pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31740 · v1 · pith:5VEVLPGWnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · 💻 cs.GT · q-bio.PE

The Cooperation Ceiling: Extrinsic Population Dynamics and the Intrinsic Escape

Harry Foster , Vince Knight , Sebastian Krapohl This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 02:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.GT q-bio.PE
keywords cooperationevolutionary game theorypopulation dynamicspublic goods gameheterogeneityextrinsic dynamicsintrinsic dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Extrinsic population dynamics set a ceiling on cooperation that intrinsic dynamics can exceed in heterogeneous groups.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper divides population dynamics in evolutionary games into extrinsic types, which update based on other players' payoffs, and intrinsic types, which update based on a player's own situation. It argues that extrinsic types cannot push cooperation past a certain level when players have different contribution abilities, while intrinsic types can. This matters because most models assume uniform conditions, but real groups are mixed, so the choice of update rule could determine whether cooperation thrives or stalls. The demonstration uses the public goods game where some contribute more than others.

Core claim

The paper establishes that extrinsic population dynamics, which base strategy updates on comparisons with other players' payoffs, impose a ceiling on the rate of cooperation in heterogeneous populations. This ceiling can be exceeded by intrinsic population dynamics, which base updates on a player's own attributes or potential payoffs. The result is shown through analysis and simulation of the public goods game in which individuals make different contribution amounts.

What carries the argument

Categorization of population dynamics as extrinsic (outward payoff comparison) versus intrinsic (inward self-assessment), applied to the public goods game with heterogeneous contributions.

Load-bearing premise

The division of population dynamics into extrinsic and intrinsic categories is exhaustive and relevant for heterogeneous populations.

What would settle it

Observing an extrinsic dynamic that achieves cooperation above the identified ceiling in the public goods game with heterogeneous contributions would disprove the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31740 by Harry Foster, Sebastian Krapohl, Vince Knight.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The four population dynamics. A, the Moran process and C, Fermi imitation dynamics are purely extrinsic. B, aspiration dynamics and D, introspection dynamics are purely intrinsic. For introspection dynamics the candidate action is chosen with probability 1 k−1 , and for aspiration dynamics there is only one other action to accept. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The heterogeneous population as a Markov chain. A, A heterogeneous population with action set A = {C, D}, in which each player has its own payoff function. B, A single transition between neighbouring states. C, Each state is a vertex of S = AN , so the state space is an N-dimensional hypercube. D, Mutation connects the chain and makes it ergodic. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Why purely extrinsic dynamics cannot exceed pC = 1 2 . A, In a social dilemma a defector pointwise dominates a cooperator: in any state, switching to D does not lower the payoff. B, At neutral payoffs the dynamic is unchanged by the label swap σ that exchanges C and D, fixing the symmetric point. C, Stochastic monotonicity then bounds the stationary cooperation probability at the neutral-drift baseline pC … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The cooperation ceiling under purely extrinsic dynamics. Throughout, N = 8, a linear contribution profile, and mutation µ = 0.05; the dashed line marks the neutral-drift baseline pC = 1 2 and, in (a), the dotted line marks r = N. Faint curves show pC trajectories across the sweep, coincident trajectories drawn once; in (a) they join parameter sets at equal selection- or choice-intensity rank across r, sinc… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Intrinsic dynamics exceed the cooperation ceiling. Same population as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The cooperation ceiling across the entire sweep. Each panel pools every parameter combination with µ > 0. (a) The distribution of pC for the purely extrinsic dynamics lies entirely at or below the neutral-drift baseline pC = 1 2 (shaded region). (b) The intrinsic dynamics place mass above 1 2 . (c) The maximum pC attained anywhere in the sweep, as a function of N: for the extrinsic dynamics it is pinned at… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The cooperation ceiling persists for large populations. Cooperation pC is estimated by simulating the Markov chain and averaging the cooperator fraction over the run. Throughout, mutation µ = 0.05, a linear contribution profile of scale M = 2N, selection intensity ε = 0.5 for the Moran process, choice intensity β = 2 for Fermi, introspection and aspiration dynamics, and aspiration level A = 0.7 M; bands, e… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Heterogeneous update rules and heterogeneous returns. Both panels are computed exactly from the steady state of the corresponding transition matrix, with N = 8, a linear contribution profile of scale M = 16, and mutation µ = 0.05; the dashed line marks the neutral-drift baseline pC = 1 2 . (a) A population that mixes Moran (extrinsic) and introspection (intrinsic) players, against the number of introspecti… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Evolutionary game theory provides a framework by which to study the emergence of cooperation in a population of self-interested actors. In such a framework, players' decisions on whether or not to cooperate evolve according to decision rules called population dynamics. However, often games are studied under the assumption that all individuals play under the same conditions, and many common choices of update rule are not well suited for a heterogeneous population. In this paper, we categorise and compare four different population dynamics in such a population as ``extrinsic'', where players learn by looking outward at the payoffs of other players, and ``intrinsic'', where players look inwardly at their own attributes or potential payoffs. We show that extrinsic population dynamics admit a ceiling on the rate of cooperation which can be exceeded by intrinsic population dynamics, and demonstrate this using the public goods game with heterogeneous contributions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript categorizes four population dynamics in evolutionary game theory for heterogeneous populations into extrinsic (learning from other players' payoffs) and intrinsic (based on own attributes or potential payoffs). Using the public goods game with heterogeneous contributions as a test case, it claims to demonstrate that extrinsic dynamics exhibit a ceiling on the rate of cooperation which intrinsic dynamics can exceed.

Significance. If the demonstration holds, the result would be significant for evolutionary game theory as it identifies a structural limitation of common extrinsic update rules in heterogeneous settings and shows how intrinsic rules can achieve higher cooperation levels. The scoped claim in a specific game provides a concrete, falsifiable test case rather than an overgeneralized assertion.

minor comments (1)
  1. Abstract: a single sentence previewing the four dynamics or the quantitative nature of the ceiling would improve accessibility without altering the claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript, for the positive summary and significance assessment, and for the recommendation to accept. We are gratified that the scoped claim and the distinction between extrinsic and intrinsic dynamics were viewed as providing a concrete, falsifiable contribution to evolutionary game theory.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained demonstration

full rationale

The paper defines extrinsic (outward payoff comparison) versus intrinsic (inward attribute or potential payoff) population dynamics as a categorization, then demonstrates via simulation in the heterogeneous-contribution public goods game that the former exhibits a cooperation ceiling the latter can exceed. No equations, self-citations, or fitted parameters are presented in the abstract or described setup that reduce a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to the inputs by construction. The central result is scoped as a comparative demonstration for four chosen rules rather than a general theorem derived from prior self-work, so the derivation chain does not collapse.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted or verified.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5673 in / 961 out tokens · 37983 ms · 2026-07-01T02:54:22.384200+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nowak, and Arne Traulsen

    Tibor Antal, Martin A. Nowak, and Arne Traulsen. Strategy abundance in 2×2 games for arbitrary mutation rates. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 257(2):340–344, 2009

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    Review: Game theory of public goods in one-shot social dilemmas without assortment.Journal of Theoretical Biology, 299:9–20, 2012

    Marco Archetti and Istv´ an Scheuring. Review: Game theory of public goods in one-shot social dilemmas without assortment.Journal of Theoretical Biology, 299:9–20, 2012. Evolution of Cooperation

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Rajib Arefin and Jun Tanimoto

    Md. Rajib Arefin and Jun Tanimoto. Evolution of cooperation in social dilemmas under the coexistence of aspiration and imitation mechanisms.Phys. Rev. E, 102:032120, Sep 2020

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Effective choice in the prisoner’s dilemma.The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24(1):3–25, 1980

    Robert Axelrod. Effective choice in the prisoner’s dilemma.The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24(1):3–25, 1980

    work page 1980

  5. [5]

    Introspection dynamics: A simple model of counterfactual learning in asymmetric games.New Journal of Physics, 24, 06 2022

    Marta Couto, S Giaimo, and Christian Hilbe. Introspection dynamics: A simple model of counterfactual learning in asymmetric games.New Journal of Physics, 24, 06 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Introspection dynamics in asymmetric multiplayer games.Dynamic Games and Applications, 13:1–30, 09 2023

    Marta Couto and Saptarshi Pal. Introspection dynamics in asymmetric multiplayer games.Dynamic Games and Applications, 13:1–30, 09 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Aspiration dynamics in structured population acts as if in a well-mixed one

    Jia Du, Bin Wu, and Long Wang. Aspiration dynamics in structured population acts as if in a well-mixed one. Scientific Reports, 5:8014, 2015

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Altrock, and Long Wang

    Jinming Du, Bin Wu, Philipp M. Altrock, and Long Wang. Aspiration dynamics of multi-player games in finite populations.Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 11(99):20140778, 2014

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    Flores, Mendeli H

    Lucas S. Flores, Mendeli H. Vainstein, Heitor C. M. Fernandes, and Marco A. Amaral. Heterogeneous contributions can jeopardize cooperation in the public goods game.Phys. Rev. E, 108:024111, Aug 2023

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    ludics.https://github.com/hefos/ludics, 2026

    Harry Foster and Vince Knight. ludics.https://github.com/hefos/ludics, 2026

    work page 2026

  11. [11]

    ludics documentation.https://hefos.github.io/ludics/, 2026

    Harry Foster and Vince Knight. ludics documentation.https://hefos.github.io/ludics/, 2026

    work page 2026

  12. [12]

    hefos/ludics (v0.4.3).https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20812318, 2026

    Harry Foster and Vincent Knight. hefos/ludics (v0.4.3).https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20812318, 2026

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.20812318 2026

  13. [13]

    Data for the cooperation ceiling: Extrinsic population dy- namics and the intrinsic escape.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20594161, 2026

    Harry Foster, Vincent Knight, and Sebastian Krapohl. Data for the cooperation ceiling: Extrinsic population dy- namics and the intrinsic escape.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20594161, 2026

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.20594161 2026

  14. [14]

    Knight, and Sebastian Krapohl

    Harry Foster, Vincent A. Knight, and Sebastian Krapohl. Introspection dynamics with mutation in additive games. 2026

    work page 2026

  15. [15]

    Nowak, Christine Taylor, and Lorens A

    Drew Fudenberg, Martin A. Nowak, Christine Taylor, and Lorens A. Imhof. Evolutionary game dynamics in finite populations with strong selection and weak mutation.Theoretical Population Biology, 70(3):352–363, 2006

    work page 2006

  16. [16]

    Ginsberg and Feng Fu

    Alexander G. Ginsberg and Feng Fu. Evolution of cooperation in public goods games with stochastic opting-out. Games, 10(1), 2019

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Hayes, and Horng-Jyh Wu

    Frank Harary, John P. Hayes, and Horng-Jyh Wu. A survey of the theory of hypercube graphs.Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 15(4):277–289, 1988

    work page 1988

  18. [18]

    The tragedy of the commons.Science, 162(3859):1243–1248, 1968

    Garrett Hardin. The tragedy of the commons.Science, 162(3859):1243–1248, 1968

    work page 1968

  19. [19]

    Volunteering as Red Queen mechanism for cooperation in public goods games.Science, 296(5570):1129–1132, 2002

    Christoph Hauert, Silvia De Monte, Josef Hofbauer, and Karl Sigmund. Volunteering as Red Queen mechanism for cooperation in public goods games.Science, 296(5570):1129–1132, 2002

    work page 2002

  20. [20]

    Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game.Nature, 428(6983):643–646, April 2004

    Christoph Hauert and Michael Doebeli. Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game.Nature, 428(6983):643–646, April 2004

    work page 2004

  21. [21]

    The dynamics of public goods.Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 4(3):575–587, 2004

    Christoph Hauert, Nina Haiden, and Karl Sigmund. The dynamics of public goods.Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 4(3):575–587, 2004. 20

    work page 2004

  22. [22]

    Hauser, Christian Hilbe, Krishnendu Chatterjee, and Martin A

    Oliver P. Hauser, Christian Hilbe, Krishnendu Chatterjee, and Martin A. Nowak. Social dilemmas among unequals. Nature, 572(7770):524–527, 2019

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Cambridge University Press, 1998

    Josef Hofbauer and Karl Sigmund.Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, 1998

    work page 1998

  24. [24]

    Teturo Kamae, Ulrich Krengel, and George L. O’Brien. Stochastic inequalities on partially ordered spaces.The Annals of Probability, 5(6):899–912, 1977

    work page 1977

  25. [25]

    Mailath, and Rafael Rob

    Michihiro Kandori, George J. Mailath, and Rafael Rob. Learning, mutation, and long run equilibria in games. Econometrica, 61(1):29–56, 1993

    work page 1993

  26. [26]

    Vincent Knight, Owen Campbell, Marc Harper, Karol M. Langner, Jonathan Campbell, Thomas Campbell, Alex Carney, Martin Chorley, Cameron Davidson-Pilon, Kristian Glass, Nikoleta Glynatsi, Tom´ aˇ s Ehrlich, Martin Jones, Georgios Koutsovoulos, Jamie Muller, Geraint Ng, Remi Noble, Nikolay Ryzhikov, Jessica Standen, Jon Taylor, Michail Theodorakis, Yingrong ...

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Heterogeneity of allocation promotes cooperation in public goods games.Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 389(21):4708–4714, 2010

    Chuang Lei, Te Wu, Jian-Yuan Jia, Rui Cong, and Long Wang. Heterogeneity of allocation promotes cooperation in public goods games.Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 389(21):4708–4714, 2010

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    Aspiration promotes cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game with the imitation rule.Phys

    Xuesong Liu, Mingfeng He, Yibin Kang, and Qiuhui Pan. Aspiration promotes cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game with the imitation rule.Phys. Rev. E, 94:012124, Jul 2016

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Fixation of strategies with the moran and fermi processes in evolutionary games.Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 484:336–344, 2017

    Xuesong Liu, Mingfeng He, Yibin Kang, and Qiuhui Pan. Fixation of strategies with the moran and fermi processes in evolutionary games.Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 484:336–344, 2017

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Fixation probabilities in evolutionary games with the moran and fermi processes.Journal of Theoretical Biology, 364:242–248, 2015

    Xuesong Liu, Qiuhui Pan, Yibin Kang, and Mingfeng He. Fixation probabilities in evolutionary games with the moran and fermi processes.Journal of Theoretical Biology, 364:242–248, 2015

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    Effect of reputation-based heterogeneous investment on cooperation in spatial public goods game.Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 152:111353, 2021

    Xiaojian Ma, Ji Quan, and Xianjia Wang. Effect of reputation-based heterogeneous investment on cooperation in spatial public goods game.Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 152:111353, 2021

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Cooperative interaction of rich and poor can be catalyzed by intermediate climate targets.Climatic Change, 109(3-4):807–814, 2011

    Manfred Milinski, Torsten R¨ ohl, and Jochem Marotzke. Cooperative interaction of rich and poor can be catalyzed by intermediate climate targets.Climatic Change, 109(3-4):807–814, 2011

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    Sommerfeld, Hans-J¨ urgen Krambeck, Floyd A

    Manfred Milinski, Ralf D. Sommerfeld, Hans-J¨ urgen Krambeck, Floyd A. Reed, and Jochem Marotzke. The collective- risk social dilemma and the prevention of simulated dangerous climate change.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(7):2291–2294, 2008

    work page 2008

  34. [34]

    P. A. P. Moran. Random processes in genetics.Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 54(1):60–71, 1958

    work page 1958

  35. [35]

    NOWAK.Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life

    MARTIN A. NOWAK.Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life. Harvard University Press, 2006

    work page 2006

  36. [36]

    Nowak and Robert M

    Martin A. Nowak and Robert M. May. Evolutionary games and spatial chaos.Nature, 359:826–829, 1992

    work page 1992

  37. [37]

    Nowak, Akira Sasaki, Christine Taylor, and Drew Fudenberg

    Martin A. Nowak, Akira Sasaki, Christine Taylor, and Drew Fudenberg. Emergence of cooperation and evolutionary stability in finite populations.Nature, 428:646–650, 2004

    work page 2004

  38. [38]

    Hisashi Ohtsuki, Pedro Bordalo, and Martin A. Nowak. The one-third law of evolutionary dynamics.Journal of Theoretical Biology, 249(2):289–295, 2007

    work page 2007

  39. [39]

    Flor´ ıa, and Yamir Moreno

    Matjaˇ z Perc, Jes´ us G´ omez-Garde˜ nes, Attila Szolnoki, Luis M. Flor´ ıa, and Yamir Moreno. Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: a review.Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 10(80):20120997, 2013

    work page 2013

  40. [40]

    Ji Quan, Yawen Zhou, Xianjia Wang, and Jian-Bo Yang. Evidential reasoning based on imitation and aspiration information in strategy learning promotes cooperation in optional spatial public goods game.Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 133:109634, 2020

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Ten simple rules for reproducible computational research.PLoS Computational Biology, 9(10):e1003285, 2013

    Geir Kjetil Sandve et al. Ten simple rules for reproducible computational research.PLoS Computational Biology, 9(10):e1003285, 2013. 21

    work page 2013

  42. [42]

    Santos and Jorge M

    Francisco C. Santos and Jorge M. Pacheco. Scale-free networks provide a unifying framework for the emergence of cooperation.Physical Review Letters, 95:098104, 2005

    work page 2005

  43. [43]

    Santos and Jorge M

    Francisco C. Santos and Jorge M. Pacheco. Risk of collective failure provides an escape from the tragedy of the commons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(26):10421–10425, 2011

    work page 2011

  44. [44]

    Santos, Marta D

    Francisco C. Santos, Marta D. Santos, and Jorge M. Pacheco. Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games.Nature, 454:213–216, 2008

    work page 2008

  45. [45]

    Princeton University Press, 2010

    Karl Sigmund.The Calculus of Selfishness:. Princeton University Press, 2010

    work page 2010

  46. [46]

    Stewart.Probability, Markov Chains, Queues, and Simulation: The Mathematical Basis of Performance Modeling

    William J. Stewart.Probability, Markov Chains, Queues, and Simulation: The Mathematical Basis of Performance Modeling. Princeton University Press, 2009

    work page 2009

  47. [47]

    Bailey, Ewa Deelman, Yolanda Gil, Brooks Hanson, Michael A

    Victoria Stodden, Marcia McNutt, David H. Bailey, Ewa Deelman, Yolanda Gil, Brooks Hanson, Michael A. Her- oux, John P.A. Ioannidis, and Michela Taufer. Enhancing reproducibility for computational methods.Science, 354(6317):1240–1241, 2016

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    Evolutionary games on graphs.Physics Reports, 446:97–216, 2007

    Gy¨ orgy Szab´ o and G´ abor F´ ath. Evolutionary games on graphs.Physics Reports, 446:97–216, 2007

    work page 2007

  49. [49]

    Evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma game on a square lattice.Phys

    Gy¨ orgy Szab´ o and Csaba T˝ oke. Evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma game on a square lattice.Phys. Rev. E, 58:69–73, Jul 1998

    work page 1998

  50. [50]

    Tarnita, Hisashi Ohtsuki, Tibor Antal, Feng Fu, and Martin A

    Corina E. Tarnita, Hisashi Ohtsuki, Tibor Antal, Feng Fu, and Martin A. Nowak. Strategy selection in structured populations.Journal of theoretical biology, 259(3), August 2009

    work page 2009

  51. [51]

    Zenodo, 2022

    The Turing Way Community.The Turing Way: A Handbook for Reproducible, Ethical and Collaborative Data Science. Zenodo, 2022. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3233853

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.3233853 2022

  52. [52]

    Nowak, and Jorge M

    Arne Traulsen, Martin A. Nowak, and Jorge M. Pacheco. Stochastic dynamics of invasion and fixation.Physical Review E, 74(1):011909, 2006

    work page 2006

  53. [53]

    Evolutionary cooperation dynamics of com- bining imitation and super-rational aspiration induced strategy updating.Applied Mathematics and Computation, 456:128134, 2023

    Si-Yi Wang, Qing-Lian Wang, Xiao-Wei Zhang, and Rui-Wu Wang. Evolutionary cooperation dynamics of com- bining imitation and super-rational aspiration induced strategy updating.Applied Mathematics and Computation, 456:128134, 2023

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    Weitz, Ceyhun Eksin, Keith Paarporn, Sam P

    Joshua S. Weitz, Ceyhun Eksin, Keith Paarporn, Sam P. Brown, and William C. Ratcliff. An oscillating tragedy of the commons in replicator dynamics with game-environment feedback.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(47):E7518–E7525, 2016

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    Greg Wilson, D. A. Aruliah, C. Titus Brown, Neil P. Chue Hong, Matt Davis, Richard T. Guy, Steven H. D. Haddock, Kathryn D. Huff, Ian M. Mitchell, Mark D. Plumbley, Ben Waugh, Ethan P. White, and Paul Wilson. Best practices for scientific computing.PLOS Biology, 12(1):e1001745, jan 2014

    work page 2014

  56. [56]

    Good enough practices in scientific computing.PLoS Computational Biology, 13(6):e1005510, 2017

    Greg Wilson et al. Good enough practices in scientific computing.PLoS Computational Biology, 13(6):e1005510, 2017

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    The evolution of cooperation affected by aspiration-driven updating rule in multi-games with voluntary participation.Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 139:110067, 2020

    Jun Zhang, Bin Hu, Yi Jie Huang, Zheng Hong Deng, and Tao Wu. The evolution of cooperation affected by aspiration-driven updating rule in multi-games with voluntary participation.Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 139:110067, 2020

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Aspiration dynamics generate robust predictions in heterogeneous populations.Nature Communications, 12(1):3250, May 2021

    Lei Zhou, Bin Wu, Jinming Du, and Long Wang. Aspiration dynamics generate robust predictions in heterogeneous populations.Nature Communications, 12(1):3250, May 2021. 22

    work page 2021