pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28508 · v1 · pith:YYAKPUVHnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · physics.app-ph

Microscopic and macroscopic characterization: MBE-grown versus sputter-deposited Au/Co/Au thin films for CISS and MIPAC effect studies

Lokesh Rasabathina , Thi Ngoc Ha Nguyen , Aleksandr Kazimir , Rico Ehrler , Julia Krone , Franziska Sch\"olzel , Zihao Liu , Peter Heinig
show 7 more authors
Markus G\"o{\ss}ler Irene Coin Christina Lamers Georgeta Salvan Lech Tomasz Baczewski Christoph Tegenkamp Olav Hellwig
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 00:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.app-ph
keywords chirality-induced spin selectivityMIPACAu/Co/Au thin filmsmolecular beam epitaxymagnetron sputteringchiral peptidesscanning tunneling spectroscopymagneto-optical Kerr effect
0
0 comments X

The pith

Microscopic CISS signatures are similar on MBE and sputter-deposited Au/Co/Au films while macroscopic MIPAC magnetic responses appear only in sputtered samples

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compares Au/Co/Au ferromagnetic thin films grown by molecular beam epitaxy versus magnetron sputtering to determine how deposition method and resulting microstructure influence chirality-induced spin selectivity and the magnetization induced by proximity of adsorbed chiral molecules after L-chiral peptide adsorption. X-ray and microscopy data show that both film types present locally smooth Au(111) regions suitable for peptide adsorption, and scanning tunneling spectroscopy after peptide exposure yields comparable magnetization-direction-dependent tunneling currents in both. Macroscopic magneto-optical Kerr effect measurements, however, detect peptide-induced coercivity increases and domain-wall velocity reductions only in the sputter-deposited films. The central effort is therefore to separate length-scale-dependent sensitivities of these two spin-related phenomena to substrate microstructure.

Core claim

These results suggest that microscopic CISS signatures are robust for both sample types, whereas macroscopic MIPAC-type magnetic responses are more sensitive to the substrate microstructure.

What carries the argument

Side-by-side microscopic (scanning tunneling spectroscopy) and macroscopic (magneto-optical Kerr effect) measurements on peptide-exposed MBE-grown versus sputter-deposited Au/Co/Au films, with supporting X-ray reflectivity, diffraction, and surface imaging to characterize microstructure differences.

If this is right

  • Local CISS effects remain accessible with either deposition technique provided locally smooth Au(111) regions exist.
  • Macroscopic MIPAC-type magnetic modifications require the grain or interface features typical of sputter deposition.
  • Sharper interfaces produced by MBE do not enhance or suppress the local CISS magnitude.
  • Device concepts relying on MIPAC must account for deposition-method dependence at the macroscopic scale.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Grain boundaries or roughness present in sputtered films may enable the collective magnetic response underlying MIPAC while being absent in MBE films.
  • Spintronic devices that need only microscopic CISS can tolerate a wider range of fabrication methods than those that also require MIPAC.
  • Systematic variation of grain size or defect density in future films could map the threshold microstructure needed for observable MIPAC.

Load-bearing premise

Peptide adsorption conditions, surface cleanliness, and measurement setups are equivalent between the two film types so that observed differences can be attributed only to deposition-induced microstructure variations.

What would settle it

Detection of clearly different CISS magnitudes in scanning tunneling spectroscopy between the two sample types, or detection of comparable macroscopic coercivity and domain-wall changes in the MBE sample, would undermine the claimed separation of microscopic robustness from macroscopic microstructure sensitivity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.28508 by Aleksandr Kazimir, Christina Lamers, Christoph Tegenkamp, Franziska Sch\"olzel, Georgeta Salvan, Irene Coin, Julia Krone, Lech Tomasz Baczewski, Lokesh Rasabathina, Markus G\"o{\ss}ler, Olav Hellwig, Peter Heinig, Rico Ehrler, Thi Ngoc Ha Nguyen, Zihao Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a,b) layer stack of MBE-grown sample and sputter-deposited sample; (c) XRR curves and corresponding best fits (red lines); (d) Scattering length density (SLD) profiles derived from XRR data, the depth z is aligned to the center of the Co film, with the literature value of bulk Co in red. The XRR curves for both samples show characteristic thickness oscillations arising from the different electron density … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) XRD patterns of MBE-grown and sputter-deposited Au/Co/Au samples highlighting sharper peaks and intense Laue oscillations for the MBE-grown sample, which are way less pronounced for the sputter-deposited sample; (b) Enlarged view of XRD patterns in the 2nd order to better separate the Au(2 2 2) and Pt(2 2 2) peak; (c) Rocking curves measured at the Au(1 1 1) reflection, with FWHM of 0.14° and 3.15° for… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Pole figure measurements for the Au{1 1 1} lattice plane family for (a) the MBE and (b) the sputter￾deposited sample. α denotes the polar angle relative to the film normal, and β is the azimuthal angle of the IP rotation. The pole figures were measured at the 2θ angles extracted from the OOP-XRD in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) XRD in-plane Bragg scans indicating the Au(2 2 0) peak from the MBE-grown and sputter-deposited sample. We can also see Pt(2 2 0), Co(2 1 1 0) and Kβ Au(2 2 0)(arising from Kβ radiation) peaks only from the MBE￾grown sample; (b) in-plane ϕ-scans of the Au(2 2 0) Bragg peak. The MBE sample shows the expected 6-fold symmetry of the fcc(2 2 0) lattice family, whereas the sputter-deposited sample has an al… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: AFM images of (a) MBE-grown and (b) sputter-deposited samples with their respective line profiles in (c,d); STM images of (e,f ) MBE-grown and (h,i) sputter-deposited samples, with their respective line profiles (g,j). The MBE-grown sample shows larger and more laterally interconnected surface features, whereas the sputter-deposited sample exhibits a more isolated granular morphology. Note the slightly dif… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The large-scale AFM image in Fig. 5(a) reveals that the MBE-grown sample shows a more intercon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) XPS survey spectra of peptides of varying lengths on Au substrates, highlighting N1s, C1s, and O1s core level regions; (b) Au4f core level spectra ; (c) S2p core level spectra with respect to the increase in peptide length. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: a) Schematic representation of the STS setup - the Co layer thickness for MBE-grown and sputter-deposited samples are 1.2 nm and 0.9 nm, respectively; b) Magnetization-dependent tip-sample distance (∆z) measurements on the sputter-deposited sample under constant current STM mode; Magnetization-dependent I-V curves measured by STS on c) MBE-grown and d) sputter-deposited Au/Co/Au films after peptide adsorpt… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: MOKE hysteresis loops before and after peptide exposure (a) MBE-grown Au/Co/Au sample and (b) sputter-deposited Au/Co/Au sample. The sputter-deposited sample has slightly enhanced coercivity after exposure to the peptides, while the MBE-grown sample has no coercivity enhancement after exposure to peptides. Domain wall motion of (c) before and (d) after peptide exposure on the sputter-deposited sample. The … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Chirality-induced spin selectivity (CISS) enables spin-dependent transport at chiral molecule/Au(111) interfaces and is used in spintronics when combined with ferromagnetic thin films in spin-valve-type hybrids. However, the influence of substrate microstructure on CISS and the related magnetization induced by the proximity of adsorbed chiral molecules (MIPAC) effect is still not well understood. In this study, we compare the effects of the adsorption of L-chiral alpha-helical alanine-rich peptides on Au/Co/Au ferromagnetic thin films fabricated by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) and magnetron sputtering. X-ray reflectivity and X-ray diffraction show sharper interfaces and a narrower Au(111) rocking-curve width for the MBE-grown sample. However, atomic force microscopy and scanning tunneling microscopy images reveal that both sample types have locally smooth Au(111) surface regions suitable for peptide adsorption, despite clear differences in larger-scale morphology. Microscopic scanning tunneling spectroscopy after peptide exposure yields similar magnetization-direction-dependent tunneling currents in both sample types, confirming a similar magnitude CISS effect on the molecular scale. In contrast, macroscopic magneto-optical Kerr effect hysteresis loops and effect microscopy reveals that only sputter-deposited samples show slight coercivity enhancements and a consistent reduction in domain wall velocity after peptide exposure. These results suggest that microscopic CISS signatures are robust for both sample types, whereas macroscopic MIPAC-type magnetic responses are more sensitive to the substrate microstructure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript compares MBE-grown versus sputter-deposited Au/Co/Au thin films using XRR, XRD, AFM, STM/STS, and MOKE before and after L-chiral peptide adsorption. It reports similar local Au(111) smoothness and magnetization-dependent tunneling currents (CISS) in both film types via STS, but observes coercivity enhancement and reduced domain-wall velocity only in the sputtered films via MOKE, concluding that microscopic CISS is robust while macroscopic MIPAC responses are microstructure-sensitive.

Significance. If the attribution of MIPAC differences to microstructure holds after controls, the distinction between scale-dependent responses would be useful for CISS-based spintronics fabrication. The multi-technique characterization (XRR/XRD for interfaces, AFM/STM for local morphology, STS for local CISS, MOKE for macro magnetism) is a positive aspect of the experimental design.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that 'macroscopic MIPAC-type magnetic responses are more sensitive to the substrate microstructure' requires that peptide adsorption conditions, coverage, and interface quality are equivalent between MBE and sputtered films. No quantitative cross-checks (XPS coverage, ellipsometry thickness, or identical MOKE sweep protocols) are described, so the observed MOKE contrast cannot be cleanly attributed to microstructure rather than adsorption variables.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and Results (MOKE and STS sections): The reported differences in coercivity and domain-wall velocity are described qualitatively without error bars, standard deviations, number of samples measured, or statistical tests. This makes it impossible to assess whether the 'slight' enhancements and velocity reductions are significant or reproducible, directly weakening the differential-sensitivity conclusion.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and figure captions would benefit from explicit statement of the number of independent samples and measurement repetitions for each technique.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below, indicating where revisions will be made to improve clarity and rigor while preserving the core findings.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that 'macroscopic MIPAC-type magnetic responses are more sensitive to the substrate microstructure' requires that peptide adsorption conditions, coverage, and interface quality are equivalent between MBE and sputtered films. No quantitative cross-checks (XPS coverage, ellipsometry thickness, or identical MOKE sweep protocols) are described, so the observed MOKE contrast cannot be cleanly attributed to microstructure rather than adsorption variables.

    Authors: We agree that explicit confirmation of equivalent adsorption conditions strengthens the attribution to microstructure. XRR data already quantify sharper interfaces in MBE films, while AFM/STM and STS confirm locally comparable Au(111) smoothness and identical CISS signatures in both film types. MOKE measurements were performed with identical sweep protocols, field ranges, and sample mounting for both sets. Although XPS and ellipsometry coverage data are not available, the local-probe equivalence at the molecular scale supports that differences in macroscopic response arise from microstructure rather than adsorption variability. We will revise the abstract and methods to explicitly state the identical MOKE protocols and add a brief discussion of this limitation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and Results (MOKE and STS sections): The reported differences in coercivity and domain-wall velocity are described qualitatively without error bars, standard deviations, number of samples measured, or statistical tests. This makes it impossible to assess whether the 'slight' enhancements and velocity reductions are significant or reproducible, directly weakening the differential-sensitivity conclusion.

    Authors: We concur that quantitative presentation of the MOKE results is needed. In the revised manuscript we will add error bars to coercivity values, report the number of samples and independent measurements, include standard deviations, and note the reproducibility across runs. Domain-wall velocity data from magneto-optical microscopy will likewise be accompanied by measurement statistics and a short discussion of variability. These additions will allow direct evaluation of significance without changing the reported trends. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental comparison with no derivations or self-referential predictions

full rationale

The paper is a side-by-side experimental characterization of MBE-grown versus sputter-deposited Au/Co/Au films. All reported contrasts (sharper interfaces via XRR/XRD for MBE, locally smooth Au(111) regions via AFM/STM for both, similar CISS via STS tunneling currents, and MIPAC-type MOKE differences only in sputtered samples) rest on direct measurements without equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. No derivation chain exists that could reduce to the authors' own inputs by construction. The central claim that microscopic CISS is robust while macroscopic MIPAC responses are microstructure-sensitive follows from the presented data sets rather than from any definitional or self-referential step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an experimental comparison relying on standard thin-film growth and surface science techniques without introducing new free parameters or entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard thin-film deposition and characterization techniques (MBE, sputtering, XRR, XRD, AFM, STM, MOKE) produce reliable, comparable data when applied to Au/Co/Au systems.
    Invoked throughout the abstract to interpret differences between sample types.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5876 in / 1239 out tokens · 55024 ms · 2026-06-30T00:35:21.462480+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K. Ray, S. P. Ananthavel, D. H. Waldeck, and R. Naaman. Asymmetric Scattering of Polarized Electrons by Organized Organic Films of Chiral Molecules.Science, 283(5403):814–816, February 1999. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5403.814

    work page doi:10.1126/science.283.5403.814 1999

  2. [2]

    Naaman and David H

    R. Naaman and David H. Waldeck. Chiral-Induced Spin Selectivity Effect.The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 3(16):2178–2187, August 2012. doi: 10.1021/jz300793y

    work page doi:10.1021/jz300793y 2012

  3. [3]

    building block

    Brian P. Bloom, Yossi Paltiel, Ron Naaman, and David H. Waldeck. Chiral Induced Spin Selectivity. Chemical Reviews, 124(4):1950–1991, February 2024. ISSN 0009-2665, 1520-6890. doi: 10.1021/acs. chemrev.3c00661

    work page doi:10.1021/acs 1950

  4. [4]

    Markus, Sidney R

    Zouti Xie, Tal Z. Markus, Sidney R. Cohen, Zeev Vager, Rafael Gutierrez, and Ron Naaman. Spin Specific Electron Conduction through DNA Oligomers.Nano Letters, 11(11):4652–4655, November

  5. [5]

    doi: 10.1021/nl2021637

    ISSN 1530-6984. doi: 10.1021/nl2021637

    work page doi:10.1021/nl2021637

  6. [6]

    J. J. Wei, C. Schafmeister, G. Bird, A. Paul, R. Naaman, and D. H. Waldeck. Molecular Chirality and Charge Transfer through Self-Assembled Scaffold Monolayers.The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 110(3):1301–1308, January 2006. ISSN 1520-6106. doi: 10.1021/jp055145c

    work page doi:10.1021/jp055145c 2006

  7. [7]

    S. G. Ray, S. S. Daube, G. Leitus, Z. Vager, and R. Naaman. Chirality-Induced Spin-Selective Properties of Self-Assembled Monolayers of DNA on Gold.Physical Review Letters, 96(3):036101, January 2006. ISSN 0031-9007, 1079-7114. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.036101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.036101 2006

  8. [8]

    Aragon` es, Ernesto Medina, Miriam Ferrer-Huerta, Nuria Gimeno, Meritxell Teixid´ o, Julio L

    Albert C. Aragon` es, Ernesto Medina, Miriam Ferrer-Huerta, Nuria Gimeno, Meritxell Teixid´ o, Julio L. Palma, Nongjian Tao, Jesus M. Ugalde, Ernest Giralt, Ismael D´ ıez-P´ erez, and Vladimiro Mujica. Mea- suring the Spin-Polarization Power of a Single Chiral Molecule.Small, 13(2):1602519, 2017. ISSN 1613-6829. doi: 10.1002/smll.201602519

    work page doi:10.1002/smll.201602519 2017

  9. [9]

    B¨ urgler, and Claus M

    Mohammad Reza Safari, Frank Matthes, Karl-Heinz Ernst, Daniel E. B¨ urgler, and Claus M. Schnei- der. Deposition of Chiral Heptahelicene Molecules on Ferromagnetic Co and Fe Thin-Film Substrates. Nanomaterials, 12(19):3281, September 2022. ISSN 2079-4991. doi: 10.3390/nano12193281

    work page doi:10.3390/nano12193281 2022

  10. [10]

    Maslyuk, Daniel N¨ urenberg, Johannes Seibel, Rafael Gutierrez, Gi- anaurelio Cuniberti, Karl-Heinz Ernst, and Helmut Zacharias

    Matthias Kettner, Volodymyr V. Maslyuk, Daniel N¨ urenberg, Johannes Seibel, Rafael Gutierrez, Gi- anaurelio Cuniberti, Karl-Heinz Ernst, and Helmut Zacharias. Chirality-Dependent Electron Spin Filter- ing by Molecular Monolayers of Helicenes.The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 9(8):2025–2030, April 2018. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00208

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00208 2025

  11. [11]

    Schneider, Karl-Heinz Ernst, and Daniel E

    Mohammad Reza Safari, Frank Matthes, Claus M. Schneider, Karl-Heinz Ernst, and Daniel E. B¨ urgler. Spin-Selective Electron Transport Through Single Chiral Molecules.Small, 20(22):2308233, 2024. ISSN 1613-6829. doi: 10.1002/smll.202308233

    work page doi:10.1002/smll.202308233 2024

  12. [12]

    Baczewski, and Christoph Tegenkamp

    Thi Ngoc Ha Nguyen, Lokesh Rasabathina, Olav Hellwig, Apoorva Sharma, Georgeta Salvan, Shira Yochelis, Yossi Paltiel, Lech T. Baczewski, and Christoph Tegenkamp. Cooperative Effect of Electron Spin Polarization in Chiral Molecules Studied with Non-Spin-Polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscopy. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 14(33):38013–38020, August ...

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.2c08668 2022

  13. [13]

    The mechanism of the molecular CISS effect in chiral nano-junctions.Chemical Science, 15(36):14905–14912, 2024

    Thi Ngoc Ha Nguyen, Georgeta Salvan, Olav Hellwig, Yossi Paltiel, Lech Thomasz Baczewski, and Christoph Tegenkamp. The mechanism of the molecular CISS effect in chiral nano-junctions.Chemical Science, 15(36):14905–14912, 2024. ISSN 2041-6520, 2041-6539. doi: 10.1039/D4SC04435E. 18

    work page doi:10.1039/d4sc04435e 2024

  14. [14]

    Schulz, Dietrich R

    Apoorva Sharma, Patrick Matthes, Ivan Soldatov, Sri Sai Phani Kanth Arekapudi, Benny B¨ ohm, Ma- rina Lindner, Oleksandr Selyshchev, Nguyen Thi Ngoc Ha, Michael Mehring, Christoph Tegenkamp, Stefan E. Schulz, Dietrich R. T. Zahn, Yossi Paltiel, Olav Hellwig, and Georgeta Salvan. Control of magneto-optical properties of cobalt-layers by adsorption ofα-heli...

    work page doi:10.1039/d0tc02734k 2020

  15. [15]

    Magnetiza- tion switching in ferromagnets by adsorbed chiral molecules without current or external magnetic field

    Oren Ben Dor, Shira Yochelis, Anna Radko, Kiran Vankayala, Eyal Capua, Amir Capua, See-Hun Yang, Lech Tomasz Baczewski, Stuart Stephen Papworth Parkin, Ron Naaman, and Yossi Paltiel. Magnetiza- tion switching in ferromagnets by adsorbed chiral molecules without current or external magnetic field. Nature Communications, 8:14567, February 2017. ISSN 2041-17...

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms14567 2017

  16. [16]

    Exchange Bias Effect of Ferro-/Antiferromagnetic Heterostructures

    Florin Radu and Hartmut Zabel. Exchange Bias Effect of Ferro-/Antiferromagnetic Heterostructures. In Hartmut Zabel and Samuel D. Bader, editors,Magnetic Heterostructures: Advances and Perspectives in Spinstructures and Spintransport, pages 97–184. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. ISBN 978-3-540- 73462-8. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-73462-8 3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73462-8 2008

  17. [17]

    Exchange bias.Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 192(2): 203–232, February 1999

    J Nogu´ es and Ivan K Schuller. Exchange bias.Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 192(2): 203–232, February 1999. ISSN 0304-8853. doi: 10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00266-2

    work page doi:10.1016/s0304-8853(98)00266-2 1999

  18. [18]

    S. Maat, K. Takano, S. S. P. Parkin, and Eric E. Fullerton. Perpendicular Exchange Bias of $\mathrm{Co}/\mathrm{Pt}$Multilayers.Physical Review Letters, 87(8):087202, August 2001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.087202

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.087202 2001

  19. [19]

    Magnetoresistance effect based on spin-selective transport in nanodevices using chiral molecules.Nanoscale, 17(32):18866–18875, August

    Mizuki Matsuzaka, Kotaro Kashima, Koki Terai, Takumi Ueda, Ryunosuke Miyamoto, Takashi Ya- mamoto, Kohei Sambe, Tomoyuki Akutagawa, and Hideo Kaiju. Magnetoresistance effect based on spin-selective transport in nanodevices using chiral molecules.Nanoscale, 17(32):18866–18875, August

  20. [20]

    doi: 10.1039/D5NR01259G

    ISSN 2040-3372. doi: 10.1039/D5NR01259G

    work page doi:10.1039/d5nr01259g 2040

  21. [21]

    Mathew, Prakash Chandra Mondal, Hagay Moshe, Yitzhak Mastai, and Ron Naaman

    Shinto P. Mathew, Prakash Chandra Mondal, Hagay Moshe, Yitzhak Mastai, and Ron Naaman. Non- magnetic organic/inorganic spin injector at room temperature.Applied Physics Letters, 105(24):242408, December 2014. ISSN 0003-6951. doi: 10.1063/1.4904941

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4904941 2014

  22. [22]

    Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity in Composite Materials: A Device Perspective.Accounts of Chemical Research, 57(10):1478–1487, May 2024

    Seyedamin Firouzeh, Md Anik Hossain, Juan Manuel Cuerva, Luis ´Alvarez de Cienfuegos, and Sandipan Pramanik. Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity in Composite Materials: A Device Perspective.Accounts of Chemical Research, 57(10):1478–1487, May 2024. ISSN 0001-4842. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.4c00077

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.4c00077 2024

  23. [23]

    Koyel Banerjee-Ghosh, Oren Ben Dor, Francesco Tassinari, Eyal Capua, Shira Yochelis, Amir Capua, See-Hun Yang, Stuart S. P. Parkin, Soumyajit Sarkar, Leeor Kronik, Lech Tomasz Baczewski, Ron Naaman, and Yossi Paltiel. Separation of enantiomers by their enantiospecific interaction with achiral magnetic substrates.Science, 360(6395):1331–1334, June 2018. do...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aar4265 2018

  24. [24]

    Advanced Materials , volume =

    Amir Ziv, Abhijit Saha, Hen Alpern, Nir Sukenik, Lech Tomasz Baczewski, Shira Yochelis, Meital Reches, and Yossi Paltiel. AFM-Based Spin-Exchange Microscopy Using Chiral Molecules.Advanced Materials, 31(40):1904206, 2019. ISSN 1521-4095. doi: 10.1002/adma.201904206

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.201904206 2019

  25. [25]

    Mali, Yves H

    Shammi Rana, Massimiliano Remigio, Lekshmi Aravindan Geetha, Karol Struty´ nski, Martina Volpi, Sanjay John, Lech Tomasz Baczewski, Yossi Paltiel, Roland Resel, Manuel Melle-Franco, Kunal S. Mali, Yves H. Geerts, and Steven De Feyter. Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity in Two-Dimensional Self-Assembled Molecular Networks.Journal of the American Chemical S...

    work page doi:10.1021/jacs.5c12143 2025

  26. [26]

    Y. H. G. Lin, C. K. Cheng, L. B. Young, L. S. Chiang, W. S. Chen, K. H. Lai, S. P. Chiu, C. T. Wu, C. T. Liang, J. J. Lin, C. H. Hsu, Y. H. Lin, J. Kwo, and M. Hong. Nanometer-thick molecular beam epitaxy Al films capped with in situ deposited Al2O3—High-crystallinity, morphology, and superconductivity. Journal of Applied Physics, 136(7):074401, August 20...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0213941 2024

  27. [27]

    Geerts, Kunal S

    Shammi Rana, Maurizio Mastropasqua Talamo, Navathej Preetha Genesh, David Cornil, Flavia Pop, J´ erˆ ome Cornil, Lech Tomasz Baczewski, Yossi Paltiel, Yves H. Geerts, Kunal S. Mali, Narcis Avarvari, and Steven De Feyter. Enantiospecific Magnetoconductance Asymmetry in a Racemic Conglomerate Driven by Surface-Assisted Symmetry Breaking.Journal of the Ameri...

    work page doi:10.1021/jacs.6c05771 2026

  28. [28]

    Thin Film Growth Through Sputtering Technique and Its Applications

    Edgar Alfonso, Jairo Olaya, and Gloria Cubillos. Thin Film Growth Through Sputtering Technique and Its Applications. InCrystallization - Science and Technology. IntechOpen, September 2012. ISBN 978-953-51-0757-6 978-953-51-5009-1. doi: 10.5772/35844

    work page doi:10.5772/35844 2012

  29. [29]

    Herron, Mar´ ıa C

    Yohaselly Santiago-Rodr´ ıguez, Jeffrey A. Herron, Mar´ ıa C. Curet-Arana, and Manos Mavrikakis. Atomic and molecular adsorption on Au(111).Surface Science, 627:57–69, September 2014. ISSN 0039-6028. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2014.04.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.susc.2014.04.012 2014

  30. [30]

    Das, An- drea L

    Niccol` o Giaconi, Lorenzo Poggini, Michela Lupi, Matteo Briganti, Anil Kumar, Tapan K. Das, An- drea L. Sorrentino, Caterina Viglianisi, Stefano Menichetti, Ron Naaman, Roberta Sessoli, and Matteo Mannini. Efficient Spin-Selective Electron Transport at Low Voltages of Thia-Bridged Triarylamine Het- ero[4]helicenes Chemisorbed Monolayer.ACS Nano, 17(15):1...

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c04878 2023

  31. [31]

    Face centred cubic cobalt ultrathin- layers in Au/Co(111) multilayers: A study by electron diffraction and by HREM.Thin Solid Films, 370 (1):186–191, July 2000

    S Jomni, N Mliki, R Belhi, K Abdelmoula, M Ayadi, and G Nihoul. Face centred cubic cobalt ultrathin- layers in Au/Co(111) multilayers: A study by electron diffraction and by HREM.Thin Solid Films, 370 (1):186–191, July 2000. ISSN 0040-6090. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(00)00916-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s0040-6090(00)00916-0 2000

  32. [32]

    R. F. C. Farrow, G. R. Harp, R. F. Marks, T. A. Rabedeau, M. F. Toney, D. Weller, and S. S. P. Parkin. Epitaxial growth of Pt on basal-plane sapphire: A seed film for artificially layered magnetic metal structures.Journal of Crystal Growth, 133(1):47–58, October 1993. ISSN 0022-0248. doi: 10. 1016/0022-0248(93)90102-3

    1993

  33. [33]

    Manifold role of a Ta adhesion layer in pressure-tuned Co/Pt multilayers.Physical Review B, 112(9), 2025

    Rico Ehrler. Manifold role of a Ta adhesion layer in pressure-tuned Co/Pt multilayers.Physical Review B, 112(9), 2025. doi: 10.1103/5g32-ykxx

    work page doi:10.1103/5g32-ykxx 2025

  34. [34]

    Controlling Amyloid Assembly Dynamics Using Spin Interfaces.ACS Nano, 19(31): 28326–28334, August 2025

    Yael Kapon, Dror Merhav, Gal Finkelstein-Zuta, Omer Blumen, Naomi Melamed-Book, Yael Levi- Kalisman, Ilya Torchinsky, Shira Yochelis, Daniel Sharon, Lech Tomasz Baczewski, Ehud Gazit, and Yossi Paltiel. Controlling Amyloid Assembly Dynamics Using Spin Interfaces.ACS Nano, 19(31): 28326–28334, August 2025. ISSN 1936-0851. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5c06285

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c06285 2025

  35. [35]

    Th¨ ummler, Jitul Deka, Pranava K

    Matthias Rohmer, Yishen Xie, Sandipan Roy, Christian Hildebrand, Justus F. Th¨ ummler, Jitul Deka, Pranava K. Sivakumar, Stuart S. P. Parkin, Thi Ngoc Ha Nguyen, Lech Tomasz Baczewski, Christoph Tegenkamp, and Wolfgang H. Binder. Chiral induced spin selectivity in achiral poly(amino acid)s acting as transducers of centrochiral information via the sergeant...

    work page doi:10.1038/s43246-025-01055-z 2025

  36. [36]

    Christopher Love, Lara A

    J. Christopher Love, Lara A. Estroff, Jennah K. Kriebel, Ralph G. Nuzzo, and George M. Whitesides. Self-Assembled Monolayers of Thiolates on Metals as a Form of Nanotechnology.Chemical Reviews, 105(4):1103–1170, April 2005. ISSN 0009-2665. doi: 10.1021/cr0300789. 20

    work page doi:10.1021/cr0300789 2005

  37. [37]

    Marqusee and R

    S. Marqusee and R. L. Baldwin. Helix stabilization by Glu-...Lys+ salt bridges in short peptides of de novo design.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 84(24): 8898–8902, December 1987. ISSN 0027-8424. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.24.8898

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.84.24.8898 1987

  38. [38]

    Alanine-Rich Peptide for Spin-Dependent Transport: Synthesis of a 36-mer via Pentamer Assembly

    Aleksandr Kazimir, Lokesh Rasabathina, Jannik Knoche, Linda Sch¨ utz, Thi Ngoc Ha Nguyen, Olav Hellwig, Christoph Tegenkamp, Georgeta Salvan, Irene Coin, and Christina Lamers. Alanine-Rich Peptide for Spin-Dependent Transport: Synthesis of a 36-mer via Pentamer Assembly. June 2026. doi: 10.26434/chemrxiv.15004758/v1

    work page doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.15004758/v1 2026

  39. [39]

    Miller, Mellie Lemon, Marisa A

    Aaron M. Miller, Mellie Lemon, Marisa A. Choffel, Sarah R. Rich, Fischer Harvel, and David C. Johnson. Extracting information from X-ray diffraction patterns containing Laue oscillations.Zeitschrift f¨ ur Naturforschung B, 77(4-5):313–322, May 2022. ISSN 1865-7117. doi: 10.1515/znb-2022-0020

    work page doi:10.1515/znb-2022-0020 2022

  40. [40]

    Castner, Kenneth Hinds, and David W

    David G. Castner, Kenneth Hinds, and David W. Grainger. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Sulfur 2p Study of Organic Thiol and Disulfide Binding Interactions with Gold Surfaces.Langmuir, 12(21): 5083–5086, January 1996. ISSN 0743-7463. doi: 10.1021/la960465w

    work page doi:10.1021/la960465w 1996

  41. [41]

    Cavalleri, G

    O. Cavalleri, G. Gonella, S. Terreni, M. Vignolo, L. Floreano, A. Morgante, M. Canepa, and R. Rolandi. High resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of L-cysteine self-assembled films.Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 6(15):4042–4046, July 2004. ISSN 1463-9084. doi: 10.1039/B405516K

    work page doi:10.1039/b405516k 2004

  42. [42]

    XPS measurements on l-cysteine and 1- octadecanethiol self-assembled films: A comparative study.Applied Surface Science, 175–176:357–362, May 2001

    O Cavalleri, L Oliveri, A Dacc` a, R Parodi, and R Rolandi. XPS measurements on l-cysteine and 1- octadecanethiol self-assembled films: A comparative study.Applied Surface Science, 175–176:357–362, May 2001. ISSN 0169-4332. doi: 10.1016/S0169-4332(01)00067-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0169-4332(01)00067-8 2001

  43. [43]

    Reference XPS spectra of amino acids.IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1050(1): 012001, January 2021

    A Artemenko, A Shchukarev, P ˇStenclov´ a, T W˚ agberg, J Segervald, X Jia, and A Kromka. Reference XPS spectra of amino acids.IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1050(1): 012001, January 2021. ISSN 1757-899X. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1050/1/012001

    work page doi:10.1088/1757-899x/1050/1/012001 2021

  44. [44]

    Rakshit, Manju Singh, Samuele Sanna, Roshni Yadav, Ko-Wei Lin, Alessio Mezzi, Simona Achilli, Elena Molteni, Marco Marino, Guido Fratesi, Valentin Dediu, and Ilaria Bergenti

    Luca Gnoli, Mattia Benini, Corrado Del Conte, Alberto Riminucci, Rajib K. Rakshit, Manju Singh, Samuele Sanna, Roshni Yadav, Ko-Wei Lin, Alessio Mezzi, Simona Achilli, Elena Molteni, Marco Marino, Guido Fratesi, Valentin Dediu, and Ilaria Bergenti. Enhancement of Magnetic Stability in Antiferromagnetic CoO Films by Adsorption of Organic Molecules.ACS Appl...

    work page doi:10.1021/acsaelm.3c01599 2024

  45. [45]

    Yao-Jane Hsu, Yu-Ling Lai, Chih-Han Chen, Ying-Chang Lin, Hsiu-Yun Chien, Jeng-Han Wang, Tu- Ngoc Lam, Yuet-Loy Chan, D. H. Wei, Hong-Ji Lin, and Chien-Te Chen. Enhanced Magnetic Anisotropy via Quasi-Molecular Magnet at Organic-Ferromagnetic Contact.The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 4(2):310–316, January 2013. doi: 10.1021/jz301757x

    work page doi:10.1021/jz301757x 2013

  46. [46]

    Collapse of the standard ferromagnetic domain structure in hybrid Co/Molecule bilayers.Nature Communications, 16(1):5807, July 2025

    Mattia Benini, Andrei Shumilin, Viktor Kabanov, Rajib Kumar Rakshit, Antarjami Sahoo, Anita Halder, Andrea Droghetti, Francesco Cugini, Massimo Solzi, Diego Bisero, Patrizio Graziosi, Alberto Riminucci, Ilaria Bergenti, Manju Singh, Luca Gnoli, Samuele Sanna, Mirko Cinchetti, Tomaz Mertelj, Stefano Sanvito, and Valentin Alek Dediu. Collapse of the standar...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61068-7 2025