pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.23729 · v1 · pith:GAAWZFBZnew · submitted 2026-06-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Interpretable Material Spatial Intelligence for Discovery of Governing Microstructural Features

Mathieu Calvat , Gregory Sparks , Dhruv Anjaria , Chris Bean , Haoren Wang , Paul Gradl , Timothy M. Smith , Allison M. Beese
show 4 more authors
Gabriel Demeneghi Kenneth Vecchio Morad Behandish J.C. Stinville
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 13:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords materials spatial intelligencemicrostructural featuresmultimodal representation learningproperty predictionmechanism discoverystructural alloyslatent representationsspatial relationships
0
0 comments X

The pith

Materials Spatial Intelligence learns shared latent representations from multimodal microstructural data to identify features governing mechanical behavior in alloys.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces Materials Spatial Intelligence as a framework that processes high-resolution spatial observations of material microstructures and deformation directly instead of using handcrafted or aggregated descriptors that lose positional information. It encodes this data into shared latent representations that maintain spatial relationships to enable property prediction alongside interpretation and optimization. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach promises to move from black-box predictions toward identifying the specific spatial patterns that control strength, ductility, and trade-offs in structural alloys, opening paths to mechanism discovery.

Core claim

MSI encodes high-resolution microstructural and deformation data into shared latent representations that preserve spatial relationships while supporting property prediction, interpretation, and optimization; by combining multimodal representation learning, MSI identifies the key features governing mechanical behavior and property trade-offs in structural alloys, enabling feature-driven microstructure optimization and mechanism discovery.

What carries the argument

Materials Spatial Intelligence (MSI), a multimodal representation learning framework that creates shared latent spaces from spatial observations to preserve relationships while identifying governing features.

If this is right

  • MSI supports property prediction that retains spatial organization in the input data.
  • The framework identifies specific microstructural features that control mechanical behavior and trade-offs.
  • Feature-driven optimization of microstructures for desired properties becomes feasible.
  • Mechanism discovery in material systems extends beyond prediction to actionable insight.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same spatial encoding approach could apply to other modalities such as thermal or electrical response maps in non-alloy systems.
  • If the latent spaces prove robust, they might support generative models that propose new microstructures optimized for multiple properties at once.
  • Validation against physics-based simulations could test whether discovered features align with known deformation mechanisms.

Load-bearing premise

The learned latent representations from multimodal spatial data will preserve and reveal causal governing microstructural features rather than correlations.

What would settle it

A controlled experiment in which microstructures are modified to alter only the features MSI identifies as governing, followed by mechanical testing that shows no corresponding change in the predicted properties.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23729 by Allison M. Beese, Chris Bean, Dhruv Anjaria, Gabriel Demeneghi, Gregory Sparks, Haoren Wang, J.C. Stinville, Kenneth Vecchio, Mathieu Calvat, Morad Behandish, Paul Gradl, Timothy M. Smith.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Material spatial intelligence (MSI) for identification of microstructural features governing macroscopic properties. (1) Alloy macroscopic mechanical properties are governed by the local microstructural state and deformation response under external loading, as well as their spatial heterogeneity. (2) These local states, their associated deformation responses, and their spatial heterogeneity can be captured… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Spatial data modalities and map-encoding scheme for microstructural and deformation states, enabling construction of alloy microstructure and deformation latent spaces for mechanical properties prediction. (1) Elementary mechanical loadings (B) are applied to capture spatial deformation heterogeneity (D) under representative loading conditions. (C)(D) Large-field-of-view probe microscopy is used to charact… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Extraction of microstructural and deformation states that break macroscopic property trade-offs. (1) A trade-off breaking index for fatigue ratio versus yield strength predicted based on either (A) microstructure or (B) deformation state latent space. The trade-off breaking index is defined relative to the average trade-off behavior (black line in (6) of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Revealing microstructural and deformation features contributions to mechanical properties. (1) Local interpretable model-agnostic explanations framework for identifying microstructural features importance on mechanical properties. (A)(B) Encoding of the initial state (red cross marker) and perturbed states (blue circle markers) to predict properties form these states and capture how the perturbation operat… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Interpretability and spatial importance analysis of microstructural features governing mechanical properties. (1) Representative examples illustrating the effect of modifying local microstructural and deformation states on the predicted mechanical properties, including here (left) Yield Strength (YS) and (right) Fatigue Strength (FS). Each row corresponds to a different modality extracted from experimental… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: An iterative synthetic microstructure optimization framework guided by the LIME. The progressive modification of the spatial distribution of GROD where the most detrimental regions identified by LIME are iteratively (A to C) replaced by configurations with zero GROD values. The associated predicted fatigue strength spatial distributions are generated (D to F) during the optimization process for the W_Steel… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Many material systems exhibit complex spatial and temporal interactions across multiple length scales and modalities that govern macroscopic behavior. Although Machine Learning (ML) is widely used in materials science to predict this behavior, most approaches still rely on handcrafted descriptors or aggregated representations that overlook spatial organization, limiting insight into governing mechanisms. We introduce Materials Spatial Intelligence (MSI), a framework inspired by spatial intelligence that learns directly from multimodal spatial observations of material systems. MSI encodes high-resolution microstructural and deformation data into shared latent representations that preserve spatial relationships while supporting property prediction, interpretation, and optimization. By combining multimodal representation learning, MSI identifies the key features governing mechanical behavior and property trade-offs in structural alloys. Beyond prediction, MSI enables feature-driven microstructure optimization and mechanism discovery. More broadly, MSI establishes a foundation for applying spatial intelligence to materials science, leveraging interpretable ML systems to accelerate scientific discovery and materiel design

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the Materials Spatial Intelligence (MSI) framework, inspired by spatial intelligence, which learns directly from multimodal spatial observations of material systems. MSI encodes high-resolution microstructural and deformation data into shared latent representations that preserve spatial relationships while supporting property prediction, interpretation, and optimization. By combining multimodal representation learning, MSI is claimed to identify the key features governing mechanical behavior and property trade-offs in structural alloys, enabling feature-driven microstructure optimization and mechanism discovery.

Significance. If the claims were substantiated with methods and validation, MSI could advance interpretable ML in materials science by addressing limitations of handcrafted descriptors and enabling spatial-relationship-preserving representations for mechanism discovery and design. No such substantiation is present, so significance cannot be assessed.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that MSI 'identifies the key features governing mechanical behavior and property trade-offs' and enables 'mechanism discovery' lacks any description of a causal identification procedure (e.g., interventions or physics constraints); the described multimodal representation learning produces statistical associations by construction, leaving the 'governing' and 'mechanism' language unsupported.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: No equations, algorithms, datasets, results, or validation experiments are provided to demonstrate how shared latent representations are formed, how spatial relationships are preserved, or how the framework achieves prediction, interpretation, or optimization.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful comments. We address each major comment below and agree that revisions to the abstract are warranted to ensure the claims accurately reflect the manuscript content.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that MSI 'identifies the key features governing mechanical behavior and property trade-offs' and enables 'mechanism discovery' lacks any description of a causal identification procedure (e.g., interventions or physics constraints); the described multimodal representation learning produces statistical associations by construction, leaving the 'governing' and 'mechanism' language unsupported.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract employs language implying causality ('governing', 'mechanism discovery') that is not supported by the described methods. The framework performs multimodal representation learning to extract statistical associations between spatial features and properties. We will revise the abstract to use precise terminology such as 'identifies key features correlated with' and 'facilitates exploration of potential mechanisms via interpretable representations'. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: No equations, algorithms, datasets, results, or validation experiments are provided to demonstrate how shared latent representations are formed, how spatial relationships are preserved, or how the framework achieves prediction, interpretation, or optimization.

    Authors: The provided manuscript consists of a high-level conceptual description. No equations, algorithms, datasets, results, or validation experiments appear in the text. We acknowledge this limitation and will revise the manuscript either by expanding it with the missing technical details or by adjusting the abstract and claims to position MSI as a proposed framework without empirical substantiation in the current version. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; framework claims rest on standard representation learning without self-referential reductions

full rationale

The paper presents MSI as a multimodal representation learning framework that encodes spatial microstructural data into latent representations for prediction, interpretation, and optimization. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-definitional steps, or load-bearing self-citations are described in the provided text. The central claim that latent representations 'identify the key features governing mechanical behavior' follows directly from the definition of representation learning applied to the input data modalities; it does not reduce to a tautology or fitted input by construction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks of representation learning methods.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only review; the central claim rests on the untested effectiveness of multimodal representation learning for preserving spatial relationships and identifying causal features in material data. No specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted beyond the framework name itself.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Multimodal spatial observations of microstructures contain identifiable governing features for mechanical behavior
    Invoked implicitly when the abstract states that MSI identifies key features from such data.
invented entities (1)
  • Materials Spatial Intelligence (MSI) framework no independent evidence
    purpose: To encode spatial data into shared latent representations for prediction, interpretation, and optimization
    New framework name and concept introduced in the abstract; no independent evidence provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5725 in / 1407 out tokens · 26675 ms · 2026-06-26T13:37:25.145782+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Olson, G. B. Computational design of hierarchically structured materials.Science277, 1237–1242, DOI: 10.1126/science. 277.5330.1237 (1997)

    work page doi:10.1126/science 1997

  2. [2]

    & Krishnan, N

    Miret, S. & Krishnan, N. A. Enabling large language models for real-world materials discovery.Nat. Mach. Intell.7, 991–998 (2025). 3.Tang, Y .et al.A multimodal large language model for materials science.Nat. Mach. Intell.1–14 (2026)

    2025

  3. [3]

    Ahlawat, D.et al.A family of large language models for materials research with insights into model adaptability in continued pretraining.Nat. Mach. Intell.1–14 (2026)

    2026

  4. [4]

    & Kochmann, D

    Bastek, J.-H. & Kochmann, D. M. Inverse design of nonlinear mechanical metamaterials via video denoising diffusion models.Nat. Mach. Intell.5, 1466–1475 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    Igashov, I.et al.Equivariant 3d-conditional diffusion model for molecular linker design.Nat. Mach. Intell.6, 417–427 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    Li, T., Biferale, L., Bonaccorso, F., Scarpolini, M. A. & Buzzicotti, M. Synthetic lagrangian turbulence by generative diffusion models.Nat. Mach. Intell.6, 393–403 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    & Lillicrap, T

    Hafner, D., Pasukonis, J., Ba, J. & Lillicrap, T. Mastering diverse control tasks through world models.Nature640, 647–653, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-08744-2 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08744-2 2025

  8. [8]

    Mater.7, 86 (2021)

    Xie, X.et al.Mechanistic data-driven prediction of as-built mechanical properties in metal additive manufacturing.npj Comput. Mater.7, 86 (2021)

    2021

  9. [9]

    Liu, Y .et al.Experimental discovery of structure–property relationships in ferroelectric materials via active learning.Nat. Mach. Intell.4, 341–350 (2022)

    2022

  10. [10]

    Wang, X.et al.Multimodal learning with next-token prediction for large multimodal models.Nature650, 327–333, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-10041-x (2026)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-10041-x 2026

  11. [11]

    Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead , volume =

    Rudin, C. Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead.Nat. Mach. Intell.1, 206–215, DOI: 10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x (2019)

    work page doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x 2019

  12. [12]

    E.et al.Physics-informed machine learning.Nat

    Karniadakis, G. E.et al.Physics-informed machine learning.Nat. Rev. Phys.3, 422–440, DOI: 10.1038/ s42254-021-00314-5 (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    communications5, 3580 (2014)

    Wei, Y .et al.Evading the strength–ductility trade-off dilemma in steel through gradient hierarchical nanotwins.Nat. communications5, 3580 (2014)

    2014

  14. [14]

    & Zhang, Z

    Pang, J., Li, S., Wang, Z. & Zhang, Z. General relation between tensile strength and fatigue strength of metallic materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. A564, 331–341 (2013). 16.Stinville, J.et al.On the origins of fatigue strength in crystalline metallic materials.Science377, 1065–1071 (2022)

    2013

  15. [15]

    & Dang Van, K

    Charkaluk, É., Bignonnet, A., Constantinescu, A. & Dang Van, K. Fatigue design of structures under thermomechanical loadings.Fatigue & Fract. Eng. Mater. & Struct.25, 1199–1206 (2002)

    2002

  16. [16]

    R., Lagoudas, D

    Cassagne, A. R., Lagoudas, D. C. & le Graverend, J.-B. A multi-scale modeling of complex thermomechanical loading paths in high-temperature shape memory alloys using a crystal-plasticity framework.Int. J. Plast.104598 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    & Cormier, J

    Prouteau, J., Villechaise, P., Signor, L. & Cormier, J. Early stages of fatigue crack initiation in relation with twin boundaries in polycrystalline ni-based superalloy ad730™.Metall. Mater. Transactions ADOI: 10.1007/s11661-022-06916-7 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1007/s11661-022-06916-7 2022

  18. [18]

    Anjaria, D.et al.Plastic deformation delocalization at cryogenic temperatures in a nickel-based superalloy.Acta Materialia276, 120106, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2024.120106 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2024.120106 2024

  19. [19]

    Texier, D.et al.Strain localization in the alloy 718 ni-based superalloy: From room temperature to 650 °c.Acta Materialia 268, 119759, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2024.119759 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2024.119759 2024

  20. [20]

    Mater.(2026)

    Yvinec, T.et al.Low stress grain boundary mediated plasticity and early fracture at basal twist grain boundaries in a titanium alloy.Commun. Mater.(2026)

    2026

  21. [21]

    S.et al.Advances and opportunities in high-throughput small-scale mechanical testing.Curr

    Gianola, D. S.et al.Advances and opportunities in high-throughput small-scale mechanical testing.Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci.27, 101090, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2023.101090 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cossms.2023.101090 2023

  22. [22]

    C.et al.High-throughput stochastic tensile performance of additively manufactured stainless steel.J

    Salzbrenner, B. C.et al.High-throughput stochastic tensile performance of additively manufactured stainless steel.J. Mater. Process. Technol.241, 1–12, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.10.023 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.10.023 2016

  23. [23]

    Gu, D.et al.Material-structure-performance integrated laser-metal additive manufacturing.Science372, eabg1487 (2021)

    2021

  24. [24]

    Ren, J.et al.Strong yet ductile nanolamellar high-entropy alloys by additive manufacturing.Nature608, 62–68 (2022)

    2022

  25. [25]

    Gao, S.et al.Additive manufacturing of alloys with programmable microstructure and properties, nat. commun. 14 (2023) 6752. 28.Zhu, T. & Chen, W. Mechanical behaviour of additively manufactured metals.Nat. Mater.1–13 (2026)

    2023

  26. [26]

    Borg, C. K. H.et al.Expanded dataset of mechanical properties and observed phases of multi-principal element alloys. Sci. Data7, DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-00768-9 (2020). 16/49

    work page doi:10.1038/s41597-020-00768-9 2020

  27. [27]

    Reports11, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90237-z (2021)

    Lee, J.-W.et al.A machine-learning-based alloy design platform that enables both forward and inverse predictions for thermo-mechanically controlled processed (tmcp) steel alloys.Sci. Reports11, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90237-z (2021). 31.Hu, Q.-M. & Yang, R. The endless search for better alloys.Science378, 26–27 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-021-90237-z 2021

  28. [28]

    Deng, Y .et al.An intelligent design for ni-based superalloy based on machine learning and multi-objective optimization. Mater. Des.221, 110935, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110935 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110935 2022

  29. [29]

    Gu, Y ., Stiles, C. D. & El-Awady, J. A. A statistical perspective for predicting the strength of metals: Revisiting the hall–petch relationship using machine learning.Acta Materialia266, 119631, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat. 2023.119631 (2024). 34.Sohail, Y .et al.Machine-learning design of ductile fenicoalta alloys with high strength.Nature643...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat 2023

  30. [30]

    L.et al.High-throughput high-resolution digital image correlation measurements by multi-beam sem imaging

    Black, R. L.et al.High-throughput high-resolution digital image correlation measurements by multi-beam sem imaging. Exp. Mech.63, 939–953, DOI: 10.1007/s11340-023-00961-y (2023)

    work page doi:10.1007/s11340-023-00961-y 2023

  31. [31]

    & Kacher, J

    DeRonja, J., Nowell, M., Wright, S. & Kacher, J. Generational assessment of ebsd detectors for cross-correlation-based analysis: From scintillators to direct detection.Ultramicroscopy257, 113913 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    Calvat, M.et al.Plasticity encoding and mapping during elementary loading for accelerated mechanical properties prediction.Scripta Materialia273, 117082 (2026)

    2026

  33. [33]

    Resolving the geometrically necessary dislocation content by conventional electron backscattering diffraction

    Pantleon, W. Resolving the geometrically necessary dislocation content by conventional electron backscattering diffraction. Scripta Materialia58, 994–997 (2008)

    2008

  34. [34]

    Charact.169, 110600, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2020.110600 (2020)

    Stinville, J.et al.Measurement of elastic and rotation fields during irreversible deformation using heaviside-digital image correlation.Mater. Charact.169, 110600, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2020.110600 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2020.110600 2020

  35. [35]

    41.Anjaria, D.et al.Dynamic plastic deformation delocalization in fcc solid solution metals.Nat

    Bourdin, F.et al.Measurements of plastic localization by heaviside-digital image correlation.Acta Materialia157, 307 – 325, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.07.013 (2018). 41.Anjaria, D.et al.Dynamic plastic deformation delocalization in fcc solid solution metals.Nat. Commun.(2026)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2018.07.013 2018

  36. [36]

    why should i trust you?

    Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S. & Guestrin, C. " why should i trust you?" explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 1135–1144 (2016)

    2016

  37. [38]

    & Enoki, M

    Hu, H., Briffod, F., Shiraiwa, T. & Enoki, M. Automated slip system identification and strain analysis framework using high-resolution digital image correlation data: Application to a bimodal ti-6al-4v alloy.Int. J. Plast.166, 103618, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103618 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103618 2023

  38. [39]

    Ni, R.et al.Automated analysis framework of strain partitioning and deformation mechanisms via multimodal fusion and computer vision.Int. J. Plast.182, 104119, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2024.104119 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2024.104119 2024

  39. [40]

    Charact.115406 (2025)

    Bean, C.et al.Statistical analyses of plastic deformation events via computer vision: Case study of additive manufactured microstructures.Mater. Charact.115406 (2025)

    2025

  40. [41]

    A.et al.Fatigue crack initiation, slip localization and twin boundaries in a nickel-based superalloy.Curr

    Stein, C. A.et al.Fatigue crack initiation, slip localization and twin boundaries in a nickel-based superalloy.Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci.18, 244–252 (2014)

    2014

  41. [42]

    & Wang, Z

    Zhang, Z. & Wang, Z. Grain boundary effects on cyclic deformation and fatigue damage.Prog. Mater. Sci.53, 1025–1099 (2008)

    2008

  42. [43]

    & Cailletaud, G

    Me´ ric, L., Poubanne, P. & Cailletaud, G. Single crystal modeling for structural calculations: part 1—model presentation. J. Eng. materials Technol.(1991)

    1991

  43. [44]

    & Berveiller, M

    Berbenni, S., Favier, V . & Berveiller, M. Impact of the grain size distribution on the yield stress of heterogeneous materials.Int. J. Plast.23, 114–142 (2007)

    2007

  44. [45]

    Zhou, C., Biner, S. B. & LeSar, R. Discrete dislocation dynamics simulations of plasticity at small scales.Acta Materialia 58, 1565–1577 (2010)

    2010

  45. [46]

    A., Stukowski, A., Oppelstrup, T

    Zepeda-Ruiz, L. A., Stukowski, A., Oppelstrup, T. & Bulatov, V . V . Probing the limits of metal plasticity with molecular dynamics simulations.Nature550, 492–495 (2017)

    2017

  46. [47]

    & Cailletaud, G

    Cormier, J. & Cailletaud, G. Constitutive modeling of the creep behavior of single crystal superalloys under non-isothermal conditions inducing phase transformations.Mater. Sci. Eng. A527, 6300–6312 (2010)

    2010

  47. [48]

    Castelluccio, G. M. & McDowell, D. L. Mesoscale cyclic crystal plasticity with dislocation substructures.Int. J. Plast. 98, 1–26 (2017)

    2017

  48. [49]

    & Kim, J

    Zhu, D., Zhang, W., Ding, Z. & Kim, J. Investigation of crack propagation driving force based on crystal plasticity and cyclic j-integral.Eng. Fract. Mech.289, 109362 (2023)

    2023

  49. [50]

    Liu, J., Xiong, W., Behera, A., Thompson, S. & To, A. C. Mean-field polycrystal plasticity modeling with grain size and shape effects for laser additive manufactured fcc metals.Int. J. Solids Struct.112, 35–42 (2017). 17/49

    2017

  50. [51]

    Healy, C. J. & Ackland, G. J. Molecular dynamics simulations of compression–tension asymmetry in plasticity of fe nanopillars.Acta Materialia70, 105–112 (2014)

    2014

  51. [52]

    & Barbe, F

    Calvat, M., Keller, C. & Barbe, F. Micromechanical analysis of a unimodal and a bimodal polycrystal with paired microstructures of ultrafine grains, 2d & 3d.Eur. J. Mech.109, 105434 (2025)

    2025

  52. [53]

    & Degallaix, S

    Aubin, V ., Quaegebeur, P. & Degallaix, S. Cyclic plasticity of a duplex stainless steel under non-proportional loading. Mater. Sci. Eng. A346, 208–215 (2003)

    2003

  53. [54]

    S., Raghu, T., Bhattacharjee, P

    Kumar, S. S., Raghu, T., Bhattacharjee, P. P., Rao, G. A. & Borah, U. Strain rate dependent microstructural evolution during hot deformation of a hot isostatically processed nickel base superalloy.J. Alloy. Compd.681, 28–42 (2016)

    2016

  54. [55]

    & Bacon, D

    Hull, D. & Bacon, D. Chapter 9 - dislocation arrays and crystal boundaries. In Hull, D. & Bacon, D. (eds.)Introduction to Dislocations (Fifth Edition), 171–204, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-096672-4.00009-8 (Butterworth- Heinemann, Oxford, 2011), fifth edition edn

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-096672-4.00009-8 2011

  55. [56]

    T.et al.A quantitative study of stress fields ahead of a slip band blocked by a grain boundary in unalloyed magnesium.Sci

    Andani, M. T.et al.A quantitative study of stress fields ahead of a slip band blocked by a grain boundary in unalloyed magnesium.Sci. Reports10, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59684-y (2020)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-020-59684-y 2020

  56. [57]

    T., Lakshmanan, A., Sundararaghavan, V ., Allison, J

    Andani, M. T., Lakshmanan, A., Sundararaghavan, V ., Allison, J. & Misra, A. Estimation of micro-hall-petch coefficients for prismatic slip system in mg-4al as a function of grain boundary parameters.Acta Materialia226, 117613, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117613 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117613 2021

  57. [58]

    Guo, Y ., Britton, T. B. & Wilkinson, A. J.Stress Concentrations, Slip Bands and Grain Boundaries In Commercially Pure Titanium, chap. 173, 1017–1021 (John Wiley And Sons, Ltd, 2016). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ 9781119296126.ch173

    2016

  58. [59]

    Edwards, T. E. J., Maeder, X., Ast, J., Berger, L. & Michler, J. Mapping pure plastic strains against locally applied stress: Revealing toughening plasticity.Sci. Adv.8, eabo5735, DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abo5735 (2022). https://www.science.org/ doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.abo5735

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abo5735 2022

  59. [60]

    & Needleman, A

    Cleveringa, H., Van der Giessen, E. & Needleman, A. A discrete dislocation analysis of bending.Int. J. Plast.15, 837–868, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(99)00013-3 (1999)

    work page doi:10.1016/s0749-6419(99)00013-3 1999

  60. [61]

    Chakravarthy, S. S. & Curtin, W. Effect of source and obstacle strengths on yield stress: A discrete dislocation study.J. Mech. Phys. Solids58, 625 – 635, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2010.03.004 (2010). 68.Cleveringa, H., Van der Giessen, E. & Needleman, A. Discrete dislocation simulations and size dependent hardening in single slip.J. Phys. IV Fr...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2010.03.004 2010

  61. [62]

    A., Kalidindi, S., Doherty, R

    Salem, A. A., Kalidindi, S., Doherty, R. & Semiatin, S. Strain hardening due to deformation twinning in α-titanium: Mechanisms.Metall. Mater. Transactions A37, 259–268 (2006)

    2006

  62. [63]

    Bean, C.et al.Heterogeneous slip localization in an additively manufactured 316l stainless steel.Int. J. Plast.159, 103436 (2022)

    2022

  63. [64]

    & Hémery, S

    Yvinec, T., Valle, V ., Hamon, F. & Hémery, S. A criterion for slip transfer in ti-6al-4 v determined using hr-dic: toward a quantitative assessment of slip length in microtextured regions.Mater. & Des.115974 (2026)

    2026

  64. [65]

    Cyclic slip irreversibilities and the evolution of fatigue damage.Metall

    Mughrabi, H. Cyclic slip irreversibilities and the evolution of fatigue damage.Metall. Mater. Transactions A40, 1257–1279, DOI: 10.1007/s11661-009-9839-8 (2009)

    work page doi:10.1007/s11661-009-9839-8 2009

  65. [66]

    76.Pan, Q

    Stinville, J.et al.Direct measurements of slip irreversibility in a nickel-based superalloy using high resolution digital image correlation.Acta Materialia186, 172–189, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.12.009 (2020). 76.Pan, Q. & Lu, L. Fatigue in metals and alloys.Nat. Mater.25, 357–365 (2026)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2019.12.009 2019

  66. [67]

    Stinville, J. C.et al.Fatigue deformation in a polycrystalline nickel base superalloy at intermediate and high temperature: Competing failure modes.Acta Materialia152, 16 – 33, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.035 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.035 2018

  67. [68]

    Stinville, J.et al.Insights into plastic localization by crystallographic slip from emerging experimental and numerical approaches.Annu. Rev. Mater. Res.53, 275–317, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-080921-102621 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-matsci-080921-102621 2023

  68. [69]

    & Hoefnagels, J

    Vermeij, T., Peerlings, R., Geers, M. & Hoefnagels, J. Automated identification of slip system activity fields from digital image correlation data.Acta Materialia243, 118502, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118502 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118502 2022

  69. [70]

    & Hoefnagels, J

    Mornout, C., Slokker, G., Vermeij, T., König, D. & Hoefnagels, J. Slide: Automated identification and quantification of grain boundary sliding and opening in 3d.Scripta Materialia268, 116861, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat. 2025.116861 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat 2025

  70. [71]

    4.01 - cyclic deformation, crack initiation, and low-cycle fatigue

    Polák, J. 4.01 - cyclic deformation, crack initiation, and low-cycle fatigue. In Milne, I., Ritchie, R. & Karihaloo, B. (eds.) Comprehensive Structural Integrity, 1 – 39, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043749-4/04060-X (Pergamon, Oxford, 2003)

    work page doi:10.1016/b0-08-043749-4/04060-x 2003

  71. [72]

    Cyclic slip irreversibility and fatigue life: A microstructure-based analysis.Acta Materialia61, 1197 – 1203, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.029 (2013)

    Mughrabi, H. Cyclic slip irreversibility and fatigue life: A microstructure-based analysis.Acta Materialia61, 1197 – 1203, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.029 (2013). 18/49

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.029 2012

  72. [73]

    Charpagne, M.et al.Slip localization in inconel 718: A three-dimensional and statistical perspective.Acta Materialia 215, 117037, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117037 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117037 2021

  73. [74]

    Hong, S. I. & Laird, C. Mechanisms of slip mode modification in f.c.c. solid solutions.Acta Metall. et Materialia38, 1581–1594, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-7151(90)90126-2 (1990)

    work page doi:10.1016/0956-7151(90)90126-2 1990

  74. [75]

    & Pollock, T

    Charpagne, M., Stinville, J., Wang, F., Philips, N. & Pollock, T. Orientation dependent plastic localization in the refractory high entropy alloy hfnbtatizr at room temperature.Mater. Sci. Eng. A848, 143291, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea. 2022.143291 (2022). 86.Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y . & Courville, A.Deep Learning(MIT Press, 2016). http://www.dee...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.msea 2022

  75. [76]

    npj Comput

    Calvat, M.et al.Learning metal microstructural heterogeneity through spatial mapping of diffraction latent space features. npj Comput. Mater.11, 284 (2025)

    2025

  76. [77]

    M., Belal, T., Anik, M

    Islam, M. M., Belal, T., Anik, M. A. H. C. & Sharif, A. Predicting materials using variational autoencoders: A systematic literature review.Arch. Comput. Methods Eng.1–52 (2026)

    2026

  77. [78]

    & Melville, J

    McInnes, L., Healy, J. & Melville, J. Umap: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03426(2018)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  78. [79]

    biotechnology37, 38–44 (2019)

    Becht, E.et al.Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using umap.Nat. biotechnology37, 38–44 (2019)

    2019

  79. [80]

    Bobbio, L. D.et al.Additive manufacturing of a functionally graded material from ti-6al-4v to invar: Experimental characterization and thermodynamic calculations.Acta Materialia127, 133–142 (2017)

    2017

  80. [81]

    & Des.256, 114115, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2025.114115 (2025)

    Bean, C.et al.Accelerated fatigue strength prediction via additive manufactured functionally graded materials and high-throughput plasticity quantification.Mater. & Des.256, 114115, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2025.114115 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2025.114115 2025

Showing first 80 references.