Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Sensitive 3mm Imaging of Discrete Sources in the Fields of X-ray-Selected Galaxy Clusters

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2608.00904 v1 pith:XXNTCNJF submitted 2026-08-02 astro-ph.CO

Sensitive 3mm Imaging of Discrete Sources in the Fields of X-ray-Selected Galaxy Clusters

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords clusterssourcessurveyx-rayclustergalaxyresultcenter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In this paper, we present the results of a blind survey for compact sources in 138 galaxy clusters from the eFEDS X-ray survey. Of these clusters, 96 are new observations. These targets have X-ray mass estimates and redshifts that formally place them above the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect (tSZ) survey limits from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT, DR5), yet were not detected. Compact sources with apparent locations close to (<104") the center of a galaxy cluster can in-fill the tSZ flux decrement, resulting in tSZ surveys missing clusters. To quantify the number of missing clusters from ACT, we carried out a survey at 90GHz using MUSTANG2 on the Green Bank Telescope and achieved a 5-sigma detection limit of 1mJy in the center of each cluster. We detected 11 discrete sources, which when scaled, is slightly lower than our previous tSZ selected sample, M2-ACT (8.0% vs 9.9%). All had radio counterparts. However, unlike the M2-ACT sample, the sources in X-ray selected clusters were concentrated closer to the cluster centers. When their effect on the measured tSZ signal is taken into account the sources we found would result in 4.5% of clusters being missed by tSZ surveys - a result similar to the estimate in recent ACT results. Most of the 96 clusters in eFEDS but not in ACT are a result of noise and overestimation of mass from X-ray measurements.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.