Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 58 references

On-chip quantum sensing of Kondo spins in a high-mobility quasi-one-dimensional nanoconstriction

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A quantum point contact is shown to host an interaction-generated Kondo spin whose state is controlled by the electron parity of an on-chip resonator.

desk verdict Worth knowing before you read it: this is a serious experimental paper with a genuinely new geometry, but the headline claim — that alternating single/double-peak zero-bias anomalies prove a nonlocally accessible Kondo spin — is not conclusively established. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.13397 v1 pith:TENSC3U3 submitted 2026-07-15 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el

Shun-Tsung Lo , Che-Cheng Wang , Sheng-Chin Ho , Jun-Hao Chang , Ming-Wei Chen , G. L. Creeth , L. W. Smith , Shih-Hsiang Chao
show 10 more authors
Yu-Chiang Hsieh Pei-Tzu Wu Yi-Cheng Wu Chi-Te Liang M. Pepper J. P. Griffiths I. Farrer G. A. C. Jones D. A. Ritchie Tse-Ming Chen
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-el
keywords quantumpointcontactKondoeffectelectronicresonator0.7anomalytwo-impurityzero-biasparitycontrolmesoscopictransport
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to prove that a quantum point contact (QPC) can host a localised spin that arises purely from electron-electron interactions, and that this spin can form Kondo states controlled by the electron occupancy of a nearby electronic resonator. By fabricating a resonator and a QPC on the same chip, the authors observe conductance oscillations whose maxima and minima coincide with single-peak and double-peak zero-bias anomalies in the differential conductance. They interpret this alternating pattern as switching between a single-impurity Kondo state (even resonator occupancy) and a two-impurity Kondo state (odd resonator occupancy). The same data show the well-known 0.7 anomaly does not participate in this parity switching; instead, it suppresses the Kondo signal, indicating it is a separate many-body state that opposes Kondo screening. If correct, this settles a long debate and provides a noninvasive probe for spin states in open nanostructures.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the electronic resonator (ER), a weakly confined Fabry–Pérot cavity defined lithographically next to the QPC. Its gate voltage controls the number of electrons in the cavity, and thereby its spin parity: odd occupancy means a net unpaired spin, even occupancy means a spin-zero state. This artificial spin acts as a second impurity that can exchange-couple to the QPC's quasi-bound spin. The QPC conductance then serves as a readout: a single zero-bias peak marks a single-impurity Kondo state, while a split double-peak marks a two-impurity Kondo state. The resonator thus converts a question about the QPC's internal spin state into a measurable pattern in the nonlinear

What would settle it

A charge sensor or single-electron transistor integrated into the resonator would show whether the double-peak appearances occur precisely at odd occupancy, as claimed. Alternatively, a spin-polarized current measurement through the QPC could reveal whether the double-peak state is indeed a spin-correlated state rather than a density effect.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a quasi-bound spin exists inside a QPC as a consequence of strong electron-electron interactions near the constriction, and that this spin is nonlocally accessible. When the on-chip electronic resonator holds an even number of electrons (zero net spin), the QPC spin forms a single-impurity Kondo state, visible as a single zero-bias conductance peak. When the resonator holds an odd number of electrons (one unpaired spin), the two spins exchange-couple into a two-impurity Kondo state, producing a double-peak zero-bias anomaly. The observed phase-locked alternation between single- and double-peak structures and the oscillations of the linear conductance is presented as

Load-bearing premise

The entire edifice rests on the assumption that the alternating single- and double-peak zero-bias anomalies are caused by the resonator's occupancy parity switching its net spin, rather than by a continuous change in the local electron density or coupling strength.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 0.7 anomaly is identified as a separate many-body state that coexists with and suppresses Kondo screening in the QPC.
  • The ER-QPC device demonstrates a noninvasive, all-electrical method to detect a spontaneous magnetic impurity inside an open nanoconstriction.
  • Parity-controlled switching of the Kondo state offers a way to actively manipulate spin correlations in one-dimensional transport channels.
  • The same sensing scheme can be applied to other strongly correlated nanostructures where local spin states are hard to reach directly.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct consequence, not drawn in the paper, is that the ER-QPC system could serve as a testbed for the crossover between single- and two-impurity Kondo physics, with coupling strength tuned by gate voltages rather than geometry.
  • The interpretation of the double-peak ZBA as a two-impurity Kondo state is borrowed from coupled quantum dots; a spin-polarized measurement would provide an independent check of whether the split peak really corresponds to a spin-correlated state.
  • If the 0.7 anomaly truly opposes Kondo screening, then devices that engineer one state may be used to switch the other on and off, which could be useful for spin-based quantum logic.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper integrates a weakly confined Fabry–Pérot-type electronic resonator (ER) with a high-mobility GaAs/AlGaAs quantum point contact (QPC) and reports that alternating single- and double-peak zero-bias anomalies (ZBAs) in the nonlinear conductance occur in phase with oscillations of the linear conductance as the ER gate voltage is swept. The authors interpret this as evidence for a QPC quasi-bound spin that forms a single-impurity Kondo state when the ER has even occupancy and a two-impurity Kondo state when the ER has odd occupancy, thereby providing nonlocal, noninvasive sensing of the QPC spin. They further report that in the 0.7-anomaly conductance regime the ZBA never splits, which they interpret as the 0.7 anomaly being a distinct quasistatic spin texture that actively suppresses Kondo correlations. A second device with an invasive, gate-defined ER shows only single-peak ZBAs, which is presented as a control.

Significance. If the interpretation is correct, this would be a major step in the long-standing debate over the 0.7 anomaly and the existence of interaction-generated quasi-bound spins in QPCs. The device design is creative, and the alternating single/double-peak pattern synchronized with conductance oscillations is an informative and nontrivial experimental signature. The paper also has genuine strengths: it presents multiple devices, includes a comparison device with a different coupling geometry, and explicitly acknowledges alternative ZBA mechanisms and its own limitations (e.g., the lower-than-expected Kondo temperature and the undetermined g-factor). However, the central claim rests on assigning the ZBA pattern to ER parity-controlled Kondo physics, and several load-bearing assumptions are not independently verified. If correct, the results would significantly reshape understanding of QPC many-body states; at present the evidence is suggestive but not conclusive.

major comments (5)
  1. [Figs. 2a, 2c, 2d and 3c; text near 'The switch cycle...'] The central claim that the alternating single- and double-peak ZBAs are controlled by ER occupancy parity is circular in its current form. The ER electron number parity is not measured independently; it is inferred from the very conductance oscillations of the QPC first plateau that are then said to be caused by odd/even ER occupancy. In an open, weakly confined Fabry–Pérot cavity, electron number parity is not a well-defined observable, and V_er also changes the QPC electrostatic environment directly. Without a separate measurement of the ER state (e.g., Coulomb blockade in a tunnel-coupled probe, or a charge sensor) or a quantitative model ruling out continuous density modulation, the phase-locking of ZBA structure with conductance oscillations demonstrates internal consistency but does not establish the parity mechanism.
  2. [Text near 'can also be well interpreted...' and refs 22–23; Figs. 3b–3d] The paper acknowledges that QPC ZBAs 'can also be well interpreted' by a smeared van Hove ridge (refs 22–23), but it does not exclude that mechanism for the observed alternating pattern. A periodic modulation of the QPC density/confinement by V_er could alternately tune a Kondo temperature or alter a van Hove ridge, producing single- and double-peak structures without invoking a parity-controlled two-impurity Kondo state. Because V_er simultaneously changes the QPC potential, the data as presented cannot distinguish between parity-controlled spin coupling and a density-controlled single-impurity effect. This is a load-bearing gap for the 'conclusive evidence' statement.
  3. [Fig. 4 and text: 'significantly lower than the approximately 10 K predicted by the Kondo model'] The temperature and magnetic-field dependence substantially weakens the Kondo assignment. The single-peak ZBA is reported to disappear at T=1.1 K, while the Kondo model cited by the paper predicts survival up to about 10 K. The authors attribute this to competition between single- and two-impurity Kondo states, but the mechanism is not quantitatively developed. The Landé g-factor is explicitly undetermined, preventing a check of the magnetic-field scale. These are admitted limitations, but they are central to the identification of the ZBA as Kondo in origin; as presented, the evidence is consistent with a Kondo interpretation but also with other interaction-driven ZBA mechanisms.
  4. [Fig. 3b; text 'δ_er ≈ 0.3 meV gives an estimation of ER size L ≈ 200 nm... within its lithographic scale L_er ≈ 400 nm'] The ER energy-level spacing is not measured directly but is inferred from the spacing of resonances in the QPC transconductance, and the conversion to a cavity size uses a free-particle formula with an assumed effective mass. The resulting L ≈ 200 nm is a factor of two smaller than the lithographic ER dimension L_er ≈ 400 nm. While this is presented as consistent 'within scale', the discrepancy is not negligible and the extracted δ_er is used to support the ER-mode filling picture. An independent characterization of the ER (e.g., bias spectroscopy of the ER itself, or a transport map in a regime where the QPC does not dominate) would strengthen this step.
  5. [Discussion around Fig. 2d and Fig. 3d: '0.7-anomaly physics actually hampers QPC Kondo spin fluctuations'] The claim that the 0.7 anomaly is a distinct state that suppresses Kondo correlations depends on the premise that the ZBA alternation in the plateau/tunneling regions is indeed Kondo. If the ZBA mechanism is non-Kondo (as the paper admits is possible), then the observed disappearance of splitting in the 0.7-anomaly region would not necessarily demonstrate a counteracting relationship between two distinct many-body states. This conclusion is therefore contingent on resolving the previous points. The paper's statement that the data 'align with the prediction' that spin polarization weakens ER-QPC singlet coupling is helpful but not a substitute for a direct test.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract states 'controllable in response to ER occupancy parity' without defining how parity is measured or controlled; consider clearly stating the inference chain in the abstract to avoid overclaiming.
  2. [Fig. 1 caption and text] The gate labels V_qpc, V_er, and V_f are used but the exact correspondence to the micrograph is not fully described; a labeled schematic with the two constrictions marked would improve clarity.
  3. [Fig. 3d] The line-cut traces are offset and the vertical bars compare peak heights, but the scale for the offset is not given. Consider adding a scale bar or explicitly stating the offset magnitude.
  4. [References] The reference list is extensive, but several key statements about the 0.7 anomaly being a spin-polarization effect (refs 27, 34–35) are cited without discussing the competing data that support Kondo interpretation. A more balanced treatment in the introduction would help.
  5. [Supporting Information] The paper refers to Supporting Notes 1, 2, and 4, but the main text does not summarize the key methods (e.g., how the ER gates are biased relative to the QPC gates, and how the second derivative maps were normalized). A brief methods summary in the main text is recommended.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

ER parity is read off the same conductance oscillations that the ZBA alternation is invoked to confirm, making the 'conclusive' nonlocal-spin claim partially circular.

  1. self definitional [Device A results; discussion of Fig. 1c inset and Figs. 2a–2d.]
    "Conversely, around G=G_Q or below, the conductance oscillations are linked to parity switches of the ER-QPC Kondo state. This is evidenced by the alternating single- and double-peak ZBAs in the nonlinear conductance (inset of Fig. 1c)... The switch cycle for linear and nonlinear conductance features are in phase... (denoted in solid and open symbols for single- and two-impurity Kondo state, respectively, in Figs. 2a, 2c, and 2d)... This result is significant in that it provides conclusive evidence of the existence of QPC quasi-bound spin which is nonlocally accessible."

    The independent variable, ER occupancy parity, is never measured by a charge sensor or spin probe; it is inferred from the linear-conductance oscillations themselves. The text first says those oscillations are 'linked to parity switches,' then labels the oscillation extrema as single- vs two-impurity Kondo states, and finally uses the phase match with alternating ZBAs as 'conclusive evidence' of a QPC quasi-bound spin. This is internal consistency between two outputs of the same V_er sweep, not an independent determination of ER charge or spin. The ER is admitted to be weakly confined and open (Fabry–Pérot type), so electron-number parity is a model-dependent label rather than a measured observable; the cause is thus defined by the effect it is invoked to explain.

full rationale

Score 4 reflects one load-bearing circular element, not a wholesale collapse. The central nonlocal-sensing claim rests on identifying ER occupancy parity as the cause of the alternating single/double ZBAs, but that parity is read off the very linear-conductance oscillations whose phase is then said to match the ZBA alternation. The paper explicitly links the conductance oscillations to 'parity switches of the ER-QPC Kondo state' and then cites the ZBA alternation as evidence for those switches, finally declaring the result 'conclusive evidence' of a quasi-bound spin. Because the ER is an open, weakly confined FP cavity, the odd/even occupancy label is an inference from the transport features being explained, not an independent observable; this is the partial circularity. The paper also acknowledges alternative ZBA mechanisms (smeared van Hove ridge, refs 22–23) and discrepancies (ZBA vanishing at 1.1 K vs roughly 10 K Kondo scale; undetermined Landé g-factor); those are correctness risks but not by themselves circularity. No load-bearing self-citation chain was found: refs 39–40 are external, and the two-impurity-Kondo assignment is imported from coupled-quantum-dot experiments rather than from the authors' own prior work. The claim that the 0.7 anomaly counteracts Kondo physics is based on a distinct observation (the 0.7 region lacks alternating ZBAs) and is not circular. Overall, the parity-inference step is partially circular, but the ZBA double-peak observation itself is not forced by construction, so the score is 4 rather than higher.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central interpretation maps conductance features onto Kondo-model states: no genuinely new physical entity is introduced, but both the QPC quasi-bound spin and the ER spin moment are inferred objects, and the resonator-parity model is calibrated on the same data it explains. The main borrowed axioms are the Rejec-Meir quasi-bound spin formation, the coupled-dot two-impurity Kondo framework, and the identification of ZBAs with Kondo physics — the last contested by van-Hove-ridge alternatives cited in the paper itself.

free parameters (2)
  • ER level spacing δ_er = ≈ 0.3 meV
    Read off the −∂²G/∂V_sd²(V_sd, V_er) map and used to estimate ER size L ≈ 200 nm via δ_er ∼ ħ²π²/m*L²; the assignment of the resonant line structure to Fabry-Pérot quantized levels is interpretive (Fig. 3b discussion).
  • Landé g-factor (effective) = unknown
    The paper states Zeeman contributions 'cannot be estimated in this work due to the undetermined Landé g-factor in the presence of strong interactions', so the magnetic-field data are only qualitatively interpretable (Fig. 4 discussion).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Alternating single-/double-peak ZBAs correspond to single- vs two-impurity Kondo regimes under ER occupancy parity switching.
    Central interpretive mapping, lifted from coupled quantum-dot literature (refs 45-55) and applied to the QPC where the impurity is not directly verified; contested by van-Hove-ridge alternatives (refs 22-23) cited in the same paper.
  • domain assumption The QPC harbors an interaction-generated quasi-bound spin (Rejec-Meir mechanism).
    Borrowed from refs 19-20; the paper's data aim to confirm it, but the ZBA signatures could in principle have other origins, as the paper concedes.
  • domain assumption ER electron occupancy changes by two electrons per oscillation cycle, with odd occupancy carrying a net spin moment.
    Inferred from the oscillation pattern itself; the weakly confined ER in device A is not independently characterized for parity, unlike the FP cavities of refs 39-40.
  • standard math Particle-in-a-box formula δ_er ∼ ħ²π²/m*L² with m* = 0.067 m_e.
    Used to estimate ER size from the measured level spacing; standard for GaAs but applied inside a strongly correlated constriction where the effective mass may differ.
invented entities (2)
  • Interaction-generated quasi-bound spin in the QPC
    purpose: The purported Kondo impurity in the open constriction, whose existence and nonlocal accessibility are the paper's first main claim.
    Its existence is concluded from the same transport signatures (ZBA alternation, conductance oscillations) that constitute the claim; no independent measurement of a localized spin is provided.
  • ER spin moment (odd-occupancy bound spin of the weakly confined resonator)
    purpose: Provides the second impurity that exchange-couples to the QPC spin to form the two-impurity Kondo state.
    The odd/even occupancy of the resonator is inferred from the conductance oscillation pattern itself; no independent charge or spin readout of the resonator is presented.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On-chip quantum sensing of Kondo spins in a high-mobility quasi-one-dimensional nanoconstriction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TENSC3U3

@misc{pith2026260713397,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On-chip quantum sensing of Kondo spins in a high-mobility quasi-one-dimensional nanoconstriction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TENSC3U3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.13397}
}
read the original abstract

The precise nature of Kondo spins has remained enigmatic when extended to multiple spin impurities or, more intriguingly, when the localized spin itself may already be the consequence of many-body interactions in a presumably-delocalized open nanoconstriction, such as a quantum point contact (QPC). It is experimentally challenging to distinguish the Kondo state from other coexisting many-body spin states in such a strongly correlated system. Here we lithographically define an all-on-chip electronic resonator (ER) and a QPC in a high-mobility GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructure transistor. Local Kondo screening of the QPC spin and nonlocal spin singlet across the ER-QPC integration are controllable in response to ER occupancy parity. We also show that the 0.7 anomaly, another strongly-correlated state in QPCs, not only has a different physical origin but furthermore counteracts the Kondo spin singlet. These results demonstrate a noninvasive quantum method for sensing spontaneous magnetic impurities within an open nanoconstriction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.13397 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Integrated electronic resonator-quantum point contact device and its linear and nonlinear transfer characteristics. (a) False-color scanning electron micrograph of the gate pattern for device A. The quantum point contact (QPC) and electronic resonator (ER) are primarily controlled by voltages Vqpc, Ver, and Vf with all other gates grounded. Bottom inset, a schematic representation of the QPC potential profile and an… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Transport anomalies in linear and nonlinear conductance, device A. (a, b) Sequences of linear conductance traces G(Vsd = 0, Vqpc) with decreasing Ver along the arrow direction for Vf = −0.72 V (a) and −0.74 V (b). (c) Transconductance ∂G/∂Vqpc versus G and Ver, displaying the oscillating and monotonic dependence of the first plateau and 0.7 anomaly on Ver, respectively. (d) Nonlinear conductance traces G(Vsd, Vqpc) … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Interplay of the QPC Kondo and 0.7 anomaly in device A. (a) Linear conductance versus Ver as Vqpc is decreased along the arrow direction with Vf fixed at −0.7 V. Green traces correspond to Vqpc = −1.60 V and −1.77 V, respectively. The plateaus (at GQ and 0.5GQ) appear as darker regions with a higher density of traces. The shaded areas indicate the simultaneous appearance of the conductance oscillations and 0.7 anoma… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Destruction of Kondo spin singlet in device A. (a, b) Double- and single-peak ZBAs with increasing temperature T along the arrow direction. The ZBA peaks are completely suppressed when T = 1.1 K. Dashed and bold traces indicate the data at T = 0.6 K and 1.1 K, respecti…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references

  1. [1]

    H. Im, D. U. Lee, Y . Jo, J. Kim, Y . Chong, W. Song, H. Kim, E. K. Kim, T. Yuk, S.-J. Sin, S. Moon, J. R. Prance, Y . A. Pashkin & J.-S. Tsai, Observation of Kondo condensation in a degenerately doped silicon metal.Nat. Physics19, 676–681 (2023)

    2023

  2. [2]

    Hartstein, W

    M. Hartstein, W. H. Toews, Y .-T. Hsu, B. Zeng, X. Chen, M. Ciomaga Hatnean, Q. R. Zhang, S. Nakamura, A. S. Padgett, G. Rodway-Gant, J. Berk, M. K. Kingston, G. H. Zhang, M. K. Chan, S. Yamashita, T. Sakakibara, Y . Takano, J.-H. Park, L. Balicas, N. Harrison, N. Shitsevalova, G. Balakrishnan, G. G. Lonzarich, R. W. Hill, M. Sutherland & Suchitra E. Seba...

    2018

  3. [3]

    B. Shen, Y . Zhang, Y . Komijani, M. Nicklas, R. Borth, A. Wang, Y . Chen, Z. Nie, R. Li, X. Lu, H. Lee, M. Smidman, F. Steglich, P. Coleman & H. Q. Yuan, Strange-metal behaviour in a pure ferromagnetic Kondo lattice.Nature579, 51–55 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    I. V . Borzenets, J. Shim, J. C. H. Chen, A. Ludwig, A. D. Wieck, S. Tarucha, H.-S. Sim & M. Yamamoto, Observation of the Kondo screening cloud.Nature579, 210–213 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    Madhavan, W

    V . Madhavan, W. Chen, T. Jamneala, M. F. Crommie & N. S. Wingreen, Tunneling into a single magnetic atom: spectroscopic evidence of the Kondo resonance.Science280, 567–569 (1998)

    1998

  6. [6]

    Spinelli, M

    A. Spinelli, M. Gerrits, R. Toskovic, B. Bryant, M. Ternes & A. F. Otte, Exploring the phase diagram of the two-impurity Kondo problem.Nat. Commun.6, 10046 (2015)

    2015

  7. [7]

    A. N. Pasupathy, R. C. Bialczak, J. Martinek, J. E. Grose, L. A. K. Donev, P. L. McEuen & D. C. Ralph, The Kondo effect in the presence of ferromagnetism.Science306, 86–89 (2004)

    2004

  8. [8]

    N. Roch, S. Florens, V . Bouchiat, W. Wernsdorfer & F. Balestro, Quantum phase transition in a single-molecule quantum dot.Nature453, 633 (2008). 9

    2008

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Nyg ˚ard, D

    J. Nyg ˚ard, D. H. Cobden & P. E. Lindelof, Kondo physics in carbon nanotubes.Nature408, 342 (2000)

    2000

  2. [10]

    Paaske, A

    J. Paaske, A. Rosch, P. W ´’olfle, N. Mason, C. M. Marcus & J. Nyg ˚ard, Non-equilibrium singlet-triplet Kondo effect in carbon nanotubes.Nat. Physics2, 460 (2006)

    2006

  3. [11]

    Goldhaber-Gordon, H

    D. Goldhaber-Gordon, H. Shtrikman, D. Mahalu, D. Abusch-Magder, U. Meirav & M. A. Kastner, Kondo effect in a single-electron transistor.Nature391, 156 (1998)

    1998

  4. [12]

    S. M. Cronenwett, T. H. Oosterkamp & L. P. Kouwenhoven, A tunable Kondo effect in quan- tum dots.Science281, 540–544 (1998)

    1998

  5. [13]

    W. G. van der Wiel, S. D. Franceschi, T. Fujisawa, J. M. Elzerman, S. Tarucha & L. P. Kouwen- hoven, The Kondo effect in the unitary limit.Science289, 2105–2108 (2000)

    2000

  6. [14]

    Commun.15, 9556 (2024)

    K.Noro, Y .Kozuka, K.Matsumura, T.Kumasaka, Y .Fujiwara, A.Tsukazaki, M.Kawasaki & T.Otsuka, Parity-independent Kondo effect of correlated electrons in electrostatically defined ZnO quantum dots.Nat. Commun.15, 9556 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    van Efferen, J

    C. van Efferen, J. Fischer, T. A. Costi, A. Rosch, T. Michely & W. Jolie, Modulated Kondo screening along magnetic mirror twin boundaries in monolayer MoS 2,Nat. Phys.20, 82 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    S. M. Cronenwett, H. J. Lynch, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, L. P. Kouwenhoven, C. M. Marcus, K. Hirose, N. S. Wingreen & V . Umansky, Low-temperature fate of the 0.7 Structure in a point contact: A Kondo-like correlated state in an open system.Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 226805 (2002)

    2002

  9. [17]

    0.7 Anomaly

    Y . Meir, K. Hirose & N. S. Wingreen, Kondo Model for the “0.7 Anomaly” in transport through a quantum point contact.Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 196802 (2002)

    2002

  10. [18]

    L. W. Smith, H. B. Chen, C. W. Chang, C. W. Wu, S. T. Lo, S. H. Chao, I. Farrer, H. E. Beere, J. P. Griffiths, G. A. C. Jones, D. A. Ritchie, Y . N. Chen & T. M. Chen, Electrically Controllable Kondo Correlation in Spin-Orbit-Coupled Quantum Point Contacts.Phys. Rev. Lett.128,...

    2022

  11. [19]

    Rejec & Y

    T. Rejec & Y . Meir, Magnetic impurity formation in quantum point contacts.Nature442, 900 (2006)

    2006

  12. [20]

    Sfigakis, C

    F. Sfigakis, C. J. B. Ford, M. Pepper, M. Kataoka, D. A. Ritchie & M. Y . Simmons, Kondo effect from a tunable bound state within a quantum wire.Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 026807 (2008). 10

    2008

  13. [21]

    B. Brun, F. Martins, S. Faniel, B. Hackens, A. Cavanna, C. Ulysse, A. Ouerghi, U. Gennser, D. Mailly, P. Simon, S. Huant, V . Bayot, M. Sanquer & H. Sellier, Electron Phase Shift at the Zero-Bias Anomaly of Quantum Point Contacts.Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 136801 (2016)

    2016

  14. [22]

    Bauer, J

    F. Bauer, J. Heyder, E. Schubert, D. Borowsky, D. Taubert, B. Bruognolo, D. Schuh, W. Wegscheider, J. von Delft & S. Ludwig, Microscopic origin of the ‘0.7-anomaly’ in quantum point contacts.Nature501, 73 (2013)

    2013

  15. [23]

    D. H. Schimmel, B. Bruognolo & J. von Delft, Spin fluctuations in the 0.7 Anomaly in quan- tum point contacts.Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 196401 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    K. J. Thomas, J. T. Nicholls, M. Y . Simmons, M. Pepper, D. R. Mace & D. A. Ritchie, Possible spin polarization in a one-dimensional electron gas.Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 135–138 (1996)

    1996

  17. [25]

    Kristensen, H

    A. Kristensen, H. Bruus, A.E. Hansen, J.B. Jensen, P.E. Lindelof, C.J. Marckmann, J. Nygrd, C.B. Srensen, F. Beuscher, A. Forchel & M. Michel, Bias and temperature dependence of the 0.7 conductance anomaly in quantum point contacts.Phys. Rev. B62, 10950 (2000)

    2000

  18. [26]

    Tokura & A

    Y . Tokura & A. Khaetskii Towards a microscopic theory of the 0.7 anomaly.Physica E12, 711 (2002)

    2002

  19. [27]

    L. P. Rokhinson, L. N. Pfeiffer & K. W. West, Spontaneous spin polarization in quantum point contacts.Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 156602 (2006)

    2006

  20. [28]

    C. Yan, S. Kumar, K. Thomas, P. See, I. Farrer, D. Ritchie, J. Griffiths, G. Jones & M. Pepper, Coherent spin amplification using a beam splitter.Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 137701 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Ho, H.-J

    S.-C. Ho, H.-J. Chang, C.-H. Chang, S.-T. Lo, G. Creeth, S. Kumar, I. Farrer, D. Ritchie, J. Griffiths, G. Jones, M. Pepper & T.-M. Chen, Imaging the zigzag wigner crystal in confinement-tunable quantum wires.Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 106801 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    A. D. Klironomos, J. S. Meyer, T. Hikihara & K. A. Matveev, Spin coupling in zigzag Wigner crystalsPhys. Rev. B76, 075302 (2007)

    2007

  23. [31]

    J. S. Meyer, K. A. Matveev & A. I. Larkin, Transition from a one-dimensional to a quasi-one- dimensional state in interacting quantum wires.Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 126404 (2007)

    2007

  24. [32]

    Aryanpour & J

    K. Aryanpour & J. E. Han, Ferromagnetic spin coupling as the origin of 0.7 Anomaly in quantum point contacts.Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 056805 (2009)

    2009

  25. [33]

    Heedt, N

    S. Heedt, N. T. Ziani, F. Cr ´epin, W. Prost, S. Trellenkamp, J. Schubert, D. Gruetzmacher, B. Trauzettel & T. Schaepers, Signatures of interaction-induced helical gaps in nanowire quantum point contacts.Nat. Physics13, 563–567 (2017). 11

    2017

  26. [34]

    T. M. Chen, A. C. Graham, M.Pepper, I. Farrer & D. A. Ritchie, Bias-controlled spin polar- ization in quantum wires.Appl. Phys. Lett.93, 032102 (2008)

    2008

  27. [35]

    T. M. Chen, M. Pepper, I. Farrer, G. A. C. Jones & D. A. Ritchie All-electrical injection and detection of a spin-polarized current using 1D conductors.Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 177202 (2012)

    2012

  28. [36]

    Chuang, S.-C

    P. Chuang, S.-C. Ho, L. W. Smith, F. Sfigakis, M. Pepper, C.-H. Chen, J.-C. Fan, J. P. Grif- fiths, I. Farrer, H. E. Beere, G. A. C. Jones, D. A. Ritchie & T.-M. Chen, All-electric all- semiconductor spin field-effect transistors.Nat. Nanotech.10, 35–39 (2015)

    2015

  29. [37]

    Lo, C.-H

    S.-T. Lo, C.-H. Chen, J.-C. Fan, L. W. Smith, G. L. Creeth, C.-W. Chang, M. Pepper, J. P. Griffiths, I. Farrer, H. E. Beere, G. A. C. Jones, D. A. Ritchie & T.-M. Chen, Controlled spatial separation of spins and coherent dynamics in spin-orbit-coupled nanostructures.Nat. Commu...

    2017

  30. [38]

    M. J. Iqbal, R. Levy, E. J. Koop, J. B. Dekker, J. P. de Jong, J. H. M. van der Velde, D. Reuter, A. D. Wieck, R. Aguado, Y . Meir & C. H. van der Wal, Odd and even Kondo effects from emergent localization in quantum point contacts.Nature501, 79 (2013)

    2013

  31. [39]

    R ¨ossler, D

    C. R ¨ossler, D. Oehri, O. Zilberberg, G. Blatter, M. Karalic, J. Pijnenburg, A. Hofmann, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, C. Reichl & W. Wegscheider, Transport spectroscopy of a spin-coherent dot-cavity system.Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 166603 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    H. Jung, D. T. Park, S. Lee, U. Kim, C. Yang, J. Kim, V . Umansky, D. Kim, H.-S. Sim, Y . Chung, H. Choi & H. K. Choi, Observation of electronic modes in open cavity resonator.Nat. Commun.14, 415 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    B. Brun, F. Martins, S. Faniel, B. Hackens, G. Bachelier, A. Cavanna, C. Ulysse, A. Ouerghi, U. Gennser, D. Mailly, S. Huant, V . Bayot, M. Sanquer & H. Sellier, Wigner and Kondo physics in quantum point contacts revealed by scanning gate microscopy.Nat. Commun.5, 4290 (2014)

    2014

  34. [42]

    Yoon, M.-G

    Y . Yoon, M.-G. Kang, T. Morimoto, L. Mourokh, N. Aoki, J. L. Reno, J. P. Bird & Y . Ochiai, Detector backaction on the self-consistent bound state in quantum point contacts.Phys. Rev. B79, 121304 (2009)

    2009

  35. [43]

    Yoon, M.-G

    Y . Yoon, M.-G. Kang, T. Morimoto, M. Kida, N. Aoki, J. L. Reno, Y . Ochiai, L. Mourokh, J. Fransson & J. P. Bird, Coupling quantum states through a continuum: a mesoscopic multistate Fano resonance.Phys. Rev. X2, 021003 (2012)

    2012

  36. [44]

    Fransson, M.-G

    J. Fransson, M.-G. Kang, Y . Yoon, S. Xiao, Y . Ochiai, J. Reno, N. Aoki & J. Bird, Tuning the Fano resonance with an intruder continuum.Nano Lett.14, 788 (2014). 12

    2014

  37. [45]

    Jeong, A

    H. Jeong, A. M. Chang & M. R. Melloch, The Kondo effect in an artificial quantum dot molecule.Science293, 2221 (2001)

    2001

  38. [46]

    N. J. Craig, J. M. Taylor, E. A. Lester, C. M. Marcus, M. P. Hanson & A. C. Gossard, Tunable nonlocal spin control in a coupled-quantum dot system.Science304, 565–567 (2004)

    2004

  39. [47]

    J. C. Chen, A. M. Chang & M. R. Melloch, Transition between quantum states in a parallel- coupled double quantum dot.Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 176801 (2004)

    2004

  40. [48]

    Simon, R

    P. Simon, R. L ´opez & Y . Oreg, Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida and magnetic-field interac- tions in coupled Kondo quantum dots.Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 86602 (2005)

    2005

  41. [49]

    R. M. Potok, I. G. Rau, H. Shtrikman, Y . Oreg & D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Observation of the two-channel Kondo effect.Nature446, 167 (2007)

    2007

  42. [50]

    Keller, L

    A. Keller, L. Peeters, C. Moca, I. Weymann, D. Mahalu, V . Umansky, G. Zar ´and & D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Universal Fermi liquid crossover and quantum criticality in a mesoscopic system.Nature526, 237–240 (2015)

    2015

  43. [51]

    Bork, Y .-h

    J. Bork, Y .-h. Zhang, L. Diekhoner, L. Borda, P. Simon, J. Kroha, P. Wahl & K. Kern, A tunable two-impurity Kondo system in an atomic point contact.Nat. Physics7, 901–906 (2011)

    2011

  44. [52]

    Pr ¨user, P

    H. Pr ¨user, P. E. Dargel, M. Bouhassoune, R. G. Ulbrich, T. Pruschke, S. Lounis & M. Wen- deroth, Interplay between the Kondo effect and the Ruderman–Kittel–Kasuya–Yosida interac- tion.Nat. Commun.5, 5417 (2014)

    2014

  45. [53]

    T. Esat, B. Lechtenberg, T. Deilmann, C. Wagner, P. Kr ¨uger, R. Temirov, M. Rohlfing, F. B. Anders & F. S. Tautz, A chemically driven quantum phase transition in a two-molecule Kondo system.Nat. Physics12, 867–873 (2016)

    2016

  46. [54]

    C. Duan, K. Sasmal, M. B. Maple, A. Podlesnyak, J.-X. Zhu, Q. Si & P. Dai, Incommensu- rate spin fluctuations in the spin-triplet superconductor candidate UTe 2.Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 237003 (2020)

    2020

  47. [55]

    Yeh, T.-K

    S.-S. Yeh, T.-K. Su, A.-S. Lien, F. Zamani, J. Kroha, C.-C. Liao, S. Kirchner & J.-J. Lin, Oxygen vacancy-driven orbital multichannel Kondo effect in Dirac nodal line metals IrO2 and RuO2.Nat. Commun.11, 4749 (2020)

    2020

  48. [56]

    Jaksch, I

    P. Jaksch, I. Yakimenko & K.-F. Berggren, From quantum point contacts to quantum wires: density-functional calculations with exchange and correlation effects.Phys. Rev. B74, 235320 (2006). 13

    2006

  49. [57]

    Lassl, P

    A. Lassl, P. Schlagheck & K. Richter, Effects of short-range interactions on transport through quantum point contacts: a numerical approach.Phys. Rev. B75, 045346 (2007)

    2007

  50. [58]

    Vionnet & O

    G. Vionnet & O. P. Sushkov, Enhancement mechanism of the electrongfactor in quantum point contacts.Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 126801 (2016). 14 a c Vf Vqpc Ver0 0 0 b i iiiii Odd Odd Even Source Drain xQPC potential energy device A device B Source Drain Vf Ver Ver Ver Vqpc2 Vqpc1 d ...

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.