Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 183 references

From inflation to hot big bang -- a tutorial on cosmological perturbations

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-09 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Inflation's quantum seeds to today's cosmic structure, derived end to end

desk verdict Solid pedagogical textbook on cosmological perturbation theory from inflation through reheating, with working code. No new science, but well-executed for its stated purpose. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.06983 v1 pith:7ZPL4WT2 submitted 2026-07-08 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

Mikko Laine , Simona Procacci This is my paper
classification hep-phastro-ph.CO
keywords perturbationsdensityinflationbangcosmologicalexpansionexponentialaccessible
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This is a pedagogical treatise that derives the complete chain from inflationary quantum fluctuations to observable cosmological perturbations within a single self-consistent framework. The authors develop linear cosmological perturbation theory from first principles: starting with the Einstein equations on a homogeneous and isotropic background, they introduce first-order perturbations, decompose them into scalar, vector, and tensor components, and track their evolution through three distinct epochs. During inflation, quantum vacuum fluctuations in a scalar field generate curvature perturbations. When modes exit the Hubble horizon, these perturbations freeze out and become classical. During reheating, the inflaton's energy thermalizes into a hot plasma, and the authors incorporate dissipative dynamics, thermal noise, and fluctuation-dissipation relations into the perturbation equations. When modes re-enter the horizon in the post-inflationary universe, they seed acoustic oscillations in the photon-baryon plasma and gravitational waves. Throughout, the authors insist on gauge-invariant variables, meaning quantities whose physical content does not depend on arbitrary coordinate choices. They provide explicit computer-algebraic derivations and numerical Python scripts for every step that is too tedious for hand computation. The load-bearing claim is that linear perturbation theory, combined with gauge-invariant variables and careful treatment of thermalization, suffices to connect inflationary initial conditions to all standard cosmological observables: the scalar power spectrum amplitude and tilt, the tensor-to-scalar ratio, spectral distortions, and effective neutrino degrees of freedom.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the gauge-invariant curvature perturbation R_T, defined as a specific combination of metric and matter perturbations that remains unchanged under coordinate transformations. The Mukhanov-Sasaki equation governs its evolution during inflation, with Bunch-Davies vacuum initial conditions setting the quantum state. During reheating, a Langevin equation for the inflaton adds dissipative friction (rate Υ) and thermal noise (correlator Ω), linked by a fluctuation-dissipation relation. The Einstein equations at linear order, decomposed into scalar/vector/tensor sectors via transverse and longitudinal projectors, provide the dynamical constraints. Transfer functions map the冻

What would settle it

If second-order perturbations during reheating or at horizon re-entry were shown to produce corrections comparable to first-order terms, the linear framework would need significant extension and the claimed self-consistency would fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the entire pipeline from inflationary vacuum fluctuations through reheating to observable cosmological signatures can be formulated as a single, internally consistent linear perturbation theory, provided one works with gauge-invariant curvature perturbations, incorporates dissipative and stochastic thermal effects during reheating via Langevin-type equations with fluctuation-dissipation relations, and tracks mode evolution through Hubble horizon exit and re-entry. The curvature perturbation R_T serves as the central object: it is conserved outside the horizon, carries the inflationary initial conditions, and maps onto the scalar power spectrum that seeds all later-

Load-bearing premise

The entire framework assumes that second-order perturbations are negligible relative to the sum of zeroth and first-order terms. This is observationally well-motivated by the tiny CMB anisotropy (about one part in 100,000), but it may break down during reheating when the inflaton oscillates coherently and during any non-thermal phase transition.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the linear framework is sufficient end-to-end, then any discrepancy between predicted and observed power spectra at small scales would point to new physics during reheating rather than to a failure of perturbation theory itself.
  • The inclusion of thermal noise and dissipation in the perturbation equations means that reheating is not an instantaneous process but leaves imprints on the scalar power spectrum that depend on the reheating temperature and inflaton coupling, making these observable in principle.
  • The tensor perturbation equation, being a wave equation with Hubble friction plus viscous corrections, provides a direct link between gravitational-wave observatories and the thermal history of the early universe.
  • The gauge-invariant formulation ensures that predictions for CMB observables are coordinate-independent, making the framework robust against the choice of computational gauge.
  • The provided numerical and symbolic tools make the full pipeline reproducible, allowing independent verification of each step from background evolution to power spectrum computation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. These lecture notes provide a pedagogical, self-contained derivation of cosmological perturbation theory, spanning the chain from inflationary quantum fluctuations through reheating and thermalization to observable signatures in the CMB and gravitational-wave backgrounds. The manuscript develops the FLRW background (Chapter 1), defines observable targets (Chapter 2), derives first-order perturbation equations with full scalar-vector-tensor decomposition (Chapter 3), treats gauge invariance systematically (Chapter 4), and then applies the formalism to inflationary perturbation generation (Chapters 5–6), dissipative reheating (Chapter 7), horizon exit/entry dynamics (Chapters 8–9), and gravitational-wave probes (Chapter 10). Python scripts for numerical and symbolic computations are publicly hosted. The notes are published as Springer Lecture Notes in Physics 1047.

Significance. The manuscript fills a genuine pedagogical gap. Existing textbooks on cosmological perturbations typically operate at a level above what a first exposure requires, and most do not integrate the reheating/thermalization epoch into the perturbation framework. The explicit, step-by-step derivations of the Einstein tensor, gauge transformations, and curvature perturbation equations—with internal crosschecks from gauge invariance—are a notable strength. The inclusion of dissipative dynamics (friction coefficient Υ, thermal noise ϱ, Langevin equation in eq. 1.62) and the introduction of R_T as the conserved quantity during reheating (eq. 4.62) are pedagogically valuable and not standard in introductory treatments. The accompanying reproducible Python code and Mathematica transcriptions add practical value. The discussion of scalar-induced gravitational waves (sec. 10.4) as a bridge beyond linear order is a thoughtful exception to the otherwise linear-only framework.

minor comments (6)
  1. Eq. (1.88): The numerical coefficient appears inconsistent. The standard result for radiation domination gives t ∝ 1/√g* (since H ∝ √g* T²/m_pl and t = 1/(2H)). The expression as written, 't ≈ (3√5/4)√(g*π³) m_pl/T² ≈ 0.301√g* m_pl/T²', has √g* in the numerator. The correct result is t ≈ (3√5)/(4√(g*π³)) m_pl/T² ≈ 0.301/√g* × m_pl/T². The same issue appears in eq. (1.89) for dt/dT. Please verify and correct the placement of √(g*π³) (denominator vs. numerator) and the corresponding numerical approximation.
  2. Notation section (p. vi): The dual use of p for both physical momentum and pressure is acknowledged, but given how frequently both appear in the same equations (e.g., eqs. 1.34–1.44), a brief remark at first joint appearance would help readers.
  3. Eq. (1.102): The natural inflation parameters (f_a = 1.25 m_pl, m = 1.09×10⁻⁶ m_pl) are described as yielding 'semi-realistic observables.' Given that natural inflation with f_a ≳ 5 m_pl is increasingly disfavored by Planck constraints on n_s and r, a one-sentence caveat noting the observational tension would be appropriate for completeness, even in a pedagogical context.
  4. Sec. 2.4, eq. (2.35): The estimate ln(a₀/aₑ) = 64.7 for Tₑ = 10¹⁵ GeV is standard, but the reference to [2.45] (Standard Model equation of state data) for the slowly-varying coefficient could benefit from a one-line explanation of how the SM EoS modifies the naive g* counting, since this is a non-trivial input for students.
  5. The manuscript is already published as a Springer ebook (doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-09893-1). If this arXiv version is intended as a living document (as suggested by the GitHub link), a brief note clarifying the relationship between the published version and the arXiv/GitHub version would help readers track which is authoritative.
  6. Chapter 10 covers a very broad range of gravitational-wave topics (vacuum fluctuations, matter sources, scalar-induced, anisotropic stress, graviton production, transfer functions, frequency domains) in limited depth. While appropriate for lecture notes, a brief forward-reference table mapping each subsection to the corresponding specialized review would help students navigate further reading.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found — pedagogical derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks

full rationale

This is a pedagogical tutorial that explicitly derives each step from first principles (Einstein equations → perturbation theory → gauge-invariant variables → Mukhanov-Sasaki equation → power spectra → reheating → observables). The observational parameters (A_s, n_s from Planck, eq. 2.8–2.9) are used as inputs/benchmarks, not claimed as derived predictions. The model parameters (f_a, m in eq. 1.102) are explicitly stated as chosen to 'yield semi-realistic observables,' which is standard model-fitting, not circular derivation. The curvature perturbation R_T (eq. 4.62) is defined as a gauge-invariant combination and its conservation is independently derived in chapter 8 from energy-momentum conservation — the definition and the conservation law are separate results. The only self-citation is to the PhD thesis [0.1] of one author, acknowledged as the origin of the lecture notes but with all content rederived explicitly. The EOS data [2.45] from one author is external numerical input, not a theoretical claim being verified. The Python scripts are publicly available for independent verification. No step in the derivation chain reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities are invented. The inflaton is a standard postulated field of inflationary cosmology, not introduced by this paper. All parameters are standard model-fitting choices for the benchmark natural inflation model, used for pedagogical illustration.

free parameters (3)
  • f_a (inflaton decay constant) = 1.25 m_pl
    Chosen in eq. 1.102 to yield semi-realistic CMB observables; a model parameter of natural inflation, not derived from first principles.
  • m (inflaton mass) = 1.09e-6 m_pl
    Chosen in eq. 1.102 to match the observed scalar amplitude A_s; standard model-fitting parameter.
  • phi(t_i) (initial field value) = 3.5 m_pl
    Set in eq. 1.103 to ensure sufficiently long inflation; an initial condition choice.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption General relativity is the correct description of gravity at early-universe energies
    The entire framework is built on Einstein equations (eq. 1.32). Invoked throughout, explicitly stated in the General Outline as not requiring quantum gravity.
  • domain assumption Linear perturbation theory is valid (second-order terms negligible)
    Stated in eq. 3.1 and discussed at end of sec. 5.3. Motivated by δT/T ~ 10^-5 but assumed throughout.
  • domain assumption The universe is homogeneous and isotropic at the largest scales
    FLRW metric adopted in eq. 1.2; justified by CMB observations in sec. 1.1.
  • domain assumption Quantum field theory in curved spacetime is valid for computing inflationary perturbations
    Bunch-Davies vacuum initial conditions in sec. 5.2 assume QFT in curved background; standard but unproven beyond perturbative level.
  • domain assumption Standard model of particle physics applies at early-universe temperatures
    Used for equation of state, g_* counting, and reheating dynamics in chapters 1 and 7.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of From inflation to hot big bang -- a tutorial on cosmological perturbations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7ZPL4WT2

@misc{pith2026260706983,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: From inflation to hot big bang -- a tutorial on cosmological perturbations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7ZPL4WT2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.06983}
}
read the original abstract

These lecture notes are meant as a pedagogic guide to cosmological inflation and the early epochs thereafter. Inflation explains how the seeds for density perturbations, which evolved into the largest structures in our universe, could have formed during a period of exponential expansion. Apart from density perturbations, also tensor perturbations are generated, which may be observed as gravitational waves. The formalism is developed through explicit computations, paying attention to general-relativistic gauge invariance, and to thermalization (the mechanism that converts part of the energy density driving exponential expansion into the conventional hot big bang). For the steps best handled numerically or computer-algebraically, simple python scripts are provided. We aim at an unassuming style, hopefully accessible to students of theoretical high-energy physics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06983 by the authors.

Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. Sketch of the Hubble rate, H, as a function of physical time (left, cf. eq. (1.86)) and conformal time (right, cf. eqs. (1.96) and (1.98)). By ti we denote an initial time, at which the Hubble rate takes the constant value Hi ≡ H(ti ), and by te the end of inflation, at which H starts to evolve. Inflation is assumed to end instantaneously, and we have set w = 0 afterwards (cf. eq. (1.74)), which corresponds to matte… view at source ↗
Figure 1.2
Figure 1.2. Numerical background solution, from eqs. (1.99)–(1.104), in physical time. For illus￾tration, the comoving momentum mode has been chosen as k/a(ti ) = 7.35 × 1052mpl, where the initial time, ti ≡ H −1 ref , is defined according to eq. (1.104). At late times, we have gone over from the full equation in eq. (1.99) to the simplified version in eq. (1.110), but the transition is smooth. This plot can be compared with th… view at source ↗
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. A sketch of the angular momentum power spectrum of the CMB temperature anisotropies, Dℓ (cf. eq. (2.4)), at different multipole moments ℓ. We note that a large multipole, ℓ, corresponds to a small angular scale, θℓ ≡ π/ℓ. In terms of the wavelength, λ ∼ 2π/k, of the underlying density perturbations, the angular de￾pendence originates by projecting plane waves onto spherical harmonics (this is described briefly in th… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: fig. 1.1 on p. 17). We then choose a moment [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_1.png]
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: figure 1.1(right) on p. 17) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p120_1.png]
Figure 6.1
Figure 6.1. Figure 6.1: Left: The dashed blue line shows a numerical solution of eq. (6.11), with initial conditions fixed through eqs. (6.15) and (6.17), and the result normalized according to eq. (6.13). The parameters are like in fig. 1.2 on p. 21. The solid red curve shows the result fr…
Figure 7.1
Figure 7.1. Figure 7.1: A sketch of a typical timeline of how inflation ends, if Υ ≪ Γ. Here Υ is the equilibration rate of the low-momentum modes of the inflaton, and Γ is the equilibration rate of the plasma particles, with physical momenta p ∼ T. As the Hubble rate decreases, any interac…
Figure 7.2
Figure 7.2. Figure 7.2: Left: A numerical solution for the reheating dynamics described by eqs. (7.48)–(7.50). The vacuum potential is like in eqs. (1.101) and (1.102), and Href is from eq. (1.104), whereas the equation of state of the plasma is parametrized according to eq. (7.114), and th…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: fig. 7.2(right), which shows the initial momentum that corresponds to a given physical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p161_7.png]
Figure 9.1
Figure 9.1. Figure 9.1: Left: An example of a numerical solution of eqs. (9.26) and (9.27), for α = 1 2 , corresponding to radiation domination (cf. eq. (9.21)). The solid curve, displaying the power spectrum corresponding to RT , can be interpreted as a determination of a transfer function…
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: fig. 1.1(right), momenta with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p221_1.png]
Figure 10.1
Figure 10.1. Figure 10.1: Examples of Feynman diagrams for graviton production. Gravitons are denoted by doubled curly lines. (i) 2 → 2 scatterings, as described by eq. (10.112). The wiggly lines denote gauge bosons, for instance gluons, which give the dominant contribution in the Standard M…
Figure 10.2
Figure 10.2. Figure 10.2: A sketch of the transfer function for the tensor channel, h 2Tt , from eq. (10.147). The lower horizontal axis displays the current frequency, f0/Hz, and the upper one the temperature at which the corresponding mode re-enters the Hubble horizon, cf. eqs. (2.40) and …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: fig. 10.3). However, an exquisite resolution might be needed for observing the signal. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p236_10.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: fig. 10.2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p238_10.png]
Figure 10.3
Figure 10.3. Figure 10.3: An illustration of the contributions of inflation and post-reheating physics to the current gravitational-wave energy density. Only features that are guaranteed to be present are displayed, even though their amplitudes are still unknown (they depend, respectively, o…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

183 extracted references · 183 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    S. Procacci, Towards a thermally complete study of inflationary predictions , PhD thesis, University of Bern, Switzerland, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48549/4522 https://doi.org/10.48549/4522

    work page doi:10.48549/4522 2023

  2. [2]

    Kurki-Suonio, Cosmological Perturbation Theory , University of Helsinki, Finland, 2024, https://www.mv.helsinki.fi/home/hkurkisu/ https://www.mv.helsinki.fi/home/hkurkisu/

    H. Kurki-Suonio, Cosmological Perturbation Theory , University of Helsinki, Finland, 2024, https://www.mv.helsinki.fi/home/hkurkisu/ https://www.mv.helsinki.fi/home/hkurkisu/

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Kodama and M

    H. Kodama and M. Sasaki, Cosmological Perturbation Theory, https://doi.org/10.1143/PTPS.78.1 Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ Suppl.\ 78 (1984) 1

    work page doi:10.1143/ptps.78.1 1984

  4. [4]

    Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology

    A.D. Linde, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology, Contemp.\ Concepts Phys.\ 5 (1990) 1 [hep-th/0503203 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0503203]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1990

  5. [5]

    Mukhanov, H.A

    V.F. Mukhanov, H.A. Feldman, and R.H. Brandenberger, Theory of cosmological perturbations, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(92)90044-Z Phys. Rept. 215 (1992) 203

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(92)90044-z 1992

  6. [6]

    Liddle and D.H

    A.R. Liddle and D.H. Lyth, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175180 Cosmological Inflation and Large-Scale Structure (Cambridge University Press, 2000)

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175180

  7. [7]

    Mukhanov and S

    V. Mukhanov and S. Winitzki, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809149 Introduction to Quantum Effects in Gravity (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809149 2007

  8. [8]

    Weinberg, Cosmology (Oxford University Press, 2008)

    S. Weinberg, Cosmology (Oxford University Press, 2008)

    work page 2008

Show all 183 references
  1. [9]

    Durrer, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316471524 The Cosmic Microwave Background (Cambridge University Press, 2020)

    R. Durrer, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316471524 The Cosmic Microwave Background (Cambridge University Press, 2020)

    2020 doi

  2. [10]

    Malik and D

    K.A. Malik and D. Wands, Cosmological perturbations, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2009.03.001 Phys.\ Rept.\ 475 (2009) 1 [0809.4944 https://arxiv.org/abs/0809.4944]

    2009 doi arXiv

  3. [11]

    Baumann, Inflation, https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814327183_0010 Contribution to TASI 2009 [0907.5424 https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.5424]

    D. Baumann, Inflation, https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814327183_0010 Contribution to TASI 2009 [0907.5424 https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.5424]

    2009 doi arXiv

  4. [12]

    Gorbunov and V.A

    D.S. Gorbunov and V.A. Rubakov, https://doi.org/10.1142/7873 Introduction to the Theory of the Early Universe: Cosmological Perturbations and Inflationary Theory (World Scientific, 2011)

    2011 doi

  5. [13]

    Huterer, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009070232 A Course in Cosmology --- From Theory to Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2023)

    D. Huterer, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009070232 A Course in Cosmology --- From Theory to Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2023)

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology , John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1971

    S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology , John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1971

    1971

  7. [15]

    Schwarz, The first second of the universe , https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.200310010 Annalen Phys.\ 12 (2003) 220 [astro-ph/0303574 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0303574]

    D.J. Schwarz, The first second of the universe , https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.200310010 Annalen Phys.\ 12 (2003) 220 [astro-ph/0303574 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0303574]

    2003 doi arXiv

  8. [16]

    Mambrini, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66994-1 Particles in the Dark Universe

    Y. Mambrini, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66994-1 Particles in the Dark Universe. A Student's Guide to Particle Physics and Cosmology , Springer, 2021

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    Rubakov and D.S

    V.A. Rubakov and D.S. Gorbunov, https://doi.org/10.1142/10447 Introduction to the Theory of the Early Universe: Hot Big Bang Theory , World Scientific, 2017

    2017 doi

  10. [18]

    Smoot et al

    G.F. Smoot et al. [COBE], Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First Year Maps , https://doi.org/10.1086/186504 Astrophys.\ J.\ Lett.\ 396 (1992) L1

    1992 doi

  11. [19]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. [Planck], Planck 2018 results.\ I.\ Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck , https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833880 Astron.\ Astrophys.\ 641 (2020) A1 [1807.06205 https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06205]

    2018 doi arXiv

  12. [20]

    Hertzberg, On inflation with non-minimal coupling , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2010)023 JHEP\ 11 (2010) 023 [1002.2995 https://arxiv.org/abs/1002.2995]

    M.P. Hertzberg, On inflation with non-minimal coupling , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2010)023 JHEP\ 11 (2010) 023 [1002.2995 https://arxiv.org/abs/1002.2995]

    2010 doi arXiv

  13. [21]

    Freese, J.A

    K. Freese, J.A. Frieman and A.V. Olinto, Natural inflation with pseudo Nambu-Goldstone bosons, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.3233 Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ 65 (1990) 3233

    1990 doi

  14. [22]

    Spokoiny, Deflationary Universe scenario, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(93)90155-B Phys.\ Lett.\ B 315 (1993) 40 [gr-qc/9306008 https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9306008]

    B. Spokoiny, Deflationary Universe scenario, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(93)90155-B Phys.\ Lett.\ B 315 (1993) 40 [gr-qc/9306008 https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9306008]

    1993 doi arXiv

  15. [23]

    M. Joyce, Electroweak baryogenesis and the expansion rate of the Universe, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.55.1875 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 55 (1997) 1875 [hep-ph/9606223 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9606223]

    1997 doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    Guth, Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 23 (1981) 347

    A.H. Guth, Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 23 (1981) 347

    1981 doi

  17. [25]

    A.D. Linde, A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)91219-9 Phys.\ Lett.\ B 108 (1982) 389

    1982 doi

  18. [26]

    Albrecht and P.J

    A. Albrecht and P.J. Steinhardt, Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1220 Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ 48 (1982) 1220

    1982 doi

  19. [27]

    Linde, Chaotic inflation, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(83)90837-7 Phys.\ Lett.\ B 129 (1983) 177

    A.D. Linde, Chaotic inflation, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(83)90837-7 Phys.\ Lett.\ B 129 (1983) 177

    1983 doi

  20. [28]

    Novello and S.E.P

    M. Novello and S.E.P. Bergliaffa, Bouncing cosmologies , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2008.04.006 Phys.\ Rept.\ 463 (2008) 127 [0802.1634 https://arxiv.org/abs/0802.1634]

    2008 doi arXiv

  21. [29]

    Rees, Polarization and Spectrum of the Primeval Radiation in an Anisotropic Universe, https://doi.org/10.1086/180208 Astrophys.\ J.\ 153 (1968) L1

    M.J. Rees, Polarization and Spectrum of the Primeval Radiation in an Anisotropic Universe, https://doi.org/10.1086/180208 Astrophys.\ J.\ 153 (1968) L1

    1968 doi

  22. [30]

    Bond and G

    J.R. Bond and G. Efstathiou, Cosmic background radiation anisotropies in universes dominated by nonbaryonic dark matter, https://doi.org/10.1086/184362 Astrophys.\ J.\ Lett.\ 285 (1984) L45

    1984 doi

  23. [31]

    Ade et al

    P.A.R. Ade et al. [BICEP and Keck], Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.151301 Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ 127 (2021) 151301 [2110.00483 https:...

    2018 doi

  24. [32]

    Zebrowski et al

    J.A. Zebrowski et al. [SPT-3G], SPT-3G D1: Constraints on inflationary gravitational waves with two years of SPT-3G data, https://doi.org/doi:10.1103/33wm-c6pt Phys.\ Rev.\ D 112 (2025) 123520 [2505.02827 https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.02827]

    2025 doi arXiv

  25. [33]

    Kamionkowski, A

    M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky and A. Stebbins, A Probe of Primordial Gravity Waves and Vorticity, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2058 Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ 78 (1997) 2058 [astro-ph/9609132 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9609132]

    doi arXiv

  26. [34]

    Seljak and M

    U. Seljak and M. Zaldarriaga, Signature of Gravity Waves in Polarization of the Microwave Background, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2054 Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ 78 (1997) 2054 [astro-ph/9609169 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9609169]

    doi arXiv

  27. [35]

    Lewis and A

    A. Lewis and A. Challinor, Weak gravitational lensing of the CMB, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2006.03.002 Phys.\ Rept.\ 429 (2006) 1 [astro-ph/0601594 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0601594]

    2006 doi arXiv

  28. [36]

    Silk, Cosmic Black-Body Radiation and Galaxy Formation , https://doi.org/10.1086/149449 Astrophys.\ J.\ 151 (1968) 459

    J. Silk, Cosmic Black-Body Radiation and Galaxy Formation , https://doi.org/10.1086/149449 Astrophys.\ J.\ 151 (1968) 459

    1968 doi

  29. [37]

    Sachs and A.M

    R.K. Sachs and A.M. Wolfe, Perturbations of a cosmological model and angular variations of the microwave background , https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-007-0448-9 Astrophys.\ J.\ 147 (1967) 73

    1967 doi

  30. [38]

    Harrison, Fluctuations at the Threshold of Classical Cosmology, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.1.2726 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 1 (1970) 2726

    E.R. Harrison, Fluctuations at the Threshold of Classical Cosmology, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.1.2726 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 1 (1970) 2726

    1970 doi

  31. [39]

    Zeldovich, A Hypothesis, Unifying the Structure and the Entropy of the Universe, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/160.1.1P Mon.\ Not.\ Roy.\ Astron.\ Soc.\ 160 (1972) 1

    Ya.B. Zeldovich, A Hypothesis, Unifying the Structure and the Entropy of the Universe, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/160.1.1P Mon.\ Not.\ Roy.\ Astron.\ Soc.\ 160 (1972) 1

    1972 doi

  32. [40]

    Aghanim et al [Planck], Planck 2018 results.\ VI.\ Cosmological parameters, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 Astron.\ Astrophys.\ 641 (2020) A6 ; ibid

    N. Aghanim et al [Planck], Planck 2018 results.\ VI.\ Cosmological parameters, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 Astron.\ Astrophys.\ 641 (2020) A6 ; ibid. 652 (2021) C4 (erratum) [1807.06209 https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06209]

    2018 doi arXiv

  33. [41]

    Akrami et al

    Y. Akrami et al. [Planck], Planck 2018 results.\ X.\ Constraints on inflation , https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833887 Astron.\ Astrophys.\ 641 (2020) A10 [1807.06211 https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06211]

    2018 doi arXiv

  34. [42]

    T. Louis et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and CDM parameters , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/062 JCAP 11 (2025) 062 [2503.14452 https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14452]

    2025 doi arXiv

  35. [43]

    Komatsu and D.N

    E. Komatsu and D.N. Spergel, Acoustic signatures in the primary microwave background bispectrum, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.63.063002 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 63 (2001) 063002 [astro-ph/0005036 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0005036]

    2001 doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    Akrami et al

    Y. Akrami et al. [Planck], Planck 2018 results.\ IX.\ Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935891 Astron.\ Astrophys.\ 641 (2020) A9 [1905.05697 https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.05697]

    2018 doi arXiv

  37. [45]

    Lyth and Y

    D.H. Lyth and Y. Rodr\'iguez, Inflationary Prediction for Primordial Non-Gaussianity , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.121302 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 121302 [astro-ph/0504045 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0504045]

    2005 doi arXiv

  38. [46]

    Andrews et al

    A. Andrews et al. [Euclid], Euclid: Field-level inference of primordial non-Gaussianity and cosmic initial conditions , 2412.11945 https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.11945

  39. [47]

    Enqvist and H

    K. Enqvist and H. Kurki-Suonio, Constraining isocurvature fluctuations with the Planck Surveyor , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.61.043002 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 61 (2000) 043002 [astro-ph/9907221 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9907221]

    2000 doi arXiv

  40. [48]

    Zeldovich and R.A

    Ya.B. Zeldovich and R.A. Sunyaev, The interaction of matter and radiation in a hot-model universe, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00661821 Astrophys.\ Space Sci.\ 4 (1969) 301

    1969 doi

  41. [49]

    Chluba and R.A

    J. Chluba and R.A. Sunyaev, The evolution of CMB spectral distortions in the early Universe, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19786.x Mon.\ Not.\ Roy.\ Astron.\ Soc.\ 419 (2012) 1294 [1109.6552 https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.6552]

    2011 doi

  42. [50]

    Fixsen, E.S

    D.J. Fixsen, E.S. Cheng, J.M. Gales, J.C. Mather, R.A. Shafer and E.L. Wright, The Cosmic Microwave Background Spectrum from the Full COBE FIRAS Data Set , https://doi.org/10.1086/178173 Astrophys. J. 473 (1996) 576 [astro-ph/9605054 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9605054]

    1996 doi arXiv

  43. [51]

    Fabbri and M.D

    R. Fabbri and M.D. Pollock, The effect of primordially produced gravitons upon the anisotropy of the cosmological microwave background radiation, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(83)91322-9 Phys.\ Lett.\ B 125 (1983) 445

    1983 doi

  44. [52]

    Polnarev, Polarization and Anisotropy Induced in the Microwave Background by Cosmological Gravitational Waves , Sov.\ Astron.\ 29 (1985) 607

    A.G. Polnarev, Polarization and Anisotropy Induced in the Microwave Background by Cosmological Gravitational Waves , Sov.\ Astron.\ 29 (1985) 607

    1985

  45. [53]

    E. Calabrese et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 constraints on extended cosmological models , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/063 JCAP 11 (2025) 063 [2503.14454 https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14454]

    2025 doi arXiv

  46. [54]

    Agazie et al

    G. Agazie et al. , The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acdac6 Astrophys.\ J.\ Lett.\ 951 (2023) L8 [2306.16213 https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16213]

    doi arXiv

  47. [55]

    Antoniadis et al

    J. Antoniadis et al. , The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346844 Astron.\ Astrophys.\ 678 (2023) A50 [2306.16214 https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16214]

    2023 doi arXiv

  48. [56]

    Reardon et al

    D.J. Reardon et al. , Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acdd02 Astrophys.\ J.\ Lett.\ 951 (2023) L6 [2306.16215 https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16215]

    doi arXiv

  49. [57]

    Xu et al

    H. Xu et al. , Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I, https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/acdfa5 Res.\ Astron.\ Astrophys.\ 23 (2023) 075024 [2306.16216 https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16216]

    2023 doi arXiv

  50. [58]

    Abend et al

    S. Abend et al. , Terrestrial very-long-baseline atom interferometry: Workshop summary, https://doi.org/10.1116/5.0185291 AVS Quantum Sci.\ 6 (2024) 024701 [2310.08183 https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.08183]

    2024 doi arXiv

  51. [59]

    Colpi et al., LISA Definition Study Report, 2402.07571 https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07571

    M. Colpi et al., LISA Definition Study Report, 2402.07571 https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07571

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    Babak, A

    S. Babak, A. Petiteau and M. Hewitson, LISA Sensitivity and SNR Calculations , 2108.01167 https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.01167

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    Li et al., Gravitational wave astronomy with TianQin, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/adc9be Rept.\ Prog.\ Phys.\ 88 (2025) 056901 [2409.19665 https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.19665]

    E.-K. Li et al., Gravitational wave astronomy with TianQin, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/adc9be Rept.\ Prog.\ Phys.\ 88 (2025) 056901 [2409.19665 https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.19665]

    2025 doi arXiv

  54. [62]

    S. Kawamura et al., Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO, https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptab019 PTEP 2021 (2021) 05A105 [2006.13545 https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.13545]

    2021 doi arXiv

  55. [63]

    D. Reitze et al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S.\ Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO, Bull.\ Am.\ Astron.\ Soc.\ 51 (2019) 035 [1907.04833 https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.04833]

    2019 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Maggiore et al., Science case for the Einstein telescope, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/050 JCAP 03 (2020) 050 [1912.02622 https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.02622]

    M. Maggiore et al., Science case for the Einstein telescope, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/050 JCAP 03 (2020) 050 [1912.02622 https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.02622]

    2020 doi arXiv

  57. [65]

    Aggarwal et al

    N. Aggarwal et al. , Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41114-021-00032-5 Living Rev.\ Rel.\ 24 (2021) 4 [2011.12414 https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.12414]

    2021 doi arXiv

  58. [66]

    Alpher, H

    R.A. Alpher, H. Bethe and G. Gamow, The Origin of Chemical Elements , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.73.803 Phys.\ Rev.\ 73 (1948) 803

    1948 doi

  59. [67]

    Fields, K.A

    B.D. Fields, K.A. Olive, T.H. Yeh and C. Young, Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis after Planck , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/010 JCAP\ 03 (2020) 010 ; ibid. 11 (2020) E02 (erratum) [1912.01132 https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.01132]

    2020 doi arXiv

  60. [68]

    Akita and M

    K. Akita and M. Yamaguchi, A precision calculation of relic neutrino decoupling, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/08/012 JCAP 08 (2020) 012 [2005.07047 https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.07047]

    2020 doi arXiv

  61. [69]

    Froustey, C

    J. Froustey, C. Pitrou and M.C. Volpe, Neutrino decoupling including flavour oscillations and primordial nucleosynthesis, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/12/015 JCAP 12 (2020) 015 [2008.01074 https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.01074]

    2020 doi arXiv

  62. [70]

    Bennett, G

    J.J. Bennett, G. Buldgen, P.F. De Salas, M. Drewes, S. Gariazzo, S. Pastor and Y.Y.Y. Wong, Towards a precision calculation of N_ eff in the Standard Model. Part II. Neutrino decoupling in the presence of flavour oscillations and finite-temperature QED, https://doi.org/10.1088...

    2021 doi arXiv

  63. [71]

    Escudero, G

    M. Escudero, G. Jackson, M. Laine and S. Sandner, Fast and flexible neutrino decoupling. Part I. The Standard Model , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2026/02/046 JCAP 02 (2026) 046 [2511.04747 https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.04747]

    2026 doi

  64. [72]

    Laine, M

    M. Laine, M. Meyer and Y. Schr\"oder, Data for the Standard Model equation of state, http://laine.itp.unibe.ch/eos15/ http://laine.itp.unibe.ch/eos15/

  65. [73]

    Bardeen, Gauge-invariant cosmological perturbations , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.22.1882 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 22 (1980) 1882

    J.M. Bardeen, Gauge-invariant cosmological perturbations , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.22.1882 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 22 (1980) 1882

    1980 doi

  66. [74]

    Arnowitt, S

    R.L. Arnowitt, S. Deser and C.W. Misner, The dynamics of general relativity , https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-008-0661-1 Gen.\ Rel.\ Grav.\ 40 (2008) 1997 [gr-qc/0405109 https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0405109]

    2008 doi arXiv

  67. [75]

    Lifshitz and L.P

    E.M. Lifshitz and L.P. Pitaevskii, Statistical Physics, Part 2 , 88-89 (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1980)

    1980

  68. [76]

    Arnold, C

    P.B. Arnold, C. Dogan and G.D. Moore, Bulk viscosity of high-temperature QCD, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.085021 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 74 (2006) 085021 [hep-ph/0608012 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0608012]

    2006 doi arXiv

  69. [77]

    Zimdahl, Bulk viscous cosmology, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.53.5483 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 53 (1996) 5483 [astro-ph/9601189 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9601189]

    W. Zimdahl, Bulk viscous cosmology, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.53.5483 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 53 (1996) 5483 [astro-ph/9601189 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9601189]

    1996 doi arXiv

  70. [78]

    Kapusta, B

    J.I. Kapusta, B. M\"uller and M. Stephanov, Relativistic theory of hydrodynamic fluctuations with applications to heavy-ion collisions, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.054906 Phys.\ Rev.\ C 85 (2012) 054906 [1112.6405 https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.6405]

    2012 doi arXiv

  71. [79]

    Arnold, G.D

    P.B. Arnold, G.D. Moore and L.G. Yaffe, Transport coefficients in high temperature gauge theories (I): leading-log results, https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2000/11/001 JHEP 11 (2000) 001 [hep-ph/0010177 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0010177]

    2000 doi arXiv

  72. [80]

    Hiscock and L

    W.A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Stability and causality in dissipative relativistic fluids, https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(83)90288-9 Annals Phys.\ 151 (1983) 466

    1983 doi

  73. [81]

    uller, Zum Paradoxon der W\

    I. M\"uller, Zum Paradoxon der W\"armeleitungstheorie, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326412 Z.\ Phys.\ 198 (1967) 329

    1967 doi

  74. [82]

    Israel and J.M

    W. Israel and J.M. Stewart, Transient relativistic thermodynamics and kinetic theory, https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(79)90130-1 Annals Phys.\ 118 (1979) 341

    1979 doi

  75. [83]

    Malik and D.R

    K.A. Malik and D.R. Matravers, A concise introduction to perturbation theory in cosmology , https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/25/19/193001 Class.\ Quant.\ Grav.\ 25 (2008) 193001 [0804.3276 https://arxiv.org/abs/0804.3276]

    2008 doi arXiv

  76. [84]

    Ma and E

    C.-P. Ma and E. Bertschinger, Cosmological Perturbation Theory in the Synchronous and Conformal Newtonian Gauges , https://doi.org/10.1086/176550 Astrophys.\ J.\ 455 (1995) 7 [astro-ph/9506072 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9506072]

    1995 doi arXiv

  77. [85]

    Bardeen, P.J

    J.M. Bardeen, P.J. Steinhardt and M.S. Turner, Spontaneous creation of almost scale-free density perturbations in an inflationary universe, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.28.679 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 28 (1983) 679

    1983 doi

  78. [86]

    Sasaki, Large Scale Quantum Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe, https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.76.1036 Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ 76 (1986) 1036

    M. Sasaki, Large Scale Quantum Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe, https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.76.1036 Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ 76 (1986) 1036

    1986 doi

  79. [87]

    Mukhanov, Quantum Theory of Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations, Sov.\ Phys.\ JETP 67 (1988) 1297 [Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ 94N7 (1988) 1]

    V.F. Mukhanov, Quantum Theory of Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations, Sov.\ Phys.\ JETP 67 (1988) 1297 [Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ 94N7 (1988) 1]

    1988

  80. [88]

    Bunch and P.C.W

    T.S. Bunch and P.C.W. Davies, Quantum field theory in de Sitter space: renormalization by point-splitting, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1978.0060 Proc.\ Roy.\ Soc.\ Lond.\ A 360 (1978) 117

    1978 doi

  81. [89]

    Mukhanov and G.V

    V.F. Mukhanov and G.V. Chibisov, Quantum fluctuations and a nonsingular universe, JETP Lett. 33 (1981) 532 [Pisma Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ 33 (1981) 549]

    1981

  82. [90]

    Hawking, The development of irregularities in a single bubble inflationary universe, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)90373-2 Phys.\ Lett.\ B 115 (1982) 295

    S.W. Hawking, The development of irregularities in a single bubble inflationary universe, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)90373-2 Phys.\ Lett.\ B 115 (1982) 295

    1982 doi

  83. [91]

    A.A. Starobinsky, Dynamics of phase transition in the new inflationary universe scenario and generation of perturbations, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)90541-X Phys.\ Lett.\ B 117 (1982) 175

    1982 doi

  84. [92]

    Guth and S.Y

    A.H. Guth and S.Y. Pi, Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1110 Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ 49 (1982) 1110

    1982 doi

  85. [93]

    Inoue and J

    S. Inoue and J. Yokoyama, Curvature perturbation at the local extremum of the inflaton's potential, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01369-7 Phys.\ Lett.\ B 524 (2002) 15 [hep-ph/0104083 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0104083]

    2002 doi arXiv

  86. [94]

    Kinney, Horizon crossing and inflation with large , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.72.023515 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 72 (2005) 023515 [gr-qc/0503017 https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0503017]

    W.H. Kinney, Horizon crossing and inflation with large , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.72.023515 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 72 (2005) 023515 [gr-qc/0503017 https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0503017]

    2005 doi arXiv

  87. [95]

    J.M. Maldacena, Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models, https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/013 JHEP 05 (2003) 013 [astro-ph/0210603 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0210603]

    2003 doi arXiv

  88. [96]

    S. Weinberg, Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.72.043514 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 72 (2005) 043514 [hep-th/0506236 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0506236]

    2005 doi arXiv

  89. [97]

    Bernardeau, T

    F. Bernardeau, T. Brunier and J.P. Uzan, High order correlation functions for self-interacting scalar field in de Sitter space, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.063520 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 69 (2004) 063520 [astro-ph/0311422 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0311422]

    2004 doi arXiv

  90. [98]

    Liddle, P

    A.R. Liddle, P. Parsons and J.D. Barrow, Formalizing the slow-roll approximation in inflation, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.50.7222 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 50 (1994) 7222 [astro-ph/9408015 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9408015]

    1994 doi arXiv

  91. [99]

    Auclair and C

    P. Auclair and C. Ringeval, Slow-roll inflation at N3LO, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.063512 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 106 (2022) 063512 [2205.12608 https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.12608]

    2022 doi arXiv

  92. [100]

    Sasaki, Y

    M. Sasaki, Y. Nambu and K.-i. Nakao, Classical behavior of a scalar field in the inflationary universe, https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(88)90132-0 Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 308 (1988) 868

    1988 doi

  93. [101]

    Starobinsky and J

    A.A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama, Equilibrium state of a self-interacting scalar field in the de Sitter background, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.50.6357 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 50 (1994) 6357 [astro-ph/9407016 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9407016]

    1994 doi arXiv

  94. [102]

    Cohen and D

    T. Cohen and D. Green, Soft de Sitter Effective Theory, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2020)041 JHEP 12 (2020) 041 [2007.03693 https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.03693]

    2020 doi arXiv

  95. [103]

    Salopek and J.R

    D.S. Salopek and J.R. Bond, Nonlinear evolution of long-wavelength metric fluctuations in inflationary models, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3936 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 42 (1990) 3936

    1990 doi

  96. [104]

    Wands, K.A

    D. Wands, K.A. Malik, D.H. Lyth and A.R. Liddle, New approach to the evolution of cosmological perturbations on large scales, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.62.043527 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 62 (2000) 043527 [astro-ph/0003278 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0003278]

    2000 doi arXiv

  97. [105]

    Sasaki and T

    M. Sasaki and T. Tanaka, Super-Horizon Scale Dynamics of Multi-Scalar Inflation, https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.99.763 Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ 99 (1998) 763 [gr-qc/9801017 https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9801017]

    1998 doi arXiv

  98. [106]

    Haddadin and W.J

    W.I.J. Haddadin and W.J. Handley, Rapid numerical solutions for the Mukhanov-Sasaki equation, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123513 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 103 (2021) 123513 [1809.11095 https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.11095]

    2021 doi arXiv

  99. [107]

    Laine, S

    M. Laine, S. Procacci and A. Rogelj, Evolution of coupled scalar perturbations through smooth reheating.\ Part I.\ Dissipative regime, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/040 JCAP 10 (2024) 040 [2407.17074 https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.17074]

    2024 doi arXiv

  100. [108]

    Albrecht, P.J

    A. Albrecht, P.J. Steinhardt, M.S. Turner and F. Wilczek, Reheating an Inflationary Universe, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1437 Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ 48 (1982) 1437

    1982 doi

  101. [109]

    Abbott, E

    L.F. Abbott, E. Farhi and M.B. Wise, Particle production in the new inflationary cosmology, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)90867-X Phys.\ Lett.\ B 117 (1982) 29

    1982 doi

  102. [110]

    Mukaida and M

    K. Mukaida and M. Yamada, Perturbative reheating and thermalization of pure Yang-Mills plasma, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2024)174 JHEP 05 (2024) 174 [2402.14054 https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14054]

    2024 doi arXiv

  103. [111]

    Y. Fu, J. Ghiglieri, S. Iqbal and A. Kurkela, Thermalization of non-Abelian gauge theories at next-to-leading order , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.054031 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 105 (2022) 054031 [2110.01540 https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.01540]

    2022 doi arXiv

  104. [112]

    Broadberry, A

    E. Broadberry, A. Hook and S. Mondal, Warm Inflation with Pseudo-scalar couplings, 2505.07943 https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07943

    arXiv

  105. [113]

    Starobinsky, A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-X Phys.\ Lett.\ B 91 (1980) 99

    A.A. Starobinsky, A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-X Phys.\ Lett.\ B 91 (1980) 99

    1980 doi

  106. [114]

    Kofman, A.D

    L. Kofman, A.D. Linde and A.A. Starobinsky, Towards the theory of reheating after inflation , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.56.3258 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 56 (1997) 3258 [hep-ph/9704452 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9704452]

    1997 doi arXiv

  107. [115]

    Barman, N

    B. Barman, N. Bernal and J. Rubio, Two or three things particle physicists (mis)understand about (pre)heating, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.116996 Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 1018 (2025) 116996 [2503.19980 https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.19980]

    2025 doi

  108. [116]

    Gibbons and S.W

    G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking, Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2738 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 15 (1977) 2738

    1977 doi

  109. [117]

    Parker, Quantized Fields and Particle Creation in Expanding Universes

    L. Parker, Quantized Fields and Particle Creation in Expanding Universes. I, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.183.1057 Phys.\ Rev.\ 183 (1969) 1057

    1969 doi

  110. [118]

    Ford, Gravitational particle creation and inflation, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.35.2955 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 35 (1987) 2955

    L.H. Ford, Gravitational particle creation and inflation, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.35.2955 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 35 (1987) 2955

    1987 doi

  111. [119]

    Kolb and A.J

    E.W. Kolb and A.J. Long, Cosmological gravitational particle production and its implications for cosmological relics, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.96.045005 Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ 96 (2024) 045005 [2312.09042 https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.09042]

    2024 doi arXiv

  112. [120]

    Bouzoud and J

    K. Bouzoud and J. Ghiglieri, Thermal axion production at hard and soft momenta, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2025)163 JHEP 01 (2025) 163 [2404.06113 https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.06113]

    2025 doi arXiv

  113. [121]

    B\"odeker and J

    D. B\"odeker and J. Nienaber, Scalar field damping at high temperatures, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.056016 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 106 (2022) 056016 [2205.14166 https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.14166]

    2022 doi arXiv

  114. [122]

    Yokoyama and A.D

    J. Yokoyama and A.D. Linde, Is warm inflation possible? , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.083509 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 60 (1999) 083509 [hep-ph/9809409 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9809409]

    1999 doi arXiv

  115. [123]

    Laine and A

    M. Laine and A. Vuorinen, Basics of Thermal Field Theory , https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31933-9 Lect.\ Notes Phys.\ 925 (2016) 1 [1701.01554 https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.01554]

    2016 doi arXiv

  116. [124]

    Laine, S

    M. Laine, S. Procacci and A. Rogelj, Evolution of coupled scalar perturbations through smooth reheating.\ Part II.\ Thermal fluctuation regime, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/12/058 JCAP 12 (2025) 058 [2507.12849 https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12849]

    2025 doi

  117. [125]

    DeRocco, P.W

    W. DeRocco, P.W. Graham and S. Kalia, Warming up cold inflation, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/11/011 JCAP 11 (2021) 011 [2107.07517 https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.07517]

    2021 doi arXiv

  118. [126]

    Berghaus, M

    K.V. Berghaus, M. Drewes and S. Zell, Warm Inflation with the Standard Model, https://doi.org/10.1103/9nn9-bsm9 Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ 135 (2025) 171002 [2503.18829 https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.18829]

    2025 doi

  119. [127]

    Ramos and G.S

    R.O. Ramos and G.S. Rodrigues, Viability of warm inflation with standard model interactions, https://doi.org/10.1103/wn1m-19gt Phys.\ Rev.\ D 111 (2025) 123527 [2504.20943 https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.20943]

    2025 doi arXiv

  120. [128]

    Kolesova, M

    H. Kolesova, M. Laine and S. Procacci, Maximal temperature of strongly-coupled dark sectors, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2023)239 JHEP 05 (2023) 239 [2303.17973 https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.17973]

    2023 doi arXiv

  121. [129]

    Mirbabayi, Loosely coupled particles in warm inflation, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/05/067 JCAP 05 (2025) 067 [2409.17927 https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17927]

    M. Mirbabayi, Loosely coupled particles in warm inflation, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/05/067 JCAP 05 (2025) 067 [2409.17927 https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17927]

    2025 doi arXiv

  122. [130]

    Weinberg, Adiabatic modes in cosmology, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.67.123504 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 67 (2003) 123504 [astro-ph/0302326 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0302326]

    S. Weinberg, Adiabatic modes in cosmology, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.67.123504 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 67 (2003) 123504 [astro-ph/0302326 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0302326]

    2003 doi arXiv

  123. [131]

    Lyth, K.A

    D.H. Lyth, K.A. Malik and M. Sasaki, A general proof of the conservation of the curvature perturbation, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2005/05/004 JCAP 05 (2005) 004 [astro-ph/0411220 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0411220]

    2005 doi arXiv

  124. [132]

    Kofman and A.D

    L.A. Kofman and A.D. Linde, Generation of density perturbations in the inflationary cosmology, https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(87)90698-5 Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 282 (1987) 555

    1987 doi

  125. [133]

    Mollerach, On the primordial origin of isocurvature perturbations, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(90)91453-I Phys.\ Lett.\ B 242 (1990) 158

    S. Mollerach, On the primordial origin of isocurvature perturbations, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(90)91453-I Phys.\ Lett.\ B 242 (1990) 158

    1990 doi

  126. [134]

    Turner and F

    M.S. Turner and F. Wilczek, Inflationary axion cosmology, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.5 Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ 66 (1991) 5

    1991 doi

  127. [135]

    Enqvist and M.S

    K. Enqvist and M.S. Sloth, Adiabatic CMB perturbations in pre-Big-Bang string cosmology, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00043-3 Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 626 (2002) 395 [hep-ph/0109214 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0109214]

    2002 doi arXiv

  128. [136]

    Lyth and D

    D.H. Lyth and D. Wands, Generating the curvature perturbation without an inflaton, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01366-1 Phys.\ Lett.\ B 524 (2002) 5 [hep-ph/0110002 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0110002]

    2002 doi arXiv

  129. [137]

    Moroi and T

    T. Moroi and T. Takahashi, Effects of cosmological moduli fields on cosmic microwave background, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01295-3 Phys.\ Lett.\ B 522 (2001) 215 ; ibid. 539 (2002) 303 (erratum) [hep-ph/0110096 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0110096]

    2001 doi arXiv

  130. [138]

    Hwang and H

    J.-c. Hwang and H. Noh, Cosmological perturbations with multiple fluids and fields, https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/19/3/308 Class.\ Quant.\ Grav.\ 19 (2002) 527 [astro-ph/0103244 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0103244]

    2002 doi arXiv

  131. [139]

    Peebles and J.T

    P.J.E. Peebles and J.T. Yu, Primeval Adiabatic Perturbation in an Expanding Universe, https://doi.org/10.1086/150713 Astrophys.\ J.\ 162 (1970) 815

    1970 doi

  132. [140]

    Peebles and R.H

    P.J.E. Peebles and R.H. Dicke, Origin of the Globular Star Clusters, https://doi.org/10.1086/149811 Astrophys.\ J.\ 154 (1968) 891

    1968 doi

  133. [141]

    Zeldovich, Gravitational Instability: An Approximate Theory for Large Density Perturbations, Astron.\ Astrophys.\ 5 (1970) 84

    Ya.B. Zeldovich, Gravitational Instability: An Approximate Theory for Large Density Perturbations, Astron.\ Astrophys.\ 5 (1970) 84

    1970

  134. [142]

    Davis, G

    M. Davis, G. Efstathiou, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White, The evolution of large-scale structure in a universe dominated by cold dark matter, https://doi.org/10.1086/163168 Astrophys.\ J.\ 292 (1985) 371

    1985 doi

  135. [143]

    Malik, D

    K.A. Malik, D. Wands and C. Ungarelli, Large-scale curvature and entropy perturbations for multiple interacting fluids, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.67.063516 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 67 (2003) 063516 [astro-ph/0211602 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0211602]

    2003 doi arXiv

  136. [144]

    Seljak and M

    U. Seljak and M. Zaldarriaga, A Line-of-Sight Integration Approach to Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies, https://doi.org/10.1086/177793 Astrophys.\ J.\ 469 (1996) 437 [astro-ph/9603033 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9603033]

    1996 doi arXiv

  137. [145]

    Lewis, A

    A. Lewis, A. Challinor and A. Lasenby, Efficient Computation of Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies in Closed Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Models, https://doi.org/10.1086/309179 Astrophys.\ J.\ 538 (2000) 473 [astro-ph/9911177 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9911177]

    2000 doi arXiv

  138. [146]

    D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues and T. Tram, The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS). Part II: Approximation schemes, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2011/07/034 JCAP 07 (2011) 034 [1104.2933 https://arxiv.org/abs/1104.2933]

    2011 doi arXiv

  139. [147]

    Challinor and A

    A. Challinor and A. Lasenby, Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies in the Cold Dark Matter Model: A Covariant and Gauge-invariant Approach, https://doi.org/10.1086/306841 Astrophys.\ J.\ 513 (1999) 1 [astro-ph/9804301 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9804301]

    1999 doi arXiv

  140. [148]

    R.A. Isaacson, Gravitational Radiation in the Limit of High Frequency.\ I.\ The Linear Approximation and Geometrical Optics, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.166.1263 Phys.\ Rev.\ 166 (1968) 1263

    1968 doi

  141. [149]

    Choi, J.S

    S.Y. Choi, J.S. Shim and H.S. Song, Factorization and polarization in linearized gravity, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.51.2751 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 51 (1995) 2751 [hep-th/9411092 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9411092]

    1995 doi arXiv

  142. [150]

    Grishchuk, Amplification of gravitational waves in an isotropic universe, Sov.\ Phys.\ JETP 40 (1975) 409 [Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ 67 (1974) 825]

    L.P. Grishchuk, Amplification of gravitational waves in an isotropic universe, Sov.\ Phys.\ JETP 40 (1975) 409 [Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ 67 (1974) 825]

    1975

  143. [151]

    Starobinsky, Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe, JETP Lett.\ 30 (1979) 682 [Pisma Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ 30 (1979) 719]

    A.A. Starobinsky, Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe, JETP Lett.\ 30 (1979) 682 [Pisma Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ 30 (1979) 719]

    1979

  144. [152]

    Rubakov, M.V

    V.A. Rubakov, M.V. Sazhin and A.V. Veryaskin, Graviton creation in the inflationary universe and the grand unification scale, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)90641-4 Phys.\ Lett.\ B 115 (1982) 189

    1982 doi

  145. [153]

    Abbott and M.B

    L.F. Abbott and M.B. Wise, Constraints on generalized inflationary cosmologies, https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(84)90329-8 Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 244 (1984) 541

    1984 doi

  146. [154]

    Domcke, Discovery Opportunities with Gravitational Waves , Contribution to TASI 2024 [2409.08956 https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.08956]

    V. Domcke, Discovery Opportunities with Gravitational Waves , Contribution to TASI 2024 [2409.08956 https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.08956]

    2024 arXiv

  147. [155]

    Laine and S

    M. Laine and S. Procacci, General SIGW source for reheating dynamics, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2026/05/102 JCAP 05 (2026) 102 [2512.04482 https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.04482]

    2026 doi arXiv

  148. [156]

    Hwang, D

    J.-c. Hwang, D. Jeong and H. Noh, Gauge Dependence of Gravitational Waves Generated from Scalar Perturbations, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa74be Astrophys.\ J.\ 842 (2017) 46 [1704.03500 https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.03500]

    2017 doi arXiv

  149. [157]

    Acquaviva, N

    V. Acquaviva, N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto, Gauge-invariant second-order perturbations and non-Gaussianity from inflation, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(03)00550-9 Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 667 (2003) 119 [astro-ph/0209156 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0209156]

    2003 doi arXiv

  150. [158]

    Baumann, P.J

    D. Baumann, P.J. Steinhardt, K. Takahashi and K. Ichiki, Gravitational wave spectrum induced by primordial scalar perturbations, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.084019 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 76 (2007) 084019 [hep-th/0703290 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0703290]

    2007 doi arXiv

  151. [159]

    Klose, M

    P. Klose, M. Laine and S. Procacci, Gravitational wave background from non-Abelian reheating after axion-like inflation, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/05/021 JCAP 05 (2022) 021 [2201.02317 https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.02317]

    2022 doi arXiv

  152. [160]

    S. Jeon, Hydrodynamic transport coefficients in relativistic scalar field theory, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.52.3591 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 52 (1995) 3591 [hep-ph/9409250 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9409250]

    1995 doi arXiv

  153. [161]

    Hauser and M

    A. Hauser and M. Laine, Matching second-order classical and 1-loop quantum tensor power spectra in de Sitter spacetime, 2605.27910 https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27910

    arXiv

  154. [162]

    Caldwell and S.S

    R.R. Caldwell and S.S. Gubser, Brief history of curvature, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.063523 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 87 (2013) 063523 [1302.1201 https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.1201]

    2013 doi arXiv

  155. [163]

    Ghiglieri, G

    J. Ghiglieri, G. Jackson, M. Laine and Y. Zhu, Gravitational wave background from Standard Model physics: complete leading order, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2020)092 JHEP 07 (2020) 092 [2004.11392 https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.11392]

    2020 doi arXiv

  156. [164]

    Ghiglieri, J

    J. Ghiglieri, J. Sch \"u tte-Engel and E. Speranza, Freezing-in gravitational waves, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.023538 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 109 (2024) 023538 [2211.16513 https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.16513]

    2024 doi arXiv

  157. [165]

    Ghiglieri, M

    J. Ghiglieri, M. Laine, J. Sch \"u tte-Engel and E. Speranza, Double-graviton production from Standard Model plasma, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/04/062 JCAP 04 (2024) 062 [2401.08766 https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.08766]

    2024 doi arXiv

  158. [166]

    Nakayama and Y

    K. Nakayama and Y. Tang, Stochastic gravitational waves from particle origin, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.11.023 Phys.\ Lett.\ B 788 (2019) 341 ; ibid. 839 (2023) 137787 (erratum) [1810.04975 https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04975]

    2018 doi arXiv

  159. [167]

    Barman, N

    B. Barman, N. Bernal, Y. Xu and \'O . Zapata, Gravitational wave from graviton Bremsstrahlung during reheating, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2023/05/019 JCAP 05 (2023) 019 [2301.11345 https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.11345]

    2023 doi arXiv

  160. [168]

    Kanemura and K

    S. Kanemura and K. Kaneta, Gravitational waves from particle decays during reheating, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138807 Phys.\ Lett.\ B 855 (2024) 138807 [2310.12023 https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12023]

    2024 doi

  161. [169]

    A. Tokareva, Gravitational waves from inflaton decay and bremsstrahlung, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138695 Phys.\ Lett.\ B 853 (2024) 138695 [2312.16691 https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.16691]

    2024 doi

  162. [170]

    Alonzo-Artiles, A

    A. Alonzo-Artiles, A. Avilez-L \'o pez, J.L. D \' az-Cruz and B.O. Larios-L \'o pez, The Higgs-Graviton Couplings: from Amplitudes to the Action, 2105.11684 https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.11684

    arXiv

  163. [171]

    Y. Ema, K. Mukaida and K. Nakayama, Scalar field couplings to quadratic curvature and decay into gravitons, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2022)087 JHEP 05 (2022) 087 [2112.12774 https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.12774]

    2022 doi arXiv

  164. [172]

    odeker, M. Sangel and M. W\

    D. B\"odeker, M. Sangel and M. W\"ormann, Equilibration, particle production, and self-energy, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.045028 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 93 (2016) 045028 [1510.06742 https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.06742]

    2016 doi arXiv

  165. [173]

    Weinberg, Damping of tensor modes in cosmology, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.023503 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 69 (2004) 023503 [astro-ph/0306304 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0306304]

    S. Weinberg, Damping of tensor modes in cosmology, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.023503 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 69 (2004) 023503 [astro-ph/0306304 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0306304]

    2004 doi arXiv

  166. [174]

    Watanabe and E

    Y. Watanabe and E. Komatsu, Improved calculation of the primordial gravitational wave spectrum in the standard model, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.73.123515 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 73 (2006) 123515 [astro-ph/0604176 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0604176]

    2006 doi arXiv

  167. [175]

    N. Mir\'on-Granese, Relativistic viscous effects on the primordial gravitational waves spectrum, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/06/008 JCAP 06 (2021) 008 [2012.11422 https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.11422]

    2021 doi arXiv

  168. [176]

    Stoetzel, R

    T. Stoetzel, R. Fechtner and S. Floerchinger, Energy-momentum response to metric perturbations in the fluid dynamic regime, https://doi.org/10.1103/qv18-3x4j Phys.\ Rev.\ D 112 (2025) 125006 [2508.16562 https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16562]

    2025 doi arXiv

  169. [177]

    Fanizza, E

    G. Fanizza, E. Pavone and L. Tedesco, Freeze-out and spectral running of primordial gravitational waves in viscous cosmology, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2026/04/016 JCAP 04 (2026) 016 [2512.04011 https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.04011]

    2026 doi arXiv

  170. [178]

    Saikawa and S

    K. Saikawa and S. Shirai, Primordial gravitational waves, precisely: the role of thermodynamics in the Standard Model, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/05/035 JCAP 05 (2018) 035 [1803.01038 https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.01038]

    2018 doi arXiv

  171. [179]

    Klose, M

    P. Klose, M. Laine and S. Procacci, Gravitational wave background from vacuum and thermal fluctuations during axion-like inflation , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/12/020 JCAP 12 (2022) 020 [2210.11710 https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11710]

    2022 doi arXiv

  172. [180]

    D.J. Schwarz, Evolution of gravitational waves through cosmological transitions, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732398002941 Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A 13 (1998) 2771 [gr-qc/9709027 https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9709027]

    1998 doi arXiv

  173. [181]

    Ghiglieri and M

    J. Ghiglieri and M. Laine, Gravitational wave background from Standard Model physics: qualitative features, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/07/022 JCAP 07 (2015) 022 [1504.02569 https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.02569]

    2015 doi arXiv

  174. [182]

    Ringwald and C

    A. Ringwald and C. Tamarit, Revealing the cosmic history with gravitational waves, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.063027 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 106 (2022) 063027 [2203.00621 https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.00621]

    2022 doi arXiv

  175. [183]

    X.-J. Xu, Y. Xu, Q. Yin and J. Zhu, Full-spectrum analysis of gravitational wave production from inflation to reheating, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2025)141 JHEP 10 (2025) 141 [2505.08868 https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.08868]

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.