Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 7 minor 102 references

Workshop data from XSPECT reveal burst, pulse, and state-change science

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 07:37 UTC pith:JLSLUPND

load-bearing objection Workshop report that honestly demonstrates XSPECT's basic science utility; mostly confirmatory results with a real calibration caveat, but solid and worth referee time as an instrument-community record. the 5 major comments →

arxiv 2607.21365 v1 pith:JLSLUPND submitted 2026-07-23 astro-ph.HE

Importance and Science Outcomes from the first XSPECT/XPoSat Workshop

Anuj Nandi , Rwitika Chatterjee , V. P. Shyam Prakash , Ankur Kushwaha , M. C. Ramadevi , Kiran M. Jayasurya , Vivek K. Agrawal , M. Varun
show 44 more authors
Karan Akbari Arya Sudhakaran Daneshwar Bhandari Vishal Kale Vishal Jadoliya Suchismito Chattopadhyay Sakshi Maurya Swasthik Visakh S Debasish Krishnatreya M Dhamodhar Reddy Akash Agarwal Giridharan L. Meghamani Halder Juris N. J. Athira Mohanan P. Majumder Arbind Pradhan Deblina Lahiri Abhishek Jhala Garima Tyagi Abhisek Tamang Akshara S B P Aromal Sreetama Das Choudhury Sunirmal Rana Ajith Balu Mary Bosco Jeyaraman Ilangovan Shivani Chaudhary Bhranti Rao Biyas Chowdhury Joysankar Majumdar Sanjeeva Rao Prattipati Subhasish Das Sandip Naskar Swapnil Singh Vaishali S Koushal Vadodariya Radhakrishna Vatedka Anurag Tyagi Sachin Narang Prapti Mittal Madhu K V Brindavan Mahto
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords XSPECTXPoSatX-ray binariesneutron starsblack holesspectral analysistiming analysisType I X-ray bursts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reports the first workshop in which researchers outside the instrument team analyzed data from XSPECT, a soft X-ray timing and spectroscopy payload on the XPoSat mission. Through seven group projects, the authors show that first-year XSPECT observations can track thermonuclear bursts, Z-shaped spectral tracks, orbital-phase state changes, pulsar spin modulation, and black-hole state transitions. The central claim is that XSPECT is scientifically productive across neutron-star low-mass X-ray binaries, accreting pulsars, and black-hole X-ray binaries, and that the collaborative training format effectively builds an analysis community. If correct, the paper offers a working model both for extracting science from XSPECT and for training analysts for future space-astronomy missions.

Core claim

The paper's central claim, on its own terms, is that XSPECT data from the first year of operations can support end-to-end spectral and timing analysis that yields recognizable astrophysical results. Using calibrated responses and background products, workshop teams measured a Type-I X-ray burst in Aql X-1 and inferred a neutron-star radius of 9.94 ± 1.56 km; traced Sco X-1 around its full Z-track with spectral softening from horizontal to normal branch; detected hard-to-soft state transitions in Cir X-1 tied to orbital phase; measured spin periods and phase-dependent absorption in GX 301-2 and Vela X-1; and followed Cyg X-1 toward a softer intermediate state while Cyg X-3 remained intermedia

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is XSPECT itself: a collimated 0.8–15 keV spectrometer with sixteen swept-charge devices, about 180 eV resolution at 6 keV, 1 ms timing, and both ground and on-board calibration anchored by supernova-remnant and Crab observations. Around it sits the analysis chain the paper describes: Level-1 screening to Level-2 event files, barycentric correction, field-of-view-wise spectra and light curves, instrument response files, blank-sky background products, and the workshop structure that handed these tools to seven trainee teams. That combination of calibrated instrument, software pipeline, and mentored group projects is what carries the argument that the reported results a

Load-bearing premise

The whole set of results rests on the assumption that XSPECT's instrument response and blank-sky background model are accurate enough that fitted parameters like the neutron-star radius and branch-dependent temperatures reflect the sources rather than unmodeled detector systematics.

What would settle it

Compare XSPECT's Aql X-1 burst spectrum and its inferred radius with spectra of the same burst taken by an independent soft X-ray observatory; if the recovered radius differs by much more than the quoted 1.56 km uncertainty, or if the spectral residuals near 1.5 and 1.8 keV vanish when the response is recalibrated, then the science outcomes are contaminated by response or background systematics.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • XSPECT can place constraints on neutron-star structure: the Aql X-1 Type-I burst, fitted with a neutron-star atmosphere model, yields a radius consistent with canonical neutron stars, and similar bursts should be usable for radius and mass measurement.
  • The full Z-track coverage of Sco X-1 shows that XSPECT's soft band can separate horizontal, normal, and flaring branches and track the accretion-rate-driven spectral changes along them.
  • Orbital phase-resolved analysis of Cir X-1 and the pulsars shows the instrument can map accretion geometry changes such as eclipse phases, clumpy wind absorption, and spin-phase modulations in wind-fed systems.
  • The Cyg X-1 and Cyg X-3 results demonstrate the ability to follow black-hole state transitions and intermediate states using both Lorentzian timing features and spectral diagnostics.
  • The workshop model produces publishable science and direct feedback on the data-analysis software, implying a path for future early-access data events that broaden the user base.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Not claimed in the paper: if the calibration and background products hold up under independent scrutiny, the quoted neutron-star radius and Z-track parameter trends become testable physical claims that other teams could re-derive from the same first-year data to check for systematic offsets.
  • Not claimed in the paper: the workshop format is a reusable template for future Indian space-mission data releases, where a small mentored cohort gets early access, runs a complete pipeline, and returns software feedback before public release.
  • Not claimed in the paper: the absence of detected quasi-periodic oscillations in these short windows does not test XSPECT's timing ceiling; longer continuous exposures or a larger source sample would be needed to see whether the 1 ms resolution can recover kilohertz oscillations in bright Z-sources.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper reports on the first XSPECT/XPoSat data-analysis workshop, in which seven trainee teams used a few days of XSPECT observations for three NS-LMXBs (Aql X-1, Sco X-1, Cir X-1), two pulsars (GX 301-2, Vela X-1), and two BH-XRBs (Cyg X-1, Cyg X-3). It summarizes the XSPECT instrument, the data-reduction pipeline, and the spectral/timing results obtained by the teams. The central claim is that the workshop demonstrates XSPECT's scientific promise and the effectiveness of collaborative training for future Indian space-astronomy missions. The paper presents a large set of first-look results: a Type-I burst in Aql X-1 with an nsatmos radius estimate; Z-track spectral evolution in Sco X-1; orbital-phase spectral state changes in Cir X-1; spin-period and pulse-profile measurements in GX 301-2 and Vela X-1; a hard-to-soft-intermediate transition in Cyg X-1; and intermediate-state spectroscopy with multiple emission lines in Cyg X-3. Detailed spectral tables and figures are provided, and the data and software are made available through ISSDC/PRADAN.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper shows that XSPECT can produce scientifically useful spectral and timing measurements of bright X-ray binaries and that the workshop-based training model is effective for community building and for preparing early-career researchers. The paper has value as a compendium of first independent XSPECT results outside the instrument team, and the public availability of the pipeline and data is a credible strength. However, the quantitative astrophysical claims rest on the accuracy of XSPECT's spectral response and background subtraction, which are not independently validated in this manuscript. The paper also contains several internal inconsistencies in the quoted parameter values. The workshop's pedagogical value is not in question, but the scientific-outcome claim needs either stronger calibration cross-checks or clearer caveats.

major comments (5)
  1. [§6.2, §7.2, §7.6] The spectral models for Sco X-1 and Cyg X-1 include ad hoc edge components at ~1.5 keV and ~1.8 keV attributed to Al/Si detector features. The paper does not demonstrate that these edges are not residual response/background systematics. Because the quoted continuum parameters (Γ, kTin, kTe, normalizations) and the derived quantities (Aql X-1 nsatmos radius in §7.1, Sco X-1 branch spectral evolution in §7.2) depend on these fits, the central science-outcome claim is vulnerable to unrecognized instrument systematics. The authors should either (a) provide a cross-check with a simultaneous observation from an independent instrument (e.g., NICER, MAXI, or Insight-HXMT) for at least one source, or (b) include an explicit estimate of systematic uncertainty from the edge parameters and background. If neither is possible, the paper should be reframed as a demonstration of the data-reduction workf
  2. [§7.2 vs Table IV] The text states that the Sco X-1 photon index increases from 1.7 in HB to 1.83 in NB, but Table IV lists Γ = 1.90 ± 0.01 for NB. The same paragraph says the disk temperature varies between 0.7 and 0.8 keV, while Table IV gives kTin = 0.76, 0.85, and 0.62 keV for HB, NB, and FB, respectively. These discrepancies undermine the reported spectral evolution along the Z-track and must be reconciled.
  3. [§6.2, §7.7, Figure 18, §8] The Cyg X-3 emission-line energies are reported inconsistently. Section 6.2 lists Si at 1.89 keV, S XVI at 3.09 and 2.5 keV, and Fe at 6.61 keV; Figure 18's caption lists Si at 1.94 keV, S XVI at 3.15 and 2.51 keV; and Section 8 states Si at 2.74 keV. Additionally, Figure 18's caption shows 'S XVI1' twice. These line energies are part of the scientific results (wind reprocessing in Cyg X-3), so the correct values must be identified and used consistently.
  4. [§7.5 and Table IV] The text says 'the best-fit value of nH rises from the first day to the last day' for Vela X-1 over orbital phases 0.15–0.48, but Table IV lists Day-1 nH = 1.7, Day-2 nH = 1.5, and Day-3 nH = 3.7 (×10^22 cm^-2), which is not monotonic. The spectral model for Vela X-1 also appears to have a column mismatch in Table IV (no photon index or compST temperature column is visible for the Vela X-1 rows). Please correct the table and the trend statement.
  5. [§4.1 and §7.1] The distance to Aql X-1 is given as ~6 kpc in Section 4.1, but Section 7.1 states that the nsatmos radius of 9.94 ± 1.56 km is obtained 'assuming a distance of 4.1–5.9 kpc.' The derived radius depends directly on distance, so the adopted value and range need to be specified and made consistent between the source description and the result.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§6.1] The Cyg X-1 observations are described as being taken on '9th, 10th, 12th, and 13th September 2025,' but Table II and Section 4.3 give 2024. Please correct the year.
  2. [§5] The sentence 'Since starting operations in January 2024' is ambiguous — the paper earlier states that science operations began on 2024 March 9, with launch on January 1. Please clarify.
  3. [§7.7] The power-density-spectrum fit for Cyg X-3 is mentioned (power-law index ~1.6–1.7) but no PDS figure or table is shown. Please either display the PDS or note that this result is not shown.
  4. [§7.6, Table III] The statement that the PDS centroid frequency shifts to higher frequencies toward a softer state is supported by ν2 (1.72 → 2.80 Hz) but not by ν1 (0.16, 0.15, 0.21, 0.17 Hz). Please phrase the claim more precisely.
  5. [Figure 6 caption] The soft color is defined as (0.8–3.0 keV)/(3–6 keV) and hard color as (3–6 keV)/(6–12 keV). This definition is unconventional; please double-check that the ratios are not inverted.
  6. [§8] The text contains a typo: 'bolometric luminositNePy' should be 'bolometric luminosity.'
  7. [Table IV] The column header 'NH(pcfabs)' is not defined in the table caption. Please add a note explaining that it is the column density of the partial-covering absorber.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No material circularity: the paper reports first-look spectral/timing fits and compares them with external literature; self-citations are standard instrument-calibration practice and do not make the central claim self-defined.

full rationale

The paper's strongest claim is that XSPECT data and the workshop training yield scientifically plausible results (Abstract, Sec. 8). The derivation chain is: raw Level-1 events -> XSPECT screening/response/background tools -> spectral/timing models -> fitted parameters -> comparisons with prior literature. None of these steps defines an output quantity in terms of an input parameter of the same step. For example, the Aql X-1 radius (9.94 +/- 1.56 km, Sec. 7.1) comes from fitting nsatmos to burst spectra and is compared with theoretical/canonical NS radii; it is not the definition of any calibration quantity. The Sco X-1 branch evolution and Cyg X-1 kTin/kTe changes are free spectral-fit parameters, and the paper presents them as observations, not as predictions from a model built to produce them. The cited self-papers ([15], [86], [14], [61]) are instrument calibration and companion-analysis papers; they provide the response/background and detailed analysis support, but the paper does not use them as a 'uniqueness theorem' or as a substitute for its own empirical fits. The only noted weakness is the presence of ad hoc Al/Si edge components in Sco X-1 (Sec. 6.2, 7.2) and Cyg X-1 (Sec. 7.6) fits; these are additional fitted parameters, not quantities defined by construction, and the paper explicitly attributes them to detector edges. Without in-paper cross-checks such as simultaneous NICER/MAXI/Insight-HXMT comparisons, the astrophysical interpretation carries systematic uncertainty, but that is a correctness/robustness concern, not circularity. The paper is self-contained enough for a workshop summary: most quantitative claims are data fits with reported uncertainties, and the central conclusion is an inference from those fits, not an identity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new free parameters or entities are introduced; the paper's science rests on the instrument calibration, standard spectral models, and literature distances.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption XSPECT detector calibration (gain, ARF/RMF) and background subtraction are accurate.
    Invoked in §2 (calibration on Cas A/Tycho/Crab) and §5 (data reduction/background); all spectral results in §7 rely on these products.
  • domain assumption Standard X-ray spectral models (diskbb, nthcomp, nsatmos, compST, pcfabs, tbabs) are adequate descriptions of these sources in the 0.8–15 keV band.
    Used throughout §6.2; the physical parameters in Table IV (kTin, kTe, nH, etc.) are only meaningful if the model family is appropriate.
  • domain assumption Literature distances and masses are correct: Aql X-1 at 4.1–5.9 kpc, Sco X-1 at 2.8 kpc, Cyg X-1 at 21.2 M_sun and 2.22 kpc.
    Used in §7.1, §7.2, §7.6 to convert fitted fluxes to Eddington ratios and to infer the neutron-star radius.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 28155 in / 9878 out tokens · 93904 ms · 2026-08-01T07:37:59.366507+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper summarizes the science outcomes of the first Workshop on Data Analysis using observations from the XSPECT payload onboard the XPoSat, which brought together early-career researchers and experts to explore the instrument's scientific capabilities through lectures and hands-on analyses. Participants performed end-to-end data analysis, including calibration, spectral modeling, and timing studies, on seven sources comprising Neutron Star Low-Mass X-ray Binaries, pulsars, and Black Hole X-ray Binaries, demonstrating the instrument's scientific potential. The observations, obtained during the first year of XSPECT operations, together with in-house developed software, were provided to the participants, making them the first users outside the instrument team to analyze XSPECT data. For NS-LMXBs, Aql X-1 exhibited a classical Type-I X-ray burst, enabling constraints on the stellar radius through spectral fitting. Sco X-1, observed across its complete Z-track, revealed systematic spectral evolution driven by accretion-rate fluctuations and disk-corona coupling, while Cir X-1 displayed orbital phase-dependent transitions between hard and soft states, reflecting changes in accretion geometry. Among accretion-powered pulsars, GX 301-2 showed a double-peaked, energy-dependent pulse profile and strong iron fluorescence lines due to stellar wind reprocessing, whereas Vela X-1 exhibited orbital phase-dependent absorption and steady coronal temperatures. Among BH-XRBs, Cyg X-1 transitioned from a hard to soft-intermediate state with increasing disk contribution and spectral softening, while Cyg X-3 remained in the intermediate state with multiple emission lines originating from a clumpy stellar wind. The workshop outcomes highlight the scientific promise of XSPECT and the importance of collaborative training in maximizing the science from XSPECT and future Indian space astronomy missions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21365 by Abhisek Tamang, Abhishek Jhala, Ajith Balu, Akash Agarwal, Akshara S B, Ankur Kushwaha, Anuj Nandi, Anurag Tyagi, Arbind Pradhan, Arya Sudhakaran, Athira Mohanan, Bhranti Rao, Biyas Chowdhury, Brindavan Mahto, Daneshwar Bhandari, Debasish Krishnatreya, Deblina Lahiri, Garima Tyagi, Giridharan L., Jeyaraman Ilangovan, Joysankar Majumdar, Juris N. J., Karan Akbari, Kiran M. Jayasurya, Koushal Vadodariya, Madhu K V, Mary Bosco, M. C. Ramadevi, M Dhamodhar Reddy, Meghamani Halder, M. Varun, P Aromal, P. Majumder, Prapti Mittal, Radhakrishna Vatedka, Rwitika Chatterjee, Sachin Narang, Sakshi Maurya, Sandip Naskar, Sanjeeva Rao Prattipati, Shivani Chaudhary, Sreetama Das Choudhury, Subhasish Das, Suchismito Chattopadhyay, Sunirmal Rana, Swapnil Singh, Swasthik Visakh S, Vaishali S, Vishal Jadoliya, Vishal Kale, Vivek K. Agrawal, V. P. Shyam Prakash.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_17.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Agrawal, P. C. (2006). A broad spectral band Indian As- tronomy satellite ‘Astrosat’. Advances in Space Research, 38(12):2989–2994

    2006

  2. [2]

    SCDs have previously been flown on Chandrayaan-1 (C1XS; [30]), Chandrayaan-2 (CLASS; [63]), and Insight-HXMT (LE Telescope; [17])

    ABOUT XSPECT XSPECT is a collimated X-ray telescope, using Swept Charge Devices (SCDs; [47], [33]) as its detectors. SCDs have previously been flown on Chandrayaan-1 (C1XS; [30]), Chandrayaan-2 (CLASS; [63]), and Insight-HXMT (LE Telescope; [17]). The instrument is sensitive in the soft X-ray band, and provides moderate energy and tim- ing resolution. XSP...

  3. [3]

    MOTIV A TION OF THE WORKSHOP This workshop brought together young researchers and experts in the field of Astronomy to discuss the science capabilities of the XSPECT payload. The participants were grouped into seven teams, and each team was guided by the instrument team members through practical steps in analyzing XSPECT data, emphasizing both spectral an...

  4. [4]

    SOURCES: NS-LMXBS, PULSARS AND BH-XRBS Seven X-ray sources from three categories (NS- LMXBs: Aql X-1, Sco X-1, Cir X-1; X-ray Pulsars: Vela X-1 and GX 301-2; BH-XRBs: Cyg X-1 and Cyg X-

  5. [5]

    The details of the sources and observation are provided in the following subsections

    were considered, for seven projects identified for this workshop. The details of the sources and observation are provided in the following subsections. 4.1. NS-LMXBs •Aql X-1 is classified as an ‘Atoll’ source and consists of a neutron star accreting matter from a K-type low-mass companion star via Roche-lobe overflow ([18]). The system is situated at an ...

    1998

  6. [6]

    OBSER V A TION AND DA T A REDUCTION Since starting operations in January 2024, XSPECT has observed a wide range of X-ray sources, including NS-LMXBs, BH-XRBs, and Pulsars. This workshop uti- lizes XSPECT observations of three NS-LMXBs: Sco X-1 (50 days, 484 ks) Aql X-1 (8 days, 104 ks), and Cir X-1 (17 days, 261 ks); two pulsars: Vela X-1 (28 days, 408 ks...

    2024

  7. [7]

    T emporal Analysis Light curves were extracted with different bin sizes de- pending on the nature of the source

    ANAL YSIS AND MODELING 6.1. T emporal Analysis Light curves were extracted with different bin sizes de- pending on the nature of the source. For Aql X-1, 1 s binned light curve was generated as shown in the left panel of Figure 4. The soft (0.8−2.8 keV) and hard (2.8−15.0 keV) band light curves were generated to plot the HID (right panel of Figure 4). Sco...

    2025

  8. [8]

    Aql X-1 XSPECT observed Aql X–1 during the initial decay phase of its 2024 outburst

    RESUL TS AND DISCUSSION 7.1. Aql X-1 XSPECT observed Aql X–1 during the initial decay phase of its 2024 outburst. The X-ray lightcurve of Aql X–1 (right panel of Figure 4) indicates a relatively sta- ble persistent flux level during the observation with a single thermonuclear burst superimposed. The HID is plotted in the right panel of Figure 4. The therm...

    2024

  9. [9]

    SUMMAR Y AND CONCLUSION The XSPECT observations of the NS–LMXBs, namely, Aql X-1, Sco X-1, and Cir X-1 provide valuable in- sights into the diverse accretion and emission processes governing these systems. Aql X-1 exhibited persistent emission accompanied by a classical thermonuclear X-ray burst (type-I), confirming active accretion onto the neu- 16 T ABL...

    2019

  10. [10]

    Axelsson, M., Borgonovo, L., and Larsson, S. (2005). Evolution of the 0.01-25 Hz power spectral components in Cygnus X-1. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 438(3):999– 1012

    2005

  11. [11]

    E., Bhuvana, G

    Baby, B. E., Bhuvana, G. R., Radhika, D., Katoch, T., Mandal, S., and Nandi, A. (2021). Revealing the na- ture of the transient source MAXI J0637-430 through spectro-temporal analysis. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 508(2):2447–2457

    2021

  12. [12]

    Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Rybizki, J., Fouesneau, M., Dem- leitner, M., and Andrae, R. (2021). Estimating Distances from Parallaxes. V. Geometric and Photogeometric Dis- tances to 1.47 Billion Stars in Gaia Early Data Release

    2021

  13. [13]

    The Astrophysical Journal, 161(3):147

  14. [14]

    Belloni, T., Homan, J., Casella, P., van der Klis, M., Nespoli, E., Lewin, W. H. G., Miller, J. M., and M´ endez, M. (2005). The evolution of the timing properties of the black-hole transient GX 339-4 during its 2002/2003 outburst. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 440(1):207–222

    2005

  15. [15]

    H., Koh, D

    Bildsten, L., Chakrabarty, D., Chiu, J., Finger, M. H., Koh, D. T., Nelson, R. W., Prince, T. A., Rubin, B. C., Scott, D. M., Stollberg, M., Vaughan, B. A., Wilson, C. A., and Wilson, R. B. (1997). Observations of Ac- creting Pulsars. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement, 113(2):367–408

    1997

  16. [16]

    Bonnet-Bidaud, J. M. and Chardin, G. (1988). Cygnus x-3, a critical review. Physics Reports, 170(6):325–404

    1988

  17. [17]

    G., and Fender, R

    Boutloukos, S., van der Klis, M., Altamirano, D., Klein- Wolt, M., Wijnands, R., Jonker, P. G., and Fender, R. P. (2006). Discovery of Twin kHz QPOs in the Peculiar X-Ray Binary Circinus X-1. The Astrophysical Journal, 653(2):1435–1444

    2006

  18. [18]

    F., Fomalont, E

    Bradshaw, C. F., Fomalont, E. B., and Geldzahler, B. J. (1999). High-resolution parallax measurements of scor- pius x-1. The Astrophysical Journal, 512(2):L121

    1999

  19. [19]

    Campana, S., Coti Zelati, F., and D’Avanzo, P. (2013). Mining the Aql X-1 long-term X-ray light curve.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 432(2):1695– 1700

    2013

  20. [20]

    Casella, P., Altamirano, D., Patruno, A., Wijnands, R., and van der Klis, M. (2008). Discovery of Coher- ent Millisecond X-Ray Pulsations in Aquila X-1. The Astrophysical Journal Letter, 674(1):L41

    2008

  21. [21]

    Casella, P., Belloni, T., and Stella, L. (2006). A continuous flaring- to normal-branch transition in ¡AS- TROBJ¿Scorpius X-1¡/ASTROBJ¿. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 446(2):579–582

    2006

  22. [22]

    and Titarchuk, L

    Chakrabarti, S. and Titarchuk, L. G. (1995). Spectral Properties of Accretion Disks around Galactic and Extra- galactic Black Holes. The Astrophysical Journal, 455:623

    1995

  23. [23]

    K., Shyam Prakash, V

    Chatterjee, R., Agrawal, V. K., Shyam Prakash, V. P., Vadodariya, K., and Vatedka, R. (2026). Tracing the outburst decay of soft X-ray transients Aql X-1 and 4U 1608-52 with XSPECT. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

    2026

  24. [24]

    K., Tyagi, A., Jayasurya, K

    Chatterjee, R., Vadodariya, K., Vatedka, R., Agrawal, V. K., Tyagi, A., Jayasurya, K. M., P., S. P. V., M.C., R., and Sharan, V. (2025). XSPECT on-board XPoSat: calibration and first results. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 11(4):044007

    2025

  25. [25]

    K., Mall, G., Dhaka, R., Misra, R., and Pathak, A

    Chaurasia, S. K., Mall, G., Dhaka, R., Misra, R., and Pathak, A. (2025). Spectral Analysis of Cygnus X-3 Us- ing Simultaneous AstroSat and Insight-HXMT Observa- tions. The Astrophysical Journal, 986(1):97

    2025

  26. [26]

    Chen, Y., Cui, W., Li, W., Wang, J., Xu, Y., Lu, F., Wang, Y., Chen, T., Han, D., Hu, W., Zhang, Y., Huo, J., Yang, Y., Li, M., Lu, B., Zhang, Z., Li, T., Zhang, S., Xiong, S., Zhang, S., Xue, R., Zhao, X., Zhu, Y., Zhu, Y., Liu, H., Yang, Y., and Zhang, F. (2020). The Low Energy X-ray telescope (LE) onboard the Insight-HXMT astronomy satellite. Science C...

    2020

  27. [27]

    and Ilovaisky, S

    Chevalier, C. and Ilovaisky, S. A. (1991). Discov- ery of a 19-hour period in Aquila X-1. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 251:L11

    1991

  28. [28]

    M., Wright, E

    Cutri, R. M., Wright, E. L., Conrow, T., Fowler, J. W., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Grillmair, C., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Masci, F., McCallon, H. L., Wheelock, S. L., Fajardo- Acosta, S., Yan, L., Benford, D., Harbut, M., Jarrett, T., Lake, S., Leisawitz, D., Ressler, M. E., Stanford, S. A., Tsai, C. W., Liu, F., Helou, G., Mainzer, A., Get- tings, D., Gonzalez, A...

    2013

  29. [29]

    Z., Wang, W., Epili, P

    Ding, Y. Z., Wang, W., Epili, P. R., Liu, Q., Ge, M. Y., Lu, F. J., Qu, J. L., Song, L. M., Zhang, S., and Zhang, S. N. (2021). Timing and spectral variability of the high-mass X-ray pulsar GX 301-2 over orbital phases ob- served by Insight-HXMT. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 506(2):2712–2724

    2021

  30. [30]

    Done, C., Gierli´ nski, M., and Kubota, A. (2007). Mod- elling the behaviour of accretion flows in x-ray binaries: Everything you always wanted to know about accretion but were afraid to ask. The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 15(1):1–66

    2007

  31. [31]

    M., Fetisova, Y., and Puls, J

    Falanga, M., Bozzo, E., Lutovinov, A., Bonnet-Bidaud, J. M., Fetisova, Y., and Puls, J. (2015). Ephemeris, or- bital decay, and masses of ten eclipsing high-mass X-ray binaries. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 577:A130

    2015

  32. [32]

    P., Belloni, T

    Fender, R. P., Belloni, T. M., and Gallo, E. (2004). Towards a unified model for black hole X-ray binary jets. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 355(4):1105–1118

    2004

  33. [33]

    Frank, J., King, A., and Raine, D. J. (2002). Accretion Power in Astrophysics: Third Edition

    2002

  34. [34]

    R., and Raine, D

    Frank, J., King, A. R., and Raine, D. (2002). Accretion power in astrophysics. Cambridge university press

    2002

  35. [35]

    F¨ urst, F., Suchy, S., Kreykenbohm, I., Barrag´ an, L., Wilms, J., Pottschmidt, K., Caballero, I., Kretschmar, P., Ferrigno, C., and Rothschild, R. (2011). Study of the many fluorescent lines and the absorption variability in gx 301- 2 with xmm-newton. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 535:A9

    2011

  36. [36]

    Giacconi, R., Gursky, H., Kellogg, E., Schreier, E., and Tananbaum, H. (1971). Discovery of Periodic X- Ray Pulsations in Centaurus X-3 from UHURU. The Astrophysical Journal Letter, 167:L67

    1971

  37. [37]

    R., and Rossi, B

    Giacconi, R., Gursky, H., Paolini, F. R., and Rossi, B. B. (1962). Evidence for x Rays From Sources Outside the Solar System. Physical Review Letters, 9(11):439–443

    1962

  38. [38]

    W., Wright, E

    Gottlieb, E. W., Wright, E. L., and Liller, W. (1975). Optical studies of UHURU sources. XI. A probable pe- riod for Scorpius X-1 = V818 Scorpii. The Astrophysical Journal Letter, 195:L33–L35

    1975

  39. [39]

    J., Howe, C

    Grande, M., Maddison, B. J., Howe, C. J., Kellett, B. J., Sreekumar, P., Huovelin, J., Crawford, I. A., Duston, C. L., Smith, D., Anand, M., Bhandari, N., Cook, A., Fernandes, V., Foing, B., Gasnaut, O., Goswami, J. N., Holland, A., Joy, K. H., Kochney, D., Lawrence, D., Maurice, S., Okada, T., Narendranath, S., Pieters, C., Rothery, D., Russell, S. S., S...

    2009

  40. [40]

    and van der Klis, M

    Hasinger, G. and van der Klis, M. (1989). Two patterns of correlated X-ray timing and spectral behaviour in low- mass X-ray binaries. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 225:79– 96

    1989

  41. [41]

    P., Jonker, P

    Heinz, S., Sell, P., Fender, R. P., Jonker, P. G., Brandt, W. N., Calvelo-Santos, D. E., Tzioumis, A. K., Nowak, M. A., Schulz, N. S., Wijnands, R., and van der Klis, M. (2013). The Youngest Known X-Ray Binary: Circinus X- 1 and Its Natal Supernova Remnant. The Astrophysical Journal, 779(2):171

    2013

  42. [42]

    and Pool, P

    Holland, A. and Pool, P. (2008). A new family of swept charge devices (SCDs) for x-ray spectroscopy ap- plications. In Dorn, D. A. and Holland, A. D., edi- tors, High Energy, Optical, and Infrared Detectors for Astronomy III, volume 7021 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, page 702117

    2008

  43. [43]

    S., Gotthelf, E

    Holt, S. S., Gotthelf, E. V., Tsunemi, H., and Negoro, H. (1994). ASCA Observations of Cassiopeia A. pasj, 46(4):L151–L155

    1994

  44. [44]

    Homan, J., van der Klis, M., Wijnands, R., Belloni, T., Fender, R., Klein-Wolt, M., Casella, P., M´ endez, M., Gallo, E., Lewin, W. H. G., and Gehrels, N. (2007). Rossi x-ray timing explorer observations of the first tran- sient z source xte j1701–462: Shedding new light on mass accretion in luminous neutron star x-ray binaries. The Astrophysical Journal,...

    2007

  45. [45]

    Homan, J., Wijnands, R., van der Klis, M., Belloni, T., van Paradijs, J., Klein-Wolt, M., Fender, R., and M´ endez, M. (2001). Correlated X-Ray Spectral and Tim- ing Behavior of the Black Hole Candidate XTE J1550- 564: A New Interpretation of Black Hole States. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement, 132(2):377–402

    2001

  46. [46]

    Spectro- temporal

    Iyer, N., Nandi, A., and Mandal, S. (2015). Determi- nation of the Mass of IGR J17091-3624 from “Spectro- temporal” Variations during the Onset Phase of the 2011 Outburst. The Astrophysical Journal, 807(1):108

    2015

  47. [47]

    J., Holt, S

    Kaluzienski, L. J., Holt, S. S., Boldt, E. A., and Ser- lemitsos, P. J. (1976). Evidence for a 16.6 day period from Circinus X-1. The Astrophysical Journal Letter, 208:L71–L75

    1976

  48. [48]

    T., G¨ uver, T., and Bostancı, Z

    Kocabıyık, T., G¨ ung¨ or, C., Sa˘ glam, M. T., G¨ uver, T., and Bostancı, Z. F. (2025). A detailed spectral study of intermittent-accreting millisecond x-ray pulsar aql x-1 during pulse-on and pulse-off stages. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 537(1):500–506

    2025

  49. [49]

    T., Bildsten, L., Chakrabarty, D., Nelson, R

    Koh, D. T., Bildsten, L., Chakrabarty, D., Nelson, R. W., Prince, T. A., Vaughan, B. A., Finger, M. H., Wil- son, R. B., and Rubin, B. C. (1997). Rapid spin-up episodes in the wind-fed accreting pulsar gx 301–2. The Astrophysical Journal, 479(2):933

    1997

  50. [50]

    Kretschmar, P., El Mellah, I., Mart ´ ınez-N´ u˜ nez, S., F¨ urst, F., Grinberg, V., Sander, A. A. C., van den Eijnden, J., Degenaar, N., Ma ´ ız Apell´ aniz, J., Jim´ enez Esteban, F., Ramos-Lerate, M., and Utrilla, E. (2021). Revisiting the archetypical wind accretor Vela X-1 in depth. Case study of a well-known X-ray binary and the limits of our knowle...

    2021

  51. [51]

    K., and Nandi, A

    Kushwaha, A., Agrawal, V. K., and Nandi, A. (2021). AstroSat and MAXI view of Cygnus X-1: Signature of an ’extreme’ soft nature. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 507(2):2602–2613. 20

    2021

  52. [52]

    and Kostka, M

    Leahy, D. and Kostka, M. (2008). Stellar wind accretion in gx 301- 2: evidence for a high-density stream. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 384(2):747– 754

    2008

  53. [53]

    and Livingston, W

    Lewin, W. and Livingston, W. (1995). Book review: X- ray binaries/cambridge u press, 1995 & 1997. Journal of the British Astronomical Association, 105(6):284

    1995

  54. [54]

    Lewin, W. H. G. and van der Klis, M. (2006). Compact Stellar X-ray Sources, volume 39. Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System

    2006

  55. [55]

    Lewin, W. H. G., van Paradijs, J., and Taam, R. E. (1993). X-Ray Bursts. Space Science Reviews, 62(3- 4):223–389

    1993

  56. [56]

    G., Holland, A

    Lowe, B. G., Holland, A. D., Hutchinson, I. B., Burt, D. J., and Pool, P. J. (2001). The swept charge device, a novel CCD-based EDX detector: first results. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 458(1- 2):568–579

    2001

  57. [57]

    V., Remillard, R

    Makishima, K., Maejima, Y., Mitsuda, K., Bradt, H. V., Remillard, R. A., Tuohy, I. R., Hoshi, R., and Naka- gawa, M. (1986). Simultaneous X-Ray and Optical Ob- servations of GX 339-4 in an X-Ray High State. The Astrophysical Journal, 308:635

    1986

  58. [58]

    Malacaria, C., Mihara, T., Santangelo, A., Makishima, K., Matsuoka, M., Morii, M., and Sugizaki, M. (2016). Probing the stellar wind environment of Vela X-1 with MAXI. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 588:A100

    2016

  59. [59]

    Mata Sanchez, D., Munoz-Darias, T., Casares, J., Steeghs, D., Ramos Almeida, C., and Acosta Pulido, J. A. (2015). Mass constraints to Sco X-1 from Bowen flu- orescence and deep near-infrared spectroscopy. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 449:L1–L5

    2015

  60. [60]

    Miller-Jones, J. C. A., Bahramian, A., Orosz, J. A., Man- del, I., Gou, L., Maccarone, T. J., Neijssel, C. J., Zhao, X., Zi´ o lkowski, J., Reid, M. J., Uttley, P., Zheng, X., Byun, D.-Y., Dodson, R., Grinberg, V., Jung, T., Kim, J.-S., Marcote, B., Markoff, S., Rioja, M. J., Rushton, A. P., Russell, D. M., Sivakoff, G. R., Tetarenko, A. J., Tudose, V., a...

    2021

  61. [61]

    Mitsuda, K., Inoue, H., Koyama, K., Makishima, K., Matsuoka, M., Ogawara, Y., Shibazaki, N., Suzuki, K., Tanaka, Y., and Hirano, T. (1984). Energy spec- tra of low-mass binary X-ray sources observed from Tenma. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 36:741–759

    1984

  62. [62]

    and Tsygankov, S

    Mushtukov, A. and Tsygankov, S. (2023). Accreting Strongly Magnetized Neutron Stars: X-ray Pulsars. In Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, page 138

    2023

  63. [63]

    S., Doroshenko, V., Molkov, S

    Nabizadeh, A., M¨ onkk¨ onen, J., Tsygankov, S. S., Doroshenko, V., Molkov, S. V., and Poutanen, J. (2019). NuSTAR observations of wind-fed X-ray pulsar GX 301-2 during unusual spin-up event. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 629:A101

    2019

  64. [64]

    Nagase, F. (1989). Accretion-powered x-ray pulsars. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 41(1):1–79

    1989

  65. [65]

    Nagase, F., Hayakawa, S., Sato, N., Masai, K., and Inoue, H. (1986). Circumstellar matter in the VELA X-1/HD 77581 system. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 38:547–569

    1986

  66. [66]

    Nandi, A., Debnath, D., Mandal, S., and Chakrabarti, S. K. (2012). Accretion flow dynamics during the evolu- tion of timing and spectral properties of GX 339-4 dur- ing its 2010-11 outburst. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 542:A56

    2012

  67. [67]

    Novikov, I. D. and Thorne, K. S. (1973). Astrophysics of black holes. In Dewitt, C. and Dewitt, B. S., editors, Black Holes (Les Astres Occlus), pages 343–450

    1973

  68. [68]

    Parsignault, D. R. et al. (1972). No x-ray flare seen by uhuru. Nature, 239:123

    1972

  69. [69]

    Paul, B. (2022). The X-ray Polarimetry Satellite XPoSat. In 44th COSPAR Scientific Assembly. Held 16-24 July, volume 44, page 1853

    2022

  70. [70]

    Prakash, V. P. S., Agrawal, V. K., Chatterjee, R., Vatedka, R., Vadodariya, K., and Vinodkumar, A. M. (2025). Spectral nature of Sco X-1 observed using the X-ray SPECtroscopy and Timing (XSPECT) pay- load onboard XPoSat. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 543(4):3754–3767

    2025

  71. [71]

    J., Ash, T

    Quaintrell, H., Norton, A. J., Ash, T. D. C., Roche, P., Willems, B., Bedding, T. R., Baldry, I. K., and Fender, R. P. (2003). The mass of the neutron star in Vela X- 1 and tidally induced non-radial oscillations in GP Vel. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 401:313–323

    2003

  72. [72]

    V., Ku- mar, Balaji, G., Athiray, P

    Radhakrishna, V., Narendranath, S., Tyagi, A., Bug, M., Unnikrishnan, U., Kulkarni, R., Sreekantha, C. V., Ku- mar, Balaji, G., Athiray, P. S., Sudhakar, M., Manoj, R., Chetty, C. V., Thyagaraj, M. R., Howe, C., Gow, J., and Sreekumar, P. (2011). The Chandrayaan-2 Large Area Soft X-Ray Spectrometer (CLASS). In42nd Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Confer...

    2011

  73. [73]

    and McClintock, J

    Rappaport, S. and McClintock, J. (1975). 3U 0900-40. The International Astronomical Union Circulars, 2833:2

    1975

  74. [74]

    Remillard, R. A. and McClintock, J. E. (2006). X-Ray Properties of Black-Hole Binaries. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 44(1):49–92

    2006

  75. [75]

    Remillard, R. A. and McClintock, J. E. (2006). X- ray properties of black-hole binaries. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 44(1):49–92

    2006

  76. [76]

    V., and Karidhal, R

    Saini, H., Madhu, K. V., and Karidhal, R. (2025). Mission analysis, design and operations plan of India’s first polarimetry satellite: X-ray Polarimetry Satellite (XPoSat). Experimental Astronomy, 59(2):17

    2025

  77. [77]

    S., Kallman, T

    Schulz, N. S., Kallman, T. E., Heinz, S., Sell, P., Jonker, P., and Brandt, W. N. (2020). Origins of X-Ray Line Emissions in Circinus X-1 at Very Low X-Ray Flux. The Astrophysical Journal, 891(2):150

    2020

  78. [78]

    Shakura, N. I. and Sunyaev, R. A. (1973). Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 24:337–355

    1973

  79. [79]

    Shapiro, S. L. and Teukolsky, S. A. (1983). The physics of compact objects. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

    1983

  80. [80]

    Sreehari, H., Nandi, A., Radhika, D., Iyer, N., and Man- dal, S. (2018). Observational aspects of outbursting black hole sources: Evolution of spectro-temporal fea- tures and X-ray variability. Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 39(1):5

    2018

Showing first 80 references.