pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30168 · v1 · pith:HFLLX4QDnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · 💻 cs.CV

Latent Noise Mask for Reducing Visual Redundancy in Multimodal Large Language Models

Kai Jiang , Ruishu Zhu , Siqi Huang , Hongyuan Zhang , Xuelong Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 06:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords Multimodal large language modelsVisual redundancyLatent noise maskEvidence tokenVisual question answeringGrounding tasksToken purificationLatent space intervention
0
0 comments X

The pith

A lightweight Lens Evidence Token scores image tokens and guides adaptive latent noise to suppress question-irrelevant ones in MLLMs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that dense redundant image tokens dilute question-relevant visual cues and hurt fine-grained reasoning in multimodal large language models. It introduces Lens, a framework that adds one temporary control token (the Lens Evidence Token) to score relevance, then injects adaptive latent noise into low-scoring tokens to soften distractors during decoding. This leaves the model backbone and token sequence unchanged while adding only a lightweight noise generator. The result is reported gains of 2.4-6.4 points on VQA datasets and 4.1-6.4 points on grounding tasks. A sympathetic reader cares because the work claims that purifying visual evidence in latent space can improve performance more directly than extending reasoning traces.

Core claim

Lens is a question-conditioned visual evidence purification framework that uses a lightweight Lens Evidence Token (LET) to score which visual tokens support the current question, then injects adaptive latent noise into low-relevance tokens to suppress distractors without altering the model backbone or token sequence, yielding 2.4-6.4 point gains on most VQA datasets and 4.1-6.4 point gains on grounding tasks.

What carries the argument

The Lens Evidence Token (LET) that scores visual token relevance to the question, together with the guided adaptive latent noise injection that softly suppresses low-relevance tokens in latent space.

If this is right

  • MLLMs gain 2.4-6.4 points on most VQA datasets when low-relevance visual tokens are softly suppressed.
  • Grounding task performance rises by 4.1-6.4 points under the same purification.
  • Only one temporary learnable control token plus a lightweight noise generator are required.
  • The model backbone and input token sequence remain unchanged.
  • Multimodal reasoning improves more directly from cleaner visual evidence than from longer reasoning traces.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same latent-space suppression pattern might apply to other token-heavy multimodal tasks where redundancy dilutes signals.
  • Because the intervention is lightweight and architecture-agnostic, it could be stacked with existing chain-of-thought or reasoning-trace methods.
  • If LET scoring generalizes across domains, similar evidence-token mechanisms might reduce effective context length in vision-language models.
  • The approach suggests that future MLLM scaling could prioritize token-quality mechanisms over raw parameter count.

Load-bearing premise

The LET scores accurately identify question-relevant visual tokens and adaptive noise injection suppresses distractors without losing critical information or creating new artifacts.

What would settle it

Applying Lens to a standard VQA benchmark and measuring zero or negative accuracy change relative to the unmodified base MLLM would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30168 by Hongyuan Zhang, Kai Jiang, Ruishu Zhu, Siqi Huang, Xuelong Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Motivation of LENS. Existing multimodal reasoning methods often add visual or latent reasoning states, yet redundant image tokens can still distract the model. LENS learns Lens Evidence Token (LET) to score visual evidence and softly suppress irrelevant visual tokens in latent space. show that visual and latent spaces can support reasoning beyond pure text, but they fail to directly reduce the influence of… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of LENS. Evidence probing appends a temporary ⟨mask⟩ token, whose hidden state is decoded by a simple MLP head fθ into the LET scores. A threshold τ converts the scores into a suppression gate, and a small noise generator predicts token-specific latent noise for low￾gate visual tokens. The control token is removed before final decoding, so the MLLM receives the purified sequence Ve with the origin… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Visualization of LENS on VQA tasks. For each example, the left image shows the question￾conditioned LET scores mapped to visual patches, and the right image shows the visual effect after applying token-level latent noise to low-relevance visual tokens. LENS preserves answer-supporting evidence such as attributes, objects, relations, and OCR fields, while suppressing irrelevant back￾ground or distracting re… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visualization of LENS on grounding tasks. For each example, the left image shows the LET scores over visual patches, and the right image shows the visual effect after applying token-level latent noise to low-relevance visual tokens. LENS keeps target objects and multiple queried instances visually stable, while perturbing surrounding clutter and non-target distractors. This illustrates its advantage in imp… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) often fail in fine-grained visual reasoning, as question-relevant visual cues are diluted by dense and redundant image tokens. Recent multimodal reasoning methods usually extend chain-of-thought from language models into visual or latent spaces, seeking to add intermediate reasoning states while overlooking the negative impact of redundant visual tokens. We propose LatEnt Noise maSk (Lens), a question-conditioned visual evidence purification framework that empowers MLLMs to reason with cleaner visual cues in latent space. Lens introduces a lightweight Lens Evidence Token (LET) to score which visual tokens support the current question and preserve them during decoding. Guided by the LET scores, it injects adaptive latent noise into low-relevance tokens, softly suppressing distractors without changing the model backbone or token sequence. With only one temporary learnable control token and a lightweight noise generator, Lens adds minimal overhead while improving the base MLLM by 2.4-6.4 points on most VQA datasets and by 4.1-6.4 points on grounding tasks. These results show that multimodal reasoning can benefit more directly from cleaner question-relevant visual evidence than from simply extending the reasoning trace.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes LatEnt Noise maSk (Lens), a question-conditioned visual evidence purification framework for MLLMs. It introduces a lightweight Lens Evidence Token (LET) to score visual tokens for question relevance and injects adaptive latent noise into low-relevance tokens to suppress distractors during decoding, without altering the model backbone or token sequence. The method claims to improve base MLLM performance by 2.4-6.4 points on most VQA datasets and 4.1-6.4 points on grounding tasks by providing cleaner visual cues.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold under rigorous validation, Lens could provide a lightweight, additive approach to mitigating visual redundancy in MLLMs, potentially offering a more direct benefit to fine-grained reasoning than extending chain-of-thought traces. The use of a single temporary learnable control token and noise generator suggests low overhead, which would be a practical strength if demonstrated with reproducible code or ablations.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: Performance numbers (2.4-6.4 points on VQA, 4.1-6.4 on grounding) are stated without any reference to the base MLLM architecture, specific datasets, baselines, number of runs, or statistical tests. This absence prevents verification of the central empirical claim and must be addressed with full experimental details, including ablations on LET scoring and noise injection.
  2. Abstract and method description: The assumption that LET scores accurately identify question-relevant tokens and that adaptive noise injection suppresses distractors without introducing artifacts or losing critical information is load-bearing for the purification claim, yet no validation of LET scoring accuracy (e.g., against human annotations or attention maps) or failure-case analysis is referenced.
minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: The phrasing 'most VQA datasets' is imprecise; list the exact datasets and report per-dataset gains for clarity.
  2. Abstract: Clarify whether the reported gains are absolute or relative, and specify the evaluation metric (e.g., accuracy, CIDEr).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive comments. We agree that the abstract requires additional context for the reported gains and that further validation of the LET scoring mechanism would strengthen the claims. We will revise the manuscript to address both points.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: Performance numbers (2.4-6.4 points on VQA, 4.1-6.4 on grounding) are stated without any reference to the base MLLM architecture, specific datasets, baselines, number of runs, or statistical tests. This absence prevents verification of the central empirical claim and must be addressed with full experimental details, including ablations on LET scoring and noise injection.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract is too terse. In the revision we will explicitly name the base model (LLaVA-1.5-7B), list the exact VQA and grounding benchmarks, state that all numbers are means over three random seeds with standard deviations, and reference the main experimental table. Expanded ablations on LET scoring thresholds and noise schedules will be moved to the main paper (currently in the appendix) and cross-referenced from the abstract. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Abstract and method description: The assumption that LET scores accurately identify question-relevant tokens and that adaptive noise injection suppresses distractors without introducing artifacts or losing critical information is load-bearing for the purification claim, yet no validation of LET scoring accuracy (e.g., against human annotations or attention maps) or failure-case analysis is referenced.

    Authors: We acknowledge that direct validation of LET token relevance (human annotations or quantitative attention-map correlation) is absent. We will add a new subsection that (i) compares LET scores against the model's own cross-attention maps on a held-out subset and (ii) presents qualitative failure cases where noise injection either removes useful tokens or fails to suppress distractors. Because collecting fresh human annotations would require new data collection, we will instead provide the attention-map analysis and failure-case study as the primary validation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The manuscript describes Lens as an additive framework that introduces a new lightweight LET token and adaptive noise injection without any equations, derivations, or reductions to prior fitted quantities. No self-definitional steps, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text; the central claim rests on empirical improvements from the described mechanism rather than any input-by-construction equivalence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 2 invented entities

Only abstract available; no explicit free parameters, mathematical axioms, or external benchmarks are stated. The LET and noise generator are presented as new lightweight components.

invented entities (2)
  • Lens Evidence Token (LET) no independent evidence
    purpose: Score relevance of visual tokens to the current question
    Introduced as a single temporary learnable control token
  • adaptive latent noise no independent evidence
    purpose: Suppress low-relevance visual tokens during decoding
    Injected based on LET scores via a lightweight noise generator

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5749 in / 1178 out tokens · 38053 ms · 2026-06-30T06:32:58.951357+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · 13 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Qwen3-VL Technical Report

    Shuai Bai, Yuxuan Cai, Ruizhe Chen, Keqin Chen, Xionghui Chen, Zesen Cheng, Lianghao Deng, Wei Ding, Chang Gao, Chunjiang Ge, et al. Qwen3-vl technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Mint-cot: Enabling interleaved visual tokens in mathematical chain-of-thought reasoning

    Xinyan Chen, Renrui Zhang, Dongzhi Jiang, Aojun Zhou, Shilin Yan, Weifeng Lin, and Hongsheng Li. Mint-cot: Enabling interleaved visual tokens in mathematical chain-of-thought reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.05331,

    work page arXiv

  3. [3]

    GRIT: Teaching MLLMs to Think with Images

    Yue Fan, Xuehai He, Diji Yang, Kaizhi Zheng, Ching-Chen Kuo, Yuting Zheng, Sravana Jyothi Narayanaraju, Xinze Guan, and Xin Eric Wang. Grit: Teaching mllms to think with images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.15879,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    doi: 10.1016/j.neucom

    ISSN 0925-2312. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom. 2022.10.039. Xingyu Fu, Minqian Liu, Zhengyuan Yang, John Corring, Yijuan Lu, Jianwei Yang, Dan Roth, Dinei Florencio, and Cha Zhang. Refocus: Visual editing as a chain of thought for structured image understanding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.05452,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neucom 2022

  5. [5]

    Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Space

    Shibo Hao, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, DiJia Su, Xian Li, Zhiting Hu, Jason Weston, and Yuandong Tian. Training large language models to reason in a continuous latent space.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06769,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    Vision-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in Multimodal Large Language Models

    Wenxuan Huang, Bohan Jia, Zijie Zhai, Shaosheng Cao, Zheyu Ye, Fei Zhao, Zhe Xu, Xu Tang, Yao Hu, and Shaohui Lin. Vision-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in multimodal large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06749,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Kai Jiang, Siqi Huang, Xiangyu Chen, Jiawei Shao, Hongyuan Zhang, Ping Luo, and Xuelong Li

    1109/TNNLS.2025.3601373. Kai Jiang, Siqi Huang, Xiangyu Chen, Jiawei Shao, Hongyuan Zhang, Ping Luo, and Xuelong Li. Multimodal continual learning with mllms from multi-scenario perspectives, 2026b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.18507. Kai Jiang, Zhengyan Shi, Dell Zhang, Hongyuan Zhang, and Xuelong Li. Mixture of noise for pre- trained model-based class...

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer

    Bo Li, Yuanhan Zhang, Dong Guo, Renrui Zhang, Feng Li, Hao Zhang, Kaichen Zhang, Peiyuan Zhang, Yanwei Li, Ziwei Liu, et al. Llava-onevision: Easy visual task transfer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03326,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Imagine while Reasoning in Space: Multimodal Visualization-of-Thought

    Chengzu Li, Wenshan Wu, Huanyu Zhang, Yan Xia, Shaoguang Mao, Li Dong, Ivan Vuli ´c, and Furu Wei. Imagine while reasoning in space: Multimodal visualization-of-thought.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.07542, 2025a. Hengli Li, Chenxi Li, Tong Wu, Xuekai Zhu, Yuxuan Wang, Zhaoxin Yu, Eric Hanchen Jiang, Song- Chun Zhu, Zixia Jia, Ying Nian Wu, et al. Seek in the ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    Reasoning Within the Mind: Dynamic Multimodal Interleaving in Latent Space

    Chengzhi Liu, Yuzhe Yang, Yue Fan, Qingyue Wei, Sheng Liu, and Xin Eric Wang. Rea- soning within the mind: Dynamic multimodal interleaving in latent space.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.12623, 2025a. Fangyu Liu, Guy Emerson, and Nigel Collier. Visual spatial reasoning.Transactions of the Associ- ation for Computational Linguistics, 11:635–651,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    Visual-rft: Visual reinforcement fine-tuning

    Ziyu Liu, Zeyi Sun, Yuhang Zang, Xiaoyi Dong, Yuhang Cao, Haodong Duan, Dahua Lin, and Jiaqi Wang. Visual-rft: Visual reinforcement fine-tuning. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Interna- tional Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 2034–2044, 2025b. Chancharik Mitra, Brandon Huang, Trevor Darrell, and Roei Herzig. Compositional chain-of- thought prompting for l...

    2034

  12. [12]

    Chain-of-visual-thought: Teaching vlms to see and think better with continuous visual tokens.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.19418,

    Yiming Qin, Bomin Wei, Jiaxin Ge, Konstantinos Kallidromitis, Stephanie Fu, Trevor Darrell, and XuDong Wang. Chain-of-visual-thought: Teaching vlms to see and think better with continuous visual tokens.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.19418,

    work page arXiv

  13. [13]

    VLM-R1: A Stable and Generalizable R1-style Large Vision-Language Model

    Haozhan Shen, Peng Liu, Jingcheng Li, Chunxin Fang, Yibo Ma, Jiajia Liao, Qiaoli Shen, Zilun Zhang, Kangjia Zhao, Qianqian Zhang, et al. Vlm-r1: A stable and generalizable r1-style large vision-language model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07615,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    OpenThinkIMG: Learning to Think with Images via Visual Tool Reinforcement Learning

    Zhaochen Su, Linjie Li, Mingyang Song, Yunzhuo Hao, Zhengyuan Yang, Jun Zhang, Guanjie Chen, Jiawei Gu, Juntao Li, Xiaoye Qu, et al. Openthinkimg: Learning to think with images via visual tool reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.08617,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    The caltech-ucsd birds-200-2011 dataset.Technical Report CNS-TR-2011-001,

    Catherine Wah, Steve Branson, Peter Welinder, Pietro Perona, and Serge Belongie. The caltech-ucsd birds-200-2011 dataset.Technical Report CNS-TR-2011-001,

    2011

  16. [16]

    Pixel Reasoner: Incentivizing Pixel-Space Reasoning with Curiosity-Driven Reinforcement Learning

    Haozhe Wang, Alex Su, Weiming Ren, Fangzhen Lin, and Wenhu Chen. Pixel reasoner: In- centivizing pixel-space reasoning with curiosity-driven reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.15966, 2025a. Weiyun Wang, Zhangwei Gao, Lixin Gu, Hengjun Pu, Long Cui, Xingguang Wei, Zhaoyang Liu, Linglin Jing, Shenglong Ye, Jie Shao, et al. Internvl3. 5: Advanc...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    Machine Mental Imagery: Empower Multimodal Reasoning with Latent Visual Tokens

    Zeyuan Yang, Xueyang Yu, Delin Chen, Maohao Shen, and Chuang Gan. Machine mental imagery: Empower multimodal reasoning with latent visual tokens.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.17218,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Introducing visual perception token into multimodal large language model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17425, 2025a

    Runpeng Yu, Xinyin Ma, and Xinchao Wang. Introducing visual perception token into multimodal large language model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17425, 2025a. Xinlei Yu, Chengming Xu, Guibin Zhang, Zhangquan Chen, Yudong Zhang, Yongbo He, Peng- Tao Jiang, Jiangning Zhang, Xiaobin Hu, and Shuicheng Yan. Vismem: Latent vision memory unlocks potential of vision-l...

    work page arXiv

  19. [19]

    Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Models

    Zhuosheng Zhang, Aston Zhang, Mu Li, Hai Zhao, George Karypis, and Alex Smola. Multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning in language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.00923,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Pyvision: Agentic vision with dynamic tooling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.07998,

    Shitian Zhao, Haoquan Zhang, Shaoheng Lin, Ming Li, Qilong Wu, Kaipeng Zhang, and Chen Wei. Pyvision: Agentic vision with dynamic tooling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.07998,

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    DeepEyes: Incentivizing "Thinking with Images" via Reinforcement Learning

    12 Preprint Ziwei Zheng, Michael Yang, Jack Hong, Chenxiao Zhao, Guohai Xu, Le Yang, Chao Shen, and Xing Yu. Deepeyes: Incentivizing” thinking with images” via reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14362,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Its policy update follows the released GRPO setting and optimizes visual understanding or grounding outputs through verifiable rewards

    with Qwen3-VL-4B and the same training data. Its policy update follows the released GRPO setting and optimizes visual understanding or grounding outputs through verifiable rewards. PAPO PAPO tests whether perception-aware policy optimization improves multimodal rea- soning under the same data setting.We use the official PAPO implementation (Wang et al., 2...

    work page arXiv