Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 minor 85 references

Transforming X-ray Binary Astrophysics with SKA+VLBI

T0 review · 0 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-26 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The phased SKA-Mid as a VLBI element will transform radio studies of X-ray binaries via improved sensitivity, astrometry and rapid response.

desk verdict This is a perspective science case projecting SKA+VLBI gains for XRBs, with no new data or derivations but some concrete program outlines that rest on unverified instrument specs. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.26914 v1 pith:QXPDVW4H submitted 2026-06-25 astro-ph.HE

Tao An , Ailing Wang , James C. A. Miller-Jones , Valeriu Tudose , Pikky Atri , Lang Cui , Hua Feng , Benito Marcote
show 1 more author
Sara E. Motta
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords X-raybinariesVLBISKAjetsaccretionastrometrypolarimetryblackholes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that running the SKA-Mid telescope in phased-array mode as one element in global VLBI networks will deliver substantially better radio data on X-ray binaries. The gains come from higher sensitivity on long baselines in key frequency bands, lower-frequency imaging with the connected array, microarcsecond position accuracy for bright sources, detailed polarization measurements, and fast response to new outbursts. A sympathetic reader would care because these features would let observers follow jet material on astronomical-unit scales, measure magnetic fields inside the jets, watch disk-jet coupling change in real time, and obtain accurate distances and birth kicks for the compact objects.

What carries the argument

The phased SKA-Mid functioning as an ultra-sensitive VLBI element in synergy with global VLBI networks, delivering time-domain high-resolution radio observations of XRBs.

What would settle it

If SKA-Mid phased-array observations fail to produce measurable sensitivity gains on VLBI baselines to X-ray binaries or cannot deliver the expected microarcsecond astrometric precision, the claimed transformation would not occur.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The phased SKA-Mid operating as a single ultra-sensitive VLBI element will transform radio studies of XRBs primarily through its time-domain capabilities: substantially improved sensitivity on VLBI baselines that include SKA-Mid in Bands 2 and 5, together with connected-element SKA-Mid imaging extending down to 0.35-1 GHz, microarcsecond-precision astrometry for bright systems, high-fidelity polarimetry for the most strongly polarized sources, and rapid target-of-opportunity response. In synergy with global VLBI networks, SKA+VLBI will track the evolution of compact ejecta and compact jets on AU scales, measure frequency-dependent core shifts to infer magnetic field strengths and gradients,

Load-bearing premise

The SKA-Mid will be built and operated with the stated sensitivity, frequency bands, rapid target-of-opportunity response, and ability to operate as a phased VLBI element alongside existing global networks.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Track the evolution of compact ejecta and jets on astronomical-unit scales in the first days of outbursts.
  • Measure frequency-dependent core shifts to determine magnetic field strengths and gradients inside the jets.
  • Resolve disk-jet coupling during state transitions in real time with cadenced multi-frequency VLBI movies.
  • Determine precise distances and natal kicks for X-ray binaries through parallaxes and proper motions in an astrometric census.
  • Provide strictly simultaneous multi-band constraints on accretion-ejection physics and jet composition when combined with future X-ray and optical telescopes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same microphysical jet measurements could be compared directly with observations of active galactic nuclei to test whether the same launching and propagation physics operate across eight orders of magnitude in black-hole mass.
  • An XRB astrometric census might uncover previously undetected natal kicks or orbital parameters that current lower-sensitivity arrays cannot reach.
  • Rapid ToO response combined with the outlined core-shift survey could capture rare, short-lived jet features whose magnetic-field evolution has never been mapped before.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a perspective paper projecting that the phased SKA-Mid, functioning as an ultra-sensitive VLBI element, will transform X-ray binary (XRB) studies via enhanced time-domain capabilities: improved sensitivity on VLBI baselines in Bands 2 and 5, connected-element imaging down to Band 1 (0.35-1 GHz), microarcsecond astrometry for bright sources, high-fidelity polarimetry, and rapid ToO response. In synergy with global VLBI networks, this will enable AU-scale tracking of ejecta and jets, frequency-dependent core-shift measurements to infer magnetic fields, real-time disk-jet coupling during state transitions, and precise parallaxes/proper motions for distances and natal kicks. The paper outlines a quantitative program for AA* and AA4 phases, including cadenced multi-frequency VLBI 'movies', an XRB astrometric census, and core-shift surveys, with representative detection rates, B-field measurements, and distance accuracies. These are framed as setting the microphysical foundation for jet physics across mass scales and establishing SKA+VLBI as the definitive high-resolution time-domain facility, with synergies for joint X-ray/optical campaigns.

Significance. If the stated SKA-Mid specifications are realized, the projections identify concrete pathways for resolving accretion-ejection physics on human timescales in XRBs and scaling those insights to AGN. The inclusion of quantitative estimates (detection rates, measurement precisions) makes the case more actionable and falsifiable against future operations. The emphasis on strictly simultaneous multi-band observations and the explicit linkage to jet composition and magnetic field gradients adds value by highlighting unique parameter space not accessible with current facilities.

minor comments (1)
  1. Abstract: the string "\aastar" is an unreplaced LaTeX command and should be rendered as "AA*" for readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and constructive review. The assessment accurately captures the manuscript's focus on the time-domain capabilities of phased SKA-Mid as a VLBI element and the quantitative projections for XRB jet tracking, astrometry, and core-shift measurements. We are pleased with the recommendation to accept.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity

full rationale

This perspective paper contains no derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or quantitative predictions derived from internal data or models. All listed capabilities (sensitivity gains, astrometry, polarimetry, ToO response) are explicitly conditional on external instrument specifications for SKA-Mid that are stated as assumptions, not derived within the text. No self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked to support any derivation chain. The content is forward-looking description of projected outcomes once the instrument parameters are granted; the derivation chain is empty by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on external assumptions about SKA instrument performance and operational capabilities that are not derived or tested within the document.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transforming X-ray Binary Astrophysics with SKA+VLBI." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QXPDVW4H

@misc{pith2026260626914,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transforming X-ray Binary Astrophysics with SKA+VLBI},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QXPDVW4H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.26914}
}
read the original abstract

X-ray binaries (XRBs) are unique laboratories where accretion, jets, strong gravity and magnetic fields can be probed on humanly tractable timescales. The phased SKA-Mid operating as a single, ultra-sensitive Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) element will transform radio studies of XRBs primarily through its time-domain capabilities: substantially improved sensitivity on VLBI baselines that include SKA-Mid in Bands 2 and 5, together with connected-element SKA-Mid imaging extending down to 0.35--1 GHz (Band 1), microarcsecond-precision astrometry for bright systems, high-fidelity polarimetry for the most strongly polarized sources, and rapid target-of-opportunity response. In synergy with global VLBI networks, SKA+VLBI will track the evolution of compact ejecta and compact jets on astronomical unit (AU) scales, measure frequency-dependent core shifts to infer magnetic field strengths and gradients, resolve disk--jet coupling during state transitions in real time, and determine precise distances and natal kicks via parallaxes and proper motions. Joint campaigns with future X-ray and optical telescopes will enable strictly simultaneous, multi-band constraints on accretion--ejection physics and on jet composition. We outline a quantitative program for \aastar\ and AA4, including cadenced, multi-frequency VLBI ``movies'' of jets over the first days of outbursts, an XRB astrometric census, and a core-shift survey, and we provide representative detection rates, magnetic field measurements and distance accuracies. These outcomes will set the microphysical foundation for jet physics across the mass scale from stellar-mass black holes and neutron stars to active galactic nuclei, and will establish SKA+VLBI as the definitive facility for time-domain, high-resolution XRB astrophysics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26914 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Benchmark for jet kinematics applied to Soft X-ray Transients (SXTs). Time-sequence radio images of GRS 1915+105 from 18 March to 16 April 1994 show the birth of compact knots from the core (cross) and their separation with apparent superluminal motion (𝛽app > 1); scale bar: 10,000 AU. Adapted from Mirabel and Rodríguez (1994). SKA-Mid phased for global VLBI will extend this kinematic diagnostic to faint, short-live… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Fender–Belloni–Gallo schematic of X-ray binary state transitions and associated jet modes (Fender et al., 2004), annotated to illustrate the unique diagnostic power of SKA + VLBI. In the hard state, SKA+VLBI will resolve and astrometrically monitor the compact, self-absorbed core, enabling ejection timing measurements to timestamp jet launch relative to the X-ray spectral transition at AU scales. During the hard-to-… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. MeerKAT imaging has revealed a shell and hotspot system around Cygnus X-1, including a compact core and a ∼20 pc ring seen at 1.28 and 2.64 GHz (Atri et al., 2025). The shell (the U-shaped curve denoted by B2-B1-B3) and the substructures (B4, B5) within the shell are consistent with powerful jets impacting the interstellar medium (Gallo et al., 2005). Similar jet-inflated bubbles have recently been discovered around… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G.E.Andersonetal

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx898. G.E.Andersonetal. InAdvancingAstrophysicswiththeSKA–II(AASKAII).2026. arXivsearch: Report number AASKAII/GemmaAnderson01. J. J. Andrews, K. Breivik, and S. Chatterjee.ApJ, 886(1):68, Nov

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx898 2026

  2. [3]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2335. P. Atri et al.MNRAS, 493(1):L81–L86, Mar

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2335

  3. [4]

    doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa010. P. Atri et al.A&A, 696:A223, Apr

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa010

  4. [5]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452837. W. A. Baan and T. An.ApJ, 980(1):119, Feb

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452837

  5. [6]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada9ea. M. Bachetti et al.Nature, 514(7521):202–204, Oct

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada9ea

  6. [7]

    doi: 10.1038/nature13791. T. M. Belloni, S. E. Motta, and T. Muñoz-Darias.Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India, 39 (3):409–428, Sept

    work page doi:10.1038/nature13791

  7. [8]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1109.3388. A. Beri et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1109.3388

  8. [9]

    , keywords =

    doi: 10.1086/157262. R.D.BlandfordandD.G.Payne.MNRAS,199:883–903,June1982.doi: 10.1093/mnras/199.4.883. R. D. Blandford and R. L. Znajek.MNRAS, 179:433–456, May

    work page doi:10.1086/157262

Show all 85 references
  1. [10]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/179.3

    doi

  2. [12]

    doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-1023-5. C. Brocksopp et al.MNRAS, 432(2):931–943, June

    doi

  3. [13]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt493. A. Burrows, T. Wang, and D. Vartanyan.ApJ, 987(2):164, July

    doi

  4. [14]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ addd04. P. Charlot et al.A&A, 644:A159, Dec

    doi

  5. [15]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038368. H. Q. Cheng et al.ApJL, 991(2):L41, Oct

    doi

  6. [16]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf104. S. Corbel et al.ApJ, 632(1):504–513, Oct

    doi

  7. [17]

    doi: 10.1086/432499. S. Corbel et al.MNRAS, 421(4):2947–2955, Apr

    doi

  8. [18]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20517.x. S. Corbel et al.MNRAS, 431:L107–L111, Apr

    2012 doi

  9. [19]

    doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slt018. M. Coriat et al.MNRAS, 414(1):677–690, June

    doi

  10. [20]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18433.x. D. Cseh et al.MNRAS, 439:L1–L5, Mar

    2011 doi

  11. [21]

    doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slt166. D. Cseh et al.MNRAS, 452(1):24–31, Sept

    doi

  12. [22]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1308. L. Cui et al.ApJ, 983(2):147, Apr

    doi

  13. [23]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc0f7. A. Della Croce et al.A&A, 690:A179, Oct

    doi

  14. [24]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450954. V. Dhawan, I. F. Mirabel, and L. F. Rodríguez.ApJ, 543(1):373–385, Nov

    doi

  15. [25]

    doi: 10.1086/520111. C. Done, M. Gierliński, and A. Kubota.A&ARv, 15(1):1–66, Dec

    doi

  16. [26]

    doi: 10.1086/300537. E. Egron et al.ApJ, 906(1):10, Jan

    doi

  17. [27]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc5b1. S. Fabrika.Astrophys. Space Phys. Rev., 12:1–152, Jan

    doi

  18. [28]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/ 0603390. H. Falcke, E. Körding, and S. Markoff.A&A, 414:895–903, Feb

    doi

  19. [29]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361: 20031683. R. Fender and T. Belloni.ARA&A, 42(1):317–364, Sept

    doi

  20. [30]

    053102.134031

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.42. 053102.134031. R. Fender and E. Gallo.Space Sci. Rev., 183(1-4):323–337, Sept

    doi

  21. [31]

    doi: 10.1086/312128. R. P. Fender and S. E. Motta.Nature Astronomy, Sept

    doi

  22. [32]

    doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02665-w. R. P. Fender et al.MNRAS, 336(1):39–46, Oct. 2002a. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05701.x. R.P.Fenderetal.MNRAS,330(1):212–218,Feb.2002b. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05072.x. R. P. Fender, T. M. Belloni, and E. Gallo.MNRAS, 355(4):1105–1118, Dec

    2002 doi

  23. [33]

    1365-2966.2004.08384.x

    doi: 10.1111/j. 1365-2966.2004.08384.x. R.P.Fender,J.Homan,andT.M.Belloni.MNRAS,396(3):1370–1382,July2009. doi: 10.1111/j. 1365-2966.2009.14841.x. G. Fragione, A. Loeb, and F. A. Rasio.ApJL, 918(2):L38, Sept

    2004 doi

  24. [34]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ ac225a. T. Fragos et al.ApJ, 697:1057–1070, June

    doi

  25. [35]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1057. C. L. Fryer.New Astron. Rev., 50(7-8):492–495, Oct

    doi

  26. [36]

    doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2006.06.052. E. Gallo, R. P. Fender, and G. G. Pooley.MNRAS, 344(1):60–72, Sept

    2006 doi

  27. [38]

    doi: 10.1038/nature03879. S. Heinz.A&A, 388:L40–L43, June

    doi

  28. [39]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020402. S. Heinz.MNRAS, 355(3):835–844, Dec

    doi

  29. [40]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08361.x. S. Heinz.ApJ, 636(1):316–322, Jan

    2004 doi

  30. [41]

    doi: 10.1086/497954. S. Heinz and R. A. Sunyaev.MNRAS, 343(3):L59–L64, Aug

    doi

  31. [42]

    2003.06918.x

    doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711. 2003.06918.x. R.M.HjellmingandM.P.Rupen.Nature,375(6531):464–468,June1995. doi: 10.1038/375464a0. G. Hobbs, D. R. Lorimer, A. G. Lyne, and M. Kramer.MNRAS, 360(3):974–992, July

    2003 doi

  32. [43]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09087.x. R. M. Jeffrey, K. M. Blundell, S. A. Trushkin, and A. J. Mioduszewski.MNRAS, 461(1):312–320, Sept

    2005 doi

  33. [44]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1322. P. Kaaret, S. Corbel, A. H. Prestwich, and A. Zezas.Science, 299(5605):365–368, Jan

    doi

  34. [45]

    doi: 10.1126/science.1079610. P. Kaaret, H. Feng, and T. P. Roberts.ARA&A, 55(1):303–341, Aug

    doi

  35. [46]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2002. L. Z. Kelley et al.ApJL, 725:L91–L96, Dec

    doi

  36. [47]

    E.Körding,H.Falcke,andS.Corbel.A&A,456(2):439–450,Sept.2006

    doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/725/1/L91. E.Körding,H.Falcke,andS.Corbel.A&A,456(2):439–450,Sept.2006. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361: 20054144. C. C. Lang, P. Kaaret, S. Corbel, and A. Mercer.ApJ, 666(1):79–85, Sept

    doi

  37. [48]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9712132. I. Mandel and B. Müller.MNRAS, 499(3):3214–3221, Dec

    doi arXiv

  38. [49]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3043. B. Marcote et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    doi

  39. [50]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556290. A. Marino et al.ApJL, 980(2):L36, Feb

    doi

  40. [51]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad9580. S. Markoff, H. Falcke, P. L. Biermann, and R. P. Fender. In M. M. Shapiro, T. Stanev, and J. P. Wefel, editors,Astrophysical Sources of High Energy Particles and Radiation, volume 44, page 135, Jan

    doi

  41. [52]

    doi: 10.1086/497628

    S.Markoff,M.A.Nowak,andJ.Wilms.ApJ,635(2):1203–1216,Dec.2005. doi: 10.1086/497628. S. Markoff et al.ApJL, 812(2):L25, Oct

    2005 doi

  42. [53]

    doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/812/2/L25. I. Martí-Vidal, A. Roy, J. Conway, and A. J. Zensus.A&A, 587:A143, Mar

    doi

  43. [55]

    1365-2966.2003.07017.x

    doi: 10.1046/j. 1365-2966.2003.07017.x. M. J. Middleton et al.Nature, 493(7431):187–190, Jan

    2003 doi

  44. [56]

    doi: 10.1038/nature11697. J. C. A. Miller-Jones.PASA, 31:e016, Mar

    doi

  45. [57]

    doi: 10.1017/pasa.2014.7. J. C. A. Miller-Jones et al.MNRAS, 388(4):1751–1758, Aug

    2014 doi

  46. [58]

    2008.13495.x

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966. 2008.13495.x. J. C. A. Miller-Jones et al.ApJL, 706(2):L230–L234, Dec

    2008 doi

  47. [59]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/706/2/ L230. J. C. A. Miller-Jones et al.MNRAS, 419(1):L49–L53, Jan

    doi

  48. [60]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011. 01176.x. J. C. A. Miller-Jones et al.Nature, 569(7756):374–377, Apr

    2011 doi

  49. [61]

    doi: 10.1126/science. abb3363. I. F. Mirabel and L. F. Rodríguez.Nature, 371(6492):46–48, Sept

    doi

  50. [62]

    I.F.MirabelandL.F.Rodríguez.ARA&A,37:409–443, Jan.1999

    doi: 10.1038/371046a0. I.F.MirabelandL.F.Rodríguez.ARA&A,37:409–443, Jan.1999. doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.37. 1.409. I. F. Mirabel et al.Nature, 413(6852):139–141, Sept

    1999 doi

  51. [63]

    doi: 10.1038/35093060. S. E. Motta et al.A&A, 696:A222, Apr

    doi

  52. [64]

    21 Transforming XRB Astrophysics with SKA+VLBI T

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452838. 21 Transforming XRB Astrophysics with SKA+VLBI T. An et al. P.NagarajanandK.El-Badry.PASP,137(3):034203,Mar.2025. doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/adb6d6. S. Naoz, Z. Haiman, E. Quataert, and L. Holzknecht.ApJL, 992(1):L12, Oct

    2025 doi

  53. [65]

    doi: 10.3847/ 2041-8213/ae0a20. T. N. O’Doherty et al.MNRAS, 521(2):2504–2524, May

  54. [66]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad680. M. W. Pakull, R. Soria, and C. Motch.Nature, 466(7303):209–212, July

    doi

  55. [67]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9907169. Z. Paragi et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), page 143, Apr

    doi arXiv

  56. [68]

    doi: 10.22323/1.215.0143. M. Pathak et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    doi

  57. [69]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab644. J. Poutanen et al.Science, 375(6583):874–876, Feb

    doi

  58. [70]

    doi: 10.1126/science.abl4679. S. Prabu et al.MNRAS, 525(3):4426–4436, Nov

    doi

  59. [71]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2570. M. J. Reid et al.ApJ, 742(2):83, Dec

    doi

  60. [72]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/83. R. A. Remillard and J. E. McClintock.ARA&A, 44(1):49–92, Sept

    doi

  61. [73]

    astro.44.051905.092532

    doi: 10.1146/annurev. astro.44.051905.092532. M.Riojaetal. InAdvancingAstrophysicswiththeSKA–II(AASKAII).2026. arXivsearch: Report number AASKAII/Rioja01. M. J. Rioja et al.AJ, 153(3):105, Mar

    2026 doi arXiv

  62. [74]

    D.M.RussellandT.Shahbaz.MNRAS,438(3):2083–2096,Mar.2014.doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2330

    doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/153/3/105. D.M.RussellandT.Shahbaz.MNRAS,438(3):2083–2096,Mar.2014.doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2330. D. M. Russell, R. P. Fender, E. Gallo, and C. R. Kaiser.MNRAS, 376(3):1341–1349, Apr

    doi

  63. [75]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11539.x. T. D. Russell et al.MNRAS, 439(2):1390–1402, Apr

    2007 doi

  64. [76]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2498. T. D. Russell et al.ApJ, 883(2):198, Oct

    doi

  65. [77]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3d36. R. Sharma, M. Massi, and G. Torricelli-Ciamponi.A&A, 660:A58, Apr

    doi

  66. [78]

    doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/sls044. K. V. Sokolovsky, Y. Y. Kovalev, A. B. Pushkarev, and A. P. Lobanov.A&A, 532:A38, Aug

    doi

  67. [79]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016072. R. Soria et al.MNRAS, 409(2):541–551, Dec

    doi

  68. [80]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17360.x. T. Sukhbold et al.ApJ, 821(1):38, Apr

    2010 doi

  69. [81]

    doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/38. A. Tchekhovskoy, R. Narayan, and J. C. McKinney.MNRAS, 418(1):L79–L83, Nov

    doi

  70. [82]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01147.x. S. J. Tingay et al.Nature, 374(6518):141–143, Mar

    2011 doi

  71. [83]

    doi: 10.1038/374141a0. V. Tudose et al.MNRAS, 375(1):L11–L15, Feb

    doi

  72. [84]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00264.x. F. Verbunt, A. Igoshev, and E. Cator.A&A, 608:A57, Dec

    2006 doi

  73. [85]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/ 201731518. B. Willems et al.ApJ, 625:324–346, May

    doi

  74. [86]

    doi: 10.1086/429557. C. M. Wood et al.ApJL, 984(2):L53, May

    doi

  75. [87]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adc9b3. D. Wysocki et al.Phys. Rev. D, 97(4):043014, Feb

    doi

  76. [88]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.043014. W. Yuan et al. InSpace Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, volume 10699, pages 543–551. SPIE,

    2018 doi

  77. [89]

    A.A.Zdziarski.MNRAS,422(2):1750–1760,May2012

    doi: 10.1007/s11433-024-2600-3. A.A.Zdziarski.MNRAS,422(2):1750–1760,May2012. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20754.x. W. Zhang et al.Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 68(1):219511, Jan

    2012 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 26, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.