REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by
The dark matter halo mass function in the $\Lambda\mathrm{CDM}$ cosmology at all times and over all scales -- from planetary to galaxy cluster masses
T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-11 · grok-4.5
Pith's one-line read A single calibrated formula gives the dark-matter halo mass function from planetary mass to clusters, from z=30 to today, at a few-percent accuracy.
desk verdict Solid, usable empirical HMF that actually covers planetary-to-cluster masses from z=30 to 0, with a clever subsampling fix and public code; the EPS mapping is the softest link but is cross-checked where it matters. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The extended Press–Schechter transformation ν=(δ_1−δ_0)/√(σ_1^{2}−σ_0^{2}) together with weighted-median subsampling of higher-density subvolumes inside the underdense VVV zooms; this maps local, environmentally biased counts onto the global f(ν) that the fitting formula then matches.
What would settle it
A new unbiased simulation that resolves the same low-mass, high-redshift regime without voids, or an independent large-volume run at intermediate mass, that yields an f(ν) differing from the calibrated formula by more than the quoted few-percent residuals in the overlapping ν range.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
An empirical correction to the Reed et al. (2007) formula, calibrated on the combined VVV and large-volume simulations, reproduces the measured halo mass function f(ν) to ∼2–3 percent at z<2 and ∼7 percent at z≳5 across the full range ln ν ∈ [−2,1.8] and 10^{-6}–10^{15.5} M_⊙, and remains accurate for modest variations of cosmological parameters.
Load-bearing premise
That extracting denser subvolumes from the extremely underdense void zooms and converting them with the extended Press–Schechter ν formula truly recovers the cosmic-mean halo abundance, with only limited direct overlap against unbiased large boxes to check.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Cluster-count forecasts for surveys can use one continuous expression from 10^{14} M_⊙ upward without stitching separate high-mass fits.
- Indirect-detection calculations can integrate the annihilation luminosity down to the planetary-mass free-streaming cut-off with a controlled abundance uncertainty.
- High-redshift galaxy and reionization models can adopt a consistent low-mass halo supply from z=30 to reionization without switching formulae.
- The same functional form remains usable, after modest re-calibration of σ(M), for cosmologies whose parameters differ only slightly from the Planck values used here.
Reading between the lines
- Because the formula is already written in ν-space, any future change in the linear power spectrum (warm dark matter cut-offs, running spectral index) can be absorbed by recomputing σ(M) alone, provided the collapse barrier itself does not change.
- The residual redshift dependence that required the new Γ(ν,z) term hints that a single universal barrier is incomplete once the effective spectral index approaches −3; a scale-dependent barrier calibrated at high z could eliminate the extra free functions.
- Public release of the fitting code makes it straightforward to re-fit the same functional form to any new suite of simulations that span a comparable dynamic range, turning the present calibration into a living standard.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper measures the dark-matter halo mass function over an unprecedented range (planetary-mass 10^{-6} M_⊙ to cluster-mass 10^{15.5} M_⊙, z=0–30) by combining the nested VVV void zooms with P-Millennium and a new large-box VVV2.8 run. An EPS-motivated weighted-median subsampling of higher-density subvolumes inside the underdense VVV regions is used to reconstruct the global f(ν). The authors then introduce an empirical, redshift-dependent correction (Eqs. 12–17) to the Reed et al. (2007) formula that reduces residuals to ∼2–3 % at z<2 and ∼7 % at z≳5. Appendices test the conversion between mass definitions and modest changes in cosmological parameters; a public Python implementation is provided.
Significance. A single, publicly coded fitting formula that is accurate from planetary to cluster scales and from z=30 to the present is a practical tool for dark-matter annihilation forecasts, high-z galaxy modelling, and cluster cosmology. The multi-simulation consistency checks (Figs. 1–3, Table 3), the explicit quantification of Poisson and cosmic-variance scatter, the mass-definition conversion test (Appendix A), and the modest cosmology-variation test (Appendix B) give the result a solid empirical foundation within ΛCDM. The public code further raises the utility of the work.
major comments (2)
- The free coefficients in Eqs. (12)–(17) (p_this work, c_this work, the amplitude and centre of G_this work, and the polynomials α(z), β(z) that define Γ) are fitted to the same multi-redshift, multi-environment suite that is later used to quote the residuals in Table 3. The comparison is therefore partly a self-consistency check rather than a fully independent validation. A short leave-one-redshift-out or leave-one-level-out exercise (or an explicit statement that the functional form was frozen before the final residual evaluation) would strengthen the claim that the ∼2–7 % accuracy is not an over-fit.
- The decisive cross-check of the EPS-motivated subsampling (Eq. 1 + §2.3) is the recovery of the unbiased P-Millennium (and VVV2.8) f(ν) to ≲0.05 dex in the overlapping ln ν interval (Figs. 1–3). That check is reassuring but limited in dynamic range. A quantitative statement of how the residual 0.05 dex scatter, once folded through the weighted-median procedure, propagates into the final ε_fit values in Table 3 would make the error budget fully transparent.
minor comments (5)
- Table 3 caption and surrounding text: clarify that ε_simulation is the floor set by inter-run scatter and that ε_fit is obtained by subtracting this floor in quadrature (or whatever procedure is actually used).
- Eq. (20): the Gaussian correction terms N(μ,ς²) are written with log M; state the base of the logarithm explicitly for reproducibility.
- Figure 4 right panel: the vertical axis label is crowded; a simpler ratio label would improve readability.
- Appendix A: the conversion to M_200c relies on the Ludlow et al. (2016) mass–concentration relation with α=0.18; a one-sentence note on the sensitivity of the transformed f(ν) to that choice would be useful.
- A few minor typos (e.g., “thesetsofsimulations”, “halomassfunction”) remain in the compiled text and should be cleaned.
Circularity Check
Empirical correction to Reed et al. (2007) is fitted to the VVV+PMILL+VVV2.8 suite and then compared to the same suite; residual accuracy is partly by construction of the parametric fit, though the form is constrained across mass/redshift/environment and checked on external cosmologies.
-
fitted input called prediction
[Section 3.2, Eqs. (12)–(17); Table 3; bottom panels of Figs. 1–3]
"Motivated by the observed evolution of the deviations, we propose an empirical correction to the Reed et al. (2007) formula: f_this work(ν)=… where p_this work(z)=0.33, c_this work=1.04, G_this work(ν,z)=… and Γ_this work(ν,z)=… We thereby correct the original R07 formula… as corroborated by the average deviation ε_fit at a ∼2−7% level in Table 3, highlighting the great performance of our fit across such a broad range of ln ν ∈ [−2,1.8] and z ∈ [0,30]."
The free parameters and z-dependent functions that define the correction are chosen expressly to reduce the residuals between the formula and the simulation measurements of f(ν). The subsequent ratios and the tabulated ε_fit therefore quantify how well the chosen parametric form interpolates the same data set used for calibration; the small residuals are statistically forced once the coefficients have been adjusted. (External checks on WMAP cosmologies and the multi-environment consistency partially mitigate, but do not remove, this character.)
full rationale
The paper is transparent that it supplies a calibrated fitting formula rather than a first-principles derivation. The functional skeleton is taken from the external Reed et al. (2007) expression; a small number of free coefficients and z-dependent functions (p, c, G amplitude/width/centre, α(z), β(z)) are then adjusted so that the modified f(ν) matches the measured halo abundances. The quoted 2–7 % deviations (Table 3, bottom panels of Figs. 1–3) are therefore residuals of that fit, not independent predictions. This is the classic “fitted input called prediction” pattern and warrants a moderate score. It is not pure circularity: the same parametric form must simultaneously describe an enormous dynamic range (ln ν ∈ [−2, 1.8], z = 0–30, multiple environments via EPS-motivated subsampling), the overlap with the unbiased P-Millennium box supplies an internal cross-check, and Appendix B tests the identical formula on independent WMAP-1 simulations (Millennium-2, Millennium-XXL). No self-definitional loop, uniqueness theorem, or load-bearing self-citation of an unverified prior result is present. The EPS transformation (Eq. 1) is an assumption whose validity is checked rather than assumed by fiat. Overall circularity is therefore limited to the ordinary residual-of-fit character of an empirical HMF formula.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (4)
- p_this work =
0.33
- c_this work =
1.04
- G_this work amplitude and centre =
polynomial/min expressions
- α(z), β(z) in Γ =
0.252+1.53θ−2.028θ²+1.382θ³ ; 4.10−2.10θ
assumptions (4)
- domain assumption Extended Press–Schechter mapping ν=(δ₁−δ₀)/√(σ₁²−σ₀²) converts local underdense counts into the global mass function.
- domain assumption Spherical-collapse barrier δ_c=1.68647 and linear growth factor D(z) remain adequate after empirical corrections.
- domain assumption Friends-of-friends + SUBFIND with M_200m definition yields a mass function that can be mapped to other common definitions via NFW/Einasto + Ludlow concentration.
- domain assumption Planck 2014 cosmological parameters and a BBKS small-scale power spectrum with no free-streaming cut-off for the L7 analysis.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of The dark matter halo mass function in the $\Lambda\mathrm{CDM}$ cosmology at all times and over all scales -- from planetary to galaxy cluster masses." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TL4SXDIT
@misc{pith2026260705505,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: The dark matter halo mass function in the $\Lambda\mathrmCDM$ cosmology at all times and over all scales -- from planetary to galaxy cluster masses},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TL4SXDIT}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.05505}
}
abstract
The dark matter halo mass function is one of the most fundamental predictions of structure formation theory and cosmological simulations. We present the full halo mass function in the $\Lambda$ cold dark matter ($\Lambda\mathrm{CDM}$) model, ranging from a planetary mass ($10^{-6}\,\mathrm{M}_\odot$; the thermal cutoff in the initial power spectrum for a fiducial CDM particle mass of $100\,\mathrm{GeV}$) to the mass of a rich galaxy cluster ($10^{15.5}\,\mathrm{M}_\odot$), and from redshift, $z=30$ to the present. To span this very large dynamic range, we combine our earlier Voids-within-Voids-within-Voids (VVV) set of simulations (Wang et al) with large volume, lower resolution cosmological simulations. We develop a subsampling method to extract subvolumes from the original simulations, allowing us to reconstruct the global halo mass function from the biased underdense VVV regions. We show that the results agree reasonably well among the sets of simulations on different scales and environments. We provide a fitting formula for the dark matter halo mass function based on the work of Reed et al. calibrated with our simulations, such that it can be applied at all scales, all environments and all times, with deviations of $\sim2-3\%$ at $z < 2$ and $\sim 7\%$ at higher redshift $z \gtrsim 5$. This formula is also accurate at least for a restricted set of models we tested with modest deviations from $\Lambda\mathrm{CDM}$ in the values of some of the cosmological parameters. A python code is publicly available at https://github.com/haonan-zheng/hmfc.
Figures
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Diffhalos: A Generative Model of Cosmological Lightcones of Dark Matter Halos
Diffhalos generates statistically accurate Monte-Carlo and quasi-Monte-Carlo lightcones of halos, subhalos and Diffmah mass-assembly histories, enabling autodiff gradients of the mass functions.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
The properties of warm dark matter haloes. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2431 , archivePrefix =. 1308.1399 , primaryClass =
-
[2]
A comparison of pre-existing CDM predictions with the abundance of JWST galaxies at high redshift. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2646 , archivePrefix =. 2406.02672 , primaryClass =
-
[3]
CEERS Key Paper. I. An Early Look into the First 500 Myr of Galaxy Formation with JWST. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acade4 , archivePrefix =. 2211.05792 , primaryClass =
-
[4]
Constraints on the identity of the dark matter from strong gravitational lenses
Constraints on the identity of the dark matter from strong gravitational lenses. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw939 , archivePrefix =. 1512.06507 , primaryClass =
-
[5]
A forward-modelling method to infer the dark matter particle mass from strong gravitational lenses
A forward-modelling method to infer the dark matter particle mass from strong gravitational lenses. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac191 , archivePrefix =. 2010.13221 , primaryClass =
-
[6]
The Formation of Dark Halos in a Universe Dominated by Cold Dark Matter. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/166213 , adsurl =
-
[7]
The nature of galaxy bias and clustering. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03101.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9903343 , primaryClass =
-
[8]
Galaxy Clusters and the Amplitude of Primordial Fluctuations. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/168439 , adsurl =
Show all 131 references
- [9]
- [10]
-
[11]
Galaxy formation as a function of large-scale environment
Galaxies-intergalactic medium interaction calculation - I. Galaxy formation as a function of large-scale environment. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15402.x , archivePrefix =. 0906.4350 , primaryClass =
2009 doi
-
[12]
Results at [formmu2]z=0
Populating a cluster of galaxies - I. Results at [formmu2]z=0. , eprint =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04912.x , adsurl =
2001 doi
-
[13]
, keywords =
The evolution of large-scale structure in a universe dominated by cold dark matter. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/163168 , adsurl =
- [14]
-
[15]
Planck 2013 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321529 , adsurl =
2013 doi
-
[16]
, year = 1974, month = feb, volume =
Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Similar Gravitational Condensation. , year = 1974, month = feb, volume =. doi:10.1086/152650 , adsurl =
1974 doi
-
[17]
, keywords =
Large-scale bias and the peak background split. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02692.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9901122 , primaryClass =
1999 doi
-
[18]
, keywords =
An excursion set model of hierarchical clustering: ellipsoidal collapse and the moving barrier. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.04950.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0105113 , primaryClass =
2002 doi
-
[19]
, keywords =
Excursion Set Mass Functions for Hierarchical Gaussian Fluctuations. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/170520 , adsurl =
-
[20]
, keywords =
The evolution of groups of galaxies in the Press-Schechter formalism. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/248.2.332 , adsurl =
-
[21]
, keywords =
Merger rates in hierarchical models of galaxy formation. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/262.3.627 , adsurl =
- [22]
-
[23]
, keywords =
The abundance and clustering of dark haloes in the standard CDM cosmogony. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05723.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0202393 , primaryClass =
2002 doi
-
[24]
, keywords =
Second-order Lagrangian perturbation theory initial conditions for resimulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16259.x , archivePrefix =. 0910.0258 , primaryClass =
2010 doi
- [25]
-
[26]
arXiv e-prints , keywords =
Panphasia: a user guide. arXiv e-prints , keywords =
-
[27]
, keywords =
Substructures in hydrodynamical cluster simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15034.x , archivePrefix =. 0808.3401 , primaryClass =
2009 doi
- [28]
-
[29]
, keywords =
The mass function of dark matter haloes. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04029.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0005260 , primaryClass =
2001 doi
-
[30]
, keywords =
Evolution of the mass function of dark matter haloes. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07113.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0301270 , primaryClass =
2003 doi
-
[31]
, keywords =
The halo mass function from the dark ages through the present day. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11204.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0607150 , primaryClass =
2006 doi
- [32]
- [33]
-
[34]
, keywords =
Halo mass function and scale-dependent bias from N-body simulations with non-Gaussian initial conditions. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15914.x , archivePrefix =. 0811.4176 , primaryClass =
2009 doi
-
[35]
, keywords =
Early structure in CDM. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09509.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0503003 , primaryClass =
2005 doi
-
[36]
, keywords =
A prescription for the conditional mass function of dark matter haloes. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13191.x , archivePrefix =. 0803.1954 , primaryClass =
2008 doi
- [37]
- [38]
-
[39]
, keywords =
The amplitude of mass fluctuations in the universe. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/262.4.1023 , adsurl =
-
[40]
Simulations and preliminary comparisons
Cold dark matter variant cosmological models - I. Simulations and preliminary comparisons. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01998.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9712142 , primaryClass =
1998 doi
-
[41]
, keywords =
Properties of galaxy clusters: mass and correlation functions. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02706.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9810189 , primaryClass =
1999 doi
- [42]
-
[43]
, keywords =
Dark matter halo abundances, clustering and assembly histories at high redshift. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12972.x , archivePrefix =. 0706.0208 , primaryClass =
2008 doi
- [44]
- [45]
-
[46]
arXiv e-prints , keywords =
Virial halo mass function in the Planck cosmology. arXiv e-prints , keywords =
- [47]
- [48]
-
[49]
, keywords =
Large-scale bias and the inaccuracy of the peak-background split. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15921.x , archivePrefix =. 0906.1314 , primaryClass =
2009 doi
-
[50]
, keywords =
Core condensation in heavy halos: a two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/183.3.341 , adsurl =
-
[51]
, year = 1970, month = feb, volume =
Structure of the Coma Cluster of Galaxies. , year = 1970, month = feb, volume =. doi:10.1086/110933 , adsurl =
1970 doi
-
[52]
, keywords =
Galaxy Formation through Hierarchical Clustering. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/170483 , adsurl =
-
[53]
, keywords =
Semi-analytic modelling of galaxy formation: the local Universe. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.03032.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9802268 , primaryClass =
1999 doi
- [54]
- [55]
- [56]
- [57]
-
[58]
, keywords =
Non-linear evolution of cosmological structures in warm dark matter models. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21252.x , archivePrefix =. 1112.0330 , primaryClass =
2012 doi
- [59]
-
[60]
Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321591 , adsurl =
2013 doi
-
[61]
, keywords =
The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0505010 , primaryClass =
2005 doi
-
[62]
, keywords =
Universal structure of dark matter haloes over a mass range of 20 orders of magnitude. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2642-9 , archivePrefix =. 1911.09720 , primaryClass =
1911 doi
- [63]
- [64]
-
[65]
, keywords =
The Statistics of Peaks of Gaussian Random Fields. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/164143 , adsurl =
-
[66]
, keywords =
Simulating the Universe with MICE: the abundance of massive clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16194.x , archivePrefix =. 0907.0019 , primaryClass =
2009 doi
- [67]
- [68]
- [69]
-
[70]
, keywords =
Linking halo mass to galaxy luminosity. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08059.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0402500 , primaryClass =
2004 doi
- [71]
- [72]
-
[73]
, keywords =
Halo occupation numbers and galaxy bias. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03779.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0005010 , primaryClass =
2000 doi
- [74]
-
[75]
, keywords =
Analytic model for galaxy and dark matter clustering. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03715.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0001493 , primaryClass =
2000 doi
-
[76]
, keywords =
The X-ray cluster survey with eRosita: forecasts for cosmology, cluster physics and primordial non-Gaussianity. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20443.x , archivePrefix =. 1111.6587 , primaryClass =
2012 doi
- [77]
- [78]
- [79]
- [80]
-
[81]
, keywords =
Gravitational imaging of cold dark matter substructures. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09523.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0501324 , primaryClass =
2005 doi
- [82]
-
[83]
, keywords =
Uncovering cold dark matter halo substructure with tidal streams. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05358.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0110690 , primaryClass =
2002 doi
- [84]
- [85]
- [86]
- [87]
- [88]
-
[89]
, keywords =
Detection of a dark substructure through gravitational imaging. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16865.x , archivePrefix =. 0910.0760 , primaryClass =
2010 doi
- [90]
- [91]
-
[92]
The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =
Halo mass functions at high redshift. The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.33232/001c.126010 , archivePrefix =. 2408.15194 , primaryClass =
- [93]
- [94]
- [95]
- [96]
- [97]
- [98]
- [99]
-
[100]
, keywords =
The shape of dark matter haloes in the Aquarius simulations: evolution and memory. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19134.x , archivePrefix =. 1104.1566 , primaryClass =
2011 doi
-
[101]
, keywords =
The shape of dark matter haloes: dependence on mass, redshift, radius and formation. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10094.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0508497 , primaryClass =
2006 doi
- [102]
- [103]
-
[104]
, keywords =
One step beyond: the excursion set approach with correlated steps. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01266.x , archivePrefix =. 1201.3876 , primaryClass =
2012 doi
-
[105]
Trudy Astrofizicheskogo Instituta Alma-Ata , year = 1965, month = jan, volume =
On the Construction of a Composite Model for the Galaxy and on the Determination of the System of Galactic Parameters. Trudy Astrofizicheskogo Instituta Alma-Ata , year = 1965, month = jan, volume =
1965
- [106]
- [107]
-
[108]
arXiv e-prints , keywords =
A redshift-independent theoretical halo mass function validated with the Uchuu simulations. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.05847 , archivePrefix =. 2512.05847 , primaryClass =
-
[109]
arXiv e-prints , keywords =
Evolution mapping III: A new recipe for the halo mass function. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.16730 , archivePrefix =. 2511.16730 , primaryClass =
-
[110]
Nature Astronomy , keywords =
A million-solar-mass object detected at a cosmological distance using gravitational imaging. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02651-2 , archivePrefix =. 2510.07382 , primaryClass =
-
[111]
arXiv e-prints , keywords =
A possible challenge for Cold and Warm Dark Matter. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.02466 , archivePrefix =. 2601.02466 , primaryClass =
- [112]
- [113]
-
[114]
, keywords =
Discreteness effects in simulations of hot/warm dark matter. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12053.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0702575 , primaryClass =
2007 doi
- [115]
- [116]
- [117]
-
[118]
, keywords =
Evolution of massive haloes in non-Gaussian scenarios. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12458.x , archivePrefix =. 0707.2516 , primaryClass =
2007 doi
- [119]
- [120]
- [121]
-
[122]
, keywords =
Tests for primordial non-Gaussianity. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04459.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0011180 , primaryClass =
2001 doi
- [123]
- [124]
-
[125]
, keywords =
Scale-dependent bias induced by local non-Gaussianity: a comparison to N-body simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14721.x , archivePrefix =. 0811.2748 , primaryClass =
2009 doi
- [126]
-
[127]
, keywords =
Scaling relations for galaxy clusters in the Millennium-XXL simulation. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21830.x , archivePrefix =. 1203.3216 , primaryClass =
2012 doi
-
[128]
, keywords =
Resolving cosmic structure formation with the Millennium-II Simulation. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15191.x , archivePrefix =. 0903.3041 , primaryClass =
2009 doi
- [129]
- [130]
- [131]
Reviewed July 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.