pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.29421 · v1 · pith:DDYX72PQnew · submitted 2026-06-28 · ⚛️ physics.med-ph · quant-ph

First-in-human quantum entanglement imaging

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 01:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.med-ph quant-ph
keywords quantum entanglementpositron annihilationpolarization correlationCompton scatteringin vivo imagingplastic scintillator PET68Ga-DOTA-TATE
0
0 comments X

The pith

Annihilation photons from positron emission inside a living human exhibit a measurable degree of quantum entanglement.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the polarization correlation of photons from electron-positron annihilation inside human tissue can be imaged in vivo. A patient received 68Ga-DOTA-TATE and was scanned with a plastic-scintillator PET system that records both interaction position and Compton-scattering plane for each photon. From the distribution of relative angles between those planes, the authors extract an entanglement parameter for the liver and spleen that sits between the value expected for fully separable photons and the value expected for maximally entangled pairs.

Core claim

By determining the relative angle between the polarization planes of annihilation photons via their Compton scattering directions in plastic scintillators, the degree of quantum entanglement can be imaged simultaneously with the conventional uptake map; the values obtained for liver and spleen lie between those predicted for separable states and for maximally entangled two-photon states.

What carries the argument

Relative angle between polarization planes of the two annihilation photons, extracted from the directions of their Compton scatters inside plastic scintillators.

If this is right

  • Entanglement maps can be produced in the same scan as standard PET uptake images without additional radiotracer or hardware.
  • Tissue-specific differences in entanglement degree become accessible as a potential contrast mechanism.
  • The method applies to any positron-emitting radionuclide used in clinical PET.
  • Preservation of partial entanglement inside the body is demonstrated for at least two organs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the entanglement parameter varies systematically with metabolic or structural tissue properties, it could supply diagnostic information orthogonal to uptake intensity.
  • Extension to time-of-flight or multi-photon coincidence data might tighten the constraint on the extracted entanglement value.
  • Comparison of entanglement images before and after therapy could test whether the parameter tracks treatment response.

Load-bearing premise

The measured angle between Compton-scattering planes accurately reports the true polarization correlation of the photons inside living tissue without large systematic distortion from multiple scattering, attenuation, or detector response.

What would settle it

A phantom measurement in which known maximally entangled photon pairs (produced in vacuum or thin target) yield an extracted entanglement parameter statistically indistinguishable from the separable-photon expectation when imaged with the same scanner geometry and reconstruction.

read the original abstract

Annihilation photons are quantum-entangled in polarization, a phenomenon that has not been exploited in medical diagnostics so far. We present the first in vivo imaging of the degree of quantum entanglement of photons originating from positron-electron annihilation within a human subject. This study utilized the Jagiellonian Positron Emission Tomography (J-PET) scanner, constructed from plastic scintillators. In plastics, annihilation photons interact primarily via the Compton effect, which provides simultaneous information regarding the photon interaction position and time, as well as the photon polarization plane. The patient was injected with a DOTA-TATE radiopharmaceutical labeled with the $^{68}$Ga radionuclide. Using the J-PET scanner, we determined the image of the radiopharmaceutical uptake and, simultaneously, the image of the degree of quantum entanglement. The latter was determined from the relative angle between the polarization planes of the annihilation photons. The values of the degree of quantum entanglement extracted for the liver and the spleen are smaller than those predicted for maximally entangled two-photon states, yet larger than expected for separable photons. This demonstration opens new perspectives for the application of quantum entanglement in clinical diagnostics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first in vivo demonstration of imaging the degree of quantum entanglement of annihilation photons originating from positron-electron annihilation in a human subject. Using the J-PET scanner with plastic scintillators, a patient injected with 68Ga-DOTA-TATE was imaged to produce simultaneous maps of radiopharmaceutical uptake and the degree of entanglement, the latter extracted from the relative angle between polarization planes of the two photons. The reported entanglement values for the liver and spleen lie between those expected for maximally entangled and for separable photon pairs.

Significance. If the measurements are robust, the work would constitute the first clinical application of quantum entanglement properties to medical imaging and could open new diagnostic modalities that exploit polarization correlations beyond standard PET intensity imaging.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the headline claim of intermediate entanglement values for liver and spleen rests on the untested assumption that the distribution of relative polarization angles measured via Compton scattering in the plastic scintillators faithfully encodes the initial two-photon state inside living tissue; the abstract provides no discussion, simulation, or correction for distortions arising from photon propagation, multiple scattering, attenuation, or finite detector resolution, any of which could produce the reported intermediate values as an artifact.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: no methods section, error bars, statistical analysis, patient demographics, or raw coincidence data are supplied, rendering it impossible to assess whether the extracted entanglement degrees are supported by the measurements or to reproduce the result.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'the image of the degree of quantum entanglement' is used without indicating how the per-voxel entanglement metric is computed or visualized.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript reporting the first in vivo quantum entanglement imaging. We address each major comment below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the headline claim of intermediate entanglement values for liver and spleen rests on the untested assumption that the distribution of relative polarization angles measured via Compton scattering in the plastic scintillators faithfully encodes the initial two-photon state inside living tissue; the abstract provides no discussion, simulation, or correction for distortions arising from photon propagation, multiple scattering, attenuation, or finite detector resolution, any of which could produce the reported intermediate values as an artifact.

    Authors: The J-PET scanner's use of plastic scintillators for simultaneous position, time, and polarization-plane information via Compton scattering has been characterized in prior publications, where the mapping from measured scattering angles to initial polarization correlation was validated under controlled conditions. We agree, however, that the submitted abstract does not explicitly discuss potential in vivo distortions. In the revised version we will add a concise paragraph (with supporting references or brief Monte Carlo considerations) addressing photon propagation, attenuation, and detector resolution effects to substantiate that the reported intermediate entanglement values are not artifacts. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: no methods section, error bars, statistical analysis, patient demographics, or raw coincidence data are supplied, rendering it impossible to assess whether the extracted entanglement degrees are supported by the measurements or to reproduce the result.

    Authors: The manuscript was prepared as a concise communication. Detailed acquisition and analysis procedures for J-PET polarization imaging are documented in our earlier technical papers on the scanner. To improve standalone reproducibility we will expand the text with a dedicated methods paragraph that includes patient demographics (age, injected activity, ethical approval), the precise definition and fitting procedure used to extract the entanglement degree, error bars derived from coincidence statistics, and a brief statistical summary. Raw coincidence lists cannot be deposited publicly without violating patient privacy regulations, but processed histograms and analysis code can be made available upon request. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental measurement of entanglement degree from observed angles

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental demonstration in which the degree of quantum entanglement is extracted from the measured distribution of relative polarization angles obtained via Compton scattering kinematics in the J-PET plastic-scintillator scanner. This extraction follows standard quantum-mechanical relations between the two-photon polarization correlation function and the entanglement parameter; the reported intermediate values for liver and spleen are direct inferences from the data, not quantities fitted to or defined by the same data in a self-referential loop. No self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked as load-bearing steps in the provided abstract or description. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external quantum-optics benchmarks and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no identifiable free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the measurement relies on standard quantum mechanics of photon polarization and the known Compton scattering process in plastic.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5961 in / 1068 out tokens · 29873 ms · 2026-06-30T01:59:20.283203+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    S.Vandenberghe,P.Moskal,J.S.Karp,StateoftheartintotalbodyPET.EJNMMIphysics7, 35 (2020)

  2. [2]

    A.Alavi,T.J.Werner,E.Ł.Stępień,P.Moskal,UnparalleledandrevolutionaryimpactofPET imaging on research and day to day practice of medicine.Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems 17, 203 (2021)

  3. [3]

    Schwenck,et al., Advances in PET imaging of cancer.Nature Reviews Cancer23(7), 474–490 (2023)

    J. Schwenck,et al., Advances in PET imaging of cancer.Nature Reviews Cancer23(7), 474–490 (2023)

  4. [4]

    S.D.Bass,S.Mariazzi,P.Moskal,E.Stępień,Colloquium:Positroniumphysicsandbiomedical applications.Reviews of Modern Physics95(2), 021002 (2023)

  5. [5]

    D. Bohm, Y. Aharonov, Discussion of Experimental Proof for the Paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky.Phys. Rev.108, 1070–1076 (1957)

  6. [6]

    Klein, T

    O. Klein, T. Nishina, über die Streuung von Strahlung durch freie Elektronen nach der neuen relativistischen Quantendynamik von Dirac.Zeitschrift für Physik52, 853–868 (1929)

  7. [7]

    M. L. H. Pryce, J. C. Ward, Angular Correlation Effects with Annihilation Radiation.Nature 160, 435 (1947)

  8. [8]

    Tkachev,et al., Measuring the evolution of entanglement in Compton scattering.Scientific Reports15(1), 6064 (2025)

    I. Tkachev,et al., Measuring the evolution of entanglement in Compton scattering.Scientific Reports15(1), 6064 (2025)

  9. [9]

    P. Moskal,et al., Nonmaximal entanglement of photons from positron-electron annihilation demonstrated using a novel plastic PET scanner.Science Advances11(18), eads3046 (2025), arXiv:2407.08574, doi:10.1126/sciadv.ads3046

  10. [10]

    Ivashkin,et al., Testing entanglement of annihilation photons.Scientific Reports13(1), 7559 (2023)

    A. Ivashkin,et al., Testing entanglement of annihilation photons.Scientific Reports13(1), 7559 (2023)

  11. [11]

    P. Moskal, Quantum Entanglement Degree, Mean Positronium Lifetime, and the3𝛾/2𝛾 Annihilation-RateRatioasNovelPETBiomarkersforHypoxia–Concept,Challenges,andPre- dictions.Bio-AlgorithmsandMed-Systems22,56–77(2026),doi:10.5604/01.3001.0055.7461. 20

  12. [12]

    puzzle of decoherence

    S. Parashari,et al., Closing the door on the “puzzle of decoherence” of annihilation quanta. Physics Letters B852, 138628 (2024)

  13. [13]

    Bordes,et al., First Detailed Study of the Quantum Decoherence of Entangled Gamma Photons.Phys

    J. Bordes,et al., First Detailed Study of the Quantum Decoherence of Entangled Gamma Photons.Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 132502 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.132502

  14. [14]

    Caradonna, I

    P. Caradonna, I. D’Amico, D. G. Jenkins, D. P. Watts, Stokes-parameter representation for Compton scattering of entangled and classically correlated two-photon systems.Phys. Rev. A 109, 033719 (2024)

  15. [15]

    Moskal,et al., Positronium image of the human brain in vivo.Science Advances10(37), eadp2840(2024),doi:10.1126/sciadv.adp2840,https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10

    P. Moskal,et al., Positronium image of the human brain in vivo.Science Advances10(37), eadp2840(2024),doi:10.1126/sciadv.adp2840,https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10. 1126/sciadv.adp2840

  16. [16]

    P.Moskal,etal.,Feasibilitystudiesofthepolarizationofphotonsbeyondtheopticalwavelength regime with the J-PET detector.The European Physical Journal C78, 970 (2018)

  17. [17]

    R. Bayerlein,et al., Monte Carlo-based scatter correction for the plastic-based modular PET scannerJ-PET.PhysicsinMedicine&Biology71(7),075026(2026),doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ ae54fb,https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae54fb

  18. [18]

    Das,et al., Development of correction techniques for the J-PET scanner.Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems20(1), 101–110 (2024), doi:10.5604/01.3001.0054.9362,https://doi

    M. Das,et al., Development of correction techniques for the J-PET scanner.Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems20(1), 101–110 (2024), doi:10.5604/01.3001.0054.9362,https://doi. org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.9362

  19. [19]

    Moskal,et al., Positronium imaging with the novel multiphoton PET scanner.Science Advances7(42), eabh4394 (2021), doi:10.1126/sciadv.abh4394,https://www.science

    P. Moskal,et al., Positronium imaging with the novel multiphoton PET scanner.Science Advances7(42), eabh4394 (2021), doi:10.1126/sciadv.abh4394,https://www.science. org/doi/abs/10.1126/sciadv.abh4394

  20. [20]

    Moskal,et al., Developing a novel positronium biomarker for cardiac myxoma imaging

    P. Moskal,et al., Developing a novel positronium biomarker for cardiac myxoma imaging. EJNMMI Physics10, 22 (2023), doi:10.1186/s40658-023-00543-w

  21. [21]

    Defect Diffus Forum.331, 275 (2012), doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.331.275

    H.Chen,J.vanHorn,Y.Jean,Applicationsofpositronannihilationspectroscopytolifescience. Defect Diffus Forum.331, 275 (2012), doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.331.275. 21

  22. [22]

    Jasinska,et al., Human tissues investigation using PALS technique.Acta Phys

    B. Jasinska,et al., Human tissues investigation using PALS technique.Acta Phys. Pol. B48, 1737 (2017), doi:10.5506/APhysPolB.48.1737

  23. [23]

    Zgardzińska,et al., Studies on healthy and neoplastic tissues using positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy and focused histopathological imaging.Sci

    B. Zgardzińska,et al., Studies on healthy and neoplastic tissues using positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy and focused histopathological imaging.Sci. Rep.10, 11890 (2020), doi:10.1038/s41598-020-68727-3

  24. [24]

    T.Ahn,etal.,Hierarchicalnatureofnanoscaleporosityinbonerevealedbypositronannihilation lifetime spectroscopy.ACS Nano.15, 4321 (2021), doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c07478

  25. [25]

    Karimi, P

    H. Karimi, P. Moskal, A. Żak, S. E. Ł, 3D melanoma spheroid model for the development of positronium biomarker.Sci. Rep.13, 7648 (2023), doi:10.1038/s41598-023-34571-4

  26. [26]

    A.Avachat,etal.,Ortho-positroniumlifetimeforsoft-tissueclassification.Sci.Rep.14,21155 (2024), doi:10.1038/s41598-024-71695-7

  27. [27]

    S. Moyo, E. Stępień, P. Moskal, Characterisation of Plasma Blood Clots in Different Physical States Using Positron Annihilation Lifetime Spectroscopy.Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems 21, 137 (2025), doi:10.5604/01.3001.0055.5409

  28. [28]

    A. M. Kožuljević,et al., Towards polarization enhanced PET: study of random background in polarization correlated Compton events.Phys. Med.145, 105780 (2026), doi:10.1016/j.ejmp. 2026.105780

  29. [29]

    P. G. Bharathi,et al., Machine learning-assisted event classification in cadmium zinc telluride positron emission tomography detectors leveraging entanglement-informed angular correla- tions.Sci. Rep.16, 3116 (2026), doi:10.1038/s41598-025-32951-6

  30. [30]

    B. Spencer,et al., Performance Evaluation of the uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanner BasedonNEMANU2-2018withAdditionalTeststoCharacterizePETScannerswithaLong Axial Field of View.J Nucl Med62, 861–870 (2021), doi:10.2967/jnumed.120.250597

  31. [31]

    J. Qi, B. Huang, Positronium lifetime image reconstruction for TOF PET.IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging41, 2828 (2022), doi:10.1109/TMI.2022.3174561. 22

  32. [32]

    Z. Chen, L. An, C. M. Kao, H. H. Huang, Properties of the positronium lifetime image reconstruction based on maximum likelihood estimation.Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems 19, 1 (2023), doi:10.5604/01.3001.0054.1807

  33. [33]

    Huang,et al., SPLIT: statistical positronium lifetime image reconstruction via time thresh- olding.IEEE Trans

    B. Huang,et al., SPLIT: statistical positronium lifetime image reconstruction via time thresh- olding.IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging43, 2148 (2024), doi:10.1109/TMI.2024.3357659

  34. [34]

    H. H. Huang,et al., A statistical reconstruction algorithm for positronium lifetime imaging using TOF PET.IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci.9, 478 (2025), doi:10.1109/TRPMS. 2025.3531225

  35. [35]

    Yoshihara,et al., Development of electron-tracking Compton imaging system with 30-𝜇m SOI pixel sensor.J

    Y. Yoshihara,et al., Development of electron-tracking Compton imaging system with 30-𝜇m SOI pixel sensor.J. Instrum.12, C01045 (2017), doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/C01045

  36. [36]

    IEEE; 2019

    P.Moskal,Towardstotal-bodymodularPETforpositroniumandquantumentanglementimag- ing.Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Con- ference (NSS/MIC); 2018 Nov 10-17; Sydney, NSW, Australia. IEEE; 2019. p. 1-4.(2018), doi:10.1109/NSSMIC.2018.8824622

  37. [37]

    Makek, D

    M. Makek, D. Bosnar, L. Pavelić, P. Šenjug, P. Žugec, Single-layer Compton detectors for measurementofpolarizationcorrelationsofannihilationquanta.Nucl.Instrum.MethodsPhys. Res. A958, 162835 (2020), doi:10.1016/j.nima.2019.162835

  38. [38]

    Shimazoe,et al., Development of simultaneous PET and Compton imaging using GAGG- SiPM based pixel detectors.Nucl

    K. Shimazoe,et al., Development of simultaneous PET and Compton imaging using GAGG- SiPM based pixel detectors.Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A954, 161499 (2020), doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2018.10.177

  39. [39]

    Yoshida,et al., Whole gamma imaging: a new concept of PET combined with Compton imaging.Phys

    E. Yoshida,et al., Whole gamma imaging: a new concept of PET combined with Compton imaging.Phys. Med. Biol.65, 125013 (2020), doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ab8e89

  40. [40]

    H.Tashima,T.Yamaya,Comptonimagingformedicalapplications.Radiol.Phys.Technol.15, 187 (2022), doi:10.1007/s12194-022-00666-2

  41. [41]

    Kim,et al., Background reduction in PET by double Compton scattering of quantum entangledannihilationphotons.J.Instrum.18,P07007(2023),doi:10.1088/1748-0221/18/07/ P07007

    D. Kim,et al., Background reduction in PET by double Compton scattering of quantum entangledannihilationphotons.J.Instrum.18,P07007(2023),doi:10.1088/1748-0221/18/07/ P07007. 23

  42. [42]

    G. R. Romanchek, G. Shoop, S. Abbaszadeh, Application of quantum entanglement induced polarization for dual-positron and prompt gamma imaging.Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems 19(1), 9–16 (2023)

  43. [43]

    G. R. Romanchek,et al., Investigation of quantum entanglement information for𝛽+𝛾coinci- dences.Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems20, 27 (2024), doi:10.5604/01.3001.0054.9079

  44. [44]

    Rep.14, 20946 (2024), doi:10.1038/s41598-024-71750-3

    D.Kim,etal.,Demonstrationofin-vivosimultaneous3Dimagingwith18F-FDGandNa131I using Compton-PET system.Sci. Rep.14, 20946 (2024), doi:10.1038/s41598-024-71750-3

  45. [45]

    Shimazoe, M

    K. Shimazoe, M. Uenomachi, Quantum sensing and imaging in the MeV regime of nuclear medicine.Appl. Phys. Express19, 040104 (2026), doi:10.35848/1882-0786/ae5bde

  46. [46]

    S.Sharma,D.Kumar,P.Moskal,Decoherencepuzzleinmeasurementsofphotonsoriginating from electron-positron annihilation.Acta Phys. Pol. A142, 428–435 (2022)

  47. [47]

    Tayefi Ardebili, P

    F. Tayefi Ardebili, P. Moskal, Assessing the spatial resolution of the modular J-PET scanner using the MLEM algorithm.Bio-Algorithms Med-Systems20, 1 (2024), doi:10.5604/01.3001. 0054.9273

  48. [48]

    Kacprzak, E

    K. Kacprzak, E. Beyene, J. Choiński,et al., Methodology for time and TOT calibration of a modular J-PET scanner with prompt gamma emitters 22Na and 44Sc.Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems22, 36 (2026), doi:10.5604/01.3001.0055.6703

  49. [49]

    P.Moskal,etal.,SimulatingNEMAcharacteristicsofthemodulartotal-bodyJ-PETscanner-an economic total-body PET from plastic scintillators.Physics in Medicine & Biology66(17), 175015 (2021), doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ac16bd

  50. [50]

    Moskal,et al., Discrete symmetries tested at 10−4 precision using linear polarization of photons from positronium annihilations.Nature Communications15(1), 78 (2024), doi:10

    P. Moskal,et al., Discrete symmetries tested at 10−4 precision using linear polarization of photons from positronium annihilations.Nature Communications15(1), 78 (2024), doi:10. 1038/s41467-023-44340-6,https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44340-6

  51. [51]

    Moskal,et al., Test of a single module of the J-PET scanner based on plastic scintillators

    P. Moskal,et al., Test of a single module of the J-PET scanner based on plastic scintillators. NuclearInstrumentsandMethodsinPhysicsResearchSectionA:Accelerators,Spectrometers, 24 DetectorsandAssociatedEquipment764,317–321(2014),doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima. 2014.07.052

  52. [52]

    S.Sharma,etal.,EstimatingrelationshipbetweentheTimeOverThresholdandenergylossby photons in plastic scintillators used in the J-PET scanner.EJNMMI-Physics7(1), 39 (2020)

  53. [53]

    G. Korcyl,et al., Trigger-less and reconfigurable data acquisition system for positron emis- sion tomography.Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems10(1), 37–40 (2014), doi:10.1515/ bams-2013-0107

  54. [54]

    Korcyl,et al., Evaluation of Single-Chip, Real-Time Tomographic Data Processing on FPGA-SoCDevices.IEEETransactionsonMedicalImaging(2018),doi:10.1109/TMI.2018

    G. Korcyl,et al., Evaluation of Single-Chip, Real-Time Tomographic Data Processing on FPGA-SoCDevices.IEEETransactionsonMedicalImaging(2018),doi:10.1109/TMI.2018. 2837741

  55. [55]

    R. Brun, F. Rademakers, ROOT - An object oriented data analysis framework.Nucl. Instrum. Meth.389, 81–86 (1997)

  56. [56]

    J. Allison,et al., Recent developments in Geant4.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equip- ment835, 186–225 (2016), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2016.06.125,https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900216306957

  57. [57]

    Merlin,et al., CASToR: a generic data organization and processing code framework for multi-modal and multi-dimensional tomographic reconstruction.Phys

    T. Merlin,et al., CASToR: a generic data organization and processing code framework for multi-modal and multi-dimensional tomographic reconstruction.Phys. Med. Biol.63(18), 185005 (2018)

  58. [58]

    M.Das,DevelopmentofMetabolicandPositroniumLifetimeImagingwiththeModularJ-PET Scanner.PhD thesis, Jagiellonian University(2026). Acknowledgments Funding:We acknowledge support from the National Science Centre of Poland through grants MAESTROno.2021/42/A/ST2/00423(P.M.);OPUSno.2021/43/B/ST2/02150(P.M.);OPUS24+LAP no. 2022/47/I/NZ7/03112 (E.Ł.S.); SONATA no....