pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.24906 · v1 · pith:HKZJPWEEnew · submitted 2026-06-16 · 🌊 nlin.PS · math-ph· math.AP· math.MP· physics.app-ph

Resonance phenomena in kink antikink collisions within higher order shifted periodic high order models

Teboho Abram Moloi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 21:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌊 nlin.PS math-phmath.APmath.MPphysics.app-ph
keywords kink antikink collisionsresonance phenomenahigher order scalar field theoriesshifted periodic modelstopological solitonsalgebraic tailscritical velocitiesscattering dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Shifted periodic extensions of higher-order field theories produce quantitatively different critical velocities and resonance structures in kink-antikink collisions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compares kink-antikink scattering in standard higher-order scalar field models and their shifted periodic extensions, both of which feature three degenerate vacua and asymmetric kinks with algebraically decaying tails. Direct numerical simulations track collisions across varying initial velocities to locate the thresholds separating capture from escape and to map the windows where energy transfers resonantly between translational motion and internal vibrations. The shifted periodic versions, built by extending polynomial potentials over multiple spatial sectors, preserve the basic kink shapes yet alter the precise values of those thresholds and the detailed layout of resonance patterns. Both model families exhibit resonant energy exchange mechanisms similar to those in lower-order theories, but the periodic shift introduces additional quantitative shifts tied to the long-range tails and higher-order terms.

Core claim

Although the conventional and shifted periodic higher-order models exhibit similar kink-antikink configurations, important quantitative differences arise in their critical velocities, resonance structures, and scattering characteristics; both classes support resonant energy transfer mechanisms analogous to those in lower-order theories while exhibiting novel features associated with higher-order interactions and long-range algebraic tails.

What carries the argument

Shifted periodic extensions of higher-order potentials, which extend conventional polynomial potentials across multiple spatial sectors to produce periodic structures while preserving three degenerate vacua and topological kinks with asymmetric profiles and algebraic tails.

If this is right

  • Escape windows and quasi-fractal patterns appear in the velocity-parameter space for collisions in both model classes.
  • Algebraic tails shape collision outcomes through long-range effects that influence energy exchange.
  • Resonant energy transfer between translational and vibrational degrees of freedom persists in these higher-order systems.
  • Higher-order interactions generate novel scattering features beyond those seen in lower-order kink models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reported quantitative shifts could serve as a diagnostic to distinguish which variant of the potential better matches a given physical system with similar topology.
  • Extending the same collision protocol to multi-kink or breather-kink interactions might amplify the differences between the two model classes.
  • Because the tails decay algebraically rather than exponentially, small changes in the periodic shift could produce measurable effects at larger separations than in conventional models.

Load-bearing premise

Direct numerical simulations of the field equations accurately resolve the algebraic tails and energy exchange without discretization artifacts or insufficient integration times.

What would settle it

A set of simulations on the same higher-order potential that finds identical critical velocities and identical locations of resonance windows for the conventional and shifted periodic versions would falsify the claimed quantitative differences.

read the original abstract

We investigate kink antikink collisions in higher order scalar field theories described by the higher order models and their shifted periodic extensions. Both classes of models possess three degenerate vacuum states and support topological kink solutions with asymmetric profiles and algebraically decaying tails. By extending conventional polynomial potentials across multiple spatial sectors, we construct shifted periodic high order field theories and examine how this modification affects the scattering dynamics of topological defects. The primary objective of this study is to provide a comparative numerical analysis of kink collisions in the standard and shifted periodic versions of these higher order models. Using direct numerical simulations, we determine the critical velocities that separate capture from escape regimes and identify resonance structures associated with energy exchange between translational and internal vibrational degrees of freedom. Particular attention is devoted to the emergence of escape windows, quasi-fractal patterns, and the role of algebraic tails in shaping the collision outcomes. Our results demonstrate that, although the conventional and shifted periodic models exhibit similar kink antikink configurations, important quantitative differences arise in their critical velocities, resonance structures, and scattering characteristics. The findings further confirm that both classes of models support resonant energy transfer mechanisms analogous to those observed in lower order theories, while simultaneously exhibiting novel features associated with higher-order interactions and long range effects. These results contribute to the growing understanding of nonlinear excitations in scalar field theories and provide new insights into the dynamics of topological solitons in shifted periodic systems

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper examines kink-antikink collisions in higher-order scalar field theories possessing three degenerate vacua and algebraically decaying kink tails. It constructs shifted periodic extensions of conventional polynomial potentials and performs direct numerical simulations to compare critical velocities separating capture and escape, resonance structures arising from translational-internal mode energy exchange, and scattering outcomes including escape windows and quasi-fractal patterns. The central claim is that, while kink profiles remain qualitatively similar, the shifted periodic models exhibit quantitatively distinct critical velocities, resonance windows, and scattering characteristics relative to the standard higher-order models, while still supporting resonant mechanisms analogous to those in lower-order theories.

Significance. If the reported quantitative distinctions survive proper numerical validation, the work would extend the study of resonant soliton scattering to higher-order models with long-range algebraic tails, highlighting how periodic extensions modify energy-exchange windows without altering the underlying resonance mechanism. The comparative approach between conventional and shifted models supplies a concrete test of the role of tail decay in collision dynamics.

major comments (1)
  1. [Numerical methods / results sections] The headline quantitative differences in critical velocities and resonance structures rest on direct numerical integration, yet the manuscript supplies no domain-size scaling studies, grid-convergence tests, or boundary-condition validation targeting the algebraically decaying tails. Without these, reported distinctions between conventional and shifted-periodic models could arise from truncation artifacts rather than physical differences (see abstract and the numerical-results section).
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that both model classes 'support resonant energy transfer mechanisms analogous to those observed in lower order theories' but does not cite the specific lower-order references used for comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on numerical validation. We agree that explicit convergence tests are needed to rule out truncation artifacts from the algebraic tails and will strengthen the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical methods / results sections] The headline quantitative differences in critical velocities and resonance structures rest on direct numerical integration, yet the manuscript supplies no domain-size scaling studies, grid-convergence tests, or boundary-condition validation targeting the algebraically decaying tails. Without these, reported distinctions between conventional and shifted-periodic models could arise from truncation artifacts rather than physical differences (see abstract and the numerical-results section).

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not include explicit domain-size scaling studies, grid-convergence tests, or dedicated boundary-condition validation for the algebraically decaying tails. Although the simulations used large domains selected to accommodate the slow tail decay and produced consistent outcomes across repeated runs, the absence of systematic documentation leaves open the possibility that some quantitative distinctions could reflect numerical truncation rather than model differences. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection to the numerical methods section that reports (i) results for successively larger domains until critical velocities and resonance windows stabilize, (ii) grid-refinement studies at fixed domain size, and (iii) comparisons of absorbing versus periodic boundary conditions. These tests will confirm that the reported differences between the standard and shifted-periodic models persist under refinement, thereby supporting their physical origin. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results from direct numerical integration of field equations

full rationale

The paper reports outcomes of direct numerical simulations comparing kink-antikink scattering in conventional higher-order models versus their shifted-periodic extensions. Critical velocities, resonance windows, and escape patterns are extracted from time evolution of the PDEs; no parameters are fitted to the target observables and then re-labeled as predictions, no self-citation chain supplies a uniqueness theorem that forces the reported distinctions, and no ansatz or renaming of known results is invoked to generate the quantitative differences. The central claims therefore remain independent of the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted. The models are described as possessing three degenerate vacua and algebraic tails, but construction details and any fitting parameters remain unspecified.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5788 in / 999 out tokens · 20306 ms · 2026-06-26T21:34:56.593675+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K., Schonfeld, J

    Campbell, D. K., Schonfeld, J. F.,&Wingate, C. A. (1983). Resonance structure in kink–antikink interactions inϕ4 theory.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena,9(1–2), 1–32

    1983

  2. [2]

    Dorey, P., Mersh, T., Romańczukiewicz, T.,&Shnir, Y. (2011). Kink–antikink collisions in theϕ 6 model.Physical Review Letters,107(9), 091602

    2011

  3. [3]

    A., Kudryavtsev, A

    Gani, V. A., Kudryavtsev, A. E.,&Lizunova, M. A. (2014). Kink interactions in the (1+1)-dimensionalϕ 6 model.Physical Review D,89(12), 125009

    2014

  4. [4]

    Belendryasova, E.,&Gani, V. A. (2019). Scattering of theϕ8 kinks with power-law asymptotics.Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation,67, 414–426

    2019

  5. [5]

    C., Decker, R

    Christov, I. C., Decker, R. S., Demirkaya, A., Gani, V. A., Kevrekidis, P. G., Radomskiy, R. V.,&Saxena, A. (2019). Kink–antikink collisions and multi-bounce resonance windows in higher-order field theories.Physical Review Letters,122(17), 171601

    2019

  6. [6]

    Mohammadi, A., Moradi Marjaneh, A.,&Christov, I. C. (2020). Asymptotic interaction and collective coordinate formulation for kinks in a parametricϕ6 model.Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation,89, 105285

    2020

  7. [7]

    (1982).Solitons and instantons: An introduction to solitons and instantons in quantum field theory

    Rajaraman, R. (1982).Solitons and instantons: An introduction to solitons and instantons in quantum field theory. North-Holland

    1982

  8. [8]

    (2006).Kinks and domain walls: An introduction to classical and quantum solitons

    Vachaspati, T. (2006).Kinks and domain walls: An introduction to classical and quantum solitons. Cambridge University Press

    2006

  9. [10]

    Vilenkin, A.,&Shellard, E. P. S. (2000).Cosmic strings and other topological defects. Cambridge University Press

    2000

  10. [11]

    (2004).Topological solitons

    Manton, N.,&Sutcliffe, P. (2004).Topological solitons. Cambridge University Press

    2004

  11. [12]

    (2015).Kink collisions in curved field space

    Ahlqvist, P., Eckerle, K.,&Greene, B. (2015).Kink collisions in curved field space. Journal of high energy physics,2015(4), 59. – 12 –

    2015

  12. [13]

    (2009).Electroweak vacua, collider phenomenology, and possible connection with dark energy

    Greenwood, E., Halstead, E., Poltis, R.,&Stojkovic, D. (2009).Electroweak vacua, collider phenomenology, and possible connection with dark energy. Physical Review D,79(10), 103003

    2009

  13. [14]

    L., Malishevskii, A

    Alfimov, G. L., Malishevskii, A. S.,&Medvedeva, E. V. (2014).Discrete set of kink velocities in Josephson structures: The nonlocal double sine–Gordon model. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena,282, 16-26

    2014

  14. [15]

    R., Krumhansl, J

    Bishop, A. R., Krumhansl, J. A.,&Trullinger, S. E. (1980).Solitons in condensed matter: a paradigm. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena,1(1), 1-44

    1980

  15. [16]

    Z., Gubser, S

    DeWolfe, O., Freedman, D. Z., Gubser, S. S.,&Karch, A. (2000).Modeling the fifth dimension with scalars and gravity. Physical Review D,62(4), 046008

    2000

  16. [17]

    Peyravi, M., Riazi, N.,&Lobo, F. S. (2016).Soliton models for thick branes. The European Physical Journal C,76(5), 247

    2016

  17. [18]

    W., Moss, I

    Hawking, S. W., Moss, I. G.,&Stewart, J. M. (1982). Bubble collisions in the very early universe. Physical Review D,26(10), 2681

    1982

  18. [19]

    T., Hui, L., Lim, E

    Giblin Jr, J. T., Hui, L., Lim, E. A.,&Yang, I. S. (2010).How to run through walls: dynamics of bubble and soliton collisions. Physical Review D,82(4), 045019

    2010

  19. [20]

    A., Lizunova, M

    Gani, V. A., Lizunova, M. A.,&Radomskiy, R. V. (2016).Scalar triplet on a domain wall: an exact solution. Journal of High Energy Physics,2016(4), 43

    2016

  20. [21]

    Peyravi, M., Riazi, N.,&Lobo, F. S. (2017).Evolution of spherical domain walls in solitonic symmetron models. Physical Review D,95(6), 064047

    2017

  21. [22]

    Kobayashi, M.,&Nitta, M. (2013). Sine-Gordon kinks on a domain wall ring. Physical Review D, 87(8), 085003

    2013

  22. [23]

    Morris, J. R. (2019).Interacting kinks and meson mixing. Annals of Physics,400, 346-365

    2019

  23. [24]

    A., Kirillov, A

    Gani, V. A., Kirillov, A. A.,&Rubin, S. G. (2018).Classical transitions with the topological number changing in the early Universe. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2018(04), 042

    2018

  24. [25]

    A., Gani, V

    Lensky, V. A., Gani, V. A.,&Kudryavtsev, A. E. (2001).Domain walls carrying aU(1) charge. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics,93(4), 677-684

    2001

  25. [26]

    Bazeia, D., Losano, L.,&Santos, J. R. L. (2013).Kinklike structures in scalar field theories: from one-field to two-field models. Physics Letters A,377 (25-27), 1615-1620

    2013

  26. [27]

    (2018).Kink dynamics in a system of two coupled scalar fields in two space–time dimensions

    Alonso-Izquierdo, A. (2018).Kink dynamics in a system of two coupled scalar fields in two space–time dimensions. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena,365, 12-26

    2018

  27. [28]

    (2018).Reflection, transmutation, annihilation, and resonance in two-component kink collisions

    Alonso-Izquierdo, A. (2018).Reflection, transmutation, annihilation, and resonance in two-component kink collisions. Physical Review D,97(4), 045016

    2018

  28. [29]

    (2014).Composite-kink solutions of coupled nonlinear wave equations

    Katsura, H. (2014).Composite-kink solutions of coupled nonlinear wave equations. Physical Review D,89(8), 085019

    2014

  29. [30]

    Correa, R. A. C., de Souza Dutra, A.,&Gleiser, M. (2014).Information-entropic measure of energy-degenerate kinks in two-field models. Physics Letters B,737, 388-394

    2014

  30. [31]

    S., Losano, L.,&Menezes, R

    Bazeia, D., Lobao, A. S., Losano, L.,&Menezes, R. (2014).First-order formalism for twinlike models with several real scalar fields. The European Physical Journal C,74(2), 2755. – 13 –

    2014

  31. [32]

    (2019).The affective factors on the uncertainty in the collisions of the soliton solutions of the double field sine-Gordon system

    Mohammadi, M.,&Riazi, N. (2019).The affective factors on the uncertainty in the collisions of the soliton solutions of the double field sine-Gordon system. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation,72, 176-193

    2019

  32. [33]

    Riazi, N., Azizi, A.,&Zebarjad, S. M. (2002).Soliton decay in a coupled system of scalar fields. Physical Review D,66(6), 065003

    2002

  33. [34]

    A.,&Kudryavtsev, A

    Gani, V. A.,&Kudryavtsev, A. E. (2001).Collisions of domain walls in a supersymmetric model. Physics of Atomic Nuclei,64(11), 2043-2050

    2001

  34. [35]

    A., Ksenzov, V

    Gani, V. A., Ksenzov, V. G.,&Kudryavtsev, A. E. (2010).Example of a self-consistent solution for a fermion on domain wall. Physics of Atomic Nuclei,73(11), 1889-1892

    2010

  35. [36]

    A., Ksenzov, V

    Gani, V. A., Ksenzov, V. G.,&Kudryavtsev, A. E. (2011).Stable branches of a solution for a fermion on domain wall. Physics of Atomic Nuclei,74(5), 771-777

    2011

  36. [37]

    A., Konyukhova, N

    Gani, V. A., Konyukhova, N. B. , Kurochkin, S. V. ,&Lensky V. A. (2004).Study of stability of a charged topological soliton in the system of two interacting scalar fields. computational mathematics and mathematical physics,44, 1968

    2004

  37. [38]

    (2014).Bi-dimensional soliton-like solutions of the nonlinear complex sine-Gordon system

    Mohammadi, M.,&Riazi, N. (2014).Bi-dimensional soliton-like solutions of the nonlinear complex sine-Gordon system. Progress of Theoretical and experimental Physics,2014(2), 023A03

    2014

  38. [39]

    (1982).Solitons and instantons

    Rajaraman, R. (1982).Solitons and instantons. North Holland, Elsevier, Amsterdam

    1982

  39. [40]

    K., Schonfeld, J

    Campbell, D. K., Schonfeld, J. F.,&Wingate, C. A. (1983).Resonance structure in kink-antikink interactions inφ4 theory. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena,9(1-2), 1-32

    1983

  40. [41]

    K., Peyrard, M.,&Sodano, P

    Campbell, D. K., Peyrard, M.,&Sodano, P. (1986).Kink-antikink interactions in the double sine-Gordon equation. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena,19(2), 165-205

    1986

  41. [43]

    R., Riazi, N.,&Mohebbi, A

    Gharaati, A. R., Riazi, N.,&Mohebbi, A. F. (2006).Internal modes of relativistic solitons. International Journal of Theoretical Physics,45(1), 53-63

    2006

  42. [44]

    Morris, J. R. (2018).Small deformations of kinks and walls. Annals of Physics,393, 122-131

    2018

  43. [45]

    A.,&Kudryavtsev, A

    Gani, V. A.,&Kudryavtsev, A. E. (1999).Kink-antikink interactions in the double sine-Gordon equation and the problem of resonance frequencies. Physical Review E,60(3), 3305

    1999

  44. [46]

    Popov, C. A. (2005).Perturbation theory for the double sine-Gordon equation. Wave Motion, 42(4), 309-316

    2005

  45. [47]

    (2009).Interaction properties of the periodic and step-like solutions of the double-Sine-Gordon equation

    Peyravi, M., Montakhab, A., Riazi, N.,&Gharaati, A. (2009).Interaction properties of the periodic and step-like solutions of the double-Sine-Gordon equation. The European Physical Journal B,72(2), 269

    2009

  46. [48]

    Wazwaz, A. M. (2006).Compactons, solitons and periodic solutions for some forms of nonlinear Klein-Gordon equations. Chaos, Solitons&Fractals,28(4), 1005-1013

    2006

  47. [49]

    Alonso-Izquierdo, A.,&Guilarte, J. M. (2012).On a family of (1 + 1)-dimensional scalar field theory models: kinks, stability, one-loop mass shifts. Annals of Physics,327(9), 2251-2274

    2012

  48. [50]

    A., Kudryavtsev, A

    Gani, V. A., Kudryavtsev, A. E.,&Lizunova, M. A. (2014).Kink interactions in the (1 + 1)-dimensionalφ 6 model. Physical Review D,89(12), 125009 – 14 –

    2014

  49. [51]

    A., Marjaneh, A

    Gani, V. A., Marjaneh, A. M., Askari, A., Belendryasova, E.,&Saadatmand, D. (2018). Scattering of the double sine-Gordon kinks. The European Physical Journal C,78(4), 345

    2018

  50. [52]

    (2018).Resonant kink–antikink scattering through quasinormal modes

    Dorey, P.,&Romańczukiewicz, T. (2018).Resonant kink–antikink scattering through quasinormal modes. Physics Letters B,779, 117-123

    2018

  51. [53]

    Popov, S. P. (2014).Interactions of breathers and kink pairs of the double sine-Gordon equation. Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics,54(12), 1876-1885

    2014

  52. [54]

    R., Nobrega, K

    Bazeia, D., Gomes, A. R., Nobrega, K. Z.,&Simas, F. C. (2019).Kink scattering in a hybrid model. Physics Letters B,793, 26-32

    2019

  53. [55]

    C.,&Saxena, A

    Khare, A., Christov, I. C.,&Saxena, A. (2014).Successive phase transitions and kink solutions inϕ 8,ϕ 10, andϕ 12 field theories. Physical Review E,90(2), 023208

    2014

  54. [56]

    Bazeia, D., Belendryasova, E.,&Gani, V. A. (2018).Scattering of kinks of the sinh-deformed φ4 model. The European Physical Journal C,78(4), 340

    2018

  55. [57]

    W., Mannering, L

    Goatham, S. W., Mannering, L. E., Hann, R.,&Krusch, S. (2011).Dynamics of Multi-kinks in the Presence of Wells and Barriers. Acta Physica Polonica B,42, 2087

    2011

  56. [58]

    Popov, S. P. (2013).Influence of dislocations on kink solutions of the double sine-Gordon equation. Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics,53(12), 1891-1899

    2013

  57. [59]

    V., Borisov, D

    Saadatmand, D., Dmitriev, S. V., Borisov, D. I.,&Kevrekidis, P. G. (2014). Iinteraction of sine-Gordon kinks and breathers with a parity-time-symmetric defect. Physical Review E, 90(5), 052902

    2014

  58. [60]

    V., Borisov, D

    Saadatmand, D., Dmitriev, S. V., Borisov, D. I., Kevrekidis, P. G., Fatykhov, M. A.,& Javidan, K. (2015).Effect of theϕ4 kink’s internal mode at scattering on a PT-symmetric defect. JETP letters,101(7), 497-502

    2015

  59. [61]

    V., Borisov, D

    Saadatmand, D., Dmitriev, S. V., Borisov, D. I., Kevrekidis, P. G., Fatykhov, M. A.,& Javidan, K. (2015).Kink scattering from a parity-time-symmetric defect in theϕ4 model. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation,29(1-3), 267-282

    2015

  60. [62]

    S.,&Vazquez, L

    Fei, Z., Kivshar, Y. S.,&Vazquez, L. (1992).Resonant kink-impurity interactions in theφ4 model. Physical Review A,46(8), 5214

    1992

  61. [63]

    S.,&Vazquez, L

    Fei, Z., Kivshar, Y. S.,&Vazquez, L. (1992).Resonant kink-impurity interactions in the sine-Gordon model. Physical Review A,45(8), 6019

    1992

  62. [64]

    S., Fei, Z.,&Vázquez, L

    Kivshar, Y. S., Fei, Z.,&Vázquez, L. (1991).Resonant soliton-impurity interactions. Physical review letters,67(10), 1177

    1991

  63. [65]

    A., Kager, J., de Lange, S.,&van Wezel, J

    Lizunova, M. A., Kager, J., de Lange, S.,&van Wezel, J. (2020).Kinks and realistic impurity models inφ4-theory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.04747

    arXiv 2020

  64. [66]

    C., Decker, R

    Christov, I. C., Decker, R. J., Demirkaya, A., Gani, V. A., Kevrekidis, P. G.,&Radomskiy, R. V. (2019).Long-range interactions of kinks. Physical Review D,99(1), 016010

    2019

  65. [67]

    Belendryasova, E.,&Gani, V. A. (2019).Scattering of theφ 8 kinks with power-law asymptotics. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation,67, 414-426

    2019

  66. [68]

    Bazeia, D., Menezes, R.,&Moreira, D. C. (2018).Analytical study of kinklike structures with polynomial tails. Journal of Physics Communications,2(5), 055019

    2018

  67. [69]

    C., Decker, R

    Christov, I. C., Decker, R. J., Demirkaya, A., Gani, V. A., Kevrekidis, P. G., Khare, A.,& Saxena, A. (2019).Kink-kink and kink-antikink interactions with long-range tails. Physical review letters,122(17), 171601. – 15 –

    2019

  68. [70]

    Manton, N. S. (2019).Forces between kinks and antikinks with long-range tails. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical,52(6), 065401

    2019

  69. [71]

    C., Decker, R

    Christov, I. C., Decker, R. J., Demirkaya, A., Gani, V. A., Kevrekidis, P. G.,&Saxena, A. (2020).Kink-Antikink Collisions and Multi-Bounce Resonance Windows in Higher-Order Field Theories. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.00154

    arXiv 2020

  70. [72]

    A., Moradi Marjaneh, A.,&Saadatmand, D

    Gani, V. A., Moradi Marjaneh, A.,&Saadatmand, D. (2019).Multi-kink scattering in the double sine-Gordon model. The European Physical Journal C,79(7), 620

    2019

  71. [73]

    V.,&Zomorrodian, M

    Moradi Marjaneh, A., Saadatmand, D., Zhou, K., Dmitriev, S. V.,&Zomorrodian, M. E. (2017).High energy density in the collision ofNkinks in theϕ 4 model. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation,49, 30-38

    2017

  72. [74]

    A., Saadatmand, D., Dmitriev, S

    Moradi Marjaneh, A., Gani, V. A., Saadatmand, D., Dmitriev, S. V.,&Javidan, K. (2017). Multi-kink collisions in theϕ6 model. Journal of High Energy Physics,2017(7), 28

    2017

  73. [75]

    (2014).Scattering of Klein-Gordon particles by a Kink-like potential

    Hassanabadi, H., Lu, L., Maghsoodi, E., Liu, G.,&Zarrinkamar, S. (2014).Scattering of Klein-Gordon particles by a Kink-like potential. Annals of Physics,342, 264-269

    2014

  74. [76]

    (2016).Collective coordinates in one-dimensional soliton models revisited

    Takyi, I.,&Weigel, H. (2016).Collective coordinates in one-dimensional soliton models revisited. Physical Review D,94(8), 085008

    2016

  75. [77]

    E., Luchini, G.,&Zakrzewski, W

    Baron, H. E., Luchini, G.,&Zakrzewski, W. J. (2014).Collective coordinate approximation to the scattering of solitons in the (1 + 1) dimensional NLS model. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical,47(26), 265201

    2014

  76. [78]

    (2010).Collective coordinate variable for soliton-potential system in sine-Gordon model

    Javidan, K. (2010).Collective coordinate variable for soliton-potential system in sine-Gordon model. Journal of mathematical physics,51(11), 112902

    2010

  77. [79]

    Christov, I.,&Christov, C. I. (2008).Physical dynamics of quasi-particles in nonlinear wave equations. Physics Letters A,372(6), 841-848

    2008

  78. [80]

    V., Mrozovskaya, E

    Radomskiy, R. V., Mrozovskaya, E. V., Gani, V. A.,&Christov, I. C. (2017).Topological defects with power-law tails. In J. Phys. Conf. Ser,798, 012087

    2017

  79. [81]

    Manton, N. S. (1979).An effective Lagrangian for solitons. Nuclear Physics B,150, 397-412

    1979

  80. [82]

    G., Khare, A.,&Saxena, A

    Kevrekidis, P. G., Khare, A.,&Saxena, A. (2004).Solitary wave interactions in dispersive equations using Manton’s approach. Physical Review E,70(5), 057603

    2004

Showing first 80 references.