Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 40 references

Interplay of Umklapp scattering and Sb-Au hybridization in surface-reconstructed Sb/Au(111)

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-09 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Sb on gold bends both shallow and deep electronic bands

desk verdict Solid ARPES with quantitative Umklapp analysis, but hybridization claim is underdetermined read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07132 v1 pith:LRP4LR6J submitted 2026-07-08 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Zhe Zheng , Celine Wassenberg , Stefanie Hilgers , Carsten Westphal , Mirko Cinchetti This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords electronicsurfacehybridizationstructurefermiinterplayscatteringsqrt
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

When antimony atoms are deposited on a gold surface and the system is annealed, the atoms self-organize into ordered superstructures that change the surface's periodicity. A standard expectation in surface physics is that such a superlattice mainly folds the host material's electronic bands into new positions in momentum space, a geometric process called Umklapp scattering. This paper uses angle-resolved photoemission to examine two successive ordered phases of Sb on Au(111) and reports that the observed electronic structure deviates from what pure geometric folding would produce. Triangular electron pockets appear at the right momentum positions predicted by folding, but they are too small near the Fermi level, indicating that the underlying gold-derived band dispersion has been modified. At deeper binding energies, the gold d-band features shift, broaden, and develop new components. The paper attributes both the shallow-pocket discrepancy and the deep-band restructuring to orbital hybridization between Sb p states and Au d states at the interface, concluding that the electronic structure is governed by the interplay of superlattice folding and chemical hybridization rather than by either mechanism alone.

What carries the argument

The argument turns on comparing ARPES measurements of clean Au(111), a (14×14) Sb reconstruction, and a Rec(3×√3) Sb reconstruction against a purely geometric folding model. The folding model predicts where replica bands and Fermi-surface pockets should appear based on the superlattice reciprocal lattice vectors. The paper tests this by checking both the momentum positions and the sizes/energies of the replicas: positions match, but sizes and deep-band line shapes do not. Energy distribution curves near the zone center are fitted with Voigt components to quantify peak shifts and new components in the −5 to −2.5 eV range, attributing these non-geometric modifications to Sb p–Au d hybrid.

What would settle it

A purely geometric folding model (possibly including matrix-element effects or final-state photoemission effects) that reproduces both the reduced Fermi-pocket size near EF and the deep-valence peak shifts and new components in the −5 to −2.5 eV range, without invoking any Sb–Au orbital hybridization.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the electronic structure of reconstructed Sb/Au(111) cannot be explained by geometric band folding (Umklapp scattering) alone. The triangular Fermi pockets in the Rec(3×√3) phase sit at the correct positions predicted by folding but are too small near the Fermi level, and deeper Au d-derived bands show peak shifts, linewidth changes, and new spectral components. Together, these observations are interpreted as evidence that Sb–Au orbital hybridization modifies both the shallow sp dispersion and the deep valence d states, so the surface electronic structure is shaped by the interplay of reconstruction-induced scattering and interfacial hybridization.

Load-bearing premise

The attribution of deep-valence spectral changes to Sb–Au orbital hybridization rests on the premise that geometric band folding and Umklapp scattering cannot modify intrinsic energy positions or spectral line shapes. This is argued by elimination rather than by a direct positive demonstration such as orbital-resolved calculations or spin-resolved measurements. If other extrinsic effects—such as photoemission final-state effects or matrix-element variations—can also produce线形

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Adsorbate-induced superstructures on noble metals should be modeled with both folding and hybridization from the outset, since replica-band positions alone are insufficient to confirm a purely geometric origin.
  • The coverage-dependent progression from weak coupling (14×14) to stronger coupling (Rec(3×√3)) suggests a tunable hybridization strength controlled by Sb coverage and annealing, offering a handle for engineering surface band dispersions.
  • If Sb p–Au d hybridization modifies states several eV below the Fermi level, similar deep-valence restructuring may occur in other group-V adsorbate/noble-metal systems and should be checked when interpreting photoemission spectra.
  • The emergence of triangular Fermi pockets at zone boundaries, shaped by both folding and hybridization, points to a route for designing Fermi-surface topologies in surface systems beyond what the pristine substrate provides.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If orbital-resolved band calculations or spin-resolved ARPES were performed on the Rec(3×√3) phase, the hybridization interpretation predicts that the deep-valence features near −3.9 eV should carry mixed Sb p and Au d orbital character, testable by photon-energy-dependent or dichroic measurements.
  • The coverage-dependent strengthening of hybridization suggests a continuous crossover rather than a sharp transition; probing intermediate coverages between 0.25 and 0.7 ML could reveal whether the pocket-size discrepancy and deep-band modifications evolve smoothly, which would further support the hybridization mechanism over a phase-specific structural effect.
  • If hybridization modifies the Au sp dispersion, it may also renormalize the Rashba spin splitting of the Au(111) surface state; spin-resolved ARPES on the reconstructed phases could test whether the spin texture of the folded bands is altered beyond what geometric folding predicts.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents an ARPES and LEED study of Sb adsorbed on Au(111), tracking the coverage-dependent evolution from the clean surface through a (14×14) reconstruction to a Rec(3×√3) phase. The authors show that triangular Fermi pockets in the Rec(3×√3) phase appear at momenta consistent with an Umklapp scattering construction based on the superlattice periodicity, but that the pocket sizes near EF are smaller than this purely geometric construction predicts. They further document modifications of deeper Au 5d-derived valence bands (peak shifts, linewidth changes, emergence of new components) and attribute these to Sb p–Au d orbital hybridization. The central claim is that the electronic structure is governed by an interplay of reconstruction-induced Umklapp scattering and interfacial hybridization, with neither mechanism alone being sufficient. The Umklapp construction is parameter-free and quantitatively consistent with the measured LEED periodicities and known Au(111) band parameters. The hybridization argument, however, rests primarily on excluding geometric folding as the cause of line-shape modifications, without independent positive identification of Sb p character in the modified states.

Significance. The systematic, coverage-dependent tracking of both near-EF and deep-valence spectral modifications across two distinct reconstruction phases is a useful contribution. The quantitative agreement between the Umklapp momentum shifts (−0.715 and −0.455 Å⁻¹) and the LEED-derived reciprocal lattice vectors is a solid result. The observation that the Fermi pockets shrink relative to the pure folding prediction is clearly documented and motivates the hybridization discussion. The work is relevant to the broader community studying adsorbate-induced band engineering on noble-metal surfaces.

major comments (3)
  1. The central hybridization argument for the deep-valence states (Section on 'Sb–Au hybridization in the deep-energy electronic states') rests on the premise that geometric band folding 'primarily generate[s] momentum replicas without modifying the intrinsic energy positions or spectral line shapes.' This premise holds in the weak-scattering limit, but the paper itself invokes a strong superlattice potential to explain the enhanced replica intensity in the Rec(3×√3) phase. A strong periodic potential naturally produces band repulsion, gap opening at crossing points, and spectral-weight redistribution through standard nearly-free-electron physics, without requiring chemical orbital hybridization between Sb p and Au d states. The manuscript does not distinguish 'strong Umklapp scattering beyond the weak limit' from 'orbital hybridization.' The authors should either (a) explicitly address why
  2. The reduced size of the triangular Fermi pockets near EF relative to the pure Umklapp prediction (Figure 3c vs. 3g) is attributed to modification of the Au sp dispersion by hybridization. However, a simpler competing explanation is a work-function shift or charge transfer that modifies the Au sp band filling without invoking Sb p–Au d hybridization. The paper does not report work-function measurements (e.g., from the secondary-electron cutoff) or discuss charge transfer. The authors should either measure or estimate the work-function change and show that it is insufficient to account for the pocket-size reduction, or explicitly discuss why this alternative is ruled out.
  3. No orbital-resolved measurements or calculations are presented to positively identify Sb p character in the modified Au d bands. Photon-energy-dependent ARPES (to exploit cross-section variations), spin-resolved ARPES, or comparison with DFT calculations of the epitaxial system would strengthen the hybridization claim. Without such evidence, the attribution to Sb p–Au d hybridization remains underdetermined by the presented data. The authors should either provide additional evidence or substantially soften the claim from 'significant mixing between Sb p orbitals and Au d states' to a more cautious statement that hybridization is consistent with but not directly demonstrated by the data.
minor comments (5)
  1. The role of three rotational domains (Figure 1g) in broadening the ARPES features is mentioned but not quantitatively assessed. Could domain superposition contribute to the linewidth changes in the deep-valence EDCs? A brief discussion would help the reader assess whether the FWHM increases (e.g., from 0.28 eV to 0.72 eV for one component) are partly extrinsic.
  2. In the EDC fitting (Section on deep-energy states), the number of Voigt components changes between phases (3 for Au(111), 2 for (14×14), 3 for Rec(3×√3)). The justification for varying the component count is not provided. The authors should explain the fitting protocol—whether it is motivated by physically distinct features or by statistical criteria—and whether the peak labels P1–P4 in Figure 4 correspond to the same fitted components across phases.
  3. The deposition rate is given as approximately 5.1 Å/h, but the coverage calibration (0.25 ML and 0.7 ML) relative to the Au(111) surface atom density is not explicitly specified. A brief note on how ML is defined here would improve reproducibility.
  4. Figure 2: The blue arrows marking Umklapp processes and the red arrows marking folded features are described in the caption but are difficult to resolve in the reproduced figures. Higher-resolution or annotated versions would aid the reader.
  5. The phrase 'interplay between reconstruction-induced Umklapp scattering and interfacial orbital hybridization' is used throughout, but the manuscript does not demonstrate a genuine interplay (i.e., that the two mechanisms are coupled or mutually modifying). The data show that both effects may be present, but 'coexistence' would be more accurate than 'interplay' unless a coupling is directly demonstrated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: Umklapp construction is parameter-free from independent LEED data; hybridization argument is a negative inference, not a definitional reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. The Umklapp scattering construction uses independently measured LEED periodicities (Δk₁₄×₁₄ = −0.715 Å⁻¹, Δk₃×√3 = −0.455 Å⁻¹) and known Au(111) band parameters as inputs — no parameters are fitted to the ARPES data to force agreement. The momentum positions of folded bands are genuine predictions from structural data. The observed discrepancy (reduced pocket size at EF, deep-valence peak shifts) is then compared against this parameter-free baseline. The hybridization attribution is a negative argument — folding alone cannot explain line-shape modifications, therefore additional effects are invoked — supported by independent literature (Refs 12, 14, 39, all by different author groups) placing Sb p states in the relevant energy range. No self-citation chain is load-bearing: the cited works are by independent groups. The skeptic's concern that strong Umklapp scattering (not just weak-limit folding) could also produce line-shape changes is a correctness risk, not a circularity — the paper does not define hybridization in terms of its observations, nor does it fit a parameter to data and rename the fit as a prediction. The derivation has independent empirical content at every step.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or postulated entities. All physical objects (Sb overlayer, Au substrate, surface states, Umklapp replicas, hybridized bands) are standard. The analysis relies on established surface science concepts and does not invent new theoretical constructs.

free parameters (2)
  • Sb coverage values (0.25 ML, 0.7 ML) = 0.25 ML and 0.7 ML
    Calibrated coverage values chosen to produce the two target reconstruction phases; not fitted to electronic data but selected to stabilize specific structures.
  • EDC Voigt fitting components (peak positions, FWHMs) = E1=-4.61, E2=-4.14, E3=-3.59 eV (Au); E1=-4.56, E2=-3.66 eV (14×14); E1=-4.65, E2=-3.90, E3=-3.58 eV (Rec(3×√3))
    Fitted to reproduce EDC line shapes; used to argue for hybridization-induced spectral modifications. The number of components (2 or 3) is chosen per phase.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Umklapp scattering by a superlattice potential generates momentum replicas of substrate bands without modifying intrinsic energy positions or spectral line shapes.
    Invoked in the Results section and Conclusion to argue that observed line-shape modifications and peak shifts in deep valence bands cannot originate from geometric folding and must reflect hybridization. This is a standard surface science assumption but is stated as a premise rather than proven.
  • domain assumption Sb p-derived states reside in the −5 to −2.5 eV binding energy range, overlapping with Au 5d states.
    Invoked in the deep-valence analysis section to justify that spectral modifications in this energy range reflect Sb–Au hybridization. Based on cited DFT calculations for free-standing and epitaxial antimonene (Refs. 12, 31, 51).
  • domain assumption The Rec(3×√3) phase is an ordered Sb overlayer on Au(111) as modeled by Cantero et al. (Ref. 13).
    The structural model in Fig. 1(e,f) is adapted from Ref. 13. The electronic structure analysis depends on this structural assignment being correct.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Interplay of Umklapp scattering and Sb-Au hybridization in surface-reconstructed Sb/Au(111)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LRP4LR6J

@misc{pith2026260707132,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Interplay of Umklapp scattering and Sb-Au hybridization in surface-reconstructed Sb/Au(111)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LRP4LR6J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07132}
}
abstract

Surface reconstructions induced by atomic adsorption can strongly reshape metallic surface states, providing a direct pathway to tune their electronic structure. Using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, we investigate the electronic structure of Sb/Au(111) during the coverage-driven evolution from the clean Au(111) surface to the $(14\times14)$ and Rec$(3\times\sqrt{3})$ phases. In the Rec$(3\times\sqrt{3})$ phase, triangular Fermi pockets emerge at the Brillouin-zone boundary. Their momentum positions are consistent with a reciprocal-space folding construction, but their reduced size near the Fermi level indicates a modification of the Au-derived $sp$ dispersion. The substantial modifications of deeper Au $d$-derived bands observed in ARPES further indicate significant mixing between Sb $p$ orbitals and Au $d$ states. These results show that the electronic structure of Sb/Au(111) is governed by the interplay between reconstruction-induced Umklapp scattering and interfacial orbital hybridization, highlighting adsorbate-substrate hybridization as a key mechanism for tuning and engineering surface electronic structures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07132 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (c,d). The reciprocal-space overlays in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Coverage-dependent evolution of the electronic structure and band folding in Sb/Au(111). (a–f) ARPES band dispersions measured along the K¯ −M¯ ′ −Γ¯ and M¯ −K¯′ −Γ¯ directions for (a,d) clean Au(111), (b,e) the (14×14) Sb/Au(111) phase, and (c,f) the Rec(3× √ 3) Sb/Au(111) phase. In each panel, the left side shows the raw dispersion and the right side the corresponding curvature plot40. Insets highlight the strong … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Constant-energy maps, band dispersions and simulated Umklapp scattering patterns of Sb/Au(111). (a–f) ARPES constant-energy maps measured at E = EF and E = EF −0.24eV for (a, d) clean Au(111), (b, e) the (14×14) Sb/Au(111) phase, (c, f) the Rec(3× √ 3) Sb/Au(111) phase. The blue hexagon denotes the Au(111) surface Brillouin zone, while the black dashed hexagon marks the Rec(3× √ 3) Sb surface Brillouin zone for the … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Evolution of deep valence states in Sb/Au(111). (a–c) ARPES intensity maps along the K¯–Γ¯ –K¯ direction for (a) pristine Au(111), (b) the (14×14) Sb/Au(111) phase, and (c) the Rec(3× √ 3) Sb/Au(111) phase. Several features located between −5 and −2.5 eV below EF are m…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & King, D

    Titmuss, S., Wander, A. & King, D. Reconstruction of clean and adsorbate-covered metal surfaces.Chem. Rev.96, 1291–1306 (1996). 6/9

    work page 1996

  2. [2]

    Yang, T.et al.Atomically thin 2D transition metal oxides: Structural reconstruction, interaction with substrates, and potential applications.Adv. Mater. Interfaces6, 1801160 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    & Crommie, M

    Chen, W., Madhavan, V ., Jamneala, T. & Crommie, M. Scanning tunneling microscopy observation of an electronic superlattice at the surface of clean gold.Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 1469 (1998). 4.Zhuang, J.et al.Band gap modulated by electronic superlattice in blue phosphorene.ACS Nano12, 5059–5065 (2018). 5.Sohail, H. M. & Uhrberg, R. Umklapp induced surface ban...

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    & Bauer, M

    Jauernik, S., Hein, P., Gurgel, M., Falke, J. & Bauer, M. Probing long-range structural order in SnPc/Ag(111) by umklapp process assisted low-energy angle-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy.Phys. Rev. B97, 125413 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Chiniwar, S.et al.Substrate-mediated umklapp scattering at the incommensurate interface of a monatomic alloy layer. Phys. Rev. B99, 155408 (2019). 8.Marchenko, D.et al.Giant rashba splitting in graphene due to hybridization with gold.Nat. Commun.3, 1232 (2012). 9.Ast, C. R.et al.Giant spin splitting through surface alloying.Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 186807 (2007)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Sakamoto, M.et al.Impact of orbital hybridization at molecule–metal interface on carrier dynamics.J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 25877–25882 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Patil, S.et al.ARPES view on surface and bulk hybridization phenomena in the antiferromagnetic Kondo lattice CeRh 2Si2. Nat. Commun.7, 11029 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Hu, J., Liu, L., Wang, X., Chen, Y . P. & Wells, J. W. Chiral quantum well Rashba splitting in Sb monolayer on Au(111). arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06814(2023)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    D.et al.Synthesis and characterization of a pure 2D antimony film on Au(111).J

    Cantero, E. D.et al.Synthesis and characterization of a pure 2D antimony film on Au(111).J. Phys. Chem. C125, 9273–9280 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Villalobos Castro, J. d. J.et al.Three-dimensional deformations in single-layer α antimonene and interaction with a Au(111) surface from first principles.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.10180(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  3. [11]

    & Gerivani, S

    Marsusi, F., Fedorov, I. & Gerivani, S. Graphene-induced band gap renormalization in polythiophene: a many-body perturbation study.J. Physics: Condens. Matter30, 035002 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Katoch, J.et al.Giant spin-splitting and gap renormalization driven by trions in single-layer WS 2/h-BN heterostructures. Nat. Phys.14, 355–359 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    Garcia-Lastra, J. M. & Thygesen, K. S. Renormalization of optical excitations in molecules near a metal surface.Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 187402 (2011)

    2011

  6. [14]

    D.et al.Probing the reconstructed Fermi surface of antiferromagnetic BaFe 2As2 in one domain.npj Quantum Mater.4, 36 (2019)

    Watson, M. D.et al.Probing the reconstructed Fermi surface of antiferromagnetic BaFe 2As2 in one domain.npj Quantum Mater.4, 36 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    & Rubel, O

    Brouet, V ., Vedant, A., Bertran, F., Le Fèvre, P. & Rubel, O. Unfolding the kagome lattice to improve understanding of ARPES in CoSn.Phys. Rev. B112, 115135 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    Zhou, D.et al.Interfacial effects on the growth of atomically thin film: Group V A elements on Au(111).Adv. Mater. Interfaces6, 1901050 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Khan, K.et al.Novel synthesis, properties and applications of emerging group V A two-dimensional monoelemental materials (2D-Xenes).Mater. Chem. Front.5, 6333–6391 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Zhang, P.et al.Topologically entangled Rashba-split Shockley states on the surface of grey arsenic.Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 046802 (2017)

    2017

  11. [19]

    Commun.13, 4603 (2022)

    Lu, Q.et al.Realization of unpinned two-dimensional dirac states in antimony atomic layers.Nat. Commun.13, 4603 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    & Yao, D.-X

    Lee, J., Tian, W.-C., Wang, W.-L. & Yao, D.-X. Two-dimensional pnictogen honeycomb lattice: structure, on-site spin-orbit coupling and spin polarization.Sci. Rep.5, 11512 (2015). 25.Lei, T.et al.Anisotropic electronic structure of antimonene.Appl. Phys. Lett.115(2019)

    2015

  13. [21]

    Zhu, J., He, C., Zhao, Y .-H. & Fu, B. Kagome-like group-V A monolayers with indirect–direct band gap transition and anisotropic mobility.J. Mater. Chem. C8, 2732–2740 (2020). 27.Novoselov, K. S.et al.Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films.Science306, 666–669 (2...

    2020

  14. [22]

    Commun.7, 13352 (2016)

    Ji, J.et al.Two-dimensional antimonene single crystals grown by van der Waals epitaxy.Nat. Commun.7, 13352 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    Lu, Q.et al.Observation of symmetry-protected dirac states in nonsymmorphic α-antimonene.Phys. Rev. B104, L201105 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Commun.15, 6001 (2024)

    Lu, Q.et al.Realization of a two-dimensional Weyl semimetal and topological Fermi strings.Nat. Commun.15, 6001 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Zan, L., Xing, D., Abd-El-Latif, A. A. & Baltruschat, H. Antimony deposition onto Au(111) and insertion of Mg.Beilstein J. Nanotechnol.10, 2541–2552 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    & Slavin, A

    Ma, P. & Slavin, A. Adsorption of antimony on Au(111) at room temperature.J. V ac. Sci. & Technol. A: V acuum, Surfaces, Films11, 2003–2007 (1993)

    2003

  19. [27]

    Hu, J., Wang, X., Åsland, A. C. & Wells, J. W. Unconventional broadening of Rashba spin splitting in a Au2Sb surface alloy with periodic structural defects.npj Quantum Mater.10, 5 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    Shah, J., Wang, W., Sohail, H. M. & Uhrberg, R. Atomic and electronic structures of the Au2Sn surface alloy on au(111). Phys. Rev. B104, 125408 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    A.et al.First evidence of a square-like Sn lattice on the Au 2Sn surface alloy on Au(111).Appl

    Hochhaus, J. A.et al.First evidence of a square-like Sn lattice on the Au 2Sn surface alloy on Au(111).Appl. Surf. Sci. 714, 164470 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    A.et al.Structural analysis of Sn on Au(111) at low coverages: Towards the surface alloy with alternating fcc and hcp domains.Sci

    Hochhaus, J. A.et al.Structural analysis of Sn on Au(111) at low coverages: Towards the surface alloy with alternating fcc and hcp domains.Sci. Rep.15, 7953 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    Pierron, T.et al.Surface reconstruction-driven band folding and spin-orbit enhancement at the α-antimonene/Au(111) interface.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.02922(2026)

    2026

  24. [32]

    & Ding, H

    Richard, P., Qian, T., Xu, Y .-M., Dai, X. & Ding, H. A precise method for visualizing dispersive features in image plots. Rev. Sci. Instrum.82(2011)

    2011

  25. [33]

    & Jensen, E

    LaShell, S., McDougall, B. & Jensen, E. Spin splitting of an Au(111) surface state band observed with angle resolved photoelectron spectroscopy.Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3419 (1996). 42.Reinert, F., Nicolay, G., Schmidt, S., Ehm, D. & Hüfner, S. Direct measurements of the L-gap surf...

    1996

  26. [34]

    & Kirschner, J

    Tusche, C., Krasyuk, A. & Kirschner, J. Spin resolved bandstructure imaging with a high resolution momentum microscope. Ultramicroscopy159, 520–529 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    & Saalfeld, H

    Courths, R., Zimmer, H.-G., Goldmann, A. & Saalfeld, H. Electronic structure of gold: An angle-resolved photoemission study along theλline.Phys. Rev. B34, 3577 (1986)

    1986

  28. [36]

    Sheverdyaeva, P.et al.Energy-momentum mapping of d-derived Au(111) states in a thin film.Phys. Rev. B93, 035113 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    V ., Wertheim, G., Hüfner, S

    Smith, N. V ., Wertheim, G., Hüfner, S. & Traum, M. M. Photoemission spectra and band structures of d-band metals. IV . X-ray photoemission spectra and densities of states in Rh, Pd, Ag, Ir, Pt, and Au.Phys. Rev. B10, 3197 (1974)

    1974

  30. [38]

    & Lapeyre, G

    Anderson, J. & Lapeyre, G. Chemisorption-induced surface umklapp processes in angle-resolved synchrotron photoemis- sion from w (001).Phys. Rev. Lett.36, 376 (1976). 48.Shirley, D. A. High-resolution X-ray photoemission spectrum of the valence bands of gold.Phys. Rev. B5, 4709 (1972)

    1976

  31. [39]

    & Shen, Z.-X

    Damascelli, A., Hussain, Z. & Shen, Z.-X. Angle-resolved photoemission studies of the cuprate superconductors.Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 473 (2003). 50.Hüfner, S.Photoelectron Spectroscopy: Principles and Applications(Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    2003

  32. [40]

    Ministerium für Kultur und Wissenschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen

    Aktürk, O. Ü., Özçelik, V . O. & Ciraci, S. Single-layer crystalline phases of antimony: Antimonenes.Phys. Rev. B91, 235446 (2015). 52.Hermann, K. LEEDpat download package, DOI: 10.17617/3.8AYKWU (2022). Acknowledgements Z.Z. and C.Wa. acknowledge valuable discussions with D.M...

    2015 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.