Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 37 references

NeHMO: Neural Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability Learning for Decentralized Safe Multi-Arm Motion Planning

T0 review · 1 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-07-02 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A neural approximation of Hamilton-Jacobi reachability captures worst-case safety constraints for decentralized multi-arm planning.

desk verdict Neural HJR approximation for decentralized multi-arm safety is a sensible direction but the safety claims rest on an unverified neural value function without error bounds or invariance checks. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.00326 v1 pith:XIYJQ7RN submitted 2026-07-01 cs.RO

Qingyi Chen , Zachary Kingston , Ahmed H. Qureshi This is my paper
classification cs.RO
keywords multi-armmotionplanningHamilton-Jacobireachabilitydecentralizedtrajectoryoptimizationneuralsafetyfunctionapproximationrobotarmmulti-manipulatorsystemsanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that learning a neural approximation of the Hamilton-Jacobi reachability value function can encode worst-case inter-arm collision avoidance. This would allow each robot arm to plan its trajectory independently using optimization, without needing to predict or coordinate with the others' behaviors. Existing decentralized methods break when predictions fail, while centralized ones cannot run in real time for many arms. If the approximation holds, multi-arm systems could operate safely and scalably in shared spaces where actions are unpredictable.

What carries the argument

The learned neural approximation to the Hamilton-Jacobi reachability safety value function, which represents the minimum time to collision under worst-case actions of other arms.

What would settle it

Run the planner in simulation where one arm follows a trajectory chosen to minimize the learned safety value; if a collision occurs without the value function indicating danger, the approximation fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

We introduce a neural Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability (HJR) learning-based approach to approximate a safety value function that captures worst-case inter-arm safety constraints. We further develop a decentralized trajectory optimization framework that uses the learned HJR representation for real-time planning. The proposed method is scalable and data-efficient, generalizes across multi-manipulator systems, and outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on challenging multi-arm motion planning tasks.

Load-bearing premise

The neural network accurately approximates the true safety value function so that its level sets correctly bound all possible worst-case collisions between arms.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The decentralized planner can guarantee safety in real time without full system coordination.
  • The approach scales to high numbers of arms where centralized methods fail.
  • It works across different multi-manipulator hardware setups without retraining from scratch.
  • Performance exceeds current baselines on tasks with complex collision constraints.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach might extend to other multi-agent planning domains like autonomous vehicles sharing roads.
  • Physical robot experiments with deliberately adversarial arm movements could test the worst-case guarantees directly.
  • Combining the learned safety function with learned dynamics models could handle uncertainty in arm behaviors beyond worst-case assumptions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper introduces NeHMO, a neural approximation of the Hamilton-Jacobi reachability (HJR) value function to encode worst-case inter-arm collision avoidance constraints in multi-manipulator systems. It then embeds this learned representation into a decentralized trajectory optimization framework for real-time planning. The authors claim the approach is scalable and data-efficient, generalizes across different multi-arm setups, and outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on challenging tasks while handling unpredictable behavior from other arms.

Significance. If the neural HJR approximation can be shown to preserve the safety guarantees of exact reachability (i.e., that sublevel sets remain invariant under the worst-case dynamics), the work would offer a practical route to safe decentralized planning in high-dimensional coupled configuration spaces without requiring explicit coordination or accurate behavior prediction. This addresses a recognized scalability barrier in multi-robot safety.

major comments (1)
  1. [Method (neural HJR approximation)] The central safety claim rests on the learned value function V_θ accurately approximating the true HJR safety value function so that its zero sublevel set remains a valid backward reachable tube under adversarial motion of other arms. No Lipschitz bounds, certified error estimates, or post-training verification that the learned sublevel sets are invariant under the HJR PDE dynamics are provided; any pointwise approximation error can move states across the safety boundary and directly undermine the decentralized safety guarantee.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for highlighting the importance of formal safety guarantees in the neural HJR approximation. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Method (neural HJR approximation)] The central safety claim rests on the learned value function V_θ accurately approximating the true HJR safety value function so that its zero sublevel set remains a valid backward reachable tube under adversarial motion of other arms. No Lipschitz bounds, certified error estimates, or post-training verification that the learned sublevel sets are invariant under the HJR PDE dynamics are provided; any pointwise approximation error can move states across the safety boundary and directly undermine the decentralized safety guarantee.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript provides no Lipschitz bounds, certified error estimates, or post-training verification that the learned sublevel sets remain invariant under the HJR PDE. Such formal certificates for neural approximations of Hamilton-Jacobi reachability are an open theoretical challenge and lie outside the scope of this work, which instead emphasizes empirical validation of practical safety and scalability. The experiments section demonstrates that the learned value function yields collision-free trajectories across diverse multi-arm configurations and unpredictable behaviors, indicating that approximation errors do not violate safety in the tested regimes. We will add an explicit limitations paragraph discussing the reliance on empirical rather than certified safety. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Certified Lipschitz bounds, error estimates, or post-training invariance verification of the neural sublevel sets under the HJR dynamics

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: neural approximation of external HJR value function is independent of its own outputs

full rationale

The paper introduces a neural network to approximate the Hamilton-Jacobi reachability safety value function for inter-arm constraints and then uses that approximation inside a decentralized trajectory optimizer. No equations, training procedures, or claims in the provided text reduce a derived quantity back to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction. The HJR PDE and its value function are treated as an external, pre-existing mathematical object; the neural step is a standard supervised approximation whose correctness is not asserted by redefinition. No self-citation chains, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or renaming of known results appear as load-bearing steps. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is provided, so no specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified from the full manuscript.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of NeHMO: Neural Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability Learning for Decentralized Safe Multi-Arm Motion Planning." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XIYJQ7RN

@misc{pith2026260700326,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: NeHMO: Neural Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability Learning for Decentralized Safe Multi-Arm Motion Planning},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XIYJQ7RN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.00326}
}
read the original abstract

Safe multi-arm motion planning is a challenging problem in robotics due to its high dimensionality, coupled configuration space, and complex collision constraints. Centralized planners are capable of coordinating all arms but often face scalability limitations, restricting applicability in real-time settings. On the other hand, decentralized methods are scalable and recent deep learning-based approaches have shown promising results. However, these depend on accurate behavior prediction or coordination protocols and may fail when other arms act unpredictably. To address these challenges, we introduce a neural Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability (HJR) learning-based approach to approximate a safety value function that captures worst-case inter-arm safety constraints. We further develop a decentralized trajectory optimization framework that uses the learned HJR representation for real-time planning. The proposed method is scalable and data-efficient, generalizes across multi-manipulator systems, and outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on challenging multi-arm motion planning tasks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00326 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Our method, NeHMO, controlling a 12-dimensional dual-UR5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. System setups and their symmetries. The primal state is depicted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. An example of NeHMO planning for the dual-UR5 system in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: An example five-UR5 scenario. Table III reports the results. As the number of manipula￾tors increases, the joint configuration space becomes more constrained due to the increase of inter-arm interactions, resulting in a high collision rate for both the naive planner an…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: An example of NeHMO avoiding collision for the UR5 arm while the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    dRRT*: Scalable and informed asymptotically-optimal multi-robot motion planning,

    R. Shome, K. Solovey, A. Dobson, D. Halperin, and K. E. Bekris, “dRRT*: Scalable and informed asymptotically-optimal multi-robot motion planning,”Autonomous Robots, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 443–467, 2020

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Representation- optimal multi-robot motion planning using conflict-based search,

    I. Solis, J. Motes, R. Sandstr ¨om, and N. M. Amato, “Representation- optimal multi-robot motion planning using conflict-based search,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 4608–4615, 2021

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    CHOMP: Gradient optimization techniques for efficient motion planning,

    N. Ratliff, M. Zucker, J. A. Bagnell, and S. Srinivasa, “CHOMP: Gradient optimization techniques for efficient motion planning,” in IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2009, pp. 489–494

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Learning a decentralized multi-arm motion planner,

    H. Ha, J. Xu, and S. Song, “Learning a decentralized multi-arm motion planner,” inConf. on Robotic Learning, 2020

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Hamilton-Jacobi reachability: A brief overview and recent advances,

    S. Bansal, M. Chen, S. Herbert, and C. J. Tomlin, “Hamilton-Jacobi reachability: A brief overview and recent advances,” inIEEE Annu. Conf. on Decision and Control, 2017, pp. 2242–2253

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Multi-vehicle collision avoidance via Hamilton-Jacobi reachability and mixed integer pro- gramming,

    M. Chen, J. C. Shih, and C. J. Tomlin, “Multi-vehicle collision avoidance via Hamilton-Jacobi reachability and mixed integer pro- gramming,” inIEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, 2016, pp. 1695– 1700

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Infusing reachability-based safety into planning and control for multi-agent interactions,

    X. Wang, K. Leung, and M. Pavone, “Infusing reachability-based safety into planning and control for multi-agent interactions,” in IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intell. Robots and Syst., 2020, pp. 6252–6259

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Deepreach: A deep learning approach to high-dimensional reachability,

    S. Bansal and C. J. Tomlin, “Deepreach: A deep learning approach to high-dimensional reachability,” inIEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2021, pp. 1817–1824

    work page 2021

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    RRT-Connect: An efficient approach to single-query path planning,

    J. J. Kuffner and S. M. LaValle, “RRT-Connect: An efficient approach to single-query path planning,” inIEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., vol. 2, 2000, pp. 995–1001

    2000

  2. [10]

    A review of path-planning approaches for multiple mobile robots,

    S. Lin, A. Liu, J. Wang, and X. Kong, “A review of path-planning approaches for multiple mobile robots,”Machines, vol. 10, no. 9, p. 773, 2022

    2022

  3. [11]

    Reciprocal velocity obstacles for real-time multi-agent navigation,

    J. Van den Berg, M. Lin, and D. Manocha, “Reciprocal velocity obstacles for real-time multi-agent navigation,” inIEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2008, pp. 1928–1935

    2008

  4. [12]

    Efficient multi- robot motion planning for manifold-constrained manipulators by ran- domized scheduling and informed path generation,

    W. Guo, Z. Kingston, K. Hang, and L. E. Kavraki, “Efficient multi- robot motion planning for manifold-constrained manipulators by ran- domized scheduling and informed path generation,”IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., 2026

    2026

  5. [13]

    Safe multiagent motion planning under uncertainty for drones using filtered reinforcement learning,

    S. Safaoui, A. P. Vinod, A. Chakrabarty, R. Quirynen, N. Yoshikawa, and S. D. Cairano, “Safe multiagent motion planning under uncertainty for drones using filtered reinforcement learning,”IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 40, pp. 2529–2542, 2024

    2024

  6. [14]

    Reachability-based trajectory safeguard (RTS): A safe and fast reinforcement learning safety layer for continuous control,

    Y . S. Shao, C. Chen, S. Kousik, and R. Vasudevan, “Reachability-based trajectory safeguard (RTS): A safe and fast reinforcement learning safety layer for continuous control,”IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 3663–3670, 2021

    2021

  7. [15]

    A toolbox of level set methods,

    I. M. Mitchellet al., “A toolbox of level set methods,”UBC Depart- ment of Computer Science Technical Report TR-2007-11, vol. 1, p. 6, 2007

    2007

  8. [16]

    Provably safe and scalable multivehicle trajectory planning,

    S. Bansal, M. Chen, K. Tanabe, and C. J. Tomlin, “Provably safe and scalable multivehicle trajectory planning,”IEEE Trans. on Control Syst. Technology, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2473–2489, 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    Isaacs: Iterative soft adversarial actor-critic for safety,

    K.-C. Hsu, D. P. Nguyen, and J. F. Fisac, “Isaacs: Iterative soft adversarial actor-critic for safety,” inLearning for Dynamics and Control Conf.PMLR, 2023, pp. 90–103

    2023

  10. [18]

    Iterative reachability estimation for safe reinforcement learning,

    M. Ganai, Z. Gong, C. Yu, S. Herbert, and S. Gao, “Iterative reachability estimation for safe reinforcement learning,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Syst., vol. 36, 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    On infusing reachability-based safety assurance within planning frameworks for human–robot vehicle interactions,

    K. Leung, E. Schmerling, M. Zhang, M. Chen, J. Talbot, J. C. Gerdes, and M. Pavone, “On infusing reachability-based safety assurance within planning frameworks for human–robot vehicle interactions,” Int. J. of Robotics Research, vol. 39, no. 10-11, pp. 1326–1345, 2020

    2020

  12. [20]

    Safe multi-agent interaction through robust control barrier functions with learned uncertainties,

    R. Cheng, M. J. Khojasteh, A. D. Ames, and J. W. Burdick, “Safe multi-agent interaction through robust control barrier functions with learned uncertainties,” inIEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, 2020, pp. 777–783

    2020

  13. [21]

    Parameterized fast and safe tracking (fastrack) using deepreach,

    H. J. Jeong, Z. Gong, S. Bansal, and S. Herbert, “Parameterized fast and safe tracking (fastrack) using deepreach,” inAnnu. Learning for Dynamics & Control Conf.PMLR, 2024, pp. 1006–1017

    2024

  14. [22]

    Reachability-based trajectory design with neural implicit safety constraints

    J. Michaux, Q. Chen, Y . Kwon, and R. Vasudevan, “Reachability-based trajectory design with neural implicit safety constraints.” Robotics: Science and Syst., 2023

    2023

  15. [23]

    Efficient motion planning for manipulators with control barrier function-induced neural controller,

    M. Yu, C. Yu, M.-M. Naddaf-Sh, D. Upadhyay, S. Gao, and C. Fan, “Efficient motion planning for manipulators with control barrier function-induced neural controller,” inIEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2024, pp. 14 348–14 355

    2024

  16. [24]

    Reach-avoid problems with time-varying dynamics, targets and constraints,

    J. F. Fisac, M. Chen, C. J. Tomlin, and S. S. Sastry, “Reach-avoid problems with time-varying dynamics, targets and constraints,” inInt. Conf. on Hybrid Syst.: Computation and Control, 2015, pp. 11–20

    2015

  17. [25]

    I. M. Mitchell,Application of level set methods to control and reachability problems in continuous and hybrid systems. Stanford University, 2002

    2002

  18. [26]

    A time-dependent Hamilton-Jacobi formulation of reachable sets for continuous dynamic games,

    I. M. Mitchell, A. M. Bayen, and C. J. Tomlin, “A time-dependent Hamilton-Jacobi formulation of reachable sets for continuous dynamic games,”IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 947– 957, 2005

    2005

  19. [27]

    Exact imposition of safety boundary conditions in neural reachable tubes,

    A. Singh, Z. Feng, and S. Bansal, “Exact imposition of safety boundary conditions in neural reachable tubes,” inIEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2025, pp. 5489–5495

    2025

  20. [28]

    On the implementation of an interior- point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear program- ming,

    A. W ¨achter and L. T. Biegler, “On the implementation of an interior- point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear program- ming,”Mathematical programming, vol. 106, pp. 25–57, 2006

    2006

  21. [29]

    Safe Planning for Articulated Robots Using Reachability-based Obstacle Avoidance With Spheres,

    J. Michaux, A. Li, Q. Chen, C. Chen, and R. Vasudevan, “Safe Planning for Articulated Robots Using Reachability-based Obstacle Avoidance With Spheres,” inRobotics: Science and Syst., Delft, Netherlands, July 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    hj reachability,

    E. Schmerling, “hj reachability,” 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    PyTorch Kinematics,

    S. Zhong, T. Power, A. Gupta, and P. Mitrano, “PyTorch Kinematics,” Feb. 2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    Reducing the barrier to entry of complex robotic software: a MoveIt! case study,

    D. Coleman, I. Sucan, S. Chitta, and N. Correll, “Reducing the barrier to entry of complex robotic software: a MoveIt! case study,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.3785, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Certifiable reachability learning using a new Lipschitz continuous value function,

    J. Li, D. Lee, J. Lee, K. S. Dong, S. Sojoudi, and C. Tomlin, “Certifiable reachability learning using a new Lipschitz continuous value function,”IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 3582– 3589, 2025

    2025

  26. [34]

    Generating formal safety assurances for high- dimensional reachability,

    A. Lin and S. Bansal, “Generating formal safety assurances for high- dimensional reachability,” inIEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2023, pp. 10 525–10 531

    2023

  27. [35]

    Multi-robot local motion planning using dynamic optimization fabrics,

    S. Bakker, L. Knoedler, M. Spahn, W. B ¨ohmer, and J. Alonso- Mora, “Multi-robot local motion planning using dynamic optimization fabrics,” in2023 International Symposium on Multi-Robot and Multi- Agent Systems (MRS). IEEE, 2023, pp. 149–155

    2023

  28. [36]

    A robust controlled backward reach tube with (almost) analytic solution for two dubins cars

    I. Mitchell, “A robust controlled backward reach tube with (almost) analytic solution for two dubins cars.” inARCH, 2020, pp. 242–258

    2020

  29. [37]

    Neural joint space implicit signed distance functions for reactive robot manipulator control,

    M. Koptev, N. Figueroa, and A. Billard, “Neural joint space implicit signed distance functions for reactive robot manipulator control,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 480–487, 2023. APPENDIXI DETAILEDSYSTEMSETUP This section presents the details of the...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed July 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.