augmented-wave method, Journal of physics: Condensed matter22, 253202 (2010)

    2010

  41. [41]

    A. H. Larsen, M. Vanin, J. J. Mortensen, K. S. Thyge- sen, and K. W. Jacobsen, Localized atomic basis set in the projector augmented wave method, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics80, 195112 (2009)

    2009

  42. [42]

    K. F. Mak, C. Lee, J. Hone, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, Atomically thin mos 2: a new direct-gap semiconductor, Physical review letters105, 136805 (2010)

    2010

  43. [43]

    Cadiz, E

    F. Cadiz, E. Courtade, C. Robert, G. Wang, Y. Shen, H. Cai, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, H. Carrere, D. La- garde, et al., Excitonic linewidth approaching the homo- geneous limit in mos 2-based van der waals heterostruc- tures, Physical Review X7, 021026 (2017)

    2017

  44. [44]

    Y. Li, A. Chernikov, X. Zhang, A. Rigosi, H. M. Hill, A. M. van der Zande, D. A. Chenet, E.-M. Shih, J. Hone, and T. F. Heinz, Measurement of the optical dielectric function of monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides: Mos 2, mo s e 2, ws 2, and ws e 2, Physical Review B90, 205422 (2014)

    2014

  45. [45]

    Courtade, S

    M.Goryca, J.Li, A.V.Stier, T.Taniguchi, K.Watanabe, E. Courtade, S. Shree, C. Robert, B. Urbaszek, X. Marie, et al., Revealing exciton masses and dielectric properties of monolayer semiconductors with high magnetic fields, Nature communications10, 4172 (2019)

    2019

  46. [46]

    W. Zhao, Z. Ghorannevis, L. Chu, M. Toh, C. Kloc, P.- H. Tan, and G. Eda, Evolution of electronic structure in atomically thin sheets of ws2 and wse2, ACS nano7, 791 (2013)

    2013

  47. [47]

    Chernikov, T

    A. Chernikov, T. C. Berkelbach, H. M. Hill, A. Rigosi, Y. Li, B. Aslan, D. R. Reichman, M. S. Hybertsen, and T. F. Heinz, Exciton binding energy and nonhydrogenic rydberg series in monolayer ws 2, Physical review letters 113, 076802 (2014)

    2014

  48. [48]

    J. S. Ross, S. Wu, H. Yu, N. J. Ghimire, A. M. Jones, G. Aivazian, J. Yan, D. G. Mandrus, D. Xiao, W. Yao, et al., Electrical control of neutral and charged excitons in a monolayer semiconductor, Nature communications 4, 1474 (2013)

    2013

  49. [49]

    A. V. Stier, N. P. Wilson, K. A. Velizhanin, J. Kono, X. Xu, and S. A. Crooker, Magnetooptics of exciton ry- dberg states in a monolayer semiconductor, Physical re- view letters120, 057405 (2018)

    2018

  50. [50]

    E. Liu, J. van Baren, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y.-C. Chang, and C. H. Lui, Magnetophotoluminescence of ex- citonrydbergstatesinmonolayerwse2,PhysicalReview B 99, 205420 (2019)

    2019

  51. [51]

    H. J. Conley, B. Wang, J. I. Ziegler, R. F. Haglund Jr, S. T. Pantelides, and K. I. Bolotin, Bandgap engineering of strained monolayer and bilayer mos2, Nano letters13, 3626 (2013)

    2013

  52. [52]

    Grzeszczyk, J

    M. Grzeszczyk, J. Szpakowski, A. Slobodeniuk, T. Kaz- imierczuk, M. Bhatnagar, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, P. Kossacki, M. Potemski, A. Babiński,et al., The optical response of artificially twisted mos 2 bilayers, Scientific Reports 11, 17037 (2021)

    2021

  53. [53]

    E. M. Alexeev, C. M. Purser, C. M. Gilardoni, J. Ker- foot, H. Chen, A. R. Cadore, B. L. Rosa, M. S. Feuer, E. Javary, P. Hays,et al., Nature of long-lived moiré in- terlayer excitons in electrically tunable mos2/mose2 het- erobilayers, Nano Letters24, 11232 (2024)

    2024

  54. [54]

    Mouri, W

    S. Mouri, W. Zhang, D. Kozawa, Y. Miyauchi, G. Eda, and K. Matsuda, Thermal dissociation of inter-layer ex- citons in mos2/mose2 hetero-bilayers, Nanoscale9, 6674 (2017)

    2017

  55. [55]

    Y. Gong, J. Lin, X. Wang, G. Shi, S. Lei, Z. Lin, X. Zou, G. Ye, R. Vajtai, B. I. Yakobson, et al. , Vertical and in-plane heterostructures from ws 2/mos 2 monolayers, Nature materials13, 1135 (2014)

    2014

  56. [56]

    H. Heo, J. H. Sung, G. Jin, J.-H. Ahn, K. Kim, M.-J. Lee, S. Cha, H. Choi, and M.-H. Jo, Rotation-misfit-free het- eroepitaxial stacking and stitching growth of hexagonal transition-metaldichalcogenidemonolayersbynucleation kinetics controls, Advanced Materials27, 3803 (2015)

    2015

  57. [57]

    Karni, E

    O. Karni, E. Barré, S. C. Lau, R. Gillen, E. Y. Ma, B. Kim, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Maultzsch, K. Barmak, et al. , Infrared interlayer exciton emission in mos 2/wse 2 heterostructures, Physical Review Let- ters 123, 247402 (2019)

    2019

  58. [58]

    Q. Lin, H. Fang, A. Kalaboukhov, Y. Liu, Y. Zhang, M. Fischer, J. Li, J. Hagel, S. Brem, E. Malic, et al. , Moiré-engineered light-matter interactions in mos2/wse2 heterobilayers at room temperature, Nature Communi- cations 15, 8762 (2024). 18 System Ed 0 Eb 0 Twist angle Substrate Temperature MoS2/MoSe2[46] 1.30 1.55 1◦ BN Room temp. MoS2/MoSe2[47] 1.47 ...

    2024

  59. [59]

    E. M. Alexeev, D. A. Ruiz-Tijerina, M. Danovich, M. J. Hamer, D. J. Terry, P. K. Nayak, S. Ahn, S. Pak, J. Lee, J. I. Sohn,et al., Resonantly hybridized excitons in moiré superlattices in van der waals heterostructures, Nature 567, 81 (2019)

    2019

  60. [60]

    E. M. Alexeev, A. Catanzaro, O. V. Skrypka, P. K. Nayak, S.Ahn, S.Pak, J.Lee, J.I.Sohn, K.S.Novoselov, H. S. Shin, et al., Imaging of interlayer coupling in van der waals heterostructures using a bright-field optical mi- croscope, Nano letters17, 5342 (2017)

    2017

  61. [61]

    Ciarrocchi, D

    A. Ciarrocchi, D. Unuchek, A. Avsar, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and A. Kis, Polarization switching and electricalcontrolofinterlayerexcitonsintwo-dimensional van der waals heterostructures, Nature photonics13, 131 (2019)

    2019

  62. [62]

    Jiang, W

    C. Jiang, W. Xu, A. Rasmita, Z. Huang, K. Li, Q. Xiong, and W.-b. Gao, Microsecond dark-exciton valley polar- ization memory in two-dimensional heterostructures, Na- ture communications9, 753 (2018)

    2018

  63. [63]

    Miller, A

    B. Miller, A. Steinhoff, B. Pano, J. Klein, F. Jahnke, A. Holleitner, and U. Wurstbauer, Long-lived direct and indirect interlayer excitons in van der waals heterostruc- tures, Nano letters17, 5229 (2017)

    2017

  64. [64]

    N. R. Wilson, P. V. Nguyen, K. Seyler, P. Rivera, A. J. Marsden, Z. P. Laker, G. C. Constantinescu, V. Kandyba, A. Barinov, N. D. Hine,et al., Determina- tion of band offsets, hybridization, and exciton binding in 2d semiconductor heterostructures, Science advances 3, e1601832 (2017)

    2017

  65. [65]

    C. Jin, E. C. Regan, A. Yan, M. Iqbal Bakti Utama, D. Wang, S. Zhao, Y. Qin, S. Yang, Z. Zheng, S. Shi, et al. , Observation of moiré excitons in wse2/ws2 het- erostructure superlattices, Nature567, 76 (2019)

    2019

  66. [66]

    Rossi, J

    A. Rossi, J. Zipfel, I. Maity, M. Lorenzon, M. Dandu, E. Barré, L. Francaviglia, E. C. Regan, Z. Zhang, J. H. Nie, et al. , Anomalous interlayer exciton diffusion in ws2/wse2 moiré heterostructure, ACS nano 18, 18202 (2024)

    2024