pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.25573 · v1 · pith:YEOW7R3Pnew · submitted 2026-06-24 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM

argosim: a Python package for radio interferometric simulations

Ezequiel Centofanti , Emma Ay\c{c}oberry , Samuel Farrens , Samuel Gullin , Manal Bensahli , Jean-Luc Starck , John Antoniadis This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 20:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM
keywords radio interferometrysimulationPython packageJAXastronomyopen sourcedifferentiable computing
0
0 comments X

The pith

The argosim Python package supplies modular simulations of radio interferometric observations with a JAX backend for speed and differentiability.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces argosim, a Python package for simulating radio interferometric observations from antenna positions through to cleaned images. It highlights the package as modular, lightweight, and compatible with major operating systems. The JAX backend is presented as the source of accelerated performance and full differentiability. The work positions the tool as fully open-source to support broader use in generating and processing such observations.

Core claim

The argosim package is a modular, lightweight Python tool compatible with all major operating systems whose JAX computational backend enables greatly accelerated performance and full differentiability for simulating radio interferometric observations from antenna positions to cleaned images, with the code publicly available on GitHub.

What carries the argument

The argosim package and its JAX backend, which performs the core computations for generating observations and supports differentiability.

Load-bearing premise

The JAX-based implementation accurately models radio interferometric physics and produces correct outputs without significant numerical or modeling errors.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison of argosim-generated visibilities and images against outputs from an established tool such as CASA on a standard test observation would confirm or refute the modeling accuracy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.25573 by Emma Ay\c{c}oberry, Ezequiel Centofanti, Jean-Luc Starck, John Antoniadis, Manal Bensahli, Samuel Farrens, Samuel Gullin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Simulated array configurations in the East North plane. Top: example of argosim parametrisable arrays, including Y-shaped, circular and regular-grid antenna configurations. Bottom: user-defined arrays, featuring the ARGOS pathfinder, the MeerKAT radio telescope and the SKA-Mid antenna layout. usability, ensuring that users can reliably reproduce current and future results while simplifying installation and… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Simulated snapshot uv-coverage of the SKA-Mid array layout for three different working frequencies and two different observation declinations. 4.2. uv-samples As mentioned in Sect. 2.1, the aperture synthesis process allows us to obtain the uv-sampling points given the antenna positions, the latitude of the array, the source declination, the operating fre￾quency of the antennas, and the observation time. T… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the dirty beam for a radio interferometer with 14 antennas distributed in a circle of 150 metres radius. Over the dirty beam, the elliptical fit is shown in black, as well as the major and minor axes of the ellipse in orange and blue, respectively. The eccentricity of the beam is 0.93, where zero corresponds to a circle and the closer to one the more elongated the ellipse is, and the beam is tilted a… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Simulation wall time for an interferometric observation using approximately 200 million uv-samples, compared across different com￾putational backends. layout design, another focused on the aperture synthesis process, and a third addressing image reconstruction. The GUI offers full control over simulation parameters and enables real-time visuali￾sation of their effects on uv-sampling, dirty beam formation, … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this paper, we present argosim, a Python package for simulating radio interferometric observations. The argosim package is modular, lightweight and compatible with all major operating systems. Its computational backend is written in JAX, which allows for greatly accelerated performance as well as the advantage of being fully differentiable. We detail the main argosim modules and describe how to use them to generate an observation, from the antenna positions to the cleaned image. The package is a fully open-source project, and its code is publicly available on GitHub.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents argosim, a Python package for simulating radio interferometric observations. It claims the package is modular, lightweight, and compatible with all major operating systems. The computational backend is written in JAX to provide greatly accelerated performance and full differentiability. The authors detail the main modules and describe usage to generate an observation from antenna positions through to the cleaned image. The code is fully open-source and available on GitHub.

Significance. If the implementation is correct and the JAX backend delivers the claimed speed and differentiability without numerical issues, the package could serve as a lightweight, gradient-enabled tool for radio interferometry simulations, potentially supporting optimization and machine-learning workflows in the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the JAX backend 'allows for greatly accelerated performance' is presented without any timing benchmarks, scaling tests, or comparisons to CPU-based or other simulators; this is load-bearing for the central engineering claim about the backend's advantages.
  2. [Main modules description] Description of main modules and usage: no validation results, example outputs, or comparisons against established packages (e.g., CASA, MeqTrees) are shown to confirm that the simulated visibilities and images accurately reproduce radio interferometric physics; this directly affects the usability claim from antenna positions to cleaned image.
minor comments (2)
  1. The manuscript would benefit from a short table or paragraph comparing argosim's features (modularity, differentiability, OS support) against existing open-source interferometric simulators.
  2. Provide a specific GitHub release tag or DOI for the version described, rather than a generic repository link, to ensure reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on the manuscript. We address each major point below and will revise the paper to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the JAX backend 'allows for greatly accelerated performance' is presented without any timing benchmarks, scaling tests, or comparisons to CPU-based or other simulators; this is load-bearing for the central engineering claim about the backend's advantages.

    Authors: We agree that the performance claim would be strengthened by quantitative evidence. The revised manuscript will include timing benchmarks, scaling tests with array size and number of antennas, and direct comparisons against equivalent NumPy/CPU implementations as well as other radio interferometry simulators. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Main modules description] Description of main modules and usage: no validation results, example outputs, or comparisons against established packages (e.g., CASA, MeqTrees) are shown to confirm that the simulated visibilities and images accurately reproduce radio interferometric physics; this directly affects the usability claim from antenna positions to cleaned image.

    Authors: We acknowledge that explicit validation strengthens the usability claim. The revised manuscript will add example outputs (dirty images, clean images, visibility plots), quantitative comparisons of simulated visibilities against analytic expectations or CASA, and brief cross-checks with established packages to confirm that the core physics is reproduced correctly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The document is a software package announcement describing argosim's modularity, OS compatibility, JAX backend for speed and differentiability, and usage workflow from antenna positions to cleaned images. No mathematical derivations, fitted parameters, predictions, or uniqueness theorems are present. All central claims are engineering assertions about code properties that can be directly verified by inspecting and executing the open-source repository rather than by any self-referential chain. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing support for any result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No mathematical derivation or scientific claim is made; the document is a software release description. No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are invoked.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5638 in / 984 out tokens · 27995 ms · 2026-06-25T20:33:40.993905+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references

  1. [1]

    2018, JAX: composable transforma- tions of Python+NumPy programs CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al

    Bradbury, J., Frostig, R., Hawkins, P., et al. 2018, JAX: composable transforma- tions of Python+NumPy programs CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 114501

    2018

  2. [2]

    Clark, B. G. 1980, A&A, 89, 377

    1980

  3. [3]

    Cornwell, T. J. 2008, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2, 793

    2008

  4. [4]

    J., Golap, K., & Bhatnagar, S

    Cornwell, T. J., Golap, K., & Bhatnagar, S. 2008, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2, 647

    2008

  5. [5]

    2013, isort: A Python utility to sort imports alphabetically., https: //github.com/PyCQA/isort, version 5.13.2

    Crosley, T. 2013, isort: A Python utility to sort imports alphabetically., https: //github.com/PyCQA/isort, version 5.13.2

    2013

  6. [6]

    2022, SKA-TEL-SKO-0001075, sKA1 Design Baseline Description

    Dewdney, P. 2022, SKA-TEL-SKO-0001075, sKA1 Design Baseline Description. Copyright 2022 SKA Observatory

    2022

  7. [7]

    E., Hall, P

    Dewdney, P. E., Hall, P. J., Schilizzi, R. T., & Lazio, T. J. L. W. 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE, 97, 1482 Di Francesco, J., Chalmers, D., Denman, N., et al. 2019, in Canadian Long Range Plan for Astronomy and Astrophysics White Papers, V ol. 2020, 32

    2009

  8. [8]

    J., Adam, A., et al

    Dia, N., Yantovski-Barth, M. J., Adam, A., et al. 2025, IRIS: A Bayesian Approach for Image Reconstruction in Radio Interferometry with expressive Score-Based priors

    2025

  9. [9]

    N., Starck, J

    Garsden, H., Girard, J. N., Starck, J. L., et al. 2015, A&A, 575, A90

    2015

  10. [10]

    B., Yun, M

    Gim, H. B., Yun, M. S., Luber, N. M., et al. 2025, AJ, 170, 60

    2025

  11. [11]

    N., Garsden, H., Starck, J

    Girard, J. N., Garsden, H., Starck, J. L., et al. 2015, Journal of Instrumentation, 10, C08013

    2015

  12. [12]

    2019, The DSA-2000 – A Radio Survey Camera

    Hallinan, G., Ravi, V ., Weinreb, S., et al. 2019, The DSA-2000 – A Radio Survey Camera

    2019

  13. [13]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357 Högbom, J. A. 1974, A&AS, 15, 417

    2020

  14. [14]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  15. [15]

    2004, pytest 8.3, https: //github.com/pytest-dev/pytest, version 8.3

    Krekel, H., Oliveira, B., Pfannschmidt, R., et al. 2004, pytest 8.3, https: //github.com/pytest-dev/pytest, version 8.3. Contributors include Hol- ger Krekel, Bruno Oliveira, Ronny Pfannschmidt, Floris Bruynooghe, Brianna

    2004

  16. [16]

    2019, Black: The uncompromising Python code formatter, https: //github.com/psf/black

    Langa, L. 2019, Black: The uncompromising Python code formatter, https: //github.com/psf/black

    2019

  17. [17]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.20845

    Liu, J., van Weeren, R., Rottgering, H., & Kuijken, K. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.20845

    arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    & Rafferty, D

    Mohan, N. & Rafferty, D. 2015, PyBDSF: Python Blob Detection and Source

    2015

  19. [19]

    1983, Proceedings of the IEEE, 71, 1295

    Napier, P., Thompson, A., & Ekers, R. 1983, Proceedings of the IEEE, 71, 1295

    1983

  20. [20]

    B., Bandura, K., Bucher, M

    Newburgh, L. B., Bandura, K., Bucher, M. A., et al. 2016, in Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes VI, ed. H. J. Hall, R. Gilmozzi, & H. K. Marshall, V ol. 9906 (SPIE), 99065X

    2016

  21. [21]

    Noordam, J. E. & Smirnov, O. M. 2010, Astronomy I&, Astrophysics, 524, A61

    2010

  22. [22]

    R., McKinley, B., Hurley-Walker, et al

    Offringa, A. R., McKinley, B., Hurley-Walker, et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 606 RASCIL developers. 2022, Radio Astronomy Simulation, Calibration, and Imaging Library., https://gitlab.com/ska-telescope/external/ rascil-main Riverbank Computing Limited. 2021, PyQt6 - Comprehensive Python Bindings for Qt v6., https://www.riverbankcomputing.com/software/pyqt/, ver...

    2014

  23. [23]

    2015, GalSim: The modular galaxy image simulation toolkit

    Rowe, B., Jarvis, M., Mandelbaum, R., et al. 2015, GalSim: The modular galaxy image simulation toolkit

    2015

  24. [24]

    & Neville, A

    Ryle, M. & Neville, A. C. 1962, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 125, 39

    1962

  25. [25]

    J., Teuben, P

    Sault, R. J., Teuben, P. J., & Wright, M. C. H. 1995, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 77, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV , ed. R. A. Shaw, H. E. Payne, & J. J. E. Hayes, 433

    1995

  26. [26]

    Sault, R. J. & Wieringa, M. H. 1994, A&AS, 108, 585

    1994

  27. [27]

    Schwab, F. R. 1984, AJ, 89, 1076

    1984

  28. [28]

    B., Carilli, C

    Taylor, G. B., Carilli, C. L., & Perley, R. A., eds. 1999, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 180, Synthesis Imaging in Radio Astronomy II The OSKAR Developers. 2020, OSKAR - A GPU-accelerated simulator for the Square Kilometre Array., https://github.com/OxfordSKA/OSKAR?tab= readme-ov-file

    1999

  29. [29]

    R., Clark, B

    Thompson, A. R., Clark, B. G., Wade, C. M., & Napier, P. J. 1980, ApJS, 44, 151

    1980

  30. [30]

    R., Moran, J

    Thompson, A. R., Moran, J. M., & Swenson, Jr., G. W. 2017, Interferometry and Synthesis in Radio Astronomy, 3rd Edition (A Wiley-Interscience Publication)

    2017

  31. [31]

    2024, Sphinx - Intelligent and beautiful doc- umentation., https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/tree/master, version 8.1.3 van der Walt, S., Schönberger, J

    Turner, A., Tran, B., Sewell, C., et al. 2024, Sphinx - Intelligent and beautiful doc- umentation., https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/tree/master, version 8.1.3 van der Walt, S., Schönberger, J. L., Nunez-Iglesias, J., et al. 2014, PeerJ, 2, e453 Viˇcánek Martínez, T., Edler, H. W., & Brüggen, M. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.11715

    arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13, 600

    Wang, Z., Bovik, A., Sheikh, H., & Simoncelli, E. 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13, 600

    2004

  33. [33]

    & Thompson, A

    Wootten, A. & Thompson, A. R. 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE, 97, 1463

    2009

  34. [34]

    G., & Pen, U

    Wucknitz, O., Spitler, L. G., & Pen, U. L. 2021, A&A, 645, A44 Article number, page 7 A&A proofs:manuscript no. aa Appendix A: Third-party software The third-party software used in argosim are listed in Table A.1 with the associated versions, and references. The table includes the packages required for running the GUI, building the documentation, formatti...

    2021