pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.26551 · v1 · pith:HAOMG7SCnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · 💻 cs.CV

PhyEditBench: A Real-World Multi-Stage Benchmark for Physics-Aware Image Editing

Shengbin Guo , Shaokang He , Chaoyue Meng , Shengpeng Xiao , Xunzhi Xiang , Shaofeng Zhang , Qi Fan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 05:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords physics-aware image editingbenchmarkPhyEditBenchphysics reasoningimage editingvideo generationreal-world instancesPhyWorld
0
0 comments X

The pith

Existing image editing models show major gaps in physics reasoning, as revealed by a new benchmark of real-world video instances, while a training-free baseline that treats video generation as reasoning outperforms them.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces PhyEditBench to measure whether instruction-based image editing models can handle physical dynamics in realistic scenes. It organizes 238 high-resolution instances drawn from videos into four primary classes and twelve subclasses, plus thirty-five synthetic cases that violate physics. Empirical tests of current top methods find they frequently produce edits that break physical rules such as conservation of momentum or object permanence. The authors also present PhyWorld, a method that applies test-time scaling and latent reduction to let the video generation process act as an intermediate reasoning step, and this baseline records higher performance than comparable models on the same benchmark.

Core claim

PhyEditBench shows that state-of-the-art instruction-based image editing methods have substantial limitations in physics-based reasoning when applied to authentic real-world dynamics. The benchmark supplies video-derived instances that capture genuine physical processes, and the training-free PhyWorld baseline demonstrates that the video generation process itself can function as an effective reasoning mechanism for producing more physically consistent edits.

What carries the argument

PhyEditBench benchmark with its hierarchical taxonomy of physics phenomena and video-extracted instances, together with the PhyWorld method that uses test-time scaling and latent reduction to treat video generation as a reasoning step for image editing.

If this is right

  • Current state-of-the-art editing methods exhibit substantial limitations in physics-based reasoning on real-world cases.
  • PhyWorld outperforms comparable models on the benchmark without requiring additional training.
  • The video generation process can serve as a reasoning mechanism that improves physical fidelity in image edits.
  • Benchmarks focused on physics phenomena are needed to expose and address these limitations in editing models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editing systems that draw on video priors may reduce unphysical artifacts in tasks involving motion or causality.
  • The benchmark could be used to measure how well models handle edits that require predicting physical outcomes over multiple steps.
  • Integrating temporal consistency checks from video generation might become a standard component of future editing pipelines.

Load-bearing premise

The 238 video-derived instances are assumed to capture authentic physical dynamics and the taxonomy of four classes and twelve subclasses is assumed to cover the physics aspects that matter for real-world editing.

What would settle it

A controlled test in which the same input image and instruction are edited by multiple models and the outputs are compared against the actual next frames of the source videos for measurable physical consistency, such as correct object trajectories after a collision.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26551 by Chaoyue Meng, Qi Fan, Shaofeng Zhang, Shaokang He, Shengbin Guo, Shengpeng Xiao, Xunzhi Xiang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: High-quality, high-resolution, real-world examples from PhyEditBench, which encompasses a diverse range of complex physical processes. Abstract. While instruction-based image editing, enabled by multi￾modal generative models, has advanced significantly, existing bench￾marks lack comprehensive evaluation of physics-based reasoning—a criti￾cal capability for handling real-world scenarios. To address this, we… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) shows our benchmark taxonomy and data volume. (b) illustrates the data construction pipeline. This profound temporal and physical understanding presents a novel pathway for solving complex image editing tasks. Instead of treating editing as a static, single-step pixel transformation, recent state-of-the-art approaches have begun to formulate image editing as a temporal generation process. Methods such … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) shows the form of normal data points, including pictures, editing instruc￾tions, explanations, and invariants. (b) depicts the data point form of anti-physics, including original images, editing instructions that violate physics, and expected phe￾nomena. (c) illustrates our benchmark scoring pipeline. Fluid Dynamics. This class focuses on complex liquid motion and multi-phase phenomena, where realistic… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Overview of the proposed PhyWorld pipeline. The editing process begins by ini￾tializing multiple Gaussian noise samples. During generation, a latent reduction strat￾egy dynamically drops intermediate frames to compress the sequence and improve efficiency. Finally, a Video Reward Model evaluates all generated candidates, selecting the optimal sequence whose final frame is then extracted as the editing resul… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative comparison on physical reasoning tasks across five distinct cate￾gories. Each row presents two editing variations (Type A/E). PhyWorld demonstrates superior physical plausibility and closer alignment with ground truth, notably excelling in the anti-physics scenario. 5.2 Main Results Overall Performance. The empirical findings summarized in Tab. 2 encompass performance across both normal and ant… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Correlation between human and VLM evaluations across different physical stages and metrics. We report the Kendall τ rank correlation coefficient on four metrics. and physical plausibility reaches up to 0.65 and 0.56, respectively, during the final output stage, logically increasing as the physical transformations become more visually pronounced. Furthermore, the evaluator maintains robust agreement when as… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

While instruction-based image editing, enabled by multi-modal generative models, has advanced significantly, existing benchmarks lack a comprehensive evaluation of physics-based reasoning, a critical capability for handling real-world scenarios. To address this, we introduce PhyEditBench, a benchmark designed to assess the physical understanding of editing models. Guided by a hierarchical taxonomy, we establish 4 primary classes and 12 subclasses. It comprises 238 high-quality, high-resolution, real-world instances meticulously extracted from videos to capture authentic physical dynamics, alongside 35 synthetic Anti-Physics instances. Our empirical analysis of current SOTA editing methods exposes substantial limitations in their physics-based reasoning. We further propose a training-free baseline named PhyWorld that uses test-time scaling and a latent reduction strategy. PhyWorld outperforms comparable models and suggests that the video generation process can effectively serve as a reasoning mechanism for image editing. The project page is available at https://github.com/Previsior/PhyEditBench.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces PhyEditBench, a benchmark for assessing physics-based reasoning in instruction-based image editing. Guided by a 4-primary/12-subclass hierarchical taxonomy, it comprises 238 high-resolution real-world instances extracted from videos plus 35 synthetic Anti-Physics cases. Empirical analysis of SOTA methods is said to reveal substantial limitations in physics reasoning; the authors also propose PhyWorld, a training-free baseline using test-time scaling and latent reduction, which outperforms comparables and suggests video generation can serve as an image-editing reasoning mechanism.

Significance. A rigorously validated benchmark of this kind would be significant for exposing gaps in current generative models' handling of real-world physics (momentum, gravity, etc.) and for motivating new reasoning strategies such as PhyWorld's video-generation approach. The work supplies a new dataset and baseline rather than a parameter-free derivation or machine-checked proof, so its value hinges entirely on the fidelity of the 238 instances and the reported performance gaps.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the 238 instances were 'meticulously extracted from videos to capture authentic physical dynamics' supplies no selection criteria, exclusion rules for non-physics confounders, inter-rater reliability statistics, or validation that the prompts isolate dynamics (e.g., momentum, gravity) from mere appearance change. This is load-bearing for the assertion that observed performance gaps reflect physics deficits rather than benchmark artifacts.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the statements that analysis 'exposes substantial limitations' and that 'PhyWorld outperforms comparable models' are unsupported by any metrics, statistical tests, instance-selection details, or error analysis, preventing verification that the central empirical claims hold.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: the 4-primary/12-subclass taxonomy is presented without coverage analysis or justification that it comprehensively addresses the physics aspects relevant to real-world image editing, undermining the claim that the benchmark is a faithful diagnostic.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the GitHub link is given but no statement appears on data release, licensing, or reproducibility of the 238 instances and evaluation protocol.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on the abstract. We address each major comment below and will revise the abstract to improve clarity and self-containment while preserving its concise nature.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the 238 instances were 'meticulously extracted from videos to capture authentic physical dynamics' supplies no selection criteria, exclusion rules for non-physics confounders, inter-rater reliability statistics, or validation that the prompts isolate dynamics (e.g., momentum, gravity) from mere appearance change. This is load-bearing for the assertion that observed performance gaps reflect physics deficits rather than benchmark artifacts.

    Authors: The full manuscript (Section 3.2) details the video extraction protocol, including explicit selection criteria focused on verifiable physical events, rules excluding appearance-only or camera-induced changes, and inter-rater validation. We agree the abstract should reference these elements briefly and will revise it to do so. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statements that analysis 'exposes substantial limitations' and that 'PhyWorld outperforms comparable models' are unsupported by any metrics, statistical tests, instance-selection details, or error analysis, preventing verification that the central empirical claims hold.

    Authors: Section 4 of the manuscript reports the full quantitative results, including per-class metrics, statistical comparisons, and error breakdowns. We will revise the abstract to include one or two key performance figures and a reference to the analysis to make the summary claims verifiable at a glance. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the 4-primary/12-subclass taxonomy is presented without coverage analysis or justification that it comprehensively addresses the physics aspects relevant to real-world image editing, undermining the claim that the benchmark is a faithful diagnostic.

    Authors: Section 3.1 motivates the taxonomy from a survey of physics phenomena in editing tasks and provides coverage rationale with examples. We will add a concise justification sentence to the abstract to address this point directly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: benchmark construction and empirical comparison are self-contained

full rationale

The paper describes construction of PhyEditBench via video extraction and taxonomy, plus a training-free baseline PhyWorld, with empirical comparisons to SOTA methods. No equations, parameter fitting, derivations, or self-citations appear in the provided text. The central claims rest on the benchmark instances and observed performance gaps rather than any reduction to inputs by construction. This matches the default expectation of an honest non-finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters, new physical laws, or invented entities. It relies on the domain assumption that realistic image editing requires explicit physics reasoning and that video-derived instances provide ground truth for such reasoning.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Image editing models must demonstrate understanding of physical laws to produce realistic outputs in real-world scenarios.
    This premise underpins both the benchmark design and the claim that current models have substantial limitations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5715 in / 1286 out tokens · 35620 ms · 2026-06-26T05:26:15.920635+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 21 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 (2023) 3

    Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F.L., Almeida, D., Altenschmidt, J., Altman, S., Anadkat, S., et al.: Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 (2023) 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    In: European conference on computer vi- sion

    Bar-Tal, O., Ofri-Amar, D., Fridman, R., Kasten, Y., Dekel, T.: Text2live: Text- driven layered image and video editing. In: European conference on computer vi- sion. pp. 707–723. Springer (2022) 2

    2022

  3. [3]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.08261 (2021) 4, 6

    Bear, D.M., Wang, E., Mrowca, D., Binder, F.J., Tung, H.Y.F., Pramod, R., Hold- away, C., Tao, S., Smith, K., Sun, F.Y., et al.: Physion: Evaluating physical predic- tion from vision in humans and machines. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.08261 (2021) 4, 6

    arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127 (2023) 2, 4, 6

    Blattmann, A., Dockhorn, T., Kulal, S., Mendelevitch, D., Kilian, M., Lorenz, D., Levi, Y., English, Z., Voleti, V., Letts, A., et al.: Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127 (2023) 2, 4, 6

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Brooks, T., Holynski, A., Efros, A.A.: Instructpix2pix: Learning to follow image editing instructions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 18392–18402 (2023) 2, 3, 11

    2023

  6. [6]

    OpenAI Technical Report (2024),https://openai.com/research/ video-generation-models-as-world-simulators2, 4, 6

    Brooks, T., Peebles, B., Holmes, C., DePue, W., Guo, Y., Jing, L., Schnurr, D., Ramesh, A., Klar, M., Sohl-Dickstein, J., et al.: Video generation models as world simulators. OpenAI Technical Report (2024),https://openai.com/research/ video-generation-models-as-world-simulators2, 4, 6

    2024

  7. [7]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.24551 (2025) 4

    Cai, Y., Li, K., Jia, M., Wang, J., Sun, J., Liang, F., Chen, W., Juefei-Xu, F., Wang, C., Thabet, A., et al.: Phygdpo: Physics-aware groupwise direct prefer- ence optimization for physically consistent text-to-video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.24551 (2025) 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.10592 (2026) 4

    Chen, D., Kasarla, T., Bang, Y., Shukor, M., Chung, W., Yu, J., Bolourchi, A., Moutakanni, T., Fung, P.: Action100m: A large-scale video action dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.10592 (2026) 4

    arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Chen, Z., Zhou, Q., Shen, Y., Hong, Y., Sun, Z., Gutfreund, D., Gan, C.: Visual chain-of-thought prompting for knowledge-based visual reasoning. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 38, pp. 1254–1262 (2024) 6

    2024

  10. [10]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06261 (2025) 2, 11

    Comanici, G., Bieber, E., Schaekermann, M., Pasupat, I., Sachdeva, N., Dhillon, I., Blistein, M., Ram, O., Zhang, D., Rosen, E., et al.: Gemini 2.5: Pushing the frontier with advanced reasoning, multimodality, long context, and next generation agentic capabilities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06261 (2025) 2, 11

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14683 (2025) 2, 11

    Deng, C., Zhu, D., Li, K., Gou, C., Li, F., Wang, Z., Zhong, S., Yu, W., Nie, X., Song, Z., et al.: Emerging properties in unified multimodal pretraining. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14683 (2025) 2, 11

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Esser, P., Chiu, J., Atighehchian, P., Granskog, J., Germanidis, A.: Structure and content-guided video synthesis with diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 7346–7356 (2023) 2

    2023

  13. [13]

    Nature Machine In- telligence2(11), 665–673 (2020) 7

    Geirhos, R., Jacobsen, J.H., Michaelis, C., Zemel, R., Brendel, W., Bethge, M., Wichmann, F.A.: Shortcut learning in deep neural networks. Nature Machine In- telligence2(11), 665–673 (2020) 7

    2020

  14. [14]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36, 52132–52152 (2023) 2 16 S

    Ghosh, D., Hajishirzi, H., Schmidt, L.: Geneval: An object-focused framework for evaluating text-to-image alignment. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36, 52132–52152 (2023) 2 16 S. Guo et al

    2023

  15. [15]

    something something

    Goyal, R., Ebrahimi Kahou, S., Michalski, V., Materzynska, J., Westphal, S., Kim, H., Haenel, V., Fruend, I., Yianilos, P., Mueller-Freitag, M., et al.: The" something something" video database for learning and evaluating visual common sense. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. pp. 5842– 5850 (2017) 4

    2017

  16. [16]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.03596 (2025) 3

    Han, F., Jiao, Y., Chen, S., Xu, J., Chen, J., Jiang, Y.G.: Controlthinker: Unveiling latent semantics for controllable image generation through visual reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.03596 (2025) 3

    arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.01295 (2025) 2, 3, 4, 8

    Han, F., Wang, Y., Li, C., Liang, Z., Wang, D., Jiao, Y., Wei, Z., Gong, C., Jin, C., Chen, J., et al.: Unireditbench: A unified reasoning-based image editing benchmark. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.01295 (2025) 2, 3, 4, 8

    arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.17618 (2025) 3, 9, 10

    He, H., Liang, J., Wang, X., Wan, P., Zhang, D., Gai, K., Pan, L.: Scaling image and video generation via test-time evolutionary search. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.17618 (2025) 3, 9, 10

    arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.24165 (2025) 2

    He, Z., Qu, X., Li, Y., Zhu, T., Huang, S., Cheng, Y.: Diffthinker: Towards genera- tive multimodal reasoning with diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.24165 (2025) 2

    arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01626 (2022) 2

    Hertz, A., Mokady, R., Tenenbaum, J., Aberman, K., Pritch, Y., Cohen-Or, D.: Prompt-to-prompt image editing with cross attention control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01626 (2022) 2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Huang, Y., Xie, L., Wang, X., Yuan, Z., Cun, X., Ge, Y., Zhou, J., Dong, C., Huang,R.,Zhang,R.,etal.:Smartedit:Exploringcomplexinstruction-basedimage editing with multimodal large language models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 8362–8371 (2024) 3

    2024

  22. [22]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21276 (2024) 2, 11

    Hurst, A., Lerer, A., Goucher, A.P., Perelman, A., Ramesh, A., Clark, A., Os- trow, A., Welihinda, A., Hayes, A., Radford, A., et al.: Gpt-4o system card. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21276 (2024) 2, 11

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.23568 (2025) 2

    Jiao, S., Lin, Y., Zhong, Y., She, Q., Zhou, W., Lan, X., Huang, Z., Yu, F., Yu, Y., Zhao, Y., et al.: Thinkgen: Generalized thinking for visual generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.23568 (2025) 2

    arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Kawar, B., Zada, S., Lang, O., Tov, O., Chang, H., Dekel, T., Mosseri, I., Irani, M.: Imagic: Text-based real image editing with diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 6007–6017 (2023) 2

    2023

  25. [25]

    Biometrika33(3), 239– 251 (1945) 13

    Kendall, M.G.: The treatment of ties in ranking problems. Biometrika33(3), 239– 251 (1945) 13

    1945

  26. [26]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.14125 (2023) 2, 4

    Kondratyuk, D., Yu, L., Gu, X., Lezama, J., Huang, J., Schindler, G., Hornung, R., Birodkar, V., Yan, J., Chiu, M.C., et al.: Videopoet: A large language model for zero-shot video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.14125 (2023) 2, 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    1 kontext: Flow match- ing for in-context image generation and editing in latent space

    Labs, B.F., Batifol, S., Blattmann, A., Boesel, F., Consul, S., Diagne, C., Dock- horn, T., English, J., English, Z., Esser, P., et al.: Flux. 1 kontext: Flow match- ing for in-context image generation and editing in latent space. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15742 (2025) 2, 11

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03467 (2026) 2

    Li, H., Jiang, L., Yan, Q., Song, Y., Kang, H., Liu, Z., Lu, X., Wu, B., Cai, D.: Thinkrl-edit: Thinking in reinforcement learning for reasoning-centric image editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03467 (2026) 2

    arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.05965 (2025) 2, 3 PhyEditBench 17

    Li, H., Zhang, M., Zheng, D., Guo, Z., Jia, Y., Feng, K., Yu, H., Liu, Y., Feng, Y., Pei, P., et al.: Editthinker: Unlocking iterative reasoning for any image editor. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.05965 (2025) 2, 3 PhyEditBench 17

    arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.13276 (2025) 2

    Li, Y., Liu, L., Zhang, X., Xue, W., Luo, W., Guo, Y., Tian, Q.: Cogniedit: Dense gradient flow optimization for fine-grained image editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.13276 (2025) 2

    arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.16888 (2025) 2, 11

    Li, Z., Liu, Z., Zhang, Q., Lin, B., Wu, F., Yuan, S., Yan, Z., Ye, Y., Yu, W., Niu, Y., et al.: Uniworld-v2: Reinforce image editing with diffusion negative-aware finetuning and mllm implicit feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.16888 (2025) 2, 11

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Liu, H., Li, C., Li, Y., Lee, Y.J.: Improved baselines with visual instruction tun- ing. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 26296–26306 (2024) 3

    2024

  33. [33]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.13918 (2025) 3, 9, 10

    Liu, J., Liu, G., Liang, J., Yuan, Z., Liu, X., Zheng, M., Wu, X., Wang, Q., Qin, W., Xia, M., et al.: Improving video generation with human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.13918 (2025) 3, 9, 10

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.17761 (2025) 2, 11

    Liu, S., Han, Y., Xing, P., Yin, F., Wang, R., Cheng, W., Liao, J., Wang, Y., Fu, H., Han, C., et al.: Step1x-edit: A practical framework for general image editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.17761 (2025) 2, 11

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Marcus, G.: The next decade in ai: Four steps towards robust artificial intelligence. arxiv. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.06177 (2020) 7

    arXiv 2002

  36. [36]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.01073 (2021) 2

    Meng, C., He, Y., Song, Y., Song, J., Wu, J., Zhu, J.Y., Ermon, S.: Sdedit: Guided image synthesis and editing with stochastic differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.01073 (2021) 2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Mokady, R., Hertz, A., Aberman, K., Pritch, Y., Cohen-Or, D.: Null-text inver- sion for editing real images using guided diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 6038–6047 (2023) 2

    2023

  38. [38]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.00387 (2025) 2, 3, 4, 8

    Pan, K., Chen, W., Qiu, H., Yu, Q., Bu, W., Wang, Z., Zhu, Y., Li, J., Tang, S.: Wiseedit: Benchmarking cognition-and creativity-informed image editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.00387 (2025) 2, 3, 4, 8

    arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Peebles,W.,Xie,S.:Scalablediffusionmodelswithtransformers.In:Proceedingsof the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 4195–4205 (2023) 3

    2023

  40. [40]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.05606 (2025) 2

    Qin, L., Gong, J., Sun, Y., Li, T., Yang, M., Yang, X., Qu, C., Tan, Z., Li, H.: Uni-cot: Towards unified chain-of-thought reasoning across text and vision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.05606 (2025) 2

    arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125 1(2), 3 (2022) 2, 4

    Ramesh, A., Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A., Chu, C., Chen, M.: Hierarchical text- conditional image generation with clip latents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125 1(2), 3 (2022) 2, 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., Ommer, B.: High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 10684–10695 (2022) 2, 3

    2022

  43. [43]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Rotstein, N., Yona, G., Silver, D., Velich, R., Bensaïd, D., Kimmel, R.: Pathways on the image manifold: Image editing via video generation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 7857– 7866 (2025) 2, 5, 9, 11

    2025

  44. [44]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.20427 (2025) 2, 11

    Seedream, T., Chen, Y., Gao, Y., Gong, L., Guo, M., Guo, Q., Guo, Z., Hou, X., Huang, W., Huang, Y., et al.: Seedream 4.0: Toward next-generation multimodal image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.20427 (2025) 2, 11

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Cognitive science14(1), 29–56 (1990) 6 18 S

    Spelke, E.S.: Principles of object perception. Cognitive science14(1), 29–56 (1990) 6 18 S. Guo et al

    1990

  46. [46]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805 (2023) 3

    Team, G., Anil, R., Borgeaud, S., Alayrac, J.B., Yu, J., Soricut, R., Schalkwyk, J., Dai, A.M., Hauth, A., Millican, K., et al.: Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805 (2023) 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Team, Q.: Qwen3.5: Accelerating productivity with native multimodal agents (February 2026),https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.59

    2026

  48. [48]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition

    Thrush, T., Jiang, R., Bartolo, M., Singh, A., Williams, A., Kiela, D., Ross, C.: Winoground: Probing vision and language models for visio-linguistic composition- ality. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition. pp. 5238–5248 (2022) 7

    2022

  49. [49]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.09611 (2025) 2

    Tian, Y., Yang, L., Yang, J., Wang, A., Tian, Y., Zheng, J., Wang, H., Teng, Z., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., et al.: Mmada-parallel: Multimodal large diffusion language models for thinking-aware editing and generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.09611 (2025) 2

    arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.10061 (2026) 5

    Tong, C., Chang, M., Zhang, S., Wang, Y., Liang, C., Zhao, Z., An, R., Zeng, B., Shi, Y., Dai, Y., et al.: Cof-t2i: Video models as pure visual reasoners for text-to- image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.10061 (2026) 5

    arXiv 2026

  51. [51]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314 (2025) 2, 4, 10

    Wan, T., Wang, A., Ai, B., Wen, B., Mao, C., Xie, C.W., Chen, D., Yu, F., Zhao, H., Yang, J., Zeng, J., Wang, J., Zhang, J., Zhou, J., Wang, J., Chen, J., Zhu, K., Zhao, K., Yan, K., Huang, L., Feng, M., Zhang, N., Li, P., Wu, P., Chu, R., Feng, R., Zhang, S., Sun, S., Fang, T., Wang, T., Gui, T., Weng, T., Shen, T., Lin, W., Wang, W., Wang, W., Zhou, W.,...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.11483 (2025) 2

    Wang, K., Chen, R., Zheng, T., Huang, H.: Imagent: A unified multi- modal agent framework for test-time scalable image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.11483 (2025) 2

    arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Advances in neural information processing systems35, 24824–24837 (2022) 6

    Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q.V., Zhou, D., et al.: Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in neural information processing systems35, 24824–24837 (2022) 6

    2022

  54. [54]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02324 (2025) 2, 11

    Wu, C., Li, J., Zhou, J., Lin, J., Gao, K., Yan, K., Yin, S.m., Bai, S., Xu, X., Chen, Y., et al.: Qwen-image technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02324 (2025) 2, 11

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.18871 (2025) 2, 11

    Wu, C., Zheng, P., Yan, R., Xiao, S., Luo, X., Wang, Y., Li, W., Jiang, X., Liu, Y., Zhou, J., et al.: Omnigen2: Exploration to advanced multimodal generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.18871 (2025) 2, 11

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.04290 (2025) 2, 5, 9, 10, 11

    Wu, J.Z., Ren, X., Shen, T., Cao, T., He, K., Lu, Y., Gao, R., Xie, E., Lan, S., Alvarez, J.M., et al.: Chronoedit: Towards temporal reasoning for image editing and world simulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.04290 (2025) 2, 5, 9, 10, 11

    arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.16707 (2025) 2, 3, 4, 8

    Wu, Y., Li, Z., Hu, X., Ye, X., Zeng, X., Yu, G., Zhu, W., Schiele, B., Yang, M.H., Yang, X.: Kris-bench: Benchmarking next-level intelligent image editing models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.16707 (2025) 2, 3, 4, 8

    arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20275 (2025) 2

    Ye, Y., He, X., Li, Z., Lin, B., Yuan, S., Yan, Z., Hou, B., Yuan, L.: Imgedit: A unified image editing dataset and benchmark. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20275 (2025) 2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.01442 (2019) 4, 6, 7 PhyEditBench 19

    Yi, K., Gan, C., Li, Y., Kohli, P., Wu, J., Torralba, A., Tenenbaum, J.B.: Clevrer: Collision events for video representation and reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.01442 (2019) 4, 6, 7 PhyEditBench 19

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1910

  60. [60]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.22625 (2025) 2

    Yin, F., Liu, S., Han, Y., Wang, Z., Xing, P., Wang, R., Cheng, W., Wang, Y., Li, A., Yin, Z., et al.: Reasonedit: Towards reasoning-enhanced image editing models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.22625 (2025) 2

    arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.21309 (2025) 4

    Yuan, Y., Wang, X., Wickremasinghe, T., Nadir, Z., Ma, B., Chan, S.H.: Newton- gen: Physics-consistent and controllable text-to-video generation via neural new- tonian dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.21309 (2025) 4

    arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.04532 (2025) 4

    Zhan, Y.W., Wang, X., Chen, H., Feng, T., Feng, W., Wang, R., Li, G., Li, Q., Zhu, W.: Phyvllm: Physics-guided video language model with motion-appearance disentanglement. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.04532 (2025) 4

    arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems36, 31428–31449 (2023) 2, 3

    Zhang, K., Mo, L., Chen, W., Sun, H., Su, Y.: Magicbrush: A manually annotated dataset for instruction-guided image editing. Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems36, 31428–31449 (2023) 2, 3

    2023

  64. [64]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision

    Zhang, T., Yu, H.X., Wu, R., Feng, B.Y., Zheng, C., Snavely, N., Wu, J., Freeman, W.T.: Physdreamer: Physics-based interaction with 3d objects via video genera- tion. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 388–406. Springer (2024) 4

    2024

  65. [65]

    Zhang, Z., Chen, Z., Yang, Z., Yang, Y.: Are image-to-video models good zero-shot image editors? arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.19435 (2025) 2

    arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.02826 (2025) 2, 3, 4, 8

    Zhao, X., Zhang, P., Tang, K., Zhu, X., Li, H., Chai, W., Zhang, Z., Xia, R., Zhai, G., Yan, J., et al.: Envisioning beyond the pixels: Benchmarking reasoning- informed visual editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.02826 (2025) 2, 3, 4, 8

    arXiv 2025