Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 63 references

Double strange hybrid baryon

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-11 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read QCD sum rules put the double-strange hybrid baryon ground state near 1.59 GeV and its first excited state near 1.90 GeV.

desk verdict Solid, standard QCD-sum-rule mass prediction for the previously uncomputed ssqg hybrid; usable numbers, usual window systematics, and a real but not fatal two-pole continuum issue. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.04237 v1 pith:PAKAZB4B submitted 2026-07-05 hep-ph hep-exhep-lat

B. Barsbay , K. Azizi , H. Sundu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-exhep-lat PACS 12.39.Mk12.38.Lg14.20.Jn
keywords hybridbaryonQCDsumrulesdoublestrangessqgmassspectrumpoleresiduegluonicexcitation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper calculates the masses and coupling strengths of a double-strange hybrid baryon whose quarks are two strange quarks plus a light quark bound with an explicit gluon. Hybrid baryons are predicted by QCD but hard to isolate experimentally because they lack exotic quantum numbers and mix with ordinary baryons. Using an interpolating current that already contains a gluon field-strength tensor, the authors build the two-point correlation function, expand it to dimension-ten condensates, and match it to a hadronic representation that includes both a negative-parity ground state and a positive-parity excited state. Averaging the two independent Lorentz structures yields a ground-state mass of about 1.59 GeV and an excited mass of about 1.90 GeV, together with their residues. These numbers give experimentalists concrete mass windows in which to look for strange hybrid baryons and supply a benchmark for other non-perturbative approaches.

What carries the argument

The interpolating current $\eta_H = g_s \epsilon^{abc}[s^a C \gamma^\mu s^b] \gamma^\nu \gamma_5 [G_{\mu\nu} q]^c$ that already carries an explicit gluon field-strength tensor, together with the pair of Borel-transformed sum rules obtained by matching the two Lorentz structures $\not q$ and $I$ after continuum subtraction.

What would settle it

A lattice-QCD spectrum or a partial-wave analysis of double-strange baryon production that finds no hybrid candidate within roughly 150 MeV of 1.59 GeV (ground) or 1.90 GeV (first excited) would falsify the predicted masses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Averaging the QCD sum-rule results obtained from the two independent Lorentz structures of the correlation function yields a ground-state mass $\widetilde{M}=(1593.44\pm130.29)$ MeV with residue $\widetilde{\lambda}=(2.57\pm0.40)\times10^{-3}~\mathrm{GeV}^5$ and a first-excited mass $M=(1897.47\pm124.44)$ MeV with residue $\lambda=(2.88\pm0.62)\times10^{-3}~\mathrm{GeV}^5$ for the ssqg hybrid baryon.

Load-bearing premise

The continuum thresholds and Borel window are assumed to cleanly separate the two lowest poles from all higher states; if the true continuum onset lies outside those windows the extracted masses move by amounts comparable to the quoted errors.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Experimental searches for double-strange baryons can target the mass windows 1.46–1.72 GeV and 1.77–2.02 GeV.
  • The calculated residues supply the coupling strengths needed to estimate production and decay rates of the hybrid states.
  • The same current and OPE can be reused for other flavor combinations (e.g., ssqg with different light-quark charges) to map the full hybrid-baryon multiplet.
  • Comparison of the predicted masses with ordinary ssq baryons of the same J^P will quantify the gluonic mass shift.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 1.59 GeV state is confirmed, its decay pattern (especially to \\Xi\\pi or \\Lambda K) could distinguish hybrid from conventional three-quark assignments.
  • The roughly 300 MeV gap between ground and first excited states offers a concrete ladder spacing that other non-perturbative methods can test.
  • Extending the same sum-rule machinery to the full SU(3) hybrid multiplet would reveal whether the strange-quark mass systematically lowers hybrid masses relative to non-strange hybrids.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies QCD sum rules to the double-strange hybrid baryon with content ssqg. An interpolating current carrying explicit gluonic degrees of freedom is used to construct the two-point correlator, which is decomposed into the independent Lorentz structures /q and I. The OPE is performed through dimension ten; after Borel transformation and continuum subtraction the two structures yield a coupled pair of sum rules that are solved for the masses and residues of a negative-parity ground state and a positive-parity first excited state. Averaging the results from the two structures produces the quoted values ~M = (1593.44 ± 130.29) MeV, ~λ = (2.57 ± 0.40) × 10^{-3} GeV^5 and M = (1897.47 ± 124.44) MeV, λ = (2.88 ± 0.62) × 10^{-3} GeV^5. Working windows for the Borel mass and continuum thresholds are fixed by the usual pole-dominance and OPE-convergence criteria, and stability plots versus M^{2} and s0 are presented.

Significance. Hybrid baryons remain poorly constrained both theoretically and experimentally; a concrete mass prediction for the double-strange sector therefore supplies a useful benchmark for lattice calculations and for future experimental searches. The calculation is technically standard for the method: the OPE is carried to high dimension, two independent structures are matched and averaged, and the numerical windows are documented. The results are falsifiable once more precise lattice or experimental data become available. The work does not claim exotic quantum numbers or a model-independent extraction, so its significance is that of a well-executed sum-rule estimate rather than a definitive resolution of the hybrid-baryon spectrum.

major comments (2)
  1. The two-pole extraction rests on the coupled sum rules (12) that share a single continuum step function Θ(s - s0) multiplying both spectral densities ρ1(s) and ρ2(s) (Appendix). Table II nevertheless assigns non-overlapping continuum windows ([3.5–4.5] GeV^{2} for the ground state, [4.5–5.5] GeV^{2} for the excited state) while keeping the same Borel interval. No test is reported of the stability of the mass difference or of the residue ratio under a common s0, nor is the continuum contamination of the higher pole quantified. Because residual continuum strength that leaks into the lower window can shift the 1.9 GeV mass by an amount comparable to the quoted ±124 MeV error, the claim that both poles have been cleanly isolated is not yet fully controlled.
  2. Section III and Table II fix the Borel window M^{2} ∈ [2,4] GeV^{2} by the requirements PC ≥ 0.5 and suppression of the dim-8+9+10 terms. The paper never tabulates the actual numerical values of the pole contribution or of the OPE ratio R(M^{2}) inside that window for either Lorentz structure. Without those numbers it is impossible to verify that the stated criteria are satisfied simultaneously for both poles, leaving an unquantified systematic that directly affects the central mass values.
minor comments (5)
  1. The abstract and the body use both “~M” and “M” for the two states; a uniform notation (e.g., M_ and M+) would improve readability.
  2. Figures 1–4 show stability versus M^{2} and s0, but the vertical scales of the mass plots begin at 0 rather than near the physical region, making the plateaus harder to judge by eye.
  3. The comparison with earlier hybrid-baryon sum-rule results (Refs. [56,60]) is limited to a single paragraph in Sec. IV; a short table of previous mass estimates would make the discussion more quantitative.
  4. A few typographical inconsistencies appear (e.g., “Techn iques”, “S ciences” in the affiliations, and the arXiv date stamp “July 7, 2026”).
  5. The unit step function is written Θ(N) with N = s; a conventional Θ(s - s0) would avoid unnecessary notation.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

Standard QCD-sum-rule extraction of hybrid-baryon masses/residues from OPE matching; only minor non-load-bearing self-citations for technical OPE ingredients.

  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. II, paragraph after Eq. (9)]
    "To evaluate these contributions, we follow the procedure described in Ref. [35]. Within this framework, the gluon-field contributions are decomposed into vacuum and propagating-gluon terms."

    Ref. [35] is by the same three authors. The citation supplies the technical decomposition of the two-gluon matrix element used in the OPE. While this is a self-citation, it is not load-bearing for the mass/residue numbers: the procedure is a standard coordinate-space treatment of gluonic operators already used by many groups, and the final numerical results are fixed by the Borel matching of the full spectral densities, not by any uniqueness claim or fitted parameter taken from [35].

full rationale

The derivation is the textbook two-point QCD sum-rule procedure: an interpolating current with explicit gluon (Eq. 2) is used to build the correlator, the OPE side is computed to dimension 10 with standard condensates (Table I, Appendix spectral densities), and the phenomenological side is written as a two-pole ansatz (ground + first excited, opposite parity) that couples to the same current (Eqs. 4–8). Matching the two independent Lorentz structures yields the coupled sum rules (12); masses and residues are solved from those equations inside Borel/continuum windows fixed by the usual pole-dominance and OPE-convergence criteria (PC ≥ 0.5, R(M²) small). No external mass or residue is fitted and then re-predicted; the numerical targets are pure outputs of the matching. Self-citations (chiefly Ref. [35] for the gluon-field decomposition and earlier hybrid-current papers by the same authors) supply only technical recipes already standard in the literature; they do not define or force the numerical values of M̃, M, λ̃, λ. Continuum-threshold windows are chosen for stability, not tuned to reproduce a pre-selected mass. Hence the central claims are not circular by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The numerical claims rest on the standard QCD-sum-rule axioms plus a handful of auxiliary parameters fixed by stability criteria and a set of vacuum condensates taken from the literature. No new dynamical entity is postulated beyond the hybrid state whose mass is being predicted.

free parameters (3)
  • Borel window M^{2} = [2–4] GeV^{2}
    Chosen by hand in [2–4] GeV^{2} so that pole contribution ≥50 % and higher-dimensional OPE terms remain small; the extracted masses vary inside the quoted errors when the window edges are moved.
  • continuum threshold s0 (ground) = [3.5–4.5] GeV^{2}
    Fixed in [3.5–4.5] GeV^{2} to separate the ground state from continuum; directly controls the upper limit of the spectral integral.
  • continuum threshold s0 (excited) = [4.5–5.5] GeV^{2}
    Fixed in [4.5–5.5] GeV^{2} for the first excited state; same role as above.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Quark-hadron duality: the OPE continuum above s0 equals the hadronic continuum.
    Invoked when the spectral integrals are cut at s0 (Eqs. after (12) and Appendix).
  • domain assumption Operator-product expansion truncated at dimension ten is sufficiently convergent inside the Borel window.
    Used to justify retaining only the listed condensate terms (Sec. II and Appendix).
  • domain assumption The chosen interpolating current couples simultaneously to the negative-parity ground state and the positive-parity first excited state with residues λ̃ and λ.
    Matrix elements defined in Eq. (5); both poles are kept in the phenomenological side (Eq. (7)).
  • domain assumption Vacuum condensates take the numerical values listed in Table I (standard literature values).
    All numerical results inherit the uncertainties of these inputs.
  • domain assumption Light-quark masses mu = md = 0 while ms is kept finite.
    Stated at the end of the Appendix; simplifies the spectral densities.
invented entities (1)
  • double-strange hybrid baryon ssqg (ground and first excited states)
    purpose: Object whose masses and residues are predicted; the paper supplies the first numerical estimates for this flavor content.
    Hybrid baryons are expected in QCD but have not been unambiguously observed; the paper postulates that the chosen current projects onto them and extracts their spectroscopic parameters.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Double strange hybrid baryon." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PAKAZB4B

@misc{pith2026260704237,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Double strange hybrid baryon},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PAKAZB4B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.04237}
}
abstract

We investigate the spectroscopic properties of the double strange hybrid baryon with quark content $ssqg$ within the framework of QCD sum rule. Using an interpolating current with explicit gluonic degrees of freedom, the two-point correlation function is analyzed in terms of two independent Lorentz structures, $\slashed{q}$ and $I$. The operator product expansion is carried out by including vacuum condensates up to dimension ten, and the corresponding sum rules are derived for both structures. By taking the average of the results obtained from the two Lorentz structures, we extract the masses and pole residues of the ground and first excited states. For the ground state, we obtain a mass of $\widetilde{M } = (1593.44\pm 130.29)~ \mathrm{MeV}$ and a residue of $\widetilde{\lambda } = (2.57\pm 0.40) \times10^{-3} ~\mathrm{GeV}^5$. For the first excited state, the corresponding values are $M = (1897.47\pm 124.44)~ \mathrm{MeV}$ and $\lambda = (2.88\pm 0.62) \times10^{-3} ~\mathrm{GeV}^5$. The obtained results provide theoretical predictions for the double strange hybrid baryon spectrum and may be useful for future experimental searches as well as further nonperturbative studies of hybrid hadrons.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.04237 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Dependence of the ground-state mass on the Borel para [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Dependence of the ground-state pole residue on the Bo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Dependence of the first orbitally excited state mass o [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Dependence of the first orbitally excited state pole r [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    6 GeV, while the first orbitally excited positive-parity state appears around 1 . 9 GeV. The corresponding pole residues have also been determined, providing informa- tion about the coupling of the interpolating current to these states. The obtained mass predictions can be compared with previous QCD sum rule studies of hybrid baryons. In Ref. [60], the spe...

  2. [2]

    The present predictions for the double strange ssqg hybrid baryon lie within a similar energy scale

    5 GeV. The present predictions for the double strange ssqg hybrid baryon lie within a similar energy scale. The differences with respect to previous results can be at- tributed to the different flavor structure, the inclusion of strange quark degrees of freedom, and the specific inter- polating current employed in the present analysis. The present study provi...

  3. [3]

    QCD Exotics,

    S. L. Olsen, “QCD Exotics,” Hyperfine Interact. 229, no.1-3, 7-20 (2014)

    2014

  4. [4]

    Gluonic Excitations of Mesons: Why They Are Missing and Where to Find Them,

    N. Isgur, R. Kokoski and J. Paton, “Gluonic Excitations of Mesons: Why They Are Missing and Where to Find Them,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 869 (1985)

    1985

  5. [5]

    A Flux Tube Model for Hadrons in QCD,

    N. Isgur and J. E. Paton, “A Flux Tube Model for Hadrons in QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 31, 2910 (1985)

    1985

  6. [6]

    Hybrid meson properties in Lattice QCD and Flux Tube Models,

    T. Burns and F. E. Close, “Hybrid meson properties in Lattice QCD and Flux Tube Models,” Phys. Rev. D 74, 034003 (2006)

    2006

  7. [7]

    Hybrids: Mixed States of Quarks and Gluons,

    M. S. Chanowitz and S. R. Sharpe, “Hybrids: Mixed States of Quarks and Gluons,” Nucl. Phys. B 222, 211- 244 (1983) [erratum: Nucl. Phys. B 228, 588-588 (1983)]

    1983

  8. [8]

    Q anti-Q G Hermaphrodite Mesons in the MIT Bag Model,

    T. Barnes, F. E. Close and F. de Viron, “Q anti-Q G Hermaphrodite Mesons in the MIT Bag Model,” Nucl. Phys. B 224, 241 (1983)

    1983

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Orbitally excited and hybrid mesons from the lattice,

    P. Lacock et al. [UKQCD], “Orbitally excited and hybrid mesons from the lattice,” Phys. Rev. D 54, 6997-7009 (1996)

    1996

  2. [10]

    Hybrid mesons from quenched QCD,

    P. Lacock et al. [UKQCD], “Hybrid mesons from quenched QCD,” Phys. Lett. B 401, 308-312 (1997)

    1997

  3. [11]

    Hybrid and orbitally excited mesons in quenched QCD,

    P. Lacock et al. [UKQCD], “Hybrid and orbitally excited mesons in quenched QCD,” Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 63, 203-205 (1998)

    1998

  4. [12]

    Lattice calculation of 1 − + hybrid mesons with improved Kogut-Susskind fermions,

    C. Bernard, T. Burch, E. B. Gregory, D. Toussaint, C. E. DeTar, J. Osborn, S. A. Gottlieb, U. M. Heller and R. Sugar, “Lattice calculation of 1 − + hybrid mesons with improved Kogut-Susskind fermions,” Phys. Rev. D 68, 074505 (2003)

    2003

  5. [13]

    1 − + exotic meson at light quark masses,

    J. N. Hedditch, W. Kamleh, B. G. Lasscock, D. B. Lein- weber, A. G. Williams and J. M. Zanotti, “1 − + exotic meson at light quark masses,” Phys. Rev. D 72, 114507 (2005)

    2005

  6. [14]

    Highly excited and exotic meson spectrum from dynamical lattice QCD,

    J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, M. J. Peardon, D. G. Richards and C. E. Thomas, “Highly excited and exotic meson spectrum from dynamical lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 262001 (2009)

    2009

  7. [15]

    Toward the excited meson spectrum of dynamical QCD,

    J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, M. J. Peardon, D. G. Richards and C. E. Thomas, “Toward the excited meson spectrum of dynamical QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 82, 034508 (2010)

    2010

  8. [16]

    Isoscalar meson spec- troscopy from lattice QCD,

    J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, B. Joo, M. J. Peardon, D. G. Richards and C. E. Thomas, “Isoscalar meson spec- troscopy from lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 83, 111502 (2011)

    2011

  9. [17]

    Toward the ex- 8 cited isoscalar meson spectrum from lattice QCD,

    J. J. Dudek et al. [Hadron Spectrum], “Toward the ex- 8 cited isoscalar meson spectrum from lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 88, no.9, 094505 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    Strangeonium-like hybrids on the lattice,

    Y. Ma, Y. Chen, M. Gong and Z. Liu, “Strangeonium-like hybrids on the lattice,” Chin. Phys. C 45, no.1, 013112 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    EX- OTIC MESONS WITH J P C = 1 − + FROM QCD SUM RULES,

    I. I. Balitsky, D. Diakonov and A. V. Yung, “EX- OTIC MESONS WITH J P C = 1 − + FROM QCD SUM RULES,” Phys. Lett. B 112, 71-75 (1982)

    1982

  12. [20]

    Ex- otic mesons from QCD sum rules,

    J. Govaerts, F. de Viron, D. Gusbin and J. Weyers, “Ex- otic mesons from QCD sum rules,” Phys. Lett. B 128, 262 (1983). [erratum: Phys. Lett. B 136, 445-445 (1984)]

    1983

  13. [21]

    QCD Sum Rules and Hybrid Mesons,

    J. Govaerts, F. de Viron, D. Gusbin and J. Weyers, “QCD Sum Rules and Hybrid Mesons,” Nucl. Phys. B 248, 1-18 (1984)

    1984

  14. [22]

    Hybrid quarkonia from QCD sum rules,

    J. Govaerts, L. J. Reinders, H. R. Rubinstein and J. Wey- ers, “Hybrid quarkonia from QCD sum rules,” Nucl. Phys. B 258, 215-229 (1985)

    1985

  15. [23]

    Exotic Mesons With J P C = 1 − +, Strange and Nonstrange,

    I. I. Balitsky, D. Diakonov and A. V. Yung, “Exotic Mesons With J P C = 1 − +, Strange and Nonstrange,” Z. Phys. C 33, 265-273 (1986)

    1986

  16. [24]

    Coupled QCD Sum Rules for Hybrid Mesons,

    J. Govaerts, L. J. Reinders, P. Francken, X. Gonze and J. Weyers, “Coupled QCD Sum Rules for Hybrid Mesons,” Nucl. Phys. B 284, 674 (1987)

    1987

  17. [25]

    Improved determination of the mass of the 1 − + light hybrid meson from QCD sum rules,

    H. Y. Jin, J. G. Korner and T. G. Steele, “Improved determination of the mass of the 1 − + light hybrid meson from QCD sum rules,” Phys. Rev. D 67, 014025 (2003)

    2003

  18. [26]

    Mass Predictions for Pseudoscalar J P C = 0 − + Charmonium and Bottomonium Hybrids in QCD Sum-Rules,

    R. Berg, D. Harnett, R. T. Kleiv and T. G. Steele, “Mass Predictions for Pseudoscalar J P C = 0 − + Charmonium and Bottomonium Hybrids in QCD Sum-Rules,” Phys. Rev. D 86, 034002 (2012)

    2012

  19. [27]

    Mass Spectrum of Heavy Quarkonium Hybrids,

    W. Chen, R. T. Kleiv, T. G. Steele, B. Bulthuis, D. Har- nett, J. Ho, T. Richards and S. L. Zhu, “Mass Spectrum of Heavy Quarkonium Hybrids,” JHEP 09, 019 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    Masses of the bottom-charm hybrid ¯bGc states,

    W. Chen, T. G. Steele and S. L. Zhu, “Masses of the bottom-charm hybrid ¯bGc states,” J. Phys. G 41, 025003 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Meson- Hybrid Mixing in J P C = 1 ++ Heavy Quarkonium from QCD Sum-Rules,

    A. Palameta, D. Harnett and T. G. Steele, “Meson- Hybrid Mixing in J P C = 1 ++ Heavy Quarkonium from QCD Sum-Rules,” Phys. Rev. D 98, no.7, 074014 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    Mass Calculations of Light Quarkonium, Exotic J P C = 0+− Hybrid Mesons from Gaussian Sum-Rules,

    J. Ho, R. Berg, W. Chen, D. Harnett and T. G. Steele, “Mass Calculations of Light Quarkonium, Exotic J P C = 0+− Hybrid Mesons from Gaussian Sum-Rules,” Phys. Rev. D 98, no.9, 096020 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Is the Y (2175) a Strangeonium Hybrid Meson?,

    J. Ho, R. Berg, T. G. Steele, W. Chen and D. Harnett, “Is the Y (2175) a Strangeonium Hybrid Meson?,” Phys. Rev. D 100, no.3, 034012 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    Heavy-light hybrid mesons with different spin-parities,

    B. Barsbay, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, “Heavy-light hybrid mesons with different spin-parities,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82, no.12, 1086 (2022) [erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C 82, no.12, 1138 (2022)]

    2022

  25. [33]

    Mass of 1− + four-quark-hybrid mixed states,

    S. H. Li, Z. S. Chen, H. Y. Jin and W. Chen, “Mass of 1− + four-quark-hybrid mixed states,” Phys. Rev. D 105, no.5, 054030 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    QCD Axial Anomaly Enhances the ηη ′ Decay of the Hybrid Can- didate η1(1855),

    H. X. Chen, N. Su and S. L. Zhu, “QCD Axial Anomaly Enhances the ηη ′ Decay of the Hybrid Can- didate η1(1855),” Chin. Phys. Lett. 39, no.5, 051201 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Predictions of the hybrid mesons with exotic quantum numbers J P C = 2+− ,

    Q. N. Wang, D. K. Lian and W. Chen, “Predictions of the hybrid mesons with exotic quantum numbers J P C = 2+− ,” Phys. Rev. D 108, no.11, 114010 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Mass spectrum of the hidden-charm hybrid states via QCD sum rules,

    Z. G. Wang, “Mass spectrum of the hidden-charm hybrid states via QCD sum rules,” Phys. Rev. D 111, no.11, 114009 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Light quarkonium hybrid mesons,

    B. Barsbay, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, “Light quarkonium hybrid mesons,” Phys. Rev. D 109, no.9, 094034 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Mass spectra of heavy hybrid quarkonia and ¯bgc mesons,

    A. Alaakol, S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, “Mass spectra of heavy hybrid quarkonia and ¯bgc mesons,” Phys. Lett. B 854, 138711 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    De- cays of the light hybrid meson 1 − +,

    G. D. Esmer, K. Azizi, H. Sundu and S. T¨ urkmen, “De- cays of the light hybrid meson 1 − +,” Phys. Rev. D 111, no.3, 034041 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    Tensor hybrid char- monia,

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, “Tensor hybrid char- monia,” Phys. Rev. D 112, no.1, 014003 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Decays of the vector charmonium and bot- tomonium hybrids,

    B. Barsbay, “Decays of the vector charmonium and bot- tomonium hybrids,” Eur. Phys. J. A 61, no.11, 242 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Evidence for a 1 − + Exotic Meson,

    D. Alde et al. [IHEP-Brussels-Los Alamos- Annecy(LAPP)], “Evidence for a 1 − + Exotic Meson,” Phys. Lett. B 205, 397 (1988)

    1988

  35. [43]

    Observation of Exotic Meson Production in the Reaction π − p → η′π − p at 18 GeV/c,

    E. I. Ivanov et al. [E852], “Observation of Exotic Meson Production in the Reaction π − p → η′π − p at 18 GeV/c,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3977-3980 (2001)

    2001

  36. [44]

    Exotic Meson Production in the f1(1285)π − System Observed in the Reaction π − p → ηπ +π − π − p at 18 GeV/ c,

    J. Kuhn et al. [E852], “Exotic Meson Production in the f1(1285)π − System Observed in the Reaction π − p → ηπ +π − π − p at 18 GeV/ c,” Phys. Lett. B 595, 109-117 (2004)

    2004

  37. [45]

    Observation of an Isoscalar Resonance with Exotic J P C = 1 − + Quantum Numbers in J/ψ → γηη ′,

    M. Ablikim et al. [BESIII], “Observation of an Isoscalar Resonance with Exotic J P C = 1 − + Quantum Numbers in J/ψ → γηη ′,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, no.19, 192002 (2022) [erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, no.15, 159901 (2023)]

    2022

  38. [46]

    Partial Wave Analysis of J/ψ → γηη ′,

    M. Ablikim et al. [BESIII], “Partial Wave Analysis of J/ψ → γηη ′,” Phys. Rev. D 106, no.7, 072012 (2022) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 107, no.7, 079901 (2023)]

    2022

  39. [47]

    Colloquium : Roper resonance: Toward a solution to the fifty year puzzle,

    V. D. Burkert and C. D. Roberts, “Colloquium : Roper resonance: Toward a solution to the fifty year puzzle,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, no.1, 011003 (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    Light hy- brid baryons in the constituent model of QCD,

    J. Viseur, C. Semay and C. Chevalier, “Light hy- brid baryons in the constituent model of QCD,” [arXiv:2606.14451 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Relativistic five quark equations and hybrid baryon spectroscopy,

    S. M. Gerasyuta and V. I. Kochkin, “Relativistic five quark equations and hybrid baryon spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. D 66, 116001 (2002)

    2002

  42. [50]

    Quark core- gluon model for heavy hybrid baryons,

    L. Cimino, C. T. Willemyns and C. Semay, “Quark core- gluon model for heavy hybrid baryons,” Phys. Rev. D 110, no.3, 034032 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    Constructing hybrid baryons with flux tubes,

    S. Capstick and P. R. Page, “Constructing hybrid baryons with flux tubes,” Phys. Rev. D 60, 111501 (1999)

    1999

  44. [52]

    Hybrid and conventional baryons in the flux tube model,

    S. Capstick and P. R. Page, “Hybrid and conventional baryons in the flux tube model,” Phys. Rev. C 66, 065204 (2002)

    2002

  45. [53]

    WHERE ARE HERMAPHRODITE BARYONS?,

    T. Barnes and F. E. Close, “WHERE ARE HERMAPHRODITE BARYONS?,” Phys. Lett. B 123, 89-92 (1983)

    1983

  46. [54]

    ARE THERE BARYONS WHICH CONTAIN CONSITUTUENT GLUONS?,

    E. Golowich, E. Haqq and G. Karl, “ARE THERE BARYONS WHICH CONTAIN CONSITUTUENT GLUONS?,” Phys. Rev. D 28, 160 (1983) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 33, 859 (1986)]

    1983

  47. [55]

    Hybrid Baryons in QCD,

    J. J. Dudek and R. G. Edwards, “Hybrid Baryons in QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 85, 054016 (2012)

    2012

  48. [56]

    Positive-parity baryon spectrum and the role of hybrid baryons,

    T. Khan, D. Richards and F. Winter, “Positive-parity baryon spectrum and the role of hybrid baryons,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.3, 034503 (2021)

    2021

  49. [57]

    Exotic J P = 1 2 + baryon from QCD sum rules,

    A. P. Martynenko, “Exotic J P = 1 2 + baryon from QCD sum rules,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 54, 488-490 (1991)

    1991

  50. [58]

    Hybrid baryons via QCD 9 sum rules,

    L. S. Kisslinger and Z. P. Li, “Hybrid baryons via QCD 9 sum rules,” Phys. Rev. D 51, R5986-R5989 (1995)

    1995

  51. [59]

    The Λ(1600): A Strange hybrid baryon,

    L. S. Kisslinger, “The Λ(1600): A Strange hybrid baryon,” Phys. Rev. D 69, 054015 (2004)

    2004

  52. [60]

    Mass and residue of Λ(1405) as hybrid and excited ordinary baryon,

    K. Azizi, B. Barsbay and H. Sundu, “Mass and residue of Λ(1405) as hybrid and excited ordinary baryon,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133, no.3, 121 (2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    Mass predictions of triply heavy hybrid baryons via QCD sum rules,

    Y. C. Zhao, C. M. Tang and L. Tang, “Mass predictions of triply heavy hybrid baryons via QCD sum rules,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83, no.7, 654 (2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    Predictions of masses for light hybrid baryons,

    Q. N. Wang, D. K. Lian, W. Chen, H. M. Yang, H. X. Chen, J. Ho and T. G. Steele, “Predictions of masses for light hybrid baryons,” Phys. Rev. D 113, no.1, 014033 (2026)

    2026

  55. [63]

    Inves- tigating charmed hybrid baryons via QCD sum rules,

    H. M. Yang, X. Luo, H. X. Chen and W. Chen, “Inves- tigating charmed hybrid baryons via QCD sum rules,” Phys. Rev. D 112, no.11, 114005 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed July 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.