Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 104 references

Europe can halve its natural gas use for about 16 billion euros a year, and gas still shapes electricity prices.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 08:37 UTC pith:LAV32THE

load-bearing objection A serious, transparent, policy-relevant sector-coupled study; the headline cost figures are conditional on an acknowledged but under-tested industry-heat mapping, so treat them as a well-built scenario analysis rather than a point estimate. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.21048 v1 pith:LAV32THE submitted 2026-07-23 econ.GN physics.soc-phq-fin.EC

Accelerating fossil gas independence in Europe

Lukas Franken , Iegor Riepin , Tom Brown This is my paper
classification econ.GN physics.soc-phq-fin.EC
keywords gas independenceenergy system modelsector couplingindustrial heatheat pumpsmarginal electricity pricinggas price volatilityEurope
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks what it would cost Europe to sharply cut its reliance on imported fossil gas, and whether doing so would actually protect consumers from global gas price shocks. Using a high-resolution, sector-coupled model of the European energy system, the authors find that cutting gas consumption to 200 billion cubic meters a year—roughly domestic production capacity—raises total system cost by about 16 billion euros annually, less than 2 percent. The cheapest reductions come from electrifying low-temperature industrial heat and displacing gas in power generation, not from residential heating. However, the paper argues that even at a small share of the electricity mix, gas remains the dominant driver of marginal electricity prices, so consumers stay exposed to global gas price volatility unless additional policy measures are introduced.

Core claim

The central discovery is that Europe's path to gas independence is economically mild in aggregate cost but uneven across sectors, and that curbing gas use does not automatically sever the link between global gas prices and consumer electricity bills. By iteratively tightening a cap on fossil gas supply in a cost-optimising model that covers power, building heat, and industrial heat in four temperature bands, the authors show that gas can be halved to 200 bcm/a for an extra annual system cost of about 16 billion euros, and reduced to 275 bcm/a for about 5 billion euros. The most cost-effective gas displacement occurs in industry heat below 500°C and in bulk power generation, with residential

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a sector-coupled European energy system model that endogenously represents almost all gas uses, including industrial heat disaggregated into four temperature bands (<100°C, 100–200°C, 200–500°C, >500°C). The model co-optimises investment and dispatch across power, buildings, industry, and biomass, and is run with an equality constraint on total fossil gas supply, which produces a shadow price for gas. This shadow price reveals the scarcity value of gas and drives the sectoral ordering of phase-out: low-temperature industrial heat is cheapest to electrify because heat pumps there enjoy high utilisation, while high-temperature processes require hydrogen. The margi

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that gas currently meets the hottest temperature end of every industrial process's heat demand—so the model can only substitute fuel for that gas-attributed slice—drives the finding that sub-500°C industry heat is the cheapest ~50 bcm to displace.

What would settle it

A detailed empirical survey of where natural gas is actually burned in European industry—by temperature band, process type (steam vs. direct firing), and load factor—would confirm or contradict the assumption that gas is concentrated at the high-temperature end of each process. If gas is found to be significantly more prevalent in low-temperature bands or in steam systems, the model's cost-optimal sector ordering would need revisiting.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If correct, the cost of reaching autarky (200 bcm/a) is comparable to a sustained 2 EUR/MWh rise in gas import prices, making import independence economically compelling.
  • The cheapest gas reductions are concentrated in sub-500°C industrial heat and power, implying that policy should prioritise industrial heat electrification and renewable-plus-storage deployment over early residential gas phase-out.
  • Without industry electrification, reaching 200 bcm/a becomes about 10 billion euros a year more expensive and requires millions of additional heat pumps in buildings.
  • At a carbon price of 100 EUR/tCO2 and long-term gas prices at or above 30 EUR/MWh, the market's cost-optimal gas consumption falls to or below autarky levels, meaning existing policy may already push Europe toward gas independence.
  • Even a low residual gas share keeps marginal electricity prices anchored to gas, so decoupling renewable generation from marginal pricing via instruments like two-sided contracts for difference will be necessary to protect consumers.
  • Current deployment trends suggest renewables can reach autarky levels by 2030–2040, but building heat and industrial electrification lag, requiring roughly a tripling of current heat-pump installation rates and a doubling of wind and solar build-out to meet 2035 autarky targets.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's sectoral ordering—low-temperature industry first, then power, then buildings—depends on the assumption that gas serves the hottest end of each industrial process's heat demand. If real gas use is more evenly spread across temperature bands or concentrated in steam vs. direct-fired processes, the relative cost of displacing gas in different sectors could shift, and the headline cost est
  • The result that gas anchors electricity prices even at low shares suggests a testable policy prediction: in a future grid with high renewable penetration, observed hourly price spikes will still correlate with gas prices as long as gas turbines or gas-opportunity-cost batteries set the marginal price. This could be verified empirically before the policies proposed are fully implemented.
  • The model's elasticity estimate (−1.33) is higher than empirical long-run elasticities; a more realistic treatment of capital-stock inertia and imperfect information would likely raise the cost of reaching the same gas-reduction milestones, though the qualitative ordering of sectors would probably remain.
  • A natural extension would be to combine this gas-supply-constrained framework with a more granular representation of distribution-grid bottlenecks and industry process characteristics (steam vs. kiln), which would test whether the cost-optimal ordering persists when those constraints are made explicit.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper uses the open-source PyPSA-Eur sector-coupled energy system model, extended with an endogenous representation of industrial process heat in four temperature bands, to compute cost-optimal European energy-system configurations under successively tighter equality constraints on fossil gas supply (450 bcm/a down to 0 in 25 bcm steps). The central claims are that reducing gas consumption to 275 bcm/a (No-LNG) costs about 5 bn EUR/a and to 200 bcm/a (Autarky) about 16 bn EUR/a; that the cheapest displacement occurs in sub-500C industry heat and in bulk power generation; that at a carbon price of 100 EUR/tCO2 and a gas price of about 30 EUR/MWh autarky becomes cost-optimal; and that gas remains a dominant driver of electricity marginal prices even when its share in the power mix is small. The paper also quantifies consumer cost pass-through of gas price shocks (about 8.7 bn EUR/a per 1 EUR/MWh gas price increase at 400 bcm/a) and compares required technology deployment rates with current trends.

Significance. If the results hold, they provide a valuable, policy-relevant quantification of the cost of European gas-import independence, with a novel endogenous treatment of industrial heat in a continent-scale model. The paper is unusually transparent about its limitations, explicitly listing single-weather-year analysis, absence of asset stranding, load-following heat constraints, and retail price gaps. It ships open-source code and data, and derives scarcity rents and elasticities from LP duality rather than from fitted parameters, which strengthens the internal consistency of the cost curves. The sectoral ordering result — sub-500C industry heat as the cheapest large tranche — is the load-bearing element and needs additional robustness testing before the headline cost figures can be taken as established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods, 'Industry Heat Demand'; Fig 21; Limitations] The gas-to-temperature-band mapping is load-bearing for the main quantitative claims. The paper states 'We cannot know in which temperature band gas heating is deployed' and assumes gas serves the hottest portion of each process's heat demand. This creates the ~1,300 TWh of gas-attributed heat, locates roughly half below 500C, and makes sub-500C industry heat the cheapest ~50 bcm to displace, which in turn drives the 5 and 16 bn EUR/a headline costs and the sectoral ordering. The Limitations paragraph acknowledges that neglecting steam-vs-kiln and other process characteristics 'could misrepresent the true cost of alternatives,' but no sensitivity analysis quantifies the effect. I request a systematic sensitivity study with alternative plausible mappings — e.g., gas distributed proportionally across temperature bands, gas assigned to the coldest end, or a process-level assignment distingu
  2. [Fig 14 and 'Cost-Optimal Gas Phase-Out...' section] The 200-500C industry heat displacement relies on a major expansion of solid biomass, from ~1,300 to ~1,700 TWh, and the model includes 'unsustainable solid biomass' and 'unsustainable biogas' categories from ENSPRESO. The paper reports aggregate biomass use but does not quantify the share of unsustainable sources in the cost-optimal solution. If those sources were excluded or constrained (as the paper notes the RePowerEU biomethane target already exceeds plausible sustainable capacity), the cheap biomass direct-firing option in the 200-500C band would be curtailed, potentially raising the cost of reaching 200 bcm and shifting the sectoral ordering. Please report the unsustainable share and provide a sensitivity case with only sustainable biomass potentials.
  3. [Results, 'At a Carbon Price of 100 EUR/tCO2...' and Fig 4] The long-term price elasticity of gas demand is reported as -1.33, derived by quadratic interpolation between model runs at 50 bcm steps and a tangent at the reference gas price of 24.6 EUR/MWh. The value is compared with empirical estimates such as -0.57, with the difference attributed to omitted frictions. Given that this elasticity is used to argue that autarky is cost-optimal at 30 EUR/MWh and that LNG import dependence persists only below ~25 EUR/MWh, the sensitivity of this threshold to the interpolation method and to the step size should be shown. A simple check would be to recompute the parabolas using the 25 bcm step results that the paper says were generated, rather than only every 50 bcm.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig 21 vs Fig 22] Numbers are inconsistent: Fig 21 says gas is assumed to meet '996 of 1514 TWh', Fig 22 shows a total of 1198 TWh of gas-attributed heat, and the Methods text says 'around 1,300 TWh'. Please reconcile these figures and specify whether the difference is due to feedstock, aggregation, or rounding.
  2. [Methods, last paragraph] Typo: 'conventation' should be 'conventions'. Also 'chose' is unnecessarily informal; consider 'we use a conversion factor of 10 TWh/bcm'.
  3. [Introduction, paragraph 2] Typo: 'asssess' should be 'assess'.
  4. [Throughout] Monetary amounts are typeset inconsistently: '16bnEUR/a', '16 bne/a', '5 bne/a', 'e10 bn/a', 'e4–10 bn', '~710 bne'. Please use a single notation (e.g., EUR bn/a) and ensure the unit is defined at first use.
  5. [Fig 5 caption] The caption states 'Each network has around 146,000 bus–snapshot pairs' but the main text says '~146,000' in one place and the violin plot shows many more samples. Clarify whether the 146,000 refers to a subset (e.g., low-voltage buses only) and explain the sampling in the caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: headline costs, shadow prices, and marginal-price results are model outputs from stated cost/technology assumptions; the industry-heat mapping is a disclosed assumption and sensitivity issue, not a fitted or self-referential prediction.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, the paper's load-bearing results are computed, not imported or constructed from the quantities they are said to predict. The headline extra costs (5 bn/a for No-LNG, 16 bn/a for autarky) are differences in the LP objective between runs with an equality constraint on fossil gas supply; the constraint is exogenous and the cost-minimizing response is a genuine model output. Gas shadow prices and the marginal electricity price distributions are dual variables from the same optimization, and the battery-opportunity-cost mechanism is supported both by the model's own Fig. 5 and by prior published work, including the self-cited [63]; the citation is explanatory rather than the sole load-bearing evidence. The long-run elasticity of about -1.33 is computed from the model's response to an exogenously varied gas price using the textbook arc definition, not fitted to a target. The industry heat temperature-band mapping is the least certain input: the paper explicitly says 'We cannot know in which temperature band gas heating is deployed' and bases its assumption on gas supplying the hottest end of each process. This is an assumption that affects the sectoral ordering and cost estimates, and the Limitations section concedes that neglecting steam-versus-kiln process characteristics 'could misrepresent the true cost of alternatives.' But this is an uncertainty/robustness caveat, not circularity: the model could in principle return a different ordering under a different mapping, and the paper does not redefine its conclusions in terms of the mapping. External anchors—JRC IDEES, DEA technology data, ENSPRESO biomass potentials, Eurostat/ODYSSEE heat mixes, and published LCOH comparisons—provide independent grounding. Self-citations to PyPSA-Eur and related work refer to open-source, reproducible code and publicly available results, and no uniqueness theorem or hidden ansatz is smuggled in via a self-citation. No circular step meets the standard of Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction or fitted parameter renamed as prediction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central numbers rest on chosen scenario parameters (gas price, carbon price), a novel but unvalidated mapping of gas onto industrial heat temperature bands, a load-following constraint on building heat, and a single weather year. These are mostly disclosed, but they are not all stress-tested.

free parameters (4)
  • Baseline fossil gas price = 24.6 EUR/MWh
    Exogenous uniform commodity price for all gas; directly sets system costs and the gas-price thresholds in Fig 4. Chosen to reflect post-2022 regime, not fitted, but load-bearing.
  • Carbon price = 100 EUR/tCO2
    Applied in all scenarios; aligns electrification with gas phase-out. Authors note results are conditional on carbon pricing expanding to uncovered sectors.
  • H2 direct-firing investment cost = 151 EUR/kW_in (10x gas direct firing)
    Own estimate with no established reference (Table 1); affects the cost of displacing >500C industry heat and hence deep phase-out costs.
  • Distribution-grid connection surcharge for heat pumps = +500 EUR/kW_el
    Added to heat-pump CAPEX (Fig 11); a modeling assumption that affects building-heat phase-out costs.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Most industry heat currently supplied by gas, biomass and waste heat is treated as generic; only the temperature band determines available technologies.
    Methods 'Industry Heat Demand'; ignores process-specific heat delivery (steam vs kiln), which the authors acknowledge in Limitations.
  • domain assumption Gas is assumed to meet the hottest temperature end of each industrial process's heat demand.
    Methods and Fig 21; cannot be verified from data; determines the ~50 bcm of <500C industry heat that is cheapest to displace.
  • domain assumption Urban individual and rural heating technologies are load-following, with partial load bounded by the relative heat load.
    Methods 'Building Heat Demand'; raises LCOH to 100-200 EUR/MWh and shapes which sector phases out gas first; the authors say this aligns with literature but it is a modeling constraint.
  • domain assumption Single weather year 2024 represents typical conditions.
    Methods and Limitations; heat-pump and renewable economics could shift with inter-annual weather variation; the authors claim 2024 is typical apart from a cold spell.
  • domain assumption Biomass and oil boiler capacity expansion in buildings is prohibited.
    Building heat methods; reflects health impacts and trends but pushes the model toward heat pumps; without it the phase-out ordering and cost might change.
  • standard math LP duality gives a close proxy for real market price formation.
    Methods 'Fossil Gas Supply Constraint and Gas Price' and ref [59]; used for all marginal-price and scarcity-rent interpretation.
  • domain assumption Retail prices are approximated by wholesale marginal prices; taxes and grid tariffs are only partially represented.
    Discussion and Limitations; the consumer-exposure estimates (8.7 bn per EUR/MWh) rely on nodal shadow prices and may not reflect real retail pass-through.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 27716 in / 21632 out tokens · 219512 ms · 2026-08-01T08:37:38.022124+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent price shocks have prompted calls to curb Europe's dependence on fossil gas imports, but the cost of this goal, and the consumer protection it affords, remain uncertain. Here we address this gap by imposing constraints on fossil gas supply in a European energy system model that co-optimises abatement across all gas uses at high spatio-temporal resolution. Cutting import reliance proves economically compelling: through savings in power generation and low-temperature heat in industry and buildings, Europe can halve its natural gas consumption for 16bnEUR/a, aligning demand with the continent's production capacity of 200 bcm. This extra system cost is comparable to what consumers spend today on a 2 EUR/MWh rise in gas import prices. However, this sovereignty alone does not shield consumers from global gas price volatility: we find that, even at a small share of the mix, gas remains dominant in shaping the marginal electricity price, leaving consumers exposed without additional policy measures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21048 by Iegor Riepin, Lukas Franken, Tom Brown.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: a Map of European gas infrastructure and supply pathways. b Supply and consumption split by country and sector. Consumption data from Eurostat [10, 11]; supply data from [12]; industrial site locations from [13, 14]. ESM studies fix industry gas phase-out exogenously [39], and fail to capture how gas scarcity drives up its value to the system, and hence its consumer price. Capturing this scarcity rent is a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: European energy system transformation pathways as annual fossil gas supply is constrained to different values ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Technology roll-out in cost-optimal No-LNG and Autarky scenarios relative to early 2020s uptake trends. Wind combines both on- and offshore installation. Note that solid biomass and electric options already supply heat to industry. The present figure refers only to the additional heat supply needed to displace demand currently met by gas. In both cases, no consistent trend has been observed over the past y… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: System cost under different fossil gas supply constraints and global [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Consumer cost markup during a gas-price hike, i.e., an increase in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Aggregate heating supply and demand for a model with 200 bcm gas consumption. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Cost-optimal nameplate capacities in the power sector for different levels of gas consumption. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison between model values and literature values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of gas boiler and heat pump Levelised Cost of Heat (LCOH) for different heat demands. From the left to right these heat pump technologies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Disaggregation of heat pump LCOHs across supply technologies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Comparison between system model (400 bcm/a gas consumption) with brownfield existing heat capacities against 2023 heat supply from various sources. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Distributions of daily power contributions (generation for gas tur [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Solid biomass and biogas balances for different levels of gas consumptions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Supply curve in the model for solid biomass, taken from the Medium [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Levelised costs of heat (LCOH) in different heat demands in the model. The uncertainty bands refer to the spread across the 50 regions in the network. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Impact on system cost, building heating and solid biomass use under 200 bcm gas use while constraining the share of industry heat that can be electrified. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Industry heat demand below 500◦C currently met by gas, by European country. 25 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Visualisation of mapping from industry heat demands to gas demand. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Annual production volumes for different industry sectors based on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Gas-attributed industry heat demand per temperature band. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Time-weighted average marginal prices for different commodities under a 200 bcm fossil gas supply constraint. [Higher prices in France in urban [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Composition of emissions under varying fossil gas supply constraints. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Installed heating capacities for all residential and service-sector heating, except district heating. The dataset used is from 2012 [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_25.png] view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: Capacity factors of renewables and, in the lower row, coefficients of performance for different kinds of heat pumps. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_26.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    URL:https://ec.e uropa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nrg_bal_s/default/t able, accessed 2026-05-25

    Eurostat, Simplified energy balances (nrg_bal_s), Online data code, European Commission, 2024. URL:https://ec.e uropa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nrg_bal_s/default/t able, accessed 2026-05-25

    2024

  2. [2]

    URL:https: //www.gov.uk/government/statistics/energy-consu mption-in-the-uk-2021

    Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, Energy Consumption in the UK (ECUK) 1970 to 2020, Tech- nical Report, UK Government, BEIS, 2021. URL:https: //www.gov.uk/government/statistics/energy-consu mption-in-the-uk-2021

    1970

  3. [3]

    URL:https://www

    Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, Exports of Norwegian oil and gas, norskpetroleum.no, 2024. URL:https://www. norskpetroleum.no/en/production-and-exports/expor ts-of-oil-and-gas/, Norway exports ∼30% of EU+UK gas consumption in 2024

    2024

  4. [4]

    Boccara, D

    G. Boccara, D. Hernandez Diaz, B. Heringa, O. Rolser, N. Sharma, T. Vahlenkamp, C. Xue, A balancing act: Se- curing European gas and power markets, McKinsey & Company (2023). URL:https://www.mckinsey.com/industr ies/oil-and-gas/our-insights/a-balancing-act-securing-e uropean-gas-and-power-markets, accessed: 2026-03-05

    2023

  5. [5]

    URL:https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/eu-natur al-gas

    Trading Economics, EU Natural Gas – TTF Gas Prices, 2026. URL:https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/eu-natur al-gas

    2026

  6. [6]

    Graichen, Wie gefährlich ist Deutschlands Gasab- hängigkeit wirklich?, 2026

    P. Graichen, Wie gefährlich ist Deutschlands Gasab- hängigkeit wirklich?, 2026. URL:https://steady.page/ de/climate-and-energy-blog/posts/5afee861-6b78-413 f-ab73-b07b5b57f22b, von Mauern und Windmühlen: Ein Energieblog (Steady)

    2026

  7. [7]

    Gillot, Endgame for gas dependence: Electrification and regional partnerships, 2026

    M. Gillot, Endgame for gas dependence: Electrification and regional partnerships, 2026. URL:https://strategicperspec tives.eu/a-credible-gas-endgame-for-europe-electrificati on-and-regional-partnerships/

    2026

  8. [8]

    Rosenow, War in the Middle East hands Europe another chance to break its fossil fuel dependency, Nature Energy (2026)

    J. Rosenow, War in the Middle East hands Europe another chance to break its fossil fuel dependency, Nature Energy (2026). doi:10.1038/s41560-026-02048-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41560-026-02048-z 2026

  9. [9]

    Zwickl-Bernhard, C

    S. Zwickl-Bernhard, C. K. Chyong, A. Creti, A. Neumann, J. Rosenow, Closure of the Strait of Hormuz fuels Europe’s natural-gas trilemma, One Earth 9 (2026) 101717. doi:10.1 016/j.oneear.2026.101717, commentary. 13

    arXiv 2026

  10. [10]

    URL:https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ databrowser/view/nrg_cb_gasm/default/table, inland consumption (IC_OBS), natural gas (G3000), TJ (GCV)

    Eurostat, Supply, transformation and consumption of gas – monthly data (nrg_cb_gasm), Online data code, European Commission, 2024. URL:https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ databrowser/view/nrg_cb_gasm/default/table, inland consumption (IC_OBS), natural gas (G3000), TJ (GCV). Ac- cessed 2026-06-02

    2024

  11. [11]

    URL:https://ec.e uropa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nrg_bal_c/default/t able, sectoral natural-gas demand split (power, buildings, industry)

    Eurostat, Complete energy balances (nrg_bal_c), Online data code, European Commission, 2024. URL:https://ec.e uropa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nrg_bal_c/default/t able, sectoral natural-gas demand split (power, buildings, industry). Accessed 2026-06-02

    2024

  12. [12]

    URL:https://www.oxfordenergy.org /publications/quarterly-gas-review-29/

    Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, Quarterly Gas Review – Issue 29, Quarterly Gas Review 29, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 2024. URL:https://www.oxfordenergy.org /publications/quarterly-gas-review-29/

    2024

  13. [13]

    Hotmaps project, Industrial sites – industrial database, Open dataset, GitLab, 2019. URL:https://gitlab.com/hotma ps/industrial_sites/industrial_sites_Industrial_Database, locations and emissions of energy-intensive industrial sites (chemicals, refineries, iron and steel, cement). Accessed 2026-06-02

    2019

  14. [14]

    Data available under the Open Database License (ODbL)

    OpenStreetMap contributors, OpenStreetMap,https://ww w.openstreetmap.org, 2024. Data available under the Open Database License (ODbL)

    2024

  15. [15]

    European Commission, REPowerEU Plan, Communica- tion COM(2022) 230 final, European Commission, Brussels,

    2022

  16. [16]

    URL:https: //eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX: 52021DC0550

    European Commission, ‘Fit for 55’: delivering the EU’s 2030 Climate Target on the way to climate neutrality, Com- munication from the Commission to the European Par- liament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM(2021) 550 final, European Commission, Brussels, 2021. URL:https: //eur-lex.europa.eu/lega...

    2030

  17. [17]

    URL:https://ec.europa.eu/commission/pr esscorner/detail/en/ip_25_2860

    European Commission, EU agrees to permanently stop Russian gas imports and phase out Russian oil, Press release IP/25/2860, 2025. URL:https://ec.europa.eu/commission/pr esscorner/detail/en/ip_25_2860

    2025

  18. [18]

    Corsoni-Husain, A

    A. Corsoni-Husain, A. Lanitis, EU publishes Regulation phasing out Russian gas and oil imports, Harneys Regula- tory Blog, 2026. URL:https://www.harneys.com/our-blogs /regulatory/eu-publishes-regulation-phasing-out-russian -gas-and-oil-imports/

    2026

  19. [19]

    URL:https://energy.ec.europa.eu/publ ications/accelerateeu-energy-union-affordable-and-sec ure-energy-through-accelerated-action_en

    European Commission, AccelerateEU – Energy Union: Af- fordable and Secure Energy through Accelerated Action, Communication COM(2026) 370 final, European Commis- sion, Brussels, 2026. URL:https://energy.ec.europa.eu/publ ications/accelerateeu-energy-union-affordable-and-sec ure-energy-through-accelerated-action_en

    2026

  20. [20]

    European Parliament and Council of the European Union, Directive (EU) 2023/959 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 amending Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission al- lowance trading within the Union and Decision (EU) 2015/1814 concerning the establishment and operation of a market stability reserve...

    2023

  21. [21]

    SI 2020/1265

    UK Government, The greenhouse gas emissions trading scheme order 2020,https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2 020/9780348209761/contents, 2020. SI 2020/1265

    2020

  22. [22]

    URL: https://www.ceer.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/RES_s tatus_review_2022_2023_C24-RES-84-05_final.pdf

    Council of European Energy Regulators, Status Review of Renewable Support Schemes in Europe for 2022 and 2023, CEER Report C24-RES-84-05, CEER, Brussels, 2025. URL: https://www.ceer.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/RES_s tatus_review_2022_2023_C24-RES-84-05_final.pdf

    2022

  23. [23]

    European Heat Pump Association, Subsidies for residential heat pumps in Europe, Technical Report, EHPA, Brussels,

  24. [24]

    URL:https://www

    International Energy Agency, Europe’s energy crisis: What factors drove the record fall in natural gas demand in 2022?, Commentary, IEA, Paris, 2023. URL:https://www. iea.org/commentaries/europes-energy-crisis-what-facto rs-drove-the-record-fall-in-natural-gas-demand-in-2022, sectoral decomposition of the 13% drop in EU gas demand in 2022 across power, bu...

    2022

  25. [25]

    Madeddu, F

    S. Madeddu, F. Ueckerdt, M. Pehl, J. Peterseim, M. Lord, K. A. Kumar, C. Krüger, G. Luderer, The CO 2 reduction potential for the European industry via direct electrification of heat supply (power-to-heat), Environmental Research Letters 15 (2020) 124004. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abbd02

    doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abbd02 2020

  26. [26]

    Rosslowe, N

    C. Rosslowe, N. Fulghum, B. Petrovich, et al., European Electricity Review 2025, Technical Report, Ember, Brussels,

    2025

  27. [27]

    URL:https://www.iea.org/reports/electricity-2026

    International Energy Agency, Electricity 2026: Analysis and Forecast to 2027, Technical Report, IEA, Paris, 2026. URL:https://www.iea.org/reports/electricity-2026

    2026

  28. [28]

    URL: https://www.ehpa.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/EHP A-Market-Report-2025-executive-summary.pdf

    European Heat Pump Association, European Heat Pump Market and Statistics Report 2025, Technical Report, Euro- pean Heat Pump Association (EHPA), Brussels, 2025. URL: https://www.ehpa.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/EHP A-Market-Report-2025-executive-summary.pdf. 14

    2025

  29. [29]

    URL:https://www.iea.org/reports/the-future-of-heat-pum ps

    International Energy Agency, The Future of Heat Pumps, Technical Report, International Energy Agency, Paris, 2022. URL:https://www.iea.org/reports/the-future-of-heat-pum ps

    2022

  30. [30]

    Rehfeldt, S

    M. Rehfeldt, S. Bußmann, T. Fleiter, J. Rissman, Direct electrification of industrial process heat: An assessment of technologies, potentials and future prospects for the EU, Study, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2024. URL:https://www. agora-industry.org, on behalf of Agora Industry

    2024

  31. [31]

    Odenweller, F

    A. Odenweller, F. Ueckerdt, The green hydrogen ambition and implementation gap, Nature Energy 10 (2025) 110–123

    2025

  32. [32]

    URL:https://www

    International Energy Agency, Global Hydrogen Review 2024, Technical Report, IEA, Paris, 2024. URL:https://www. iea.org/reports/global-hydrogen-review-2024

    2024

  33. [33]

    URL:https://www.irena

    IRENA, Methanol Institute, Innovation Outlook: Renew- able Methanol, Technical Report, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi, 2021. URL:https://www.irena. org/publications/2021/Jan/Innovation-Outlook-Renewab le-Methanol

    2021

  34. [34]

    Energy Information Administration, Hydrogen for refineries is increasingly provided by industrial suppliers, Today in Energy, 2015

    U.S. Energy Information Administration, Hydrogen for refineries is increasingly provided by industrial suppliers, Today in Energy, 2015. URL:https://www.eia.gov/todayine nergy/detail.php?id=24612

    2015

  35. [35]

    URL:https://www.iea

    International Energy Agency, The Future of Petrochem- icals: Towards more sustainable plastics and fertilisers, Technical Report, IEA, Paris, 2018. URL:https://www.iea. org/reports/the-future-of-petrochemicals

    2018

  36. [36]

    Fehrenbach, M

    H. Fehrenbach, M. Pehnt, Biomethane in Europe, Tech- nical Report, Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung Heidelberg (ifeu), Heidelberg, Germany, 2022. URL:https: //www.ifeu.de/fileadmin/uploads/ifeu_ECF_biomethane_ EU_final_01.pdf

    2022

  37. [37]

    URL:https://www.agor a-energiewende.org/publications/breaking-free-from-fos sil-gas

    Agora Energiewende, Breaking Free from Fossil Gas: A New Path to a Climate-Neutral Europe, Technical Report, Agora Energiewende, Berlin, 2023. URL:https://www.agor a-energiewende.org/publications/breaking-free-from-fos sil-gas

    2023

  38. [38]

    URL:https: //www.agora-industry.org/publications/the-business-cas e-for-electrifying-industrial-heat

    Agora Industry, Agora Energiewende, Fraunhofer ISI, ECCO Think Tank, Reform Institut, The business case for electrifying industrial heat: Evidence from selected EU Member States, Technical Report, Agora Industry and Agora Energiewende, Berlin, Germany, 2026. URL:https: //www.agora-industry.org/publications/the-business-cas e-for-electrifying-industrial-heat

    2026

  39. [39]

    T. T. Pedersen, E. K. Gøtske, A. Dvorak, G. B. Andresen, M. Victoria, Long-term implications of reduced gas imports on the decarbonization of the European energy system, Joule 6 (2022) 1566–1580. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2022.06.023

    doi:10.1016/j.joule.2022.06.023 2022

  40. [40]

    Jewell, V

    J. Jewell, V. Vinichenko, D. McCollum, N. Bauer, K. Riahi, T. Aboumahboub, O. Fricko, M. Harmsen, T. Kober, V. Krey, et al., Comparison and interactions between the long-term pursuit of energy independence and climate policies, Na- ture Energy 1 (2016) 16073

    2016

  41. [41]

    URL:https://www.ise.fraunhofer .de/en/press-media/press-releases/2023/net-electricity-g eneration-in-germany-in-2022-significant-increase-in-g eneration-from-wind-and-pv.html

    Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE, Net electricity generation in Germany in 2022: Significant in- crease in generation from wind and PV, Press release, Fraun- hofer ISE, Freiburg, 2023. URL:https://www.ise.fraunhofer .de/en/press-media/press-releases/2023/net-electricity-g eneration-in-germany-in-2022-significant-increase-in-g eneration-fr...

    2022

  42. [42]

    Hafner, G

    M. Hafner, G. Luciani, Italy and its North African gas interconnections, Energy Comment, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 2023. URL:https://www.oxfordenergy.o rg/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Italy-and-its-N orth-African-gas-interconnections.pdf, TransMed and Greenstream capacities. Accessed: 2026-05-25

    2023

  43. [43]

    URL:https://www.tap-ag.com/ infrastructure-operation/how-tap-operates, operational capacity 10 bcm/a, expandable to 20 bcm/a; +1.2 bcm/a from January 2026

    Trans Adriatic Pipeline AG, How TAP operates, TAP AG corporate website, 2026. URL:https://www.tap-ag.com/ infrastructure-operation/how-tap-operates, operational capacity 10 bcm/a, expandable to 20 bcm/a; +1.2 bcm/a from January 2026. Accessed: 2026-05-25

    2026

  44. [44]

    L. M. Pastore, G. Lo Basso, L. de Santoli, Towards a dra- matic reduction in the European natural gas consumption: Italy as a case study, Journal of Cleaner Production 369 (2022) 133377. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133377

    arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    Hörsch, F

    J. Hörsch, F. Hofmann, D. Schlachtberger, T. Brown, PyPSA-Eur: An open optimisation model of the European transmission system, Energy Strategy Reviews 22 (2018) 207–215

    2018

  46. [46]

    Brown, D

    T. Brown, D. Schlachtberger, A. Kies, S. Schramm, M. Greiner, Synergies of sector coupling and transmis- sion reinforcement in a cost-optimised, highly renewable European energy system, Energy 160 (2018) 720–739

    2018

  47. [47]

    Neumann, E

    F. Neumann, E. Zeyen, M. Victoria, T. Brown, The poten- tial role of a hydrogen network in Europe, Joule 7 (2023) 1793–1817. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2023.06.016

    doi:10.1016/j.joule.2023.06.016 2023

  48. [48]

    Nikas, N

    A. Nikas, N. Frilingou, C. Heussaff, P. Fragkos, S. Mittal, J. Sampedro, S. Giarola, J.-P. Sasse, L. Rinaldi, H. Doukas, et al., Three different directions in which the European Union could replace Russian natural gas, Energy 290 (2024) 130254

    2024

  49. [49]

    Millinger, F

    M. Millinger, F. Hedenus, E. Zeyen, F. Neumann, L. Re- ichenberg, G. Berndes, Diversity of biomass usage path- ways to achieve emissions targets in the European energy system, Nature Energy 10 (2025) 226–242

    2025

  50. [50]

    Glaum, F

    P. Glaum, F. Neumann, M. Millinger, T. Brown, A minimal methanol backstop for high-electrification scenarios, Joule (2026) 102464. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2026.102464. 15

    arXiv 2026

  51. [51]

    E. D. Vicente, C. A. Alves, An overview of particulate emis- sions from residential biomass combustion, Atmospheric Research 199 (2018) 159–185. doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2017. 08.027

    work page doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2017 2018

  52. [52]

    P. P. Altermatt, J. Clausen, H. Brendel, C. Breyer, C. Ger- hards, C. Kemfert, U. Weber, M. Wright, Replacing gas boilers with heat pumps is the fastest way to cut German gas consumption, Communications Earth & Environment 4 (2023) 56

    2023

  53. [53]

    URL:https://www

    International Energy Agency, Levelized cost of heating (LCOH) for consumers, for selected space and water heat- ing technologies and countries, 2021. URL:https://www. iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/levelized-cost-of-h eating-lcoh-for-consumers-for-selected-space-and-w ater-heating-technologies-and-countries, chart only; methodology not fully documente...

    2021

  54. [54]

    Ember, A power sector analysis of the draft national en- ergy and climate plans (NECPs), Dataset and report, 2024. URL:https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/draft-nec ps-put-eu-shortofrepowereu/, country-level installed ca- pacity and generation targets for 2025, 2030, 2040 and 2050 extracted from EU Member States’ draft updated NECPs

    2024

  55. [55]

    Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, Clean Power 2030 Action Plan: A New Era of Clean Electric- ity, Technical Report, UK Government, London, 2024. URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/clean-p ower-2030-action-plan/clean-power-2030-action-plan-a -new-era-of-clean-electricity-main-report, 2030 capac- ity ranges: solar PV 45–47 GW; onshor...

    2030

  56. [56]

    URL:https://www.ceer.eu/wp -content/uploads/2024/05/ACER-Market-Monitoring-Rep ort-2020-Gas-Wholesale-Markets-Volume.pdf

    ACER, CEER, Annual Report on the Results of Monitor- ing the Internal Electricity and Natural Gas Markets in 2020 – Gas Wholesale Markets Volume, Technical Report, European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators, Ljubljana, 2021. URL:https://www.ceer.eu/wp -content/uploads/2024/05/ACER-Market-Monitoring-Rep ort-2020-Gas-Wholesale-Markets-Volume.pdf

    2020

  57. [57]

    D. Tong, Q. Zhang, Y. Zheng, K. Caldeira, C. Shearer, C. Hong, Y. Qin, S. J. Davis, Committed emissions from ex- isting energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5◦C climate target, Nature 572 (2019) 373–377

    2019

  58. [58]

    Zwickl-Bernhard, A

    S. Zwickl-Bernhard, A. Creti, A. Neumann, The EU’s CBAM trinity in LNG supply: Modeling global trade flows, supply risks and upstream emissions, Energy Economics 157 (2026) 109252. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109252

    arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    S. Boyd, L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization, Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004. See Ch. 5 on duality and Ch. 5.6 on perturbation and sensitivity analysis

    2004

  60. [60]

    Labandeira, J

    X. Labandeira, J. M. Labeaga, X. López-Otero, A meta- analysis on the price elasticity of energy demand, Energy Policy 102 (2017) 549–568. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.002

    doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.002 2017

  61. [61]

    Zakeri, I

    B. Zakeri, I. Staffell, P. E. Dodds, M. Grubb, P. Ekins, J. Jääskeläinen, S. Cross, K. Helin, G. Castagneto Gissey, The role of natural gas in setting electricity prices in Eu- rope, Energy Reports 10 (2023) 2778–2792. doi:10.1016/j.eg yr.2023.09.069

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eg 2023

  62. [62]

    Schittekatte, C

    T. Schittekatte, C. Batlle, Power Crisis in the EU 3.0: Pro- posals to Complete Long-Term Markets, CEEPR Working Paper 2023-04, MIT Center for Energy and Environmen- tal Policy Research, Cambridge, MA, 2023. URL:https: //ceepr.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/MIT-CEE PR-WP-2023-04.pdf

    2023

  63. [63]

    Brown, F

    T. Brown, F. Neumann, I. Riepin, Price formation without fuel costs: The interaction of demand elasticity with storage bidding, Energy Economics 147 (2025) 108483

    2025

  64. [64]

    J. Geis, M. Lindner, T. Brown, Managing the mismatch: The role of flexibility on the path to a carbon-neutral energy system, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.00674 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  65. [65]

    Salmon, O

    N. Salmon, O. Alšauskas, S. Harmsen, S. Bouckaert, The energy crisis creates even stronger impetus for EU electri- fication, IEA Commentary, International Energy Agency, Paris, 2026. URL:https://www.iea.org/commentaries/the-e nergy-crisis-creates-even-stronger-impetus-for-eu-elect rification, licence: CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-06-14

    2026

  66. [66]

    Arlia, J

    D. Arlia, J. Hutchinson, Drivers of electricity prices across households and energy-intensive industries and their im- portance for the EU’s decarbonisation objectives, in: ECB Economic Bulletin, 1, European Central Bank, 2026. URL: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/economic-bulletin/fo cus/2026/html/ecb.ebbox202601_02~a552b71378.en.html, published 17 February 2026

    2026

  67. [67]

    Schittekatte, I

    T. Schittekatte, I. Momber, L. Meeus, Future-proof tar- iff design: Recovering sunk grid costs in a world where consumers are pushing back, Energy Economics 70 (2018) 484–498. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2018.01.028

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2018.01.028 2018

  68. [68]

    URL:https://energy.mit.edu/wp-content /uploads/2016/12/Utility-of-the-Future-Full-Report.pdf, principal investigators: I

    MIT Energy Initiative, Utility of the Future: An MIT En- ergy Initiative Response to an Industry in Transition, Tech- nical Report, MIT Energy Initiative and IIT-Comillas, Cam- bridge, MA, 2016. URL:https://energy.mit.edu/wp-content /uploads/2016/12/Utility-of-the-Future-Full-Report.pdf, principal investigators: I. Pérez-Arriaga and C. Knittel

    2016

  69. [69]

    URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=C ELEX:52025XC06703, Brussels, 10 December 2025

    European Commission, Commission notice — guidance on efficient and timely grid connections, Official Journal of the European Union, CELEX:52025XC06703, 2025. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=C ELEX:52025XC06703, Brussels, 10 December 2025

    2025

  70. [70]

    Cremona, Crossed Wires: Grid Capacity Could Block EU Energy Security, Technical Report, Ember, 2026

    E. Cremona, Crossed Wires: Grid Capacity Could Block EU Energy Security, Technical Report, Ember, 2026. URL: https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/crossed-wires-g rid-capacity-could-block-eu-energy-security/, accessed: 2026-04-15. 16

    2026

  71. [71]

    URL:https://www.eure lectric.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/From-Backlog-t o-Breakthrough-Managing-Connection-Queues-in-Distr ibution-Networks.cleaned.pdf

    Eurelectric, From Backlog to Breakthrough: Managing Connection Queues in Distribution Networks, Technical Report, Eurelectric, Brussels, 2025. URL:https://www.eure lectric.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/From-Backlog-t o-Breakthrough-Managing-Connection-Queues-in-Distr ibution-Networks.cleaned.pdf

    2025

  72. [72]

    URL:https://www

    German Emissions Trading Authority (DEHSt), Umwelt- bundesamt, Relief for small emitters 2026 to 2030, Deutsche Emissionshandelsstelle (DEHSt), 2024. URL:https://www. dehst.de/EN/Topics/EU-ETS-1/Stationary/Small-Emitters -2026-2030/small-emitters-2026-2030_node.html, national Art. 27 implementation: installations below 15,000 t CO2- eq in each of 2021–202...

    2026

  73. [73]

    European Commission, Directorate-General for Climate Action, ETS2: buildings, road transport and additional sec- tors, European Commission, Climate Action, 2026. URL: https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/carbon-markets/e ts2-buildings-road-transport-and-additional-sectors_en, upstream cap-and-trade: the surrender obligation falls on fuel suppliers, not ...

    2026

  74. [74]

    URL:https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/ho w-to-install-more-heat-pumps-insights-from-a-surve y-of-heating-engineers/

    Nesta, How to Install More Heat Pumps: Insights from a Survey of Heating Engineers, Technical Report, Nesta, London, 2024. URL:https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/ho w-to-install-more-heat-pumps-insights-from-a-surve y-of-heating-engineers/

    2024

  75. [75]

    URL:https://ehpa.org/news-and-resources/press-releases/ dutch-heat-pump-industry-responds-to-cancellation-o f-2026-legislation/

    European Heat Pump Association, Dutch heat pump in- dustry responds to cancellation of 2026 legislation, Press release, European Heat Pump Association (EHPA), 2024. URL:https://ehpa.org/news-and-resources/press-releases/ dutch-heat-pump-industry-responds-to-cancellation-o f-2026-legislation/

    2026

  76. [76]

    Victoria, K

    M. Victoria, K. Zhu, T. Brown, G. B. Andresen, M. Greiner, Early decarbonisation of the European energy system pays off, Nature Communications 11 (2020) 6223. doi:10.1038/s4 1467-020-20015-4

    doi:10.1038/s4 2020

  77. [77]

    Ruhnau, C

    O. Ruhnau, C. Stiewe, J. Muessel, L. Hirth, Natural gas savings in Germany during the 2022 energy crisis, Nature Energy 8 (2023) 621–628. doi:10.1038/s41560-023-01260-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41560-023-01260-5 2022

  78. [78]

    P. Ruiz, W. Nijs, D. Tarvydas, A. Sgobbi, A. Zucker, R. Pilli, R. Jonsson, A. Camia, C. Thiel, C. Hoyer-Klick, F. Dalla Longa, T. Kober, J. Badger, P. Volker, B. S. Elbersen, A. Brosowski, D. Thrän, ENSPRESO – an open, EU-28 wide, transparent and coherent database of wind, solar and biomass energy potentials, Energy Strategy Reviews 26 (2019) 100379. doi:...

    arXiv 2019

  79. [79]

    Brown, J

    T. Brown, J. Hörsch, D. Schlachtberger, PyPSA: Python for power system analysis, arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.09913 (2017)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  80. [80]

    Rózsai, M

    M. Rózsai, M. Jaxa-Rozen, R. Salvucci, P. Sikora, J. Tattini, F. Neuwahl, JRC-IDEES-2021: the Integrated Database of the European Energy System — Data update and technical documentation, JRC Technical Report JRC137809, Publi- cations Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2024. doi:10.2760/614599

    work page doi:10.2760/614599 2021

Showing first 80 references.