pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.23303 · v1 · pith:TSJDE2DZnew · submitted 2026-06-22 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con · cond-mat.str-el

Harnessing Josephson-Shapiro physics to verify interlayer exciton superfluidity

Filippo Pascucci , Alexander R. Hamilton , Milorad V. Milosevic , David Neilson This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 06:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el
keywords exciton superfluidityJosephson junctionShapiro stepsbilayer grapheneBCS-BEC crossovertransition metal dichalcogenidesneutral condensate
0
0 comments X

The pith

Shapiro steps in a Dayem-bridge excitonic Josephson junction can verify zero-field exciton superfluidity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes using Shapiro steps in a Dayem-bridge excitonic Josephson junction as a direct test for interlayer exciton superfluidity in electron-hole bilayers. The condensate's electrical neutrality has made phase coherence hard to probe directly until now. The authors predict resolvable Shapiro plateaus in current and voltage regimes accessible in experiments with double-bilayer graphene and low-density double-layer transition-metal dichalcogenides. They also show that the Shapiro response evolves nonmonotonically when density is tuned across the BCS-BEC crossover, determined by the healing length behavior.

Core claim

Observation of Shapiro steps in a Dayem-bridge excitonic Josephson junction would provide direct evidence of exciton superfluidity by demonstrating phase coherence in the neutral condensate, with the response showing distinct nonmonotonic behavior across the BCS-BEC crossover due to changes in the healing length.

What carries the argument

Shapiro steps in the current-voltage response of the Dayem-bridge excitonic Josephson junction under microwave drive.

If this is right

  • Shapiro plateaus should appear at resolvable current and voltage values in double-bilayer graphene.
  • The same plateaus should remain observable in low-density double-layer transition-metal dichalcogenides.
  • The Shapiro response should change nonmonotonically as density crosses the BCS-BEC regime.
  • Exciton bilayers could function as a platform for neutral Josephson devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Confirmation would enable studies of neutral superfluid phase dynamics at zero magnetic field.
  • The nonmonotonic signature could serve as an experimental marker for the BCS-BEC crossover in bilayer systems.
  • The approach might extend to testing phase coherence in other electrically neutral paired condensates.

Load-bearing premise

The junction must operate such that only the superfluid condensate contributes to the current-phase relation, with no significant interference from normal tunneling, disorder, or charging effects.

What would settle it

Fabricating the Dayem-bridge junction and measuring its current-voltage curve under microwave irradiation to check for the predicted voltage plateaus and their nonmonotonic density dependence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23303 by Alexander R. Hamilton, David Neilson, Filippo Pascucci, Milorad V. Milosevic.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Our proposed S-S ′ -S device and measurement setup. Top (green) layer is n-doped, and bottom (red) layer is p-doped. Bulk layer width is W, Dayem bridge has width w and length L. AC current source I, voltage drop across the bridge V , ammeter A. Drive current Idrive in the top layer induces a drag current Idrag in the bottom layer. regions S. The current density in the bridge (labeled as region S ′ ) will … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Critical Josephson current eIJJ c as a function of the interparticle spacing r0 for DBG. The double bilayer graphene is separated by an insulator of dielectric constant ε and thick￾ness d. the standard effective description for weakly capacitive Dayem bridges and has been shown to reproduce experi￾mental current-voltage characteristics and Shapiro steps in superconducting S-S ′ -S nanobridges [39, 40]. For… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Voltage-density characteristics for AC current (eIX,AC = 0.2 µA, ωAC = 50 GHz), for DC currents: eIX,DC = 0.4 µA (blue line) and eIX,DC = 0.6 µA (green line). Inset: current width of the first step ∆I as a function of density for eIX,DC = 0.4 µA. quantity regulating the Shapiro steps ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Shapiro steps in the Dayem bridge. For all curves eIX,AC = 0.2 µA and ωAC = 50 GHz. (a) I-V characteristics for different r0, as labeled. V is the time voltage average and IX,DC is the injected exciton direct current component. (b) V (t) at values of eIX,DC indicated by the circled numbers for r0 = 2.85a ∗ B. (c) V (t) at the start of the first step for the values of r0, as labeled. the same step, the V (t… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Critical velocity vc and (b) healing length ξh at zero temperature as functions of the average interparticle distance r0. Blue lines: DBG, green lines: TMDs. Solid lines: interlayer distance d = 1 nm, dashed lines: d = 2 nm. In panel (b), the black dashed line indicates the limiting condition for S-S ′ -S at zero temperature: [L = 30 nm]/3.5. Inset: zoom of minimum in healing length near the onset dens… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Obtaining definitive evidence for zero-magnetic-field exciton superfluidity in electron-hole bilayers remains a longstanding challenge because the condensate is electrically neutral and its phase coherence is difficult to probe directly. We propose a direct test based on Shapiro steps in a Dayem-bridge excitonic Josephson junction. We predict clearly resolvable Shapiro plateaus in experimentally accessible current and voltage regimes for double-bilayer graphene and, in the low-density regime, double-layer transition-metal dichalcogenides. Moreover, by tuning the density across the BCS-BEC crossover we show that the Shapiro response acquires a distinct nonmonotonic evolution. This is determined by the nonmonotonic behavior of the healing length in the crossover from bosonic to fermionic excitations. Observation of these signatures would provide direct evidence of exciton superfluidity and establish exciton bilayers as a platform for neutral Josephson devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes using Shapiro steps in a Dayem-bridge excitonic Josephson junction as a direct probe of interlayer exciton superfluidity in double-bilayer graphene and low-density double-layer transition-metal dichalcogenides. It predicts clearly resolvable Shapiro plateaus in experimentally accessible regimes and shows that the Shapiro response evolves nonmonotonically with density across the BCS-BEC crossover, with the nonmonotonicity determined by the healing length of the condensate.

Significance. If the predictions are borne out, the work would supply a concrete, falsifiable signature for phase coherence in electrically neutral exciton condensates, which has been difficult to establish directly. The nonmonotonic density dependence tied to the BCS-BEC crossover constitutes a distinctive testable feature that could distinguish superfluid from normal behavior. The proposal also positions exciton bilayers as a platform for neutral Josephson devices. These elements make the manuscript significant for both verification of exciton superfluidity and potential device applications.

major comments (1)
  1. [experimental feasibility discussion] The claim that Shapiro plateaus remain clearly resolvable rests on the assumption that the current-phase relation is dominated by the superfluid condensate. The manuscript does not provide quantitative estimates of the parameter regimes in which normal-state tunneling, disorder, or charging effects remain negligible (see the experimental feasibility discussion). Without such bounds, the resolvability prediction cannot be assessed as load-bearing for the central claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract and main text use 'double-bilayer graphene' and 'double-layer transition-metal dichalcogenides' interchangeably with slight variations; adopt consistent terminology throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the recommendation for minor revision. The single major comment is addressed below; we will incorporate the requested quantitative estimates into the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The claim that Shapiro plateaus remain clearly resolvable rests on the assumption that the current-phase relation is dominated by the superfluid condensate. The manuscript does not provide quantitative estimates of the parameter regimes in which normal-state tunneling, disorder, or charging effects remain negligible (see the experimental feasibility discussion). Without such bounds, the resolvability prediction cannot be assessed as load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would be strengthened by explicit bounds on the regimes where normal-state contributions remain subdominant. In the revision we will add a dedicated subsection (or expanded appendix) that estimates (i) the ratio of normal tunneling conductance to the Josephson critical current using measured interlayer resistances in double-bilayer graphene and TMD devices, (ii) the disorder-induced phase-slip rate relative to the Josephson frequency using reported mobility values, and (iii) the charging energy scale compared with the Josephson energy for the proposed Dayem-bridge geometry. These estimates will be anchored to parameters from existing experiments and will delineate the density and bias windows in which the predicted Shapiro plateaus should remain resolvable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's central claims consist of theoretical predictions for observable Shapiro plateaus and their nonmonotonic density dependence, derived from standard Josephson junction physics and the known nonmonotonic healing length across the BCS-BEC crossover. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are presented that reduce any prediction to an input by construction. The derivation relies on external physical principles rather than internal redefinition or self-referential fitting, making the argument self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The proposal implicitly rests on standard Josephson-junction phenomenology and BCS-BEC crossover theory for excitons.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Exciton condensate in electron-hole bilayers supports a Josephson current-phase relation analogous to charged superconductors
    Required for Shapiro steps to appear; invoked by the choice of Dayem-bridge geometry.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5690 in / 1342 out tokens · 32598 ms · 2026-06-26T06:21:43.747912+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A Dayem bridge is a nanoconstriction joining two regions of bulk super- fluid

    in a Dayem bridge Josephson junction [ 30, 31] could be employed as a direct phase-coherence probe of super- fluidity with neutral bilayer excitons. A Dayem bridge is a nanoconstriction joining two regions of bulk super- fluid. The current in the nanoconstriction is higher than in the bulk regions, allowing the formation of an S-S′-S or S-N -S junction in...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    G. W. Burg, N. Prasad, K. Kim, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, A. H. MacDonald, L. F. Register, and E. Tutuc, Strongly enhanced tunneling at total charge neutrality in double-bilayer graphene- WSe2 heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 177702 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    Z. Wang, D. A. Rhodes, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. C. Hone, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Evidence of high- temperature exciton condensation in two-dimensional atomic double layers, Nature (London) 574, 76 (2019)

    2019

  4. [4]

    J. Gu, L. Ma, S. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. C. Hone, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Dipolar excitonic insula- tor in a moiré lattice, Nat. Phys. 18, 395 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    L. Ma, P. X. Nguyen, Z. Wang, Y. Zeng, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Strongly correlated excitonic insulator in atomic double layers, Nature (London) 598, 585 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    P. X. Nguyen, L. Ma, R. Chaturvedi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Perfect coulomb drag in a dipolar excitonic insulator, Science 388, 274 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    R. Qi, Q. Li, J. Nie, R. Xia, H. Kim, H. Lim, J. Xie, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. F. Crommie, A. H. Mac- Donald, and F. Wang, Two-component exciton conden- sates in an electron–hole bilayer, Nature 10.1038/s41586- 026-10636-y (2026)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586- 2026

  8. [8]

    Y. E. Lozovik and V. I. Yudson, A new mechanism for superconductivity: Pairing between spatially separated electrons and holes, Sov. Phys. JETP 44, 389 (1976) , (Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 71, 738-753 (1976))

    1976

  9. [9]

    Zeng and A

    Y. Zeng and A. H. MacDonald, Electrically controlled two-dimensional electron-hole fluids, Phys. Rev. B 102, 085154 (2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    Xie and A

    M. Xie and A. H. MacDonald, Electrical reservoirs for bilayer excitons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 067702 (2018)

    2018

  11. [11]

    Pieri, D

    P. Pieri, D. Neilson, and G. C. Strinati, Effects of density imbalance on the BCS-BEC crossover in semiconductor electron-hole bilayers, Phys. Rev. B 75, 113301 (2007)

    2007

  12. [12]

    Salasnich, P

    L. Salasnich, P. A. Marchetti, and F. Toigo, Super- fluidity, sound velocity, and quasicondensation in the two-dimensional BCS-BEC crossover, Phys. Rev. A 88, 053612 (2013)

    2013

  13. [13]

    López Ríos, A

    P. López Ríos, A. Perali, R. J. Needs, and D. Neil- son, Evidence from quantum Monte Carlo simulations of large-gap superfluidity and BCS-BEC crossover in double electron-hole layers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 177701 (2018)

    2018

  14. [14]

    Su and A

    J.-J. Su and A. H. MacDonald, How to make a bilayer exciton condensate flow, Nat. Phys. 4, 799 (2008)

    2008

  15. [15]

    Nandi, A

    D. Nandi, A. D. K. Finck, J. P. Eisenstein, L. N. Pfeif- fer, and K. W. West, Exciton condensation and perfect Coulomb drag, Nature 488, 481 (2012)

    2012

  16. [16]

    V. L. Ginzburg and L. D. Landau, On the Theory of superconductivity, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 20, 1064 (1950)

    1950

  17. [17]

    I. B. Spielman, J. P. Eisenstein, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Resonantly enhanced tunneling in a double layer quantum Hall ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5808 (2000)

    2000

  18. [18]

    B. N. Narozhny and A. Levchenko, Coulomb drag, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 025003 (2016)

    2016

  19. [19]

    J. I. A. Li, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Hone, and C. Dean, Excitonic superfluid phase in double bilayer graphene, Nat. Phys. 13, 751 (2017)

    2017

  20. [20]

    X. Liu, J. I. A. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, B. I. Halperin, P. Kim, and C. R. Dean, Crossover be- tween strongly coupled and weakly coupled exciton su- perfluids, Science 375, 205 (2022)

    2022

  21. [21]

    B. D. Josephson, Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling, Phys. Lett. 1, 251 (1962)

    1962

  22. [22]

    P. W. Anderson and J. M. Rowell, Probable observation of the Josephson superconducting tunneling effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 230 (1963)

    1963

  23. [23]

    Sukhatme, Y

    K. Sukhatme, Y. Mukharsky, T. Chui, and D. Pearson, Observation of the ideal josephson effect in superfluid 4he, Nature 411, 280 (2001)

    2001

  24. [24]

    Ancilotto, L

    F. Ancilotto, L. Salasnich, and F. Toigo, DC Josephson effect with Fermi gases in the Bose-Einstein regime, Phys. Rev. A 79, 033627 (2009)

    2009

  25. [25]

    Spuntarelli, P

    A. Spuntarelli, P. Pieri, and G. C. Strinati, Josephson effect throughout the BCS-BEC crossover, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 040401 (2007)

    2007

  26. [26]

    Taghinejad, A

    H. Taghinejad, A. A. Eftekhar, P. M. Campbell, B. Beatty, M. Taghinejad, Y. Zhou, C. J. Perini, H. Moradinejad, W. E. Henderson, E. V. Woods, X. Zhang, P. Ajayan, E. J. Reed, E. M. Vogel, and A. Adibi, Strain relaxation via formation of cracks in compositionally modulated two-dimensional semiconduc- tor alloys, npj 2D Mater. Appl 2, 10 (2018)

    2018

  27. [27]

    Mahjouri-Samani, M.-W

    M. Mahjouri-Samani, M.-W. Lin, K. Wang, A. R. Lupini, J. Lee, L. Basile, A. Boulesbaa, C. M. Rouleau, A. A. Puretzky, I. N. Ivanov, K. Xiao, M. Yoon, and D. B. Geo- hegan, Patterned arrays of lateral heterojunctions within monolayer two-dimensional semiconductors, Nat. Com- 6 mun. 6, 7749 (2015)

    2015

  28. [28]

    Frisenda, A

    R. Frisenda, A. J. Molina-Mendoza, T. Mueller, A. Castellanos-Gomez, and H. S. J. van der Zant, Atom- ically thin p–n junctions based on two-dimensional ma- terials, Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 3339 (2018)

    2018

  29. [29]

    C. Gong, H. Zhang, W. Wang, L. Colombo, R. M. Wal- lace, and K. Cho, Band alignment of two–dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides: Application in tun- nel field effect transistors, App. Phys. Lett. 107, 139904 (2015)

    2015

  30. [30]

    Shapiro, Josephson currents in superconducting tun- neling: The effect of microwaves and other observations, Phys

    S. Shapiro, Josephson currents in superconducting tun- neling: The effect of microwaves and other observations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 80 (1963)

    1963

  31. [31]

    A. H. Dayem and J. J. Wiegand, Behavior of thin-film superconducting bridges in a microwave field, Phys. Rev. 155, 419 (1967)

    1967

  32. [32]

    K. K. Likharev, Superconducting weak links, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 101 (1979)

    1979

  33. [33]

    Makhlin, G

    Y. Makhlin, G. Schön, and A. Shnirman, Quantum-state engineering with josephson-junction devices, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 357 (2001)

    2001

  34. [34]

    Astafiev, Y

    O. Astafiev, Y. A. Pashkin, Y. Nakamura, T. Yamamoto, and J. S. Tsai, Temperature square dependence of the low frequency 1/f charge noise in the josephson junction qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 137001 (2006)

    2006

  35. [35]

    J. Koch, T. M. Yu, J. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Charge-insensitive qubit design de- rived from the cooper pair box, Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007)

    2007

  36. [36]

    C. R. Dean, A. F. Young, I. Meric, C. Lee, L. Wang, S. Sorgenfrei, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Kim, K. L. Shepard, and J. Hone, Boron nitride substrates for high- quality graphene electronics, Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 722 (2010)

    2010

  37. [37]

    J. I. A. Li, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Hone, A. Levchenko, and C. R. Dean, Negative Coulomb drag in double bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 046802 (2016)

    2016

  38. [38]

    Gong, G.-B

    Z. Gong, G.-B. Liu, H. Yu, D. Xiao, X. Cui, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Magnetoelectric effects and valley-controlled spin quantum gates in transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers, Nat. Commun. 4, 2053 (2013)

    2053

  39. [39]

    Gumann, T

    A. Gumann, T. Dahm, and N. Schopohl, Microscopic theory of superconductor-constriction-superconductor josephson junctions in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 76, 064529 (2007)

    2007

  40. [40]

    C. D. Shelly, P. See, J. Ireland, E. J. Romans, and J. M. Williams, Weak link nanobridges as single flux quan- tum elements, Superconductor Science and Technology 30, 095013 (2017)

    2017

  41. [41]

    C. D. Shelly, P. See, I. Rungger, and J. M. Williams, Existence of shapiro steps in the dissipative regime in superconducting weak links, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 024070 (2020)

    2020

  42. [42]

    Battisti, J

    S. Battisti, J. Koch, A. Paghi, L. Ruf, A. Gulian, S. Teknowijoyo, C. Cirillo, Z. M. Kakhaki, C. Attanasio, E. Scheer, A. Di Bernardo, G. De Simoni, and F. Gia- zotto, Demonstration of high-impedance superconduct- ing nbre dayem bridges, Applied Physics Letters 124, 172601 (2024)

    2024

  43. [43]

    Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, Dover Books on Physics Series (Dover Publications, 2004)

    M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, Dover Books on Physics Series (Dover Publications, 2004)

    2004

  44. [44]

    Russer, Influence of microwave radiation on cur- rent‐voltage characteristic of superconducting weak links, Journal of Applied Physics 43, 2008 (1972)

    P. Russer, Influence of microwave radiation on cur- rent‐voltage characteristic of superconducting weak links, Journal of Applied Physics 43, 2008 (1972)

    2008

  45. [45]

    Gross, A

    R. Gross, A. Marx, and F. Deppe, Applied Superconduc- tivity: Josephson Effect and Superconducting Electron- ics (Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston, 2016)

    2016

  46. [46]

    A. A. Golubov, M. Y. Kupriyanov, and E. Il’ichev, The current-phase relation in Josephson junctions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 411 (2004)

    2004

  47. [47]

    Rontani and L

    M. Rontani and L. J. Sham, Coherent exciton trans- port in semiconductors, in Novel Superfluids: Volume 2 , edited by K.-H. Bennemann and J. B. Ketterson (Oxford University Press, 2014)

    2014

  48. [48]

    Combescot, M

    R. Combescot, M. Y. Kagan, and S. Stringari, Collective mode of homogeneous superfluid Fermi gases in the BEC- BCS crossover, Phys. Rev. A 74, 042717 (2006)

    2006

  49. [49]

    Pascucci and L

    F. Pascucci and L. Salasnich, Josephson effect with superfluid fermions in the two-dimensional BCS-BEC crossover, Phys. Rev. A 102, 013325 (2020)

    2020

  50. [50]

    Perali, D

    A. Perali, D. Neilson, and A. R. Hamilton, High- temperature superfluidity in double-bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 146803 (2013)

    2013

  51. [51]

    X. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. I. Halperin, and P. Kim, Quantum Hall drag of exciton condensate in graphene, Nat. Phys. 13, 746 (2017)

    2017

  52. [52]

    Landau, Theory of the superfluidity of Helium II, Phys

    L. Landau, Theory of the superfluidity of Helium II, Phys. Rev. 60, 356 (1941)

    1941

  53. [53]

    P. W. Anderson, Random–phase approximation in the theory of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. 112, 1900 (1958)

    1900

  54. [54]

    N. N. Bogoliubov, On the theory of superfluidity, J. Phys. 11, 23 (1947)

    1947

  55. [55]

    Salasnich and F

    L. Salasnich and F. Toigo, Composite bosons in the two– dimensional BCS–BEC crossover from Gaussian fluctua- tions, Phys. Rev. A 91, 011604 (2015)

    2015

  56. [56]

    Pascucci, S

    F. Pascucci, S. Conti, A. Perali, J. Tempere, and D. Neil- son, Effects of intralayer correlations on electron-hole double-layer superfluidity, Phys. Rev. B 109, 094512 (2024). 7 End Matter Appendix A: Healing length—The healing length at zero temperature is defined as, ξh = ℏ m∗vc , (10) with the superfluid critical velocity given by the Landau criterion...

    2024