Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 42 references

Physics and Astrophysics of Black Holes with eXTP

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-13 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read eXTP's combined X-ray spectrum, timing and polarimetry will tighten black-hole spin and strong-field GR tests beyond current missions.

desk verdict Solid conference summary of the eXTP strong-gravity white paper; useful capability forecasts, no new science. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.09112 v1 pith:WLIR63WF submitted 2026-07-10 astro-ph.HE gr-qc

Cosimo Bambi This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords eXTPblack-holespinX-rayreflectionspectroscopycontinuumfittingpolarimetrystrong-fieldgravitytestsquasi-periodicoscillationsdisk-coronamodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that the forthcoming eXTP mission can measure masses and spins of accreting black holes and test whether their spacetime is Kerr by combining spectral, timing and polarimetric X-ray data. Its Spectroscopic Focusing Array has a larger effective area than existing instruments, so the same 30 ks exposure recovers input spin more tightly and places stronger joint limits on spin and a deformation parameter that quantifies deviations from Kerr. Polarimetry further constrains corona geometry, while timing of quasi-periodic oscillations and reverberation lags can yield masses once the correct model is identified. The same data set can address open questions about spin distributions, jet launching and corona evolution for both stellar-mass and supermassive black holes. Realizing these gains requires more advanced polarimetric models before the planned 2030 launch.

What carries the argument

The disk-corona model (thermal disk photons inverse-Comptonized in a hot corona, producing a relativistic reflection spectrum) analysed with the reflection codes relxill and relxill_nk that map observed line profiles and continuum shapes onto black-hole spin and possible non-Kerr deformation parameters.

What would settle it

After launch, compare the spin and deformation-parameter posteriors obtained from the same bright X-ray binary with eXTP/SFA versus contemporaneous NICER data; if the eXTP contours are not systematically tighter, the area-driven improvement claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Simulations of bright black-hole X-ray binaries show that eXTP/SFA recovers the input spin more precisely than NICER/XTI for identical 30 ks exposures and places substantially tighter joint constraints on spin and the Johannsen deformation parameter that vanishes only for Kerr, demonstrating that the mission's larger collecting area plus simultaneous polarimetry can deliver sharper strong-field tests of general relativity.

Load-bearing premise

The forecasts assume that the phenomenological reflection model and the chosen simulation parameters correctly represent real corona geometries and disk ionization; if they do not, the claimed precision gains shrink.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This conference contribution reviews the expected capabilities of the eXTP mission (launch ~2030) for black-hole astrophysics and strong-field gravity tests. After summarizing the SFA, PFA and W2C instruments and the standard disk-corona framework, the paper outlines how combined spectral, timing and polarimetric observations can measure black-hole masses (continuum + reflection, reverberation, variability/QPOs) and spins (reflection spectroscopy, continuum fitting, polarimetry, QPOs), and can constrain deviations from the Kerr metric (primarily via reflection with relxill_nk). Concrete end-to-end simulations for bright stellar-mass sources (flux 2e-8 erg cm^-2 s^-1, 30 ks and 300 ks exposures) are presented in Figs. 2–3, showing that eXTP/SFA recovers input spin more tightly than NICER/XTI and yields substantially smaller joint contours on spin and the Johannsen deformation parameter α13. The text closes by stressing the need for more advanced polarimetric models before launch.

Significance. If the forecasts hold, eXTP will deliver a step-change in the precision of spin and Kerr-deviation measurements for both stellar-mass and supermassive black holes, and will open a new polarimetric channel that can break geometric degeneracies. The manuscript’s principal strength is the transparent, end-to-end simulation comparison (Figs. 2–3) that quantifies the gain relative to NICER under identical exposure and model assumptions; these figures, together with the clear mapping onto the six open questions listed in Sec. 2, make the white-paper results accessible to a broader astrophysics audience. The work is therefore a useful, timely summary for the community preparing for eXTP.

minor comments (5)
  1. Fig. 2 caption: “demostrates” → “demonstrates”; also “We employ therelxillmodel” needs spaces (“the relxill model”).
  2. Fig. 3 caption and body: the deformation parameter is written both as α13 and α_13; adopt a single notation throughout.
  3. Sec. 1, instrument list: the SFA-T total effective area is given as 2750 cm^{2} at 1.5 keV; a brief parenthetical comparison with NICER’s effective area would help non-specialist readers appreciate the factor-of-several gain claimed later.
  4. Sec. 4, continuum-fitting paragraph: the factor-of-∼3 reduction in spin uncertainty relative to NICER is stated without a supporting figure or table; a short quantitative sentence or reference to the white-paper table would strengthen the claim.
  5. Throughout: a few missing spaces after periods and before citations (e.g., “blackholes.Inthiscontribution”) remain from the arXiv conversion; a light copy-edit pass will remove them.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: capability review with independent simulation forecasts, not a closed derivation loop.

full rationale

This manuscript is a short conference summary of the eXTP strong-gravity white paper. It does not claim to derive new physical quantities, uniqueness theorems, or first-principles predictions from fitted parameters. The quantitative statements (Figs. 2–3) are forward-looking instrument simulations that inject known input values (a_sim, α13=0, Γ=1.7, q=3, etc.) into the public phenomenological models relxill and relxill_nk and then recover those same inputs with smaller error bars for eXTP/SFA than for NICER/XTI. Recovery of injected parameters is the expected, non-circular behavior of a simulation study; the paper never renames a fit as an independent prediction. Self-citations (to the author’s earlier methodological papers and to the collaboration white paper [3]) supply the simulation setup and prior context; they are not load-bearing uniqueness claims that force the result. The open questions listed in Section 2 and the model-dependence caveats in Sections 4–5 are left open. Consequently the derivation chain is empty of circular steps and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a review of mission capabilities, the load-bearing content is the set of domain assumptions about accretion physics and the free parameters chosen for the illustrative simulations. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • simulation flux (2–10 keV) = 2e-8 erg cm^{-2} s^{-1}
    Fixed at 2×10^{-8} erg cm^{-2} s^{-1} to represent a ‘bright’ black-hole binary; the claimed precision gains scale with this choice.
  • exposure times = 30 ks / 300 ks
    30 ks and 300 ks chosen by hand for the comparison plots; longer exposures tighten contours by construction.
  • relxill input parameters (Γ, E_cut, q, A_Fe, log ξ, R_f, i) = Γ=1.7, E_cut=300 keV, q=3, A_Fe=1, logξ=3, R_f=1, i=45°/70°
    Standard but arbitrary values (Γ=1.7, q=3, log ξ=3, etc.) used to generate the mock spectra that demonstrate eXTP’s superiority.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The Novikov–Thorne thin-disk model correctly describes the thermal continuum of stellar-mass black holes in the soft state.
    Invoked throughout Sections 3–4 as the basis for continuum-fitting mass and spin measurements.
  • domain assumption The phenomenological reflection model relxill (and its non-Kerr extension) adequately captures the relativistic iron line and Compton hump.
    Used for all spin-recovery and Kerr-test simulations in Sections 4–5.
  • domain assumption Astrophysical black holes are described by the Kerr metric (or a controlled deformation thereof) in the absence of exotic matter or modified gravity.
    Baseline hypothesis being tested; stated in the opening of Section 5.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Physics and Astrophysics of Black Holes with eXTP." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WLIR63WF

@misc{pith2026260709112,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Physics and Astrophysics of Black Holes with eXTP},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WLIR63WF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.09112}
}
read the original abstract

The enhanced X-ray Timing and Polarimetry (eXTP) mission will combine spectral, timing, and polarimetric techniques to study accreting black holes, measure their masses and spins, and test Einstein's theory of General Relativity in the strong-field regime. In this contribution, I review the capabilities of eXTP to advance our current understanding of black hole physics and astrophysics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09112 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Sketch of the disk-corona model (left) and examples of possible coronal geometries (right). Figure from Ref. [7]. it efficiently radiates: its thermal spectrum scales as 𝑀−1/4 , where 𝑀 is the black hole mass. Consequently, the spectrum peaks in the soft X-ray band (0.1-10 keV) for stellar-mass black holes in X-ray binaries, and in the UV/optical band (1-100 eV) for supermassive black holes in active galactic nuclei… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Ability of eXTP/SFA and NICER/XTI to recover black hole spins. The simulations assume bright black hole X-ray binaries (flux 2 · 10−8 erg cm−2 s −1 in the 2-10 keV band) and an exposure time of 30 ks. We employ the relxill model [24, 25] with the following input parameters: photon index Γ = 1.7, cutoff energy 𝐸cut = 300 keV, inner disk radius at the innermost stable circular orbit 𝑅in = 𝑅ISCO, disk inclination angle… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Ability of eXTP/SFA and NICER/XTI to test the Kerr geometry. We show the measurements of the spin parameter 𝑎∗ and of the Johannsen deformation parameter 𝛼13 (𝛼13 = 0 corresponds to the Kerr solution, while 𝛼13 ≠ 0 indicates a deviation from the Kerr geometry) for a 30 ks observation with NICER/XTI (in green), a 30 ks observation with eXTP/SFA (in orange), and a 300 ks observation with eXTP/SFA (in blue). For each m… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    S. N. Zhang, A. Santangelo, Y. Xu, H. Feng, F. Lu, Y. Chen, M. Ge, K. Nandra, X. Wu and M. Feroci,et al. The enhanced X-ray Timing and Polarimetry mission—eXTP for launch in 2030, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68, 119502 (2025) [erratum: Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.69, 239551 (2025)], https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-025-2786-6 [arXiv:2506.08101 [astro-ph.HE]]

    doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2786-6

  2. [2]

    Ge,et al

    A.Li, A.L.Watts, G.Zhang, S.Guillot, Y.Xu, A.Santangelo, S.Zane, H.Feng, S.N.Zhang and M. Ge,et al. Dense matter in neutron stars with eXTP, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68, 119503 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-025-2761-4 [arXiv:2506.08104 [astro- ph.HE]]

    doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2761-4 2025

  3. [3]

    Q. Bu, C. Bambi, L. Gou, Y. Xu, P. Uttley, A. De Rosa, A. Santangelo, S. Zane, H. Feng and S. N. Zhang,et al. Probing the strong gravity region of black holes with eXTP, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68, 119504 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-025-2789-2 [arXiv:2506.08105 [astro-ph.HE]]. 8 Physics and Astrophysics of Black Holes with eXTPCosimo Bambi

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2789-2 2025

  4. [4]

    M. Ge, L. Ji, R. Taverna, S. Tsygankov, Y. Xu, A. Santangelo, S. Zane, S. N. Zhang, H. Feng and W. Chen,et al. Physics of strong magnetism with eXTP, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68, 119505 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-025-2796-y [arXiv:2506.08369 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2796-y 2025

  5. [5]

    S. X. Yi, W. Zhao, R. X. Xu, X. F. Wu, G. Stratta, S. Dall’Osso, Y. J. Xu, A. Santangelo, S. Zane and S. N. Zhang,et al. Prospects for time-domain and multi-messenger science with eXTP, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68, 119506 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433- 025-2782-2 [arXiv:2506.08368 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1007/s11433- 2025

  6. [6]

    P.Zhou,J.Mao,L.Zhang,A.Patruno,E.Bozzo,Y.Xu,A.Santangelo,S.Zane,S.Zhangand S.N.Zhang,etal.ObservatorysciencewitheXTP,Sci.ChinaPhys.Mech.Astron.68,119507 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-025-2799-0 [arXiv:2506.08367 [astro-ph.IM]]

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2799-0 2025

  7. [7]

    Black hole X-ray spectra: notes on the relativistic calculations

    C. Bambi,Black hole X-ray spectra: notes on the relativistic calculations, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.12262 [arXiv:2408.12262 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.12262

  8. [8]

    G. Matt, G. C. Perola and L. Piro,The iron line and high energy bump as X-ray signatures of cold matter in Seyfert 1 galaxiesAstron. Astrophys.247, 25 (1991)

    1991

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Martocchia and G

    A. Martocchia and G. Matt,Iron K𝛼line intensity from accretion discs around rotating black holes,Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc.282,L53(1996),https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/282.4.L53

    1996 doi

  2. [10]

    D. N. Page and K. S. Thorne,Disk-Accretion onto a Black Hole. Time-Averaged Structure of Accretion Disk, Astrophys. J.191, 499-506 (1974), https://doi.org/10.1086/152990

    1974 doi

  3. [11]

    N. I. Shakura and R. A. Sunyaev,Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance, Astron. Astrophys.24, 337-355 (1973)

    1973

  4. [12]

    R. R. Ross and A. C. Fabian,A Comprehensive range of x-ray ionized reflection mod- els, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.358, 211-216 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2966.2005.08797.x [arXiv:astro-ph/0501116 [astro-ph]]

    2005 doi

  5. [13]

    Garcia and T

    J. Garcia and T. Kallman,X-ray reflected spectra from accretion disk models. I. Con- stant density atmospheres, Astrophys. J.718, 695 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1088/0004- 637X/718/2/695 [arXiv:1006.0485 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2010 doi arXiv

  6. [14]

    C. Bambi,Black Holes: A Laboratory for Testing Strong Gravity(Springer Sin- gapore, 2017), ISBN 978-981-10-4523-3, 978-981-13-5158-7, 978-981-10-4524-0, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4524-0

    2017 doi

  7. [15]

    I. D. Novikov and K. S. Thorne,Astrophysics and black holes, inBlack Holes(Eds. C. De Witt and B. De Witt, Gordon and Breach, New York, USA, 1973), pp. 343-450

    1973

  8. [16]

    S. N. Zhang, W. Cui and W. Chen,Black hole spin in X-ray binaries: Observational conse- quences, Astrophys. J. Lett.482, L155 (1997), https://doi.org/10.1086/310705 [arXiv:astro- ph/9704072 [astro-ph]]. 9 Physics and Astrophysics of Black Holes with eXTPCosimo Bambi

    1997 doi

  9. [17]

    J. E. McClintock, R. Narayan and J. F. Steiner,Black Hole Spin via Continuum Fitting and the Role of Spin in Powering Transient Jets, Space Sci. Rev.183, 295-322 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-0003-9 [arXiv:1303.1583 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2014 doi arXiv

  10. [18]

    P. A. Draghis, J. M. Miller, A. Zoghbi, M. Reynolds, E. Costantini, L. C. Gallo and J. A. Tomsick,A Systematic View of Ten New Black Hole Spins, Astrophys. J.946, 19 (2023), https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acafe7 [arXiv:2210.02479 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2023 doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    A. C. Fabian, M. J. Rees, L. Stella and N. E. White,X-ray fluorescence from the inner disc in Cygnus X-1, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.238, 729-736 (1989), https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/238.3.729

    1989 doi

  12. [20]

    Bambi, L

    C. Bambi, L. W. Brenneman, T. Dauser, J. A. Garcia, V. Grinberg, A. Ingram, J. Jiang, H. Liu, A. M. Lohfink and A. Marinucci,et al. Towards Precision Measurements of Ac- creting Black Holes Using X-Ray Reflection Spectroscopy, Space Sci. Rev.217, 65 (2021), https://doi.org/10....

    2021 doi arXiv

  13. [21]

    M.L.Parker,J.A.Tomsick,J.A.Kennea,J.M.Miller,F.A.Harrison,D.Barret,S.E.Boggs, F. E. Christensen, W. W. Craig and A. C. Fabian,et al. NuSTAR and Swift observations of the very high state in GX 339-4: Weighing the black hole with X-rays, Astrophys. J. Lett.821, L6 (2016), https:...

    2016 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    S. Riaz, M. Kyriazis, A. B. Abdikamalov, C. Bambi and S. Shashank,Testing regular black holes with X-ray data of GX 339–4, JCAP03, 022 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1088/1475- 7516/2025/03/022 [arXiv:2306.09673 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2025 doi arXiv

  15. [23]

    Paolillo and I

    M. Paolillo and I. Papadakis,Continuum optical-UV and X-ray variability of AGN: current results and future challenges, Riv. Nuovo Cim.48, 537-621 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1007/s40766-025-00072-5 [arXiv:2506.23899 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2025 doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    Dauser, J

    T. Dauser, J. Garcia, J. Wilms, M. Bock, L. W. Brenneman, M. Falanga, K. Fukumura and C. S. Reynolds,Irradiation of an Accretion Disc by a Jet: General Properties and Implications for Spin Measurements of Black Holes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.430, 1694 (2013) https://doi.org...

    2013 doi arXiv

  17. [25]

    García, T

    J. García, T. Dauser, A. Lohfink, T. R. Kallman, J. Steiner, J. E. McClintock, L. Brenneman, J. Wilms, W. Eikmann and C. S. Reynolds,et al. Improved Reflection Models of Black-Hole Accretion Disks: Treating the Angular Distribution of X-rays, Astrophys. J.782, 76 (2014) https:...

    2014 doi arXiv

  18. [26]

    Bambi,Testing black hole candidates with electromagnetic radiation, Rev

    C. Bambi,Testing black hole candidates with electromagnetic radiation, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 025001 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.025001 [arXiv:1509.03884 [gr-qc]]

    2017 doi arXiv

  19. [27]

    Z. Cao, S. Nampalliwar, C. Bambi, T. Dauser and J. A. Garcia,Testing general relativity with the reflection spectrum of the supermassive black hole in 1H0707−495, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 051101(2018),https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.051101[arXiv:1709.00219[gr-qc]]. 10 Phys...

    2018 doi arXiv

  20. [28]

    A.Tripathi,S.Nampalliwar,A.B.Abdikamalov,D.Ayzenberg,C.Bambi,T.Dauser,J.A.Gar- ciaandA.Marinucci,TowardPrecisionTestsofGeneralRelativitywithBlackHoleX-RayRe- flectionSpectroscopy,Astrophys.J.875,56(2019),https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab0e7e [arXiv:1811.08148 [gr-qc]]

    2019 doi arXiv

  21. [29]

    Tripathi, Y

    A. Tripathi, Y. Zhang, A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi, J. Jiang, H. Liu and M.Zhou,TestingGeneralRelativitywithNuSTARdataofGalacticBlackHoles,Astrophys.J. 913,79(2021),https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abf6cd[arXiv:2012.10669[astro-ph.HE]]

    2021 doi arXiv

  22. [30]

    Bambi,Testing Gravity with Black Hole X-Ray Data, inRecent Progress on Gravity Tests: Challenges and Future Perspectives(Eds

    C. Bambi,Testing Gravity with Black Hole X-Ray Data, inRecent Progress on Gravity Tests: Challenges and Future Perspectives(Eds. C. Bambi and A. Cardenas-Avendano, Springer Singapore, 2024), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2871-8_5 [arXiv:2210.05322 [gr-qc]]

    2024 doi arXiv

  23. [31]

    M. Zhou, A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi, H. Liu and S. Nampalliwar,XSPEC model for testing the Kerr black hole hypothesis using the continuum-fitting method, Phys. Rev. D99, 104031 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.104031 [arXiv:1903.09782 [gr-qc]]

    2019 doi arXiv

  24. [32]

    Tripathi, M

    A. Tripathi, M. Zhou, A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi, L. Gou, V. Grin- berg, H. Liu and J. F. Steiner,Testing general relativity with the stellar-mass black hole in LMC X-1 using the continuum-fitting method, Astrophys. J.897, 84 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3847/1538...

    2020 doi arXiv

  25. [33]

    Krawczynski,Tests of General Relativity in the Strong Gravity Regime Based on X-Ray Spectropolarimetric Observations of Black Holes in X-Ray Binaries, Astrophys

    H. Krawczynski,Tests of General Relativity in the Strong Gravity Regime Based on X-Ray Spectropolarimetric Observations of Black Holes in X-Ray Binaries, Astrophys. J.754, 133 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/754/2/133 [arXiv:1205.7063 [gr-qc]]

    2012 doi arXiv

  26. [34]

    D. Liu, Z. Li, Y. Cheng and C. Bambi,X-ray spectropolarimetric measurements of the Kerr metric, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 383 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3600-9 [arXiv:1504.06788 [gr-qc]]

    2015 doi arXiv

  27. [35]

    C.Bambi,Probingthespace-timegeometryaroundblackholecandidateswiththeresonance models for high-frequency QPOs and comparison with the continuum-fitting method, JCAP 09, 014 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2012/09/014 [arXiv:1205.6348 [gr-qc]]

    2012 doi arXiv

  28. [36]

    C.Bambi,TestingthenatureoftheblackholecandidateinGROJ1655-40withtherelativistic precession model, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 162 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-015- 3396-7 [arXiv:1312.2228 [gr-qc]]

    2015 doi arXiv

  29. [37]

    Bambi, A

    C. Bambi, A. Cardenas-Avendano, T. Dauser, J. A. Garcia and S. Nampalliwar,Testing the Kerr black hole hypothesis using X-ray reflection spectroscopy, Astrophys. J.842, 76 (2017), https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa74c0 [arXiv:1607.00596 [gr-qc]]

    2017 doi arXiv

  30. [38]

    A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi, T. Dauser, J. A. Garcia and S. Nampalliwar, PublicReleaseofRELXILL_NK:ARelativisticReflectionModelforTestingEinstein’sGravity, Astrophys. J.878, 91 (2019), https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab1f89 [arXiv:1902.09665 [gr-qc]]. 11 Physic...

    2019 doi arXiv

  31. [39]

    A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi, T. Dauser, J. A. Garcia, S. Nampalliwar, A. Tripathi and M. Zhou,Testing the Kerr black hole hypothesis using X-ray reflection spectroscopy and a thin disk model with finite thickness, Astrophys. J.899, 80 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3...

    2020 doi arXiv

  32. [40]

    Tripathi, A

    A. Tripathi, A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi, V. Grinberg and M. Zhou,Testing the Kerr Black Hole Hypothesis with GX 339–4 by a Combined Analysis of Its Thermal SpectrumandReflectionFeatures,Astrophys.J.907,31(2021),https://doi.org/10.3847/1538- 4357/abccbd [arXiv:20...

    2021 doi arXiv

  33. [41]

    Tripathi, A

    A. Tripathi, A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi, V. Grinberg, H. Liu and M. Zhou, TestingtheKerrblackholehypothesiswiththecontinuum-fittingandtheironlinemethods: the caseofGRS1915+105,JCAP01,019(2022)https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/01/019 [arXiv:2106.10982 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2022 doi arXiv

  34. [42]

    Zhang, H

    Z. Zhang, H. Liu, A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi and M. Zhou,Testing the KerrBlackHoleHypothesiswithGRS1716-249byCombiningtheContinuumFittingandthe Iron-line Methods, Astrophys. J.924, 72 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac350e [arXiv:2106.03086 [astro-ph.HE]]. 12

    2022 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.