pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.26780 · v1 · pith:K53HKZLUnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · 💻 cs.CV · eess.IV

Event-based Gaze Control System for Accurate Real-time Spin Estimation in Professional Ball Games

Yunpu Hu , Fabian Schilling , Valentina Cavinato , Asude Aydin , Agis Politis , Ricardo Tapiador Morales , Kirk Y.W. Scheper , Peter D\"urr
show 1 more author
Naoya Takahashi
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 05:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV eess.IV
keywords event-based visionspin estimationball trackingcontrast maximizationtable tennisactive visionreal-time processing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Event-based system with active mirrors estimates ball spin in real time at 750 Hz during professional matches.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an event camera system that uses fast-moving mirrors and a tunable lens to keep a fast-spinning ball in view and focused. It introduces an offline contrast-maximization method on the sphere that reaches high accuracy on static balls from several sports. An online version uses a neural network trained on the offline results to deliver low-latency spin estimates during live table tennis games. This matters because spin determines ball flight paths yet has been difficult to measure without special markings or high-speed equipment.

Core claim

The offline s-CMax method achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on static balls across multiple sports with mean magnitude and axis errors of 2.1% and 4.0 degrees. The online method, using an uncertainty-aware CNN trained on pseudo-ground-truth labels from the offline approach plus GPU-accelerated contrast maximization, achieves 8.8% magnitude and 6.4 degrees axis mismatch with 3 ms latency and 750 Hz throughput in professional table tennis matches.

What carries the argument

Contrast maximization on the sphere (s-CMax) that aligns event data to estimate rotation parameters, combined with an uncertainty-aware convolutional neural network for real-time inference and hybrid 2D/3D tracking using event detection and external localization.

If this is right

  • Spin estimation becomes feasible without modifying the ball or using special lighting.
  • Real-time spin data at 750 Hz can support immediate analysis during matches.
  • The system works across table tennis, baseball, tennis, and golf in offline mode.
  • Low 3 ms latency enables potential integration into coaching or broadcasting tools.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Combining the spin estimates with existing ball trajectory systems could improve flight prediction models.
  • The active gaze control approach might extend to other fast-moving objects like drones or vehicles.
  • Training the network on more diverse data could reduce the gap between offline and online accuracy.

Load-bearing premise

The spin labels generated by the offline contrast-maximization method are accurate enough to serve as training targets for the online network without introducing errors that would affect real-time performance.

What would settle it

Running the online system on a dataset of table tennis rallies where independent high-speed camera recordings provide direct ground-truth spin values and checking if the reported error levels hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26780 by Agis Politis, Asude Aydin, Fabian Schilling, Kirk Y.W. Scheper, Naoya Takahashi, Peter D\"urr, Ricardo Tapiador Morales, Valentina Cavinato, Yunpu Hu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The gaze control system (GCS) actively tracks the ball and measures its spin in ball games. 1 Introduction Spin plays a key role in many ball sports due to its effect on the ball’s flight and contact dynamics. Athletes routinely apply spin to control the ball’s flight path, deceive opponents, or gain a tactical advantage. Accurate spin estimation is thus of vital importance for performance analysis, sports… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of the information flow in the GCS. the event stream to set velocity constraints. However, all existing event-based methods employ static, wide-angle cameras, which severely limits the spatial resolution on the ball and conflates translational motion with spin, a funda￾mental challenge for in-flight estimation. Our work addresses both limitations through active tracking with a telephoto lens, prop… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The effect of different ball types on the s-CMax magnitude and axis error. The bottom row shows a time surface representation of the different balls when their pattern is visible, spinning at 1 krpm. We recorded a dataset with different balls in a sidespin configuration with a total of 19 raw event files, 9 files with the table tennis ball from 1-9 krpm, 4 files for the golf and tennis ball from 1-4 krpm, … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: CNN magnitude and axis errors on the held-out test set for different uncertainty percentiles and magnitude ranges. 5 Conclusion We presented an event-based active vision system for real-time ball tracking and spin estimation, combining an event camera with a focus-tunable telephoto lens and fast galvanometer mirrors to obtain a magnified, motion-compensated view of unmodified balls in flight. The hybrid tr… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Spin plays a crucial role in many ball sports due to its effect on the trajectory of the ball. Vision-based estimation of the ball's spin during a game with conventional cameras is challenging due to the ball's small size, high speed, and fast rotation. To address these challenges, we propose an event-based active vision system that can track unmodified balls and measure their spin in real-time. The system consists of an event camera for its high temporal resolution and minimal motion blur, high-speed pan/tilt galvanometer mirrors to keep the ball in the field of view, and a low-latency focus-tunable telephoto lens to increase the spatial resolution on the ball and keep it in focus. To track the ball, we use a hybrid approach that combines 2D event-based detection for centering and 3D positions from a ball localization system for re-initialization. For high-accuracy spin estimation, we propose an offline method that performs contrast maximization on the sphere (s-CMax). This method achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on static balls across multiple sports (table tennis, baseball, tennis, and golf), with mean magnitude and axis errors of 2.1% and 4.0 degrees, respectively. We then develop a low-latency online method for table tennis as a case study in real-time applications. This method uses an uncertainty-aware convolutional neural network trained on pseudo-ground-truth spin labels from the offline approach, combined with a GPU-accelerated batch implementation of contrast maximization for refinement. We demonstrate reliable tracking and spin estimation with a three-view setup during professional table tennis matches, with high accuracy (8.8% magnitude and 6.4 degrees axis mismatch), 3 ms latency, and 750 Hz throughput.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents an event-based active vision system combining an event camera, high-speed pan/tilt galvanometer mirrors, and a focus-tunable telephoto lens for real-time ball tracking and spin estimation in sports. An offline contrast-maximization method on the sphere (s-CMax) is claimed to achieve state-of-the-art accuracy (2.1% magnitude error, 4.0° axis error) on static balls across table tennis, baseball, tennis, and golf. An online uncertainty-aware CNN trained on s-CMax pseudo-ground-truth labels, with GPU-accelerated refinement, is demonstrated on professional table tennis matches yielding 8.8% magnitude and 6.4° axis mismatch at 3 ms latency and 750 Hz throughput.

Significance. If the offline labels prove unbiased under dynamic conditions, the work would provide a practical hardware-software pipeline for high-throughput spin measurement in unmodified professional games, addressing longstanding challenges of motion blur and small ball size with event sensing and active gaze control. The hybrid 2D/3D tracking and real-match demonstration add engineering value for sports analytics applications.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The s-CMax accuracy figures (2.1% magnitude, 4.0° axis) are reported exclusively for static balls, yet these same labels serve as pseudo-ground-truth both to train the online CNN and to compute the live-match mismatch (8.8% magnitude, 6.4° axis). No separate error characterization of s-CMax is supplied for high linear velocity, changing distance, or event sparsity typical of game conditions, directly undermining the reliability of the reported online accuracy.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The online accuracy is quantified as 'mismatch' to the offline pipeline rather than to independent ground truth; because the CNN is trained directly on s-CMax labels, the numerical result is at least partly circular and cannot be interpreted as an external validation of real-time performance.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: No dataset sizes, error-bar methodology, ablation studies, or derivation details are provided for either the static-ball s-CMax results or the live-match CNN evaluation, preventing assessment of statistical significance or robustness of the central quantitative claims.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The distinction between 'error' (static) and 'mismatch' (live) is important but should be stated more explicitly when the numbers are first introduced.
  2. Hardware throughput (750 Hz) and latency (3 ms) figures would benefit from a brief description of the measurement protocol or timing diagram.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for highlighting important aspects of our validation strategy. We address each major comment below with clarifications and planned revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The s-CMax accuracy figures (2.1% magnitude, 4.0° axis) are reported exclusively for static balls, yet these same labels serve as pseudo-ground-truth both to train the online CNN and to compute the live-match mismatch (8.8% magnitude, 6.4° axis). No separate error characterization of s-CMax is supplied for high linear velocity, changing distance, or event sparsity typical of game conditions, directly undermining the reliability of the reported online accuracy.

    Authors: We agree that s-CMax was characterized only on static balls and that its behavior under dynamic game conditions (high velocity, varying distance, event sparsity) lacks separate quantification. Independent ground truth for spinning balls in unmodified professional play is difficult to acquire. We will revise the abstract and add a dedicated limitations paragraph discussing potential biases and how static results may extrapolate, while retaining the pseudo-ground-truth approach as the most practical option. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The online accuracy is quantified as 'mismatch' to the offline pipeline rather than to independent ground truth; because the CNN is trained directly on s-CMax labels, the numerical result is at least partly circular and cannot be interpreted as an external validation of real-time performance.

    Authors: The reported 8.8 % / 6.4° figures are the final output after the GPU-accelerated contrast-maximization refinement step applied to the CNN prediction. This refinement is not identical to the offline s-CMax pipeline. Nevertheless, we acknowledge the result remains relative rather than externally validated. We will edit the abstract and results section to explicitly label the metric as “mismatch to the offline reference after refinement” and discuss its interpretation. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: No dataset sizes, error-bar methodology, ablation studies, or derivation details are provided for either the static-ball s-CMax results or the live-match CNN evaluation, preventing assessment of statistical significance or robustness of the central quantitative claims.

    Authors: We will supply the missing information in the revised manuscript: number of static-ball trials per sport, exact error aggregation procedure (including any standard deviations), ablation results on the spherical contrast-maximization formulation, a concise derivation of the s-CMax objective, and the number of frames/matches used for the live-match evaluation together with the aggregation method. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Online CNN accuracy reported as mismatch to offline s-CMax pseudo-ground-truth labels used for its own training

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "This method uses an uncertainty-aware convolutional neural network trained on pseudo-ground-truth spin labels from the offline approach, combined with a GPU-accelerated batch implementation of contrast maximization for refinement. We demonstrate reliable tracking and spin estimation with a three-view setup during professional table tennis matches, with high accuracy (8.8% magnitude and 6.4 degrees axis mismatch)"

    The CNN is trained on spin labels produced by the offline s-CMax pipeline; the numerical accuracy claimed for the online method is the mismatch between online outputs and those same offline labels. This makes the live performance metric statistically dependent on the offline estimator by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central online performance numbers (8.8% magnitude / 6.4° axis) are computed directly against the same offline s-CMax outputs that supply the training targets. Because no independent external ground-truth is supplied for the dynamic match data, the reported 'accuracy' figure reduces to a measure of how well the CNN reproduces its own training source rather than an independent measurement. The offline s-CMax itself is presented with separate static-ball validation, so the circularity is partial and confined to the online pipeline.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central claims rest on the unstated assumption that event patterns on a sphere uniquely determine spin and that the galvanometer-lens hardware can maintain focus and centering at game speeds.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5886 in / 1361 out tokens · 23496 ms · 2026-06-26T05:04:08.245764+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    IEEE Sensors Letters9(3), 1–4 (2025).https://doi.org/ 10.1109/LSENS.2025.3537116, art

    Aakanksha, Kumar, A., Rajagopalan, A.: Ball trajectory and spin analysis from asynchronous videos. IEEE Sensors Letters9(3), 1–4 (2025).https://doi.org/ 10.1109/LSENS.2025.3537116, art. no. 3500704

    work page doi:10.1109/lsens.2025.3537116 2025

  2. [2]

    Event- based visual flow.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 25(2): 407–417, 2013

    Benosman, R., Clercq, C., Lagorce, X., Sio-Hoi Ieng, Bartolozzi, C.: Event- Based Visual Flow. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Sys- tems25(2), 407–417 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2013.2273537, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6589170/

    work page doi:10.1109/tnnls.2013.2273537 2014

  3. [3]

    In: Ranchordas, A., Araújo, H.J., Pereira, J.M., Braz, J

    Boracchi, G., Caglioti, V., Giusti, A.: Estimation of 3D Instantaneous Motion of a Ball from a Single Motion-Blurred Image. In: Ranchordas, A., Araújo, H.J., Pereira, J.M., Braz, J. (eds.) Computer Vision and Computer Graphics. Theory and Applications. pp. 225–237. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2009).https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-642-10226-4_18

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-10226-4_18 2009

  4. [4]

    In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics

    Chen, X., Tian, Y., Huang, Q., Zhang, W., Yu, Z.: Dynamic model based ball trajectory prediction for a robot ping-pong player. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics. pp. 603–608 (Dec 2010).https://doi. org/10.1109/ROBIO.2010.5723394

    work page doi:10.1109/robio.2010.5723394 2010

  5. [5]

    Nature652(8111), 886–891 (Apr 2026).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026- 10338-5,https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10338-5

    Dürr, P., El Gheche, M., Maeda, G.J., Mukai, N., Takahashi, N., Heusser, S., Sahloul, H., Saraiji, Y., Adodin, P., Bi, Y., Blakeman, S., Conti, C., Fuentes Hitos, D., Hu, Y., Khadivar, F., Kreiser, R., Martinez, L., Schilling, F., Tapiador Morales, R., Torrente, G., Ynocente Castro, M., Abecassis, L., Giammarino, A., Huang, Y.T., Nagel, Y., Scotti, A., Si...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-026- 2026

  6. [6]

    In: 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC)

    Finateu, T., Niwa, A., Matolin, D., Tsuchimoto, K., Mascheroni, A., Reynaud, E., Mostafalu, P., Brady, F., Chotard, L., LeGoff, F., Takahashi, H., Wakabayashi, H., Oike, Y., Posch, C.: A 1280×720 Back-Illuminated Stacked Temporal Con- trast Event-Based Vision Sensor with 4.86µm Pixels, 1.066GEPS Readout, Pro- grammable Event-Rate Controller and Compressiv...

    work page doi:10.1109/isscc19947.2020.9063149 2020

  7. [7]

    In: 2009 ICCAS-SICE

    Furuno, S., Kobayashi, K., Okubo, T., Kurihara, Y.: A study on spin-rate measure- ment using a uniquely marked moving ball. In: 2009 ICCAS-SICE. pp. 3439–3442 (Aug 2009)

    2009

  8. [8]

    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 44(1):154–180

    Gallego, G., Delbrück, T., Orchard, G., Bartolozzi, C., Taba, B., Censi, A., Leutenegger, S., Davison, A.J., Conradt, J., Daniilidis, K., Scaramuzza, D.: Event- Based Vision: A Survey. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.44(1), 154–180 (Jan 2022).https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3008413

    work page doi:10.1109/tpami.2020.3008413 2022

  9. [9]

    In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Gallego, G., Gehrig, M., Scaramuzza, D.: Focus Is All You Need: Loss Functions for Event-Based Vision. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 12280–12289 (2019)

    2019

  10. [10]

    In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion

    Gallego, G., Rebecq, H., Scaramuzza, D.: A Unifying Contrast Maximization Framework for Event Cameras, with Applications to Motion, Depth, and Optical Flow Estimation. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion. pp. 3867–3876 (Jun 2018).https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00407 17

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00407 2018

  11. [11]

    IEEE Robot

    Gallego, G., Scaramuzza, D.: Accurate Angular Velocity Estimation With an Event Camera. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett.2(2), 632–639 (Apr 2017).https://doi.org/ 10.1109/LRA.2016.2647639

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2016.2647639 2017

  12. [12]

    Kanzow and D

    Gao, F., Han, L.: Implementing the Nelder-Mead simplex algorithm with adaptive parameters. Computational Optimization and Applications51(1), 259–277 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589- 010- 9329- 3,https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10589-010-9329-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10589- 2012

  13. [13]

    In: IEEE Int

    Glover, J., Kaelbling, L.P.: Tracking the spin on a ping pong ball with the quater- nion Bingham filter. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. pp. 4133–4140. IEEE, Hong Kong, China (May 2014).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2014.6907460

    work page doi:10.1109/icra.2014.6907460 2014

  14. [14]

    In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

    Gossard, T., Krismer, J., Ziegler, A., Tebbe, J., Zell, A.: Table Tennis Ball Spin Estimation with an Event Camera. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. pp. 3347–3356 (2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    Design Initiative for a 10 TeV pCM Wakefield Collider,

    Gossard, T., Tebbe, J., Ziegler, A., Zell, A.: SpinDOE: A ball spin estimation method for table tennis robot (Mar 2023).https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 2303.03879

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Frontiers in Sports and Active Living5, 1113069 (2023)

    Hashimoto, Y., Nagami, T., Yoshitake, S., Nakata, H.: The relationship be- tween pitching parameters and release points of different pitch types in major league baseball players. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living5, 1113069 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1113069,https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/articles/PMC10164925/

    work page doi:10.3389/fspor.2023.1113069 2023

  17. [17]

    Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition

    He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 770–778. IEEE (2016).https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90,https://ieeexplore. ieee.org/document/7780459/

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 2016

  18. [18]

    In: 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Work- shops (CVPRW)

    Hu, Y., Liu, S.C., Delbruck, T.: v2e: From video frames to realistic dvs events. In: 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Work- shops (CVPRW). pp. 1312–1321 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW53098. 2021.00144

    work page doi:10.1109/cvprw53098 2021

  19. [19]

    Vespignani, J

    Huang, Y., Xu, D., Tan, M., Su, H.: Trajectory prediction of spinning ball for ping-pong player robot. In: 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. pp. 3434–3439 (Sep 2011).https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS. 2011.6095044

    work page doi:10.1109/iros 2011

  20. [20]

    In: IEEE Int

    Iida,K.,Oku,H.:SaccadeMirror3:High-speedgazecontrollerwithultrawidegaze control range using triple rotational mirrors. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. pp. 624–629 (May 2016).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487186

    work page doi:10.1109/icra.2016.7487186 2016

  21. [21]

    Malaysian Journal of Movement, Health & Exercise10(1), 48 (2021).https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-9409.328217

    Kashiwagi, R., Okamura, S., Iwanaga, S., Murakami, S., Numata, K., Takahashi, H.: The differences in the ball speed and the spin rate depending on the results of a tennis serve. Malaysian Journal of Movement, Health & Exercise10(1), 48 (2021).https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-9409.328217

    work page doi:10.4103/2231-9409.328217 2021

  22. [22]

    Kendall, A., Gal, Y.: What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision? In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. vol. 30, pp. 5574–5584. Curran Associates, Inc. (2017)

    2017

  23. [23]

    In: 2025 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII)

    Miyashita, L., Ishikawa, M.: Saccade Argos: Hierarchical Robust Tracking System for High Spatio-temporal Resolution Vision. In: 2025 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII). pp. 811–816. IEEE, Munich, Germany (Jan 2025).https://doi.org/10.1109/SII59315.2025.10871046

    work page doi:10.1109/sii59315.2025.10871046 2025

  24. [24]

    In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Muglikar, M., Gehrig, M., Gehrig, D., Scaramuzza, D.: How to Calibrate Your Event Camera. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp.1403–1409.IEEE,Nashville,TN,USA(Jun2021).https://doi.org/10.1109/ CVPRW53098.2021.00155 18

    arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

    Nakabayashi, T., Higa, K., Yamaguchi, M., Fujiwara, R., Saito, H.: Event-based Ball Spin Estimation in Sports. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. pp. 3367–3375 (Jun 2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    In: Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference

    Nakashima, A., Ogawa, Y., Kobayashi, Y., Hayakawa, Y.: Modeling of rebound phenomenon of a rigid ball with friction and elastic effects. In: Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference. pp. 1410–1415 (2010).https://doi.org/10. 1109/ACC.2010.5530520,https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5530520

    arXiv 2010

  27. [27]

    In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics

    Nakashima, A., Ogawa, Y., Liu, C., Hayakawa, Y.: Robotic table tennis based on physical models of aerodynamics and rebounds. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics. pp. 2348–2354 (2011).https://doi. org/10.1109/ROBIO.2011.6181649

    work page doi:10.1109/robio.2011.6181649 2011

  28. [28]

    In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

    Okumura, K., Oku, H., Ishikawa, M.: High-speed gaze controller for millisecond- order pan/tilt camera. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. pp. 6186–6191 (2011).https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1109 / ICRA . 2011 . 5980080

    2011

  29. [29]

    Advanced Robotics29(7), 457–468 (Apr 2015).https: //doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2015.1011299

    Okumura, K., Yokoyama, K., Oku, H., Ishikawa, M.: 1 ms Auto Pan-Tilt – video shooting technology for objects in motion based on Saccade Mirror with background subtraction. Advanced Robotics29(7), 457–468 (Apr 2015).https: //doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2015.1011299

    work page doi:10.1080/01691864.2015.1011299 2015

  30. [30]

    Pfrommer, B.: Frequency cam: Imaging periodic signals in real-time (2025),https: //arxiv.org/abs/2211.00198

    arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    In: Proceedings ofthe7thACMInternationalWorkshoponMultimediaContentAnalysisinSports

    Sato, K., Nakabayashi, T., Yamaguchi, M., Higa, K., Fujiwara, R., Saito, H.: Time- consistent Ball Tracking and Spin Estimation with Event Camera. In: Proceedings ofthe7thACMInternationalWorkshoponMultimediaContentAnalysisinSports. pp. 59–64. ACM, Melbourne VIC Australia (Oct 2024).https://doi.org/10. 1145/3689061.3689067

    arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    (eds.) Computer Vision – ACCV 2006

    Sturm, P., Bonfort, T.: How to Compute the Pose of an Object Without a Di- rect View? In: Narayanan, P.J., Nayar, S.K., Shum, H.Y. (eds.) Computer Vision – ACCV 2006. pp. 21–31. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2006).https://doi.org/10.1007/11612704_3

    work page doi:10.1007/11612704_3 2006

  33. [33]

    IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement62(11), 2890–2900 (Nov 2013)

    Su, H., Fang, Z., Xu, D., Tan, M.: Trajectory Prediction of Spinning Ball Based on Fuzzy Filtering and Local Modeling for Robotic Ping–Pong Player. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement62(11), 2890–2900 (Nov 2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2013.2263672

    work page doi:10.1109/tim.2013.2263672 2013

  34. [34]

    https://doi.org/10.1080/18824889.2025.2466881

    Sueishi, T., Tochioka, H., Ishikawa, M.: High-speed spin measurement system for dottedtabletennisballusingsingle-frameM-sequencemulti-exposures.SICEJour- nal of Control, Measurement, and System Integration18(1), 2466881 (Dec 2025). https://doi.org/10.1080/18824889.2025.2466881

    work page doi:10.1080/18824889.2025.2466881 2025

  35. [35]

    International Journal of Computer Science in Sport23(1), 37–53 (Feb 2024).https://doi.org/10.2478/ ijcss-2024-0003

    Tamaki, S., Yamagata, S., Hashizume, S.: Spin measurement system for table ten- nis balls based on asynchronous non-high-speed cameras. International Journal of Computer Science in Sport23(1), 37–53 (Feb 2024).https://doi.org/10.2478/ ijcss-2024-0003

    2024

  36. [36]

    The 10th Korea-Japan Joint Workshop on Frontiers of Computer Vision pp

    Tamaki, T., Sugino, T., Yamamoto, M.: Measuring Ball Spin by Image Registra- tion. The 10th Korea-Japan Joint Workshop on Frontiers of Computer Vision pp. 269–274 (2004)

    2004

  37. [37]

    In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)

    Tamaki, T., Wang, H., Raytchev, B., Kaneda, K., Ushiyama, Y.: Estimating the spin of a table tennis ball using Inverse Compositional Image Alignment. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). pp. 1457–1460 (Mar 2012).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2012. 6288166 19

    work page doi:10.1109/icassp.2012 2012

  38. [38]

    Table Tennis Sciences4, 278–284 (2002)

    Tang, H.p., Mizoguchi, M., Toyoshima, S.: Speed and spin characteristics of the 40mm table tennis ball. Table Tennis Sciences4, 278–284 (2002)

    2002

  39. [39]

    Sakurada, M

    Tebbe, J., Klamt, L., Gao, Y., Zell, A.: Spin Detection in Robotic Table Tennis. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. pp. 9694–9700 (May 2020).https://doi.org/ 10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9196536

    work page doi:10.1109/icra40945.2020.9196536 2020

  40. [40]

    ACM SIGGRAPH 2004 Papers , pages =

    Theobalt, C., Albrecht, I., Haber, J., Magnor, M., Seidel, H.P.: Pitching a baseball: Tracking high-speed motion with multi-exposure images. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2004 Papers. pp. 540–547. SIGGRAPH ’04, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (Aug 2004).https://doi.org/10.1145/1186562.1015758

    work page doi:10.1145/1186562.1015758 2004

  41. [41]

    48550/arXiv.2402.13616

    Wang, C.Y., Yeh, I.H., Liao, H.Y.M.: YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Information (Feb 2024).https://doi.org/10. 48550/arXiv.2402.13616

    arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    In: IEEE/RSJ Int

    Wang, J., Olson, E.: AprilTag 2: Efficient and robust fiducial detection. In: IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst. pp. 4193–4198 (Oct 2016).https: //doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2016.7759617

    work page doi:10.1109/iros.2016.7759617 2016

  43. [43]

    IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Mea- surement64(8), 2280–2290 (Aug 2015).https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2014

    Zhang, Y., Xiong, R., Zhao, Y., Wang, J.: Real-Time Spin Estimation of Ping-Pong Ball Using Its Natural Brand. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Mea- surement64(8), 2280–2290 (Aug 2015).https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2014. 2385173

    work page doi:10.1109/tim.2014 2015

  44. [44]

    In: IEEE Int

    Zhang, Y., Zhao, Y., Xiong, R., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Chu, J.: Spin observation and trajectory prediction of a ping-pong ball. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. pp. 4108–4114 (May 2014).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2014.6907456

    work page doi:10.1109/icra.2014.6907456 2014

  45. [45]

    IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems10(4), 557–566 (2020)

    Zhu, Q., Triesch, J., Shi, B.E.: An Event-by-Event Approach for Velocity Esti- mation and Object Tracking With an Active Event Camera. IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems10(4), 557–566 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/JETCAS.2020.3040329

    work page doi:10.1109/jetcas.2020.3040329 2020