Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 114 references

Testing Gravity with Binary Pulsars in the SKA Era

T0 review · 1 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-07-03 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The Square Kilometre Array will enable deeper tests of general relativity by improving timing of known binary pulsars and discovering dozens of new relativistic systems.

desk verdict This is a science-case review projecting SKA pulsar timing improvements for gravity tests, without introducing new methods or results. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.02064 v1 pith:JEFIEZN7 submitted 2026-07-02 astro-ph.HE gr-qc

V. Venkatraman Krishnan , L. Shao , V. Balakrishnan , A. Carleo , M. Colom i Bernadich , A. Corongiu , A. Deller , P. C. C. Freire
show 16 more authors
M. Geyer E. Hackmann H. Hu Z. Hu M. Kramer J. Kunz K. Liu M. E. Lower X. Miao D. Perrodin D. S. Pillay A. Possenti S. Ransom I. Stairs B. Stappers The SKA Pulsar Science Working Group
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords binarypulsarsgeneralrelativitytestsSquareKilometreArraystrong-fieldgravitycosmiccensorshipno-hairtheorempulsartiminggravitationalradiation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out how the Square Kilometre Array telescope can advance tests of gravity in the strong-field regime through observations of binary and trinary radio pulsars. Higher timing precision on recycled pulsars will permit tighter searches for any departures from general relativity in systems already known. A full Galactic census is expected to turn up many additional relativistic binaries, among them possible pulsar-black hole pairs that could check the cosmic censorship hypothesis and the no-hair theorem. The same data would also address the strong equivalence principle, gravitational dipole radiation, extra field components, gravitomagnetism, and spacetime symmetries. These measurements would supply constraints on gravity that are difficult to obtain by other routes.

What carries the argument

Timing precision of recycled pulsars in binary systems, which supplies the observable used to search for departures from general relativity.

What would settle it

SKA observations that fail to reach the required timing precision on recycled pulsars or that discover far fewer than dozens of new relativistic binaries.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Binary and trinary radio pulsars act as natural laboratories for strong-field gravity. The SKA's high sensitivity in the Southern Hemisphere will improve timing precision of recycled pulsars, allowing deeper searches for deviations from general relativity in existing systems. A Galactic census will additionally discover dozens of new relativistic pulsar systems, including candidate pulsar-black hole binaries usable for tests of the cosmic censorship hypothesis and the no-hair theorem. The aspects of gravitation to be explored include the strong equivalence principle, gravitational dipole radiation, extra field components, gravitomagnetism, and spacetime symmetries.

Load-bearing premise

The Square Kilometre Array will reach the sensitivity needed in the Southern Hemisphere and the Galactic census will find the expected number of suitable new relativistic systems.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Deeper searches for deviations from general relativity become possible in already-known binary pulsar systems.
  • Dozens of new relativistic pulsar systems will be found, including candidates for pulsar-black hole binaries.
  • Tests of the cosmic censorship hypothesis and the no-hair theorem can be performed with any pulsar-black hole systems discovered.
  • Measurements of the strong equivalence principle, gravitational dipole radiation, extra field components, gravitomagnetism, and spacetime symmetries will be sharpened.
  • Radiative properties of gravity can be probed with higher precision than before.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Success would give independent checks on strong-field gravity that complement gravitational-wave detections of black-hole mergers.
  • The same timing data could be re-used to place limits on the population of compact objects and on the Galactic supernova rate.
  • If no deviations appear, the results would tighten the parameter space available to alternative gravity theories that predict dipole radiation or violations of the equivalence principle.
  • Non-detection of pulsar-black hole systems at the expected rate would require revision of current models of binary evolution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a forward-looking science-case review for gravity tests with binary and trinary radio pulsars using the Square Kilometre Array (SKA). It claims that SKA's high sensitivity in the Southern Hemisphere will improve timing precision of recycled pulsars for deeper searches of deviations from general relativity in known systems, while a Galactic census will discover dozens of new relativistic systems (including potential pulsar-black hole binaries) usable for tests of the cosmic censorship hypothesis and no-hair theorem. The text outlines specific aspects of gravitation to be probed (strong equivalence principle, gravitational dipole radiation, extra field components, gravitomagnetism, spacetime symmetries) and the SKA capabilities required.

Significance. If the projected timing improvements and discovery yields are realized, the work usefully maps out a set of strong-field gravity tests that are complementary to other experiments and that exploit the unique properties of pulsar timing. It provides a clear roadmap of the observational requirements on SKA. The absence of quantitative error budgets or discovery-rate calculations, however, leaves the central 'dozens of systems' projection unsupported.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that a Galactic census 'will yield the discovery of dozens of relativistic pulsar systems, including potentially pulsar-black hole binaries' for testing cosmic censorship and the no-hair theorem is presented without any supporting calculation, reference to expected yields, sensitivity thresholds, or error budget. This projection is load-bearing for the claim that SKA will open qualitatively new tests.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: repeated 'will' in the sentence 'A Galactic census of pulsars will, in addition, will yield'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of the manuscript's significance and for the constructive comment on the abstract. We address the point below and have made revisions to strengthen the supporting references.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that a Galactic census 'will yield the discovery of dozens of relativistic pulsar systems, including potentially pulsar-black hole binaries' for testing cosmic censorship and the no-hair theorem is presented without any supporting calculation, reference to expected yields, sensitivity thresholds, or error budget. This projection is load-bearing for the claim that SKA will open qualitatively new tests.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by explicit references to the basis for the projected yields. The 'dozens of relativistic pulsar systems' figure is drawn from published population-synthesis and survey-sensitivity studies of SKA pulsar searches (including estimates for relativistic binaries and potential pulsar-black-hole systems). In the revised version we will insert a concise parenthetical reference to these works in the abstract and will add a short clarifying sentence in the main text that points the reader to the relevant discovery-rate calculations. This addresses the load-bearing nature of the claim without requiring new computations within the present review. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: forward-looking review without derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper is a science-case review outlining prospective gravity tests enabled by future SKA pulsar timing. It contains no equations, no fitted parameters, no predictions derived from internal data, and no self-citation chains that reduce the central claims to prior author work by construction. Claims rest on external assumptions about SKA sensitivity and discovery yields rather than any load-bearing derivation that collapses to its own inputs. This matches the default expectation for non-circular papers; the reader's assessment of score 1.0 is consistent with the absence of any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No mathematical derivations, fitted parameters, or new physical entities are introduced; the document is a review of observational prospects.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Testing Gravity with Binary Pulsars in the SKA Era." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JEFIEZN7

@misc{pith2026260702064,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Testing Gravity with Binary Pulsars in the SKA Era},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JEFIEZN7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.02064}
}
read the original abstract

Binary (and trinary) radio pulsars are natural laboratories in space for understanding gravity in the strong field regime, with many unique and precise tests carried out so far, including the most precise tests of the strong equivalence principle and of the radiative properties of gravity. The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope, with its high sensitivity in the Southern Hemisphere, will vastly improve the timing precision of recycled pulsars, allowing for a deeper search of potential deviations from general relativity (GR) in currently known systems. A Galactic census of pulsars will, in addition, will yield the discovery of dozens of relativistic pulsar systems, including potentially pulsar -- black hole binaries, which can be used to test the cosmic censorship hypothesis and the ``no-hair'' theorem. Aspects of gravitation to be explored include tests of strong equivalence principles, gravitational dipole radiation, extra field components of gravitation, gravitomagnetism, and spacetime symmetries. In this chapter, we describe the kinds of gravity tests possible with binary pulsar and outline the features and abilities that SKA must possess to best contribute to this science.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.02064 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The mass-mass diagram of the Hulse-Taylor pulsar, PSR B1913+16 based on the PK parameters measured by Weisberg & Huang (2016). In the figure the underlying gravitational theory is assumed to be GR. Under this theory, we can calculate bands denot￾ing the 1 − 𝜎 uncertainties in the component masses inferred from various relativistic effects. The fact that all bands meet at the same region in the diagram im￾plies that … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of different gravity experi￾ments in terms of spacetime curvature probed and maximum spacetime curvature possible. The y-axis gives the maximum spacetime curvature in the sys￾tem. Since the Y axis is the maximum value of the X￾axis, the lower diagonal is greyed out as impossible. The curvature is calculated as the square-root of the Kretschmann scalar 𝑅𝛼𝛽𝛾 𝛿𝑅 𝛼𝛽𝛾 𝛿 (full contraction of the Riemann tensor)… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The mass-mass diagram of PSR J0737−3039A/B, also known as the double pulsar (Kramer et al., 2021). In the figure the under￾lying gravitational theory is assumed to be GR. The inset is an expanded view of the region of principal interest, where the intersection of all curves within a small region within measurement uncertainties means that GR has passed all these tests. For more details, see Kramer et al. (2021), fig… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Fractional error of PK parameters for J0737−3039A with simulated future data. The solid lines represent results using AA* and the dash-dotted lines represent results using AA4. This is perhaps best seen in the double pulsar, where adding just 5-years of MeerKAT data to…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Required number of circular orbit templates as a function of minimum spin period of the pulsar for a SKA-mid survey for DNS and PSRBH systems de￾noted as red and gray lines respectively. The dotted and solid lines assume that there is 33.3% and 50% of the orbit within …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Wall clock pulsar search run time as a function of num￾ber of A100 GPUs for circular orbit searches for DNS and PSRBH binaries. The colors and line styles are same as 5. Keplerian bank searches generally take orders of magnitude longer com￾pared to traditional searches…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Evolution of the relative error for the derivative of the orbital period as obtained by simulations over ten years of evolved versions of PSR J0737−3039A (with 𝑃b ' 1 hour) and PSR J0514−4002E (with 𝑃b ' 7 hours), assuming the SKA AA∗ and SKA AA4 configurations. We als…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Present and potential future constraints on Damour-Esposito Farésé (DEF) gravity from binary pulsars for the theory’s linear (𝛼0) and quadratic (𝛽0) coupling coefficients of the scalar field. When 𝛼0 = 𝛽0 = 0, then the theory reduces to General Relativity. The solid re…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Fractional error of the BH spin measure￾ment as a function of orbital period of a PSR-SBH system. Here we assumed timing observations with weekly cadence and 10-yr time span. For NP, we used 100 𝜇s timing precision from each observation. For MSP, we assumed AA4 sensiti…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 114 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abbate, F. et al.. 2026, in Advancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII), arXiv search: Report number AASKAII/Abbate01

    work page 2026

  2. [2]

    P .et al

    Abbott, B. P .et al.. 2016, Phys. Rev. Let., 116, 061102 —. 2020, ApJL, 892, L3 —. 2017, Phys. Rev. Let., 119, 161101 Altaha Motahar, Z. et al.. 2017, Phys. Rev. D, 96, 064046

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Antoniadis, J. et al.. 2013, Science, 340, 448

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Archibald, A. M. et al.. 2018, Nature, 559, 73

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    & Zwicky, F

    Baade, W. & Zwicky, F. 1934, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 20, 259

    work page 1934

  6. [6]

    & Deffayet, C

    Babichev, E. & Deffayet, C. 2013, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 30, 184001

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Bagchi, M. et al.. 2026, in Advancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII), arXiv search: Report number AASKAII/Bagchi01

    work page 2026

  8. [8]

    2022, MNRAS, 511, 1265

    Balakrishnan, V .et al.. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 1265

    work page 2022

Show all 114 references
  1. [9]

    Barr, E. D. et al.. 2024, Science, 383, 275

    2024

  2. [10]

    Basu, A. et al. . 2026, in Advancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII), arXiv search: Report number AASKAII/AvishekBasu01

    2026

  3. [11]

    Batrakov, A. et al.. 2024, A&A, 686, A101

    2024

  4. [12]

    & Hackmann, E

    Ben-Salem, B. & Hackmann, E. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 1768 31 Testing Gravity with Binary Pulsars Venkatraman Krishnan, Shao et al

    2022

  5. [13]

    Berti, E. et al.. 2015, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32, 243001

    2015

  6. [14]

    Bertotti, B. et al.. 2003, Nature, 425, 374

    2003

  7. [15]

    & Teukolsky, S

    Blandford, R. & Teukolsky, S. A. 1976, ApJ, 205, 580

    1976

  8. [16]

    P .et al

    Breton, R. P .et al.. 2008, Science, 321, 104

    2008

  9. [17]

    Burgay, M. et al.. 2003, Nature, 426, 531

    2003

  10. [18]

    Chatterjee, S. et al.. 2009, ApJ, 698, 250

    2009

  11. [19]

    Cordes, J. M. et al.. 2004, New Astron. Rev., 48, 1413

    2004

  12. [20]

    & East, W

    Corman, M. & East, W. E. 2024, Phys. Rev. D, 110, 084065

    2024

  13. [21]

    & Deruelle, N

    Damour, T. & Deruelle, N. 1986, Annales de L ’Institut Henri Poincare Section (A) Physique The- orique, 44, 263

    1986

  14. [22]

    & Esposito-Farese, G

    Damour, T. & Esposito-Farese, G. 1992, Phys. Rev. D, 46, 4128

    1992

  15. [23]

    & Esposito-Farèse, G

    Damour, T. & Esposito-Farèse, G. 1992, Phys. Rev. D, 46, 4128

    1992

  16. [24]

    & Esposito-Farese, G

    Damour, T. & Esposito-Farese, G. 1993, Phys. Rev. Let., 70, 2220

    1993

  17. [25]

    & Schäfer, G

    Damour, T. & Schäfer, G. 1991, Journal of Mathematical Physics, 32, 127

    1991

  18. [26]

    & Taylor, J

    Damour, T. & Taylor, J. H. 1991, ApJ, 366, 501 —. 1992, Phys. Rev. D, 45, 1840 de Rham, C. et al.. 2017, Reviews of Modern Physics, 89, 025004 —. 2013, Phys. Rev. D, 87, 044025 de Rham, C. et al.. 2013, Physical Review D, 87, 044025

    1991

  19. [27]

    Deller, A. T. et al.. 2019, ApJ, 875, 100

    2019

  20. [28]

    Desvignes, G. et al.. 2019, Science, 365, 1013

    2019

  21. [29]

    Ding, H. et al.. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 4982

    2023

  22. [30]

    Doneva, D. D. & Y azadjiev, S. S. 2016, JCAP , 11, 019

    2016

  23. [31]

    Doroshenko, O. V . & Kopeikin, S. M. 1995, MNRAS, 274, 1029

    1995

  24. [32]

    Eardley, D. M. 1975, ApJL, 196, L59

    1975

  25. [33]

    Edwards, R. T. et al.. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1549

    2006

  26. [34]

    1915, Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wis- senschaften, 844 Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration

    Einstein, A. 1915, Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wis- senschaften, 844 Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 875, L1 —. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 930, L12 32 Testing Gravity with Binary Pu...

    1915

  27. [35]

    Everitt, C. W. F. et al.. 2011, Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, 221101 Faucher-Giguère, C.-A. & Loeb, A. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 3951

    2011

  28. [36]

    Ferdman, R. D. et al.. 2020, Nature, 583, 211

    2020

  29. [37]

    Finn, L. S. & Sutton, P . J. 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 65, 044022

    2002

  30. [38]

    Fonseca, E. et al.. 2014, ApJ, 787, 82

    2014

  31. [39]

    Freire, P . C. C. & Wex, N. 2024, Living Reviews in Relativity, 27, 5

    2024

  32. [40]

    J.et al

    Guo, Y . J.et al.. 2021, A&A, 654, A16

    2021

  33. [41]

    Gupta, T. et al.. 2021, Class. Quant. Grav., 38, 195003

    2021

  34. [42]

    & Müller, J

    Hofmann, F. & Müller, J. 2018, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 35, 035015

    2018

  35. [43]

    Hu, H. et al.. 2022, A&A, 667, A149

    2022

  36. [44]

    Hu, H. et al.. 2020, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 497, 3118

    2020

  37. [45]

    Hulse, R. A. & Taylor, J. H. 1975, ApJL, 195, L51 Julié, F.-L. et al.. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 111, 024016

    1975

  38. [46]

    Kleihaus, B. et al.. 2016, Phys. Rev. D, 93, 064077

    2016

  39. [47]

    Kopeikin, S. M. & Schäfer, G. 1999, Phys. Rev. D, 60, 124002

    1999

  40. [48]

    Kramer, M. et al.. 2004, New Astron. Rev., 48, 993 —. 2006, Science, 314, 97 —. 2021, Physical Review X, 11, 041050

    2004

  41. [49]

    & Wex, N

    Kramer, M. & Wex, N. 2009, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 26, 073001

    2009

  42. [50]

    Kulkarni, S. R. et al.. 1993, Nature, 364, 421

    1993

  43. [51]

    Kyutoku, K. et al.. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 2615

    2019

  44. [52]

    & Rafikov, R

    Lai, D. & Rafikov, R. R. 2005, ApJL, 621, L41

    2005

  45. [53]

    Lau, M. Y . M.et al.. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 3061

    2020

  46. [54]

    2016, ApJ, 831, 150

    Lazarus, P .et al.. 2016, ApJ, 831, 150

    2016

  47. [55]

    & Thirring, H

    Lense, J. & Thirring, H. 1918, Physikalische Zeitschrift, 19, 156

    1918

  48. [56]

    Liu, K. et al.. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 3115

    2014

  49. [57]

    Liu, K. et al.. 2014, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 445, 3115 33 Testing Gravity with Binary Pulsars Venkatraman Krishnan, Shao et al

    2014

  50. [58]

    Liu, K. et al.. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 2276

    2020

  51. [59]

    Lorimer, D. R. 2005, Living Reviews in Relativity, 8, 7

    2005

  52. [60]

    Lorimer, D. R. & Kramer, M. 2005, Handbook of Pulsar Astronomy, Vol. 4

    2005

  53. [61]

    Lower, M. E. et al.. 2024, A&A, 682, A26

    2024

  54. [62]

    Lyne, A. G. et al.. 2004, Science, 303, 1153

    2004

  55. [63]

    Meng, L. et al.. 2025, A&A, 704, A153

    2025

  56. [64]

    Miao, X. et al.. 2019, Phys. Rev. D, 99, 123015 —. 2021, ApJ, 921, 114 —. 2020, ApJ, 898, 69

    2019

  57. [65]

    Misner, C. W. et al.. 1973, Gravitation

    1973

  58. [66]

    Nicolis, A. et al.. 2009, Phys. Rev. D, 79, 064036

    2009

  59. [67]

    1968, Physical Review, 169, 1014 —

    Nordtvedt, K. 1968, Physical Review, 169, 1014 —. 1987, ApJ, 320, 871

    1968

  60. [68]

    Oppenheimer, J. R. & Volkoff, G. M. 1939, Physical Review, 55, 374

    1939

  61. [69]

    Oswald, L. S. et al.. 2025, submitted

    2025

  62. [70]

    2011, Phys

    Pani, P .et al.. 2011, Phys. Rev. D, 84, 104035

    2011

  63. [71]

    1979, in General Relativity: An Einstein centenary survey, ed

    Penrose, R. 1979, in General Relativity: An Einstein centenary survey, ed. S. W. Hawking & W. Is- rael, Vol. 1 (Cambridge; New Y ork: Cambridge University Press), 581–638

    1979

  64. [72]

    Peters, P . C. 1964, Physical Review, 136, 1224

    1964

  65. [73]

    Pfahl, E. et al.. 2005, AJ, 628, 343

    2005

  66. [74]

    Ransom, S. M. et al.. 2003, ApJ, 589, 911 —. 2014, Nature, 505, 520

    2003

  67. [75]

    Ridolfi, A. et al.. 2022, A&A, 664, A27

    2022

  68. [76]

    Saffer, A. et al.. 2025, ApJL, 983, L20 Sänger, E. M. et al.. 2026, Phys. Rev. D, 113, 084070

    2025

  69. [77]

    2017, ApJL, 848, L15

    Savchenko, V .et al.. 2017, ApJL, 848, L15

    2017

  70. [78]

    Schiff, L. I. 1960, Phys. Rev. Lett., 4, 215

    1960

  71. [79]

    1990, A&A, 232, 62 34 Testing Gravity with Binary Pulsars Venkatraman Krishnan, Shao et al

    Schneider, J. 1990, A&A, 232, 62 34 Testing Gravity with Binary Pulsars Venkatraman Krishnan, Shao et al

    1990

  72. [80]

    & Y agi, K

    Seymour, B. & Y agi, K. 2018, Phys. Rev. D, 98, 124007

    2018

  73. [81]

    Shao, L. et al.. 2013, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 30, 165019

    2013

  74. [82]

    Shao, L. et al.. 2017, Phys. Rev. X, 7, 041025

    2017

  75. [83]

    Shao, L. et al.. 2015, in Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), 42

    2015

  76. [84]

    & Wex, N

    Shao, L. & Wex, N. 2012, Class. Quant. Grav., 29, 215018

    2012

  77. [85]

    & Wex, N

    Shao, L. & Wex, N. 2012, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 29, 21.5018 —. 2013, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 30, 165020

    2012

  78. [86]

    Shao, L. et al.. 2015, in 13th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Astrophysics, and Relativistic Field Theories, 1704–1706

    2015

  79. [87]

    Shao, L. et al.. 2018, Phys. Rev. Lett., 120, 241104

    2018

  80. [88]

    Shao, L. et al.. 2020, Phys. Rev. D, 102, 024069

    2020

  81. [89]

    Shapiro, I. I. 1964, Phys. Rev. Let., 13, 789

    1964

  82. [90]

    Silva, H. O. et al.. 2021, Phys. Rev. Lett., 126, 181101

    2021

  83. [91]

    Sipior, M. S. et al.. 2004, MNRAS, 354, L49

    2004

  84. [92]

    2023, SKAO staged delivery, array assemblies and layouts, Report SKAO-TEL- 0002299, SKA Observatory (SKAO)

    Sridhar, S. 2023, SKAO staged delivery, array assemblies and layouts, Report SKAO-TEL- 0002299, SKA Observatory (SKAO)

    2023

  85. [93]

    Stairs, I. H. et al.. 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 141101

    2004

  86. [94]

    Stovall, K. et al.. 2018, ApJL, 854, L22

    2018

  87. [95]

    Taylor, J. H. et al.. 1979, Nature, 277, 437

    1979

  88. [96]

    Taylor, J. H. & Weisberg, J. M. 1982, ApJ, 253, 908 —. 1989, ApJ, 345, 434

    1982

  89. [97]

    Thrane, E. et al.. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 5408

    2020

  90. [98]

    Tolman, R. C. 1939, Physical Review, 55, 364 Venkatraman Krishnan, V .et al.. 2020, Science, 367, 577

    1939

  91. [99]

    Voisin, G. et al.. 2020, A&A, 638, A24 —. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.10066

    2020

  92. [100]

    & Tauris, T

    Voss, R. & Tauris, T. M. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 1169

    2003

  93. [101]

    & Zhao, Z.-C

    Wang, S. & Zhao, Z.-C. 2024, Phys. Rev. D, 109, L061502

    2024

  94. [102]

    Watts, A. et al.. 2015, in Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), 43 35 Testing Gravity with Binary Pulsars Venkatraman Krishnan, Shao et al

    2015

  95. [103]

    Weisberg, J. M. & Huang, Y . 2016, ApJ, 829, 55

    2016

  96. [104]

    & Kopeikin, S

    Wex, N. & Kopeikin, S. 1999, ApJ, 513, 388

    1999

  97. [105]

    & Kopeikin, S

    Wex, N. & Kopeikin, S. M. 1999, ApJ, 514, 388

    1999

  98. [106]

    & Kramer, M

    Wex, N. & Kramer, M. 2007, MNRAS, 380, 455 —. 2020, Universe, 6, 156

    2007

  99. [107]

    Will, C. M. 1993, Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics —. 2018, Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics

    1993

  100. [108]

    Will, C. M. 2018, Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics (Cambridge University Press)

    2018

  101. [109]

    Will, C. M. & Nordtvedt, Jr., K. 1972, ApJ, 177, 757

    1972

  102. [110]

    Xu, R. et al.. 2020, Phys. Rev. D, 102, 064057 Y agi, K.et al.. 2014a, Phys. Rev. D, 89, 084067, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 90, 069902 (2014), Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 90, 069901 (2014)] —. 2014b, Phys. Rev. Lett., 112, 161101 —. 2016, Phys. Rev. D, 93, 024010 —. 2013, Phys. Rev. D, 87, ...

    2020

  103. [111]

    & Spergel, D

    Yunes, N. & Spergel, D. N. 2009, Phys. Rev. D, 80, 042004

    2009

  104. [112]

    & Portegies Zwart, S

    Yungelson, L. & Portegies Zwart, S. F. 1998, arXiv:astro-ph/9801127

    1998 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Zhao, J. et al.. 2022, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 39, 11LT01

    2022

  106. [114]

    Zhu, W. W. et al.. 2019, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 482, 3249 36

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed July 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.