The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2607.03069 · v1 · pith:S554IOAE · submitted 2026-07-03 · cs.CV

SafeGuard: A Multi-Agent Perception-Reasoning Framework for Social-Risk AI-Generated Video Detection

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:S554IOAErecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CV
keywords perceptualsemanticvideoai-generateddetectionforensicphysicalreasoning
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

As video generation paradigms evolve from localized manipulation to full-scene synthesis, AI-generated video detection becomes increasingly challenging, as forgeries exhibit coherent global structure and high perceptual realism. However, existing benchmarks are biased toward perceptual fidelity and primarily evaluate detectors based on perceptual artifacts, providing limited coverage of scenarios that require reasoning about violations of physical laws, structural coherence, or social logic. This dataset bias shapes current approaches and results in a Perception-Reasoning Gap: artifact-centric models capture low-level statistical irregularities yet lack semantic inference, whereas vision-language models perform semantic reasoning but remain insensitive to fine-grained forensic cues. To bridge this gap, we propose SafeGuard, a multi-agent framework that enables collaborative specialization between forensic perception and semantic reasoning. A hierarchical perceptual solver extracts fine-grained forensic evidence, while a self-reflective verifier enforces consistency between semantic inference and physical plausibility, forming an interpretable evidence chain. To support evaluation, we introduce SafeVid, a novel AI-generated video detection benchmark comprising 20K videos spanning 10 social risk categories, designed to evaluate physical plausibility, structural consistency, and the rationality of social behaviors. Extensive experiments demonstrate the generalization of SafeGuard, improving accuracy on SafeVid by +18.7% and consistently outperforming prior methods across four public benchmarks.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.