Pith. sign in

REVIEW

AcoustiTrace: When Plausible Sound Violates Physics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2608.02035 v1 pith:EM26T47E submitted 2026-08-03 cs.MM cs.SD

AcoustiTrace: When Plausible Sound Violates Physics

classification cs.MM cs.SD
keywords acousticacoustitracesoundaudio-videoplausibleprocessesarounddimensions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Recent audio-video generators can produce semantically plausible and apparently synchronized sound, yet may still violate the acoustic processes implied by visible events and environments. Existing benchmarks provide limited support for attributing such violations to particular acoustic processes and quantifying their severity. We introduce AcoustiTrace, a diagnostic benchmark that formalizes acoustic physical realism in audio-video generation. AcoustiTrace organizes text-to-audio-video (T2AV) and image-to-audio-video (I2AV) evaluation around the acoustic process, covering sound generation, propagation environment, and acoustic reception through eight dimensions grounded in measurable acoustic quantities. Based on these evaluation dimensions, we construct a large-scale dataset organized around acoustic mechanisms, comprising real-world audio-video recordings and acoustically annotated RGB-D observations, and use it to develop targeted prompt suites and validated evaluators. Experiments reveal that even leading generators still struggle with fundamental acoustic processes despite producing plausible sound events. Finally, we show that the diagnostics AcoustiTrace provides for specific acoustic relations can guide model refinement toward more physically faithful audio and open new directions for incorporating acoustic principles into training objectives, reward modeling, and candidate selection.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.