pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28902 · v1 · pith:FPZDKLE4new · submitted 2026-06-27 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Reproducible Ohmic bismuth contacts to textrm{MoS}₂ nanotubes and nanoribbons

Robin T. K. Schock , Stefan Obloh , Korbinian Fink , Matthias Kronseder , Matja\v{z} Malok , Maja Rem\v{s}kar , Andreas K. H\"uttel This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 08:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords MoS2 nanotubesbismuth contactsOhmic contactsreproducible fabricationtwo-point resistancetransition metal dichalcogenidesnanoribbonssemimetal contacts
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bismuth contacts to MoS2 nanotubes and nanoribbons achieve reproducible finite room-temperature two-point resistances with a median of 340 kΩ.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates fabrication steps that allow metallic contacts to be attached reproducibly to single vapor-phase grown MoS2 nanotubes and nanoribbons. All devices in a large series exhibit finite room-temperature two-point resistances without any gating applied. This addresses long-standing challenges with contact scatter on curved surfaces of these nanostructures. A detailed analysis traces the effects of specific fabrication changes that enable the improvement.

Core claim

Using bismuth semimetal contacts together with targeted fabrication process adjustments makes it possible to produce contacts to individual MoS2 nanotubes and nanoribbons that consistently show finite two-point resistances at room temperature in the absence of gating, reaching a median value of 340 kΩ across a large fabrication series.

What carries the argument

Bismuth semimetal contacts applied through optimized fabrication steps to vapor-phase grown MoS2 nanotubes and nanoribbons.

If this is right

  • Contact resistances no longer scatter widely on the same chip for these curved nanostructures.
  • MoS2 nanotubes and nanoribbons become more viable as building blocks for field-effect transistors.
  • Quantum electronic devices based on these materials gain a practical route to metallic leads.
  • The same bismuth-based approach used for flat MoS2 flakes can be adapted to tubular and ribbon geometries.
  • Analysis of individual fabrication steps isolates which changes most improve contact performance.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method may extend to other curved transition-metal dichalcogenide structures where contact formation has been difficult.
  • Reproducible contacts could enable systematic studies of transport properties that were previously limited by contact variability.
  • If nanotube diameter or chirality variations remain uncontrolled, further process tuning may still be needed for even tighter resistance distributions.

Load-bearing premise

The specific fabrication process changes are what produce the observed reproducibility rather than uncontrolled differences in nanotube quality or measurement setup.

What would settle it

A replication attempt that applies the reported fabrication steps but still produces wide scatter in contact resistances across devices on the same chip would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.28902 by Andreas K. H\"uttel, Korbinian Fink, Maja Rem\v{s}kar, Matja\v{z} Malok, Matthias Kronseder, Robin T. K. Schock, Stefan Obloh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Attaching metallic contacts to transition metal dichalcogenide nanostructures and in particular to $\textrm{MoS}_2$ has posed significant challenges over the past years. For $\textrm{MoS}_2$ nanotubes and nanoribbons, a highly promising material for field effect transistors as well as quantum electronic devices, this is even more the case due to the small, curved surface. So far all attempts there have led to a wide scatter of contact resistances on the same chip. Recently, for quasi two-dimensional, flat $\textrm{MoS}_2$ flakes, the use of semimetals has led to a breakthrough, making transparent and Ohmic contacts possible. Here, we demonstrate the steps required to reproducibly fabricate contacts to single, vapor phase grown $\textrm{MoS}_2$ nanotubes and nanowires. All devices display finite room-temperature two-point resistances in absence of gating, with a median value of $340\,\textrm{k}\Omega$ in a large fabrication series. A detailed analysis elucidates the impact of the different fabrication changes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a fabrication process for bismuth contacts to vapor-phase grown MoS₂ nanotubes and nanoribbons that yields reproducible Ohmic behavior. All devices in a large series exhibit finite room-temperature two-point resistances without gating, with a reported median value of 340 kΩ; the authors provide a detailed analysis attributing the improvement to specific changes in the contact fabrication sequence relative to prior attempts that showed wide scatter.

Significance. If the attribution to the bismuth process holds after controls, the result would be significant for enabling reliable transport measurements and device applications in 1D TMD nanostructures, extending the semimetal-contact approach recently successful on flat 2D MoS₂ flakes. The work directly addresses a long-standing experimental bottleneck in the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results / Fabrication analysis] Results section (or equivalent): the central claim that the observed consistency (all finite resistances, median 340 kΩ) arises from the bismuth-contact fabrication changes rather than from uncontrolled variations in nanotube quality requires explicit controls. No pre-contact characterization (TEM, Raman, or ungated metrics on the same nanotubes) or same-batch comparisons between old and new processes are described; without these, the reduced scatter could reflect growth-batch selection effects.
  2. [Abstract and Results] The abstract states that all devices conducted and supplies a median resistance, but the manuscript must include raw I-V curves, device-by-device resistances with error bars or histograms, and confirmation that the contacts are linear (Ohmic) rather than merely finite. These data are load-bearing for the reproducibility claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures and Methods] Figure captions and methods should explicitly state the number of devices measured, the range of nanotube diameters, and any post-fabrication annealing or gating conditions used for the two-point data.
  2. [Introduction] The manuscript should cite the specific prior works on MoS₂ nanotube contacts that showed scatter, to allow direct comparison of the new median value.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of significance and for the constructive major comments. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the reproducibility claim.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results / Fabrication analysis] Results section (or equivalent): the central claim that the observed consistency (all finite resistances, median 340 kΩ) arises from the bismuth-contact fabrication changes rather than from uncontrolled variations in nanotube quality requires explicit controls. No pre-contact characterization (TEM, Raman, or ungated metrics on the same nanotubes) or same-batch comparisons between old and new processes are described; without these, the reduced scatter could reflect growth-batch selection effects.

    Authors: We agree that pre-contact characterization of the same nanotubes and same-batch comparisons would provide the strongest possible isolation of the fabrication-sequence effect. The current manuscript attributes the improvement to the specific changes in contact fabrication by direct comparison with the authors' prior attempts on similar vapor-phase material that exhibited wide scatter; the large series (all devices finite) is presented as evidence that the new sequence produces consistent results. We will revise the Results section to add an explicit limitations paragraph acknowledging the absence of pre-contact TEM/Raman on the contacted tubes and the lack of same-batch old-vs-new controls, and to clarify that growth-batch selection cannot be fully ruled out. If any supporting growth metrics exist in the authors' records they will be included; otherwise the attribution will be presented with the appropriate caveat. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract and Results] The abstract states that all devices conducted and supplies a median resistance, but the manuscript must include raw I-V curves, device-by-device resistances with error bars or histograms, and confirmation that the contacts are linear (Ohmic) rather than merely finite. These data are load-bearing for the reproducibility claim.

    Authors: We will add the requested data to the revised manuscript. A new figure (or expanded Results subsection) will show representative raw I-V curves for multiple devices, a histogram of all two-point resistances, and a statement confirming linearity within the measured bias range. Device-by-device values with any available uncertainty will be tabulated or plotted. These additions directly support the abstract claim and the reproducibility statement. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental report with no derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental fabrication study reporting measured two-point resistances (median 340 kΩ) across devices. No equations, first-principles derivations, parameter fits, or 'predictions' appear anywhere in the text. The central claim rests on direct electrical measurements from a fabrication series rather than any reduction to self-defined inputs or self-citations. External controls and nanotube characterization are separate validity questions, not circularity. This matches the default expectation of score 0 for self-contained experimental work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No mathematical model, free parameters, axioms, or new physical entities are introduced; the paper is an experimental fabrication report.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5752 in / 1032 out tokens · 39352 ms · 2026-06-30T08:25:09.656341+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Spot anchoring

    Predominantly, linear behaviour was observed, see, e.g., the measurement of several nanotube segments on chip𝛾in Fig. 4(a). The only occurences of clear diode-like response were on chip𝛼, where the substrate was not heated during contact deposition. This is demonstrated in Fig. 4(b) with the response of two neighboring segments; the curves nearly coincide...

  2. [2]

    S., Geim A

    Novoselov, K. S.et al.Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films.Science306, 666–669 (2004). URLhttps: //www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1102896

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1126/science.1102896 2004

  3. [3]

    S.et al.Two-dimensional atomic crystals.Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences102, 10451– 10453 (2005)

    Novoselov, K. S.et al.Two-dimensional atomic crystals.Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences102, 10451– 10453 (2005). URLhttps://www.pnas.org/content/ 102/30/10451

    2005

  4. [4]

    URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/ s41928-021-00670-1

    Das, S.et al.Transistors based on two-dimensional materi- als for future integrated circuits.Nature Electronics4, 786– 799 (2021). URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/ s41928-021-00670-1

    2021

  5. [5]

    Record-Low Metal to Semiconductor Contact Resistance in Atomic-Layer-Deposited In2O3 TFTs Reaching the Quantum Limit,

    Dorow, C. J.et al.Exploring manufacturability of novel 2D channel materials: 300mm wafer-scale 2D NMOS & PMOS using MoS 2, WS 2, & WSe 2. In2023 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 1–4 (2023). URLhttps://dx.doi. org/10.1109/IEDM45741.2023.10413874

    work page doi:10.1109/iedm45741.2023.10413874 2023

  6. [6]

    Record-Low Metal to Semiconductor Contact Resistance in Atomic-Layer-Deposited In2O3 TFTs Reaching the Quantum Limit,

    Chou, A.-S.et al.Status and performance of integration modules toward scaled CMOS with transition metal dichalco- genide channel. In2023 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 1–4 (2023). URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ IEDM45741.2023.10413779

    work page arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qute.202100162

    Jing, F.-M.et al.Gate-controlled quantum dots based on 2D materials.Advanced Quantum Technologies5, 2100162 (2022). URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qute.202100162

    work page doi:10.1002/qute.202100162 2022

  8. [8]

    & Hersam, M

    Liu, X. & Hersam, M. C. 2D materials for quantum information science.Nature Reviews Materials4, 669– 684 (2019). URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/ s41578-019-0136-x

    2019

  9. [9]

    URLhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10

    Qiu, D.et al.Recent advances in 2D supercon- ductors.Advanced Materials33, 2006124 (2021). URLhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10. 1002/adma.202006124

    2021

  10. [10]

    URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/ s41586-019-1493-8

    Hills, G.et al.Modern microprocessor built from com- plementary carbon nanotube transistors.Nature572, 595– 602 (2019). URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/ s41586-019-1493-8

    2019

  11. [11]

    Nature Electronics7, 684–693 (2024)

    Si, J.et al.A carbon-nanotube-based tensor processing unit. Nature Electronics7, 684–693 (2024). URLhttps://www. nature.com/articles/s41928-024-01211-2

    2024

  12. [12]

    & Lindner, N

    Stern, A. & Lindner, N. H. Topological quantum computa- tion—from basic concepts to first experiments.Science339, 1179–1184 (2013). URLhttps://www.science.org/doi/ 10.1126/science.1231473

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1231473 2013

  13. [13]

    smoking gun

    Frolov, S. M.et al.Data sharing helps avoid “smoking gun” claims of topological milestones.Science391, 137– 142 (2026). URLhttps://www.science.org/doi/abs/ 10.1126/science.adk9181

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adk9181 2026

  14. [14]

    URLhttps://www

    Xiang, R.et al.One-dimensional van der Waals heterostruc- tures.Science367, 537–542 (2020). URLhttps://www. science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aaz2570

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aaz2570 2020

  15. [15]

    & L ´evy, F

    Remskar, M., Skraba, Z., Cl ´eton, F., Sanjin ´es, R. & L ´evy, F. MoS2 as microtubes.Appl. Phys. Lett.69, 351–353 (1996). 7 URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.118057

    work page doi:10.1063/1.118057 1996

  16. [16]

    R.et al.Multiwall MoS2 tubes as optical resonators

    Kazanov, D. R.et al.Multiwall MoS2 tubes as optical resonators. Applied Physics Letters113, 101106 (2018). URLhttps: //dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5047792

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5047792 2018

  17. [17]

    URLhttps://dx.doi

    Remskar, M.et al.Confinement related phenomena in MoS 2 tubular structures grown from vapour phase.Israel Journal of Chemistry62, e202100100 (2022). URLhttps://dx.doi. org/10.1002/ijch.202100100

    work page doi:10.1002/ijch.202100100 2022

  18. [18]

    Fathipour, S.et al.Synthesized multiwall MoS 2 nanotube and nanoribbon field-effect transistors.Appl. Phys. Lett.106, 022114 (2015). URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4906066

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4906066 2015

  19. [19]

    Zur Halbleitertheorie der Sperrschicht- und Spitzengleichrichter.Zeitschrift f ¨ur Physik113, 367–414 (1939)

    Schottky, W. Zur Halbleitertheorie der Sperrschicht- und Spitzengleichrichter.Zeitschrift f ¨ur Physik113, 367–414 (1939). URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01340116

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01340116 1939

  20. [20]

    Tung, R. T. The physics and chemistry of the Schottky bar- rier height.Applied Physics Reviews1, 011304 (2014). URL https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.4858400

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4858400 2014

  21. [21]

    Louie, S. G. & Cohen, M. L. Electronic structure of a metal- semiconductor interface.Physical Review B13, 2461–2469 (1976). URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB. 13.2461

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb 1976

  22. [22]

    Valence-band offsets and Schottky barrier heights of layered semiconductors explained by interface-induced gap states.Applied Physics Letters72, 1899–1901 (1998)

    M ¨onch, W. Valence-band offsets and Schottky barrier heights of layered semiconductors explained by interface-induced gap states.Applied Physics Letters72, 1899–1901 (1998). URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.121220

    work page doi:10.1063/1.121220 1901

  23. [23]

    Gong, C., Colombo, L., Wallace, R. M. & Cho, K. The un- usual mechanism of partial Fermi level pinning at metal–MoS2 interfaces.Nano Letters14, 1714–1720 (2014). URLhttps: //dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl403465v

    work page doi:10.1021/nl403465v 2014

  24. [24]

    URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ acsnano.6b07159

    Kim, C.et al.Fermi level pinning at electrical metal contacts of monolayer molybdenum dichalcogenides.ACS Nano11, 1588–1596 (2017). URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ acsnano.6b07159

    2017

  25. [25]

    URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10

    Sotthewes, K.et al.Universal Fermi-level pinning in transition- metal dichalcogenides.The Journal of Physical Chemistry C123, 5411–5420 (2019). URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10. 1021/acs.jpcc.8b10971

    2019

  26. [26]

    URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-021-03472-9

    Shen, P.-C.et al.Ultralow contact resistance between semimetal and monolayer semiconductors.Nature593, 211–217 (2021). URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-021-03472-9

    2021

  27. [27]

    Schock, R. T. K.et al.Non-destructive low-temperature contacts to MoS 2 nanoribbon and nanotube quantum dots.Advanced Materials35, 2209333 (2023). URLhttps://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/adma.202209333

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202209333 2023

  28. [28]

    URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05431-4

    Li, W.et al.Approaching the quantum limit in two-dimensional semiconductor contacts.Nature613, 274–279 (2023). URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05431-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05431-4 2023

  29. [29]

    Schock, R. T. K.et al.Material transfer and contact op- timization in MoS 2 nanotube devices.physica status solidi (b)262, 2400366 (2025). URLhttps://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pssb.202400366

    work page doi:10.1002/pssb.202400366 2025

  30. [30]

    Zailer, I., Frost, J. E. F., Chabasseur-Molyneux, V., Ford, C. J. B. & Pepper, M. Crosslinked PMMA as a high-resolution negative resist for electron beam lithography and applications for physics of low-dimensional structures.Semiconductor Science and Technology11, 1235 (1996). URLhttps://dx.doi.org/ 10.1088/0268-1242/11/8/021

    work page doi:10.1088/0268-1242/11/8/021 1996

  31. [31]

    Jarillo-Herrero, P., Sapmaz, S., Dekker, C., Kouwenhoven, L. P. & van der Zant, H. S. J. Electron-hole symmetry in a semi- conducting carbon nanotube quantum dot.Nature429, 389– 392 (2004). URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/ nature02568

    2004

  32. [32]

    URLhttps://www

    Jarillo-Herrero, P.et al.Orbital Kondo effect in carbon nan- otubes.Nature434, 484–488 (2005). URLhttps://www. nature.com/articles/nature03422

    2005

  33. [33]

    Jarillo-Herrero, P. (2007). Private communication

    2007

  34. [34]

    ACS Nano18, 22444–22453 (2024)

    Sun, Z.et al.Low contact resistance on monolayer MoS 2 field- effect transistors achieved by CMOS-compatible metal contacts. ACS Nano18, 22444–22453 (2024). URLhttps://dx.doi. org/10.1021/acsnano.4c07267

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c07267 2024

  35. [35]

    Das, S., Chen, H.-Y., Penumatcha, A. V. & Appenzeller, J. High performance multilayer MoS 2 transistors with scandium contacts.Nano Letters13, 100–105 (2013). URLhttps: //dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl303583v

    work page doi:10.1021/nl303583v 2013

  36. [36]

    & H¨ uttel, A

    Reinhardt, S., Pirker, L., B ¨auml, C., Rem ˇskar, M. & H¨ uttel, A. K. Coulomb blockade spectroscopy of a MoS 2 nan- otube.physica status solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research Letters 13, 1900251 (2019). URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ pssr.201900251

    2019

  37. [37]

    J.et al.Visualizing the metal-MoS 2 contacts in two- dimensional field-effect transistors with atomic resolution.Phys

    Wu, R. J.et al.Visualizing the metal-MoS 2 contacts in two- dimensional field-effect transistors with atomic resolution.Phys. Rev. Materials3, 111001 (2019). URLhttps://dx.doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.111001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.3.111001 2019

  38. [38]

    In2018 IEEE 13th Nanotechnology Mate- rials and Devices Conference, 1–4 (IEEE, Portland, OR, USA, 2018)

    Liu, M.et al.Improvement of metal-semiconductor contact from Schottky to Ohmic by Cu doping in transition metal dichalco- genide transistors. In2018 IEEE 13th Nanotechnology Mate- rials and Devices Conference, 1–4 (IEEE, Portland, OR, USA, 2018). URLhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/ 8605891/

    2018

  39. [39]

    URLhttps: //www.nature.com/articles/s41928-024-01176-2

    Jiang, J.et al.Yttrium-doping-induced metallization of molyb- denum disulfide for Ohmic contacts in two-dimensional tran- sistors.Nature Electronics7, 545–556 (2024). URLhttps: //www.nature.com/articles/s41928-024-01176-2

    2024

  40. [40]

    & Esseni, D

    Lizzit, D., Khakbaz, P., Driussi, F., Pala, M. & Esseni, D. Ohmic behavior in metal contacts to n/p-type transition-metal dichalcogenides: Schottky versus tunneling barrier trade-off. ACS Applied Nano Materials(2023). URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1021/acsanm.3c00166

    work page doi:10.1021/acsanm.3c00166 2023

  41. [41]

    URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0155663

    Chen, Y.et al.Gate-tunable superconductivity in hybrid InSb–Pb nanowires.Applied Physics Letters123, 082601 (2023). URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0155663

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0155663 2023

  42. [42]

    URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.12.125

    Kumari, L.et al.Effects of deposition temperature and thickness on the structural properties of thermal evaporated bismuth thin films.Applied Surface Science253, 5931–5938 (2007). URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.12.125

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.12.125 2007

  43. [43]

    L., Thrush, C

    Partin, D. L., Thrush, C. M., Heremans, J., Morelli, D. T. & Olk, C. H. Growth and characterization of epitaxial bismuth films. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics Processing and Phenomena7, 348–353 (1989). URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1116/1.584748

    work page doi:10.1116/1.584748 1989

  44. [44]

    Li, L.-J. (2024). Private communication

    2024

  45. [45]

    & Massalski, T

    Okamoto, H. & Massalski, T. B. The Au-Bi (gold-bismuth) system.Bulletin of Alloy Phase Diagrams4, 401–407 (1983). URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02868093

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02868093 1983

  46. [46]

    de Haas, W. J. & Jurriaanse, F. The super-conductivity of gold- bismuth.Naturwissenschaften19, 706–706 (1931)

    1931

  47. [47]

    McDonnell, S., Addou, R., Buie, C., Wallace, R. M. & Hinkle, C. L. Defect-dominated doping and contact resistance in MoS2. ACS Nano8, 2880–2888 (2014). URLhttps://dx.doi.org/ 10.1021/nn500044q

    work page doi:10.1021/nn500044q 2014

  48. [48]

    URLhttps: //www.nature.com/articles/s41557-018-0136-2

    Pet ˝o, J.et al.Spontaneous doping of the basal plane of MoS 2 single layers through oxygen substitution under ambient condi- tions.Nature Chemistry10, 1246–1251 (2018). URLhttps: //www.nature.com/articles/s41557-018-0136-2

    2018

  49. [49]

    npj 2D Materials and Applications7, 1–9 (2023)

    Schwarz, A.et al.Thiol-based defect healing of WSe 2 and WS2. npj 2D Materials and Applications7, 1–9 (2023). URLhttps: 8 //www.nature.com/articles/s41699-023-00421-0

    2023

  50. [50]

    Malok, M., Jelenc, J., Krajnc, A. P. & Rem ˇskar, M. Edge and defect effects on charge distribution in collapsed MoS 2 nanotubes.Nanoscale Advances7, 8161–8169 (2025). URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D5NA00771B

    work page doi:10.1039/d5na00771b 2025

  51. [51]

    & Rem ˇskar, M

    Malok, M., Jelenc, J. & Rem ˇskar, M. Electrical properties of collapsed MoS 2 nanotubes.Nanoscale17, 12361–12370 (2025). URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D5NR00284B

    work page doi:10.1039/d5nr00284b 2025

  52. [52]

    Cheng, R.-R

    Khadiev, A.et al.Misfit layered compounds: Insights into chemical, kinetic, and thermodynamic stability of nanophases.Accounts of Chemical Research57, 3243–3253 (2024). URLhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs. accounts.4c00412

    work page doi:10.1021/acs 2024

  53. [53]

    URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc

    Reinhardt, S.et al.Lab::Measurement — a portable and ex- tensible framework for controlling lab equipment and conduct- ing measurements.Computer Physics Communications234, 216 (2019). URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc. 2018.07.024

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc 2019