Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 22 references

CCAT: Optical Design of the 410 GHz Prime-Cam Module

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The existing 350 GHz three-lens Prime-Cam optics, left unchanged, remain a viable baseline for a 410 GHz module when operated at effective configuration 3 at the reference telescope elevation.

desk verdict Competent, honestly-scoped design study: the 410 GHz viability result is real and new for the CCAT program, but it rests on a single telescope elevation and an inherited, unreleased Zemax model. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02579 v1 pith:5Y4ZQOF5 submitted 2026-08-03 astro-ph.IM physics.optics

Tilak M. Patel , Tanner Buck , Anthony Huber , Eve M. Vavagiakis , James Burgoyne , Scott Chapman , Ben Keller , Jenna E. Moore
show 2 more authors
Michael D. Niemack CCAT Collaboration
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IMphysics.optics
keywords prime-camFYST410GHzopticaldesignHuygensPSFStrehlratiokineticinductancedetectorstoleranceanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the three-lens silicon optics already built for the instrument's 350 GHz module can be reused without modification for a new 410 GHz camera module. Using Huygens point-spread-function simulations at a fixed telescope elevation, it compares four possible module positions and finds that the configuration labeled 3 keeps the average Strehl ratio at 0.838, above the usual 0.8 diffraction-limited threshold, with low average ellipticity (0.048) and compact encircled energy. The 410 GHz penalty is moderate: roughly 4.7% lower mean Strehl than at 350 GHz and essentially no increase in beam asymmetry. The paper concludes the inherited design is a viable baseline for 410 GHz, provided observations are arranged so the module operates in the Config 3 optical state; it also reports that alignment errors within the tested tolerance ranges do not seriously degrade performance.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the unchanged three-lens silicon optical train, which is reused from the existing 350/280 GHz modules; the paper deliberately changes only the operating wavelength to 410 GHz. The mechanism that carries the argument is the choice of effective optical configuration: because telescope elevation rotates where each module sits in the focal plane, observations can be scheduled so the module sees the beam of configuration 3, the off-axis position with the best aberration balance. Performance is assessed with Huygens point-spread-function analysis sampled at 25 field points, using three complementary metrics — Strehl ratio, ellipticity, and 80%/95% encircled-energy radii

What would settle it

Re-run the same optical model at another telescope elevation, such as 30 or 85 degrees, and recompute the 410 GHz mean Strehl for configurations 2, 3, 4, and 6; if Config 3's mean Strehl drops below 0.8 or another configuration surpasses it, the claim that the inherited design is viable at 410 GHz via Config 3 fails as stated. Alternatively, measure the actual assembled lens positions from the fabricated hardware and feed them into the Monte Carlo tolerance model; alignment errors outside the tested ranges would undercut the robustness conclusion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the mechanically compatible 350 GHz three-lens design remains a working baseline for a 410 GHz module if it is used in effective configuration 3. With lens surfaces, spacings, and receiver geometry unchanged, simulations give a mean Strehl ratio of 0.838 at 410 GHz, above the 0.8 diffraction-limited criterion, a mean ellipticity of 0.048, and a mean 80%-encircled-energy radius of 1844 µm. Compared to 350 GHz, the mean Strehl drops by about 4.7%, while mean and maximum ellipticity stay nearly unchanged. Configurations 2, 4, and 6 are worse: Config 2 falls to 0.672 mean Strehl with stronger field variation, and Configs 4 and 6 sit at 0.778, below the threshold. The pa

Load-bearing premise

The entire comparison and the viability conclusion rest on simulations at a single fixed telescope elevation of 60 degrees; at other elevations the effective module positions rotate relative to the telescope's aberration pattern, so the ranking of configurations and the above-0.8 Strehl result could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim holds, the 410 GHz module can reuse the existing lens fabrication and alignment procedures, avoiding a costly optical redesign.
  • Observing plans can be designed so the 410 GHz module operates in the Config 3 optical state, even if the physical detector slot is elsewhere, because configuration is set by telescope pointing.
  • Config 2 should be avoided for 410 GHz; Configs 4 and 6 are usable fallbacks but leave the average Strehl below the diffraction-limited threshold.
  • The alignment study implies that assembly effort is better spent on lens decenter and tilt control than on extremely tight lens-to-lens spacing.
  • Mean Strehl above 0.8 in Config 3 gives grounds to proceed with more detailed field-resolved PSF analysis and a final tolerance budget.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because all results are simulated at one telescope elevation, the natural next test is to repeat the scan at several elevations; I would expect the Config 3 advantage to shift or shrink, since elevation rotates the aberration pattern over the module.
  • The matched-PSF examples show a four-lobed beam with ellipticity near zero, which suggests that scalar metrics alone could silently miss severe beam morphologies; future module selections may need morphology-aware figures of merit.
  • The tolerance Monte Carlo covers only optical perturbations; combining it with metrology of the already fabricated shells could convert these sensitivity curves into a concrete mechanical specification, which the paper leaves as future work.
  • The same method could be pushed to higher frequencies, say 460 GHz, in the Config 3 position to find where the inherited design stops meeting the 0.8 Strehl criterion.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a Zemax OpticStudio optical performance study for a candidate 410 GHz Prime-Cam instrument module on FYST. The design reuses the existing 350 GHz three-lens silicon architecture unchanged, and the authors evaluate four effective Prime-Cam module configurations at both 350 and 410 GHz. Using Huygens PSF analysis, they compute Strehl ratio, ellipticity, and encircled-energy radii (r80, r95) at 25 field points. The main result is that effective configuration 3 gives mean Strehl 0.838 at 410 GHz, mean ellipticity 0.048, and mean r80 1844 µm, while configuration 2 is substantially worse and configurations 4/6 are intermediate. A preliminary tolerance analysis with inverse-sensitivity and 1000-trial Monte Carlo is also reported. The paper concludes that the 350 GHz three-lens design remains a viable baseline for the 410 GHz module.

Significance. If the result holds, it is practically useful: it would allow the 410 GHz module to reuse an existing, mechanically compatible three-lens design, avoiding a costly redesign. The paper's multi-metric PSF comparison (Strehl, ellipticity, encircled energy) is a genuine improvement over Strehl-only studies, and the detector-aware field-set update is a sensible, clearly documented modification. The authors are also transparent about the preliminary nature of the tolerance analysis and about the fixed telescope elevation. However, the headline viability claim rests on a thin margin above the Strehl 0.8 threshold and on an inherited Zemax model that is not independently checkable from the manuscript; these conditions must be addressed before the claim can be accepted at face value.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.1, §7, Table 2] All simulations are run at a fixed telescope elevation of 60°, and the text states that changing elevation rotates the effective Prime-Cam configurations relative to the receiver. The viability claim in §7 therefore depends on the unverified premise that configuration 3 remains the best configuration and stays above Strehl 0.8 at other elevations. The margin is thin: mean Strehl 0.838 vs. the 0.8 threshold, with field-to-field scatter of about 0.1 (Table 2, Fig. 5). Please add an elevation sweep or at least one or two representative elevations and report the resulting configuration ranking and threshold crossing, or re-scope the abstract and conclusions so that the viability claim is explicitly confined to the reference elevation of 60°.
  2. [§3.1, Tables 2 and 5; data availability] The central numerical results are produced entirely in an inherited Zemax model (Refs. 9, 13) that is not included or fully described. No lens radii, thicknesses, conic constants, spacings, or telescope prescription details are given, so the reported Strehl/ellipticity/r80 values cannot be independently reproduced. Ref. 9 is listed as 'Manuscript in preparation.' Please provide the optical prescription as supplementary material or a permanent data link (or, if the journal permits, a clear data-availability statement explaining the restriction), so that the 0.838 mean Strehl and the configuration ranking are checkable.
  3. [§6.2, Fig. 7, Table 4] The Monte Carlo robustness result is reported on a Strehl-based merit-function scale, but the design's viability threshold is expressed in terms of mean Strehl (0.8). A Monte Carlo distribution centered on the nominal merit function (std ~1.57%, Fig. 7) does not directly show the probability that mean or minimum Strehl falls below 0.8, especially since the inverse-sensitivity results in Table 5 are highly asymmetric and several directions do not reach the ΔM=0.01 target. In addition, the reference ranges are taken from the 850 GHz module rather than derived for 410 GHz. Please report the Monte Carlo distributions of the PSF metrics used throughout the paper (mean/minimum Strehl, ellipticity, r80) and justify or re-label the reference ranges. Without this, 'not fragile' is a statement about the merit function, not about the metrics that determine viability.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table 2 and Fig. 5] Configurations 4 and 6 have exactly identical summary values in every metric. Since they are separate physical positions, please state explicitly whether this is a symmetry of the crossed-Dragone focal plane or an artifact; if symmetry, give a brief explanation.
  2. [§3.4 and Fig. 4] The 25 field points are equally weighted in the field-averaged metrics, but the module's approximately 21,000 detectors are not necessarily uniformly distributed over the sampled footprint. I suggest adding a detector-area-weighted or detector-population-weighted average to confirm that the mean Strehl 0.838 and the configuration ranking are not sensitive to the equal-weight choice.
  3. [Abstract and §7] The abstract and final sentence present the design as a 'viable baseline' without repeating the reference-elevation qualifier stated in §3.1 and §7. Add the qualifier or reference to the elevation sweep once it is performed.
  4. [References 8, 9] Key inputs are cited as 'Manuscript in preparation' or 'Manuscript to be submitted.' Please provide public versions, DOIs, or repository links where possible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the 410 GHz performance numbers are forward optical simulations of a fixed prescription, not fits or definitional identities.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that an existing three-lens design, unchanged except for wavelength, yields mean Strehl 0.838 at Config 3 and remains above the 0.8 threshold at 410 GHz. This is obtained by direct Huygens PSF simulation in Zemax; no parameter is fitted to the target result, and the threshold comparison is an evaluation, not an identity. The analysis does rely on the authors' inherited Zemax model (Refs. 9, 13) and on tolerance ranges taken from the 850 GHz module work (Ref. 16), but these are input assumptions and engineering conventions, not results that are later 'predicted'. The paper explicitly labels the tolerance ranges as 'reference perturbation ranges ... not a final mechanical tolerance range', so their use does not smuggle in the conclusion. Likewise, the field-sampling revision is disclosed and quantified in Table 1; it changes the Config 3 mean Strehl from 0.822 to 0.838, but this is a stated methodological choice about representing the detector footprint, not a fit tuned to push the conclusion over threshold. The fixed-elevation limitation in §3.1 is an external-validity caveat, not a circular step. No self-citation chain is load-bearing; the known Config 3 preference is independently re-derived by the four-configuration comparison in §4. Overall the derivation is self-contained with respect to stated assumptions, so score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a commercial raytracing model inherited from prior, largely unpublished Prime-Cam work (Refs. 9, 13), plus several stated modeling choices: fixed telescope elevation, detector-aware field sampling, and reference tolerance ranges. No physical constants are fitted and no new entities are postulated; the ledger records the input choices and assumptions that would change the conclusion if altered.

free parameters (3)
  • Tolerance reference ranges for Monte Carlo = |Δz| ≤ 1.0 mm; |Δx|, |Δy| ≤ 0.5 mm; |θx|, |θy| ≤ 0.16°
    Adopted from the 850 GHz module tolerancing (Ref. 16) and stated as reference ranges, not derived for the 410 GHz module (§6.2, Table 4).
  • Inverse-sensitivity merit-function increment ΔM = 0.01
    Chosen threshold representing a 4.34% change; used to rank alignment sensitivities and to define 'exceeded' trials in the Monte Carlo (§6.1, §6.2).
  • Field sampling positions for Fields 4/5 = x = ±0.45° (moved inward from ±0.65°)
    Detector-aware choice justified qualitatively by the populated detector footprint; Table 1 shows it raises minimum Strehl and lowers maximum ellipticity, so it affects the reported performance (§3.4, Table 1).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The inherited Zemax model (Refs. 9, 13) correctly represents the FYST telescope and Prime-Cam module prescriptions
    All results depend on this unpublished archive; no independent verification data are provided in the paper.
  • domain assumption Fixed telescope elevation of 60° is representative for evaluating effective configurations
    Section 3.1 uses a single elevation; changing elevation rotates configurations and would alter the telescope-induced aberrations.
  • domain assumption Strehl ratio > 0.8 defines diffraction-limited performance
    Standard Maréchal criterion used as the quality threshold; the paper adopts it without derivation or discussion (§3.3).
  • domain assumption Huygens PSF computed by Zemax OpticStudio is accurate for this optical system
    Relies on commercial physical-optics propagation; sampling and integration parameters are not documented (§3.1, §3.2).
  • ad hoc to paper The three-lens design optimized at 350 GHz is a sensible unmodified starting point for 410 GHz
    The paper explicitly tests inherited lenses with unchanged prescriptions, which is the premise of the entire study (§2.2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of CCAT: Optical Design of the 410 GHz Prime-Cam Module." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5Y4ZQOF5

@misc{pith2026260802579,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: CCAT: Optical Design of the 410 GHz Prime-Cam Module},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5Y4ZQOF5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02579}
}
read the original abstract

Prime-Cam is a first-generation instrument for the Fred Young Submillimeter Telescope (FYST), enabling wide-field, multi-frequency observations for cosmology, line-intensity mapping, and galaxy studies. We present an optical performance study for a candidate 410 GHz broadband module designed to field approximately 21,000 polarisation-sensitive kinetic inductance detectors (KIDs). The three-lens silicon design was adapted from the SO LATR design and used for the existing 280 and 350 GHz Prime-Cam instrument modules, as well as this study. At 410 GHz, a shorter wavelength places tighter demands on wavefront quality and beam shape. Using Ansys Zemax OpticStudio and Huygens PSF analysis, we evaluate candidate module positions, compare 350 and 410 GHz performance, and assess field-dependent Strehl ratio, ellipticity, and encircled-energy behaviour. A preliminary tolerancing study, using inverse increment and Monte Carlo methods, tests sensitivity to selected alignment perturbations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.02579 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Prime-Cam in FYST, with ray traces showing the path of light guided into the instrument by two mirrors. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. 3-lens optical design ray trace generated by Zemax. The three lenses, focal plane, and lyot stop are labelled. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Photo of the Prime-Cam instrument showing the instrument module positions and the relevant optical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Detector-aware field sampling used for the analysis. The 25 field points are defined in angular coordinates and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of performance at effective Prime-Cam configurations for 350 GHz and 410 GHz modules. Bars [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Matched 410 GHz Huygens PSFs for effective configurations 2 (top row) and 3 (bottom row). Each column [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Distribution of the Strehl based tolerance merit function for 1000 Monte Carlo trials of the 410 GHz configuration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references

  1. [1]

    CCAT: The Prime-Cam instrument for the fred young submillimeter telescope—overview and status,

    Vavagiakis, E. M., Wang, Y., Lin, L. T., Aravena, M., Austermann, J. E., Bertoldi, F., Burgoyne, J., Butler, V., Chapman, S. C., Choi, S. K., Chung, D., Crites, A., Dev, A., Duell, C. J., Fich, M., Fissel, L., Freundt, R. G., Gazda, E., Huber, A. I., Johnstone, D., Keller, B., Malachuk, P., Middleton, A., Moore, J., Niemack, M. D., Nikola, T., Okada, Y., ...

    2026

  2. [2]

    Designs for a large-aperture telescope to map the CMB 10×faster,

    Niemack, M. D., “Designs for a large-aperture telescope to map the CMB 10×faster,”Applied Optics55, 1686–1694 (Mar. 2016)

    2016

  3. [3]

    The optical design of the six-meter CCAT-prime and Simons Ob- servatory telescopes,

    Parshley, S. C., Niemack, M. D., Hills, R., Dicker, S. R., D¨ unner, R., Erler, J., Gallardo, P. A., Gud- mundsson, J. E., Herter, T., Koopman, B. J., Limon, M., Matsuda, F. T., Mauskopf, P., Riechers, D. A., Stacey, G. J., and Vavagiakis, E. M., “The optical design of the six-meter CCAT-prime and Simons Ob- servatory telescopes,” in [Ground-Based and Air...

    2018

  4. [4]

    Prime-Cam: A first-light instrument for the CCAT-prime telescope,

    Vavagiakis, E. M., Ahmed, Z., Ali, A., Basu, K., Battaglia, N., Bertoldi, F., Bond, R., Bustos, R., Chapman, S. C., Chung, D., Coppi, G., Cothard, N. F., Dicker, S., Duell, C. J., Duff, S. M., Erler, J., Fich, M., Galitzki, N., Gallardo, P. A., Henderson, S. W., Herter, T. L., Hilton, G., Hubmayr, J., Irwin, K. D., Koopman, B. J., McMahon, J., Murray, N.,...

    2018

  5. [5]

    CCAT: Prime-Cam optics overview and status update,

    Huber, Z. B., Lin, L. T., Vavagiakis, E. M., Freundt, R. G., Butler, V., Chapman, S. C., Choi, S. K., Crites, A. T., Duell, C. J., Gallardo, P. A., Huber, A. I., Keller, B., Middleton, A., Niemack, M. D., Nikola, T., Orlowski-Scherer, J., Smith, E., Stacey, G., Walker, S., and Zou, B., “CCAT: Prime-Cam optics overview and status update,” in [Millimeter, S...

    2024

  6. [6]

    CCAT-prime Collaboration: Science Goals and Forecasts with Prime-Cam on the Fred Young Submillimeter Telescope,

    CCAT-Prime Collaboration, Aravena, M., Austermann, J. E., Basu, K., Battaglia, N., Beringue, B., Bertoldi, F., Bigiel, F., Bond, J. R., Breysse, P. C., Broughton, C., Bustos, R., Chapman, S. C., Charmetant, M., Choi, S. K., Chung, D. T., Clark, S. E., Cothard, N. F., Crites, A. T., Dev, A., Douglas, K., Duell, C. J., D¨ unner, R., Ebina, H., Erler, J., Fi...

    2023

  7. [7]

    Sensitivity of the Prime-Cam instrument on the CCAT-prime telescope,

    Choi, S. K., Austermann, J., Basu, K., Battaglia, N., Bertoldi, F., Chung, D. T., Cothard, N. F., Duff, S., Duell, C. J., Gallardo, P. A., Gao, J., Herter, T., Hubmayr, J., Niemack, M. D., Nikola, T., Riechers, D., Rossi, K., Stacey, G. J., Stevens, J. R., Vavagiakis, E. M., Vissers, M. R., and Walker, S., “Sensitivity of the Prime-Cam instrument on the C...

    2020

  8. [8]

    The 410 GHz camera module for FYST: Design and testing of the MKID focal plane,

    Chapman, S. C., Wheeler, J., Austermann, J., Beall, J. A., Burgoyne, J., Devina, J., Henke, D., Huber, A., Hubmayr, J., Niemack, M., Patel, T., Sinclair, A., Vavagiakis, E., and Vissers, M. R., “The 410 GHz camera module for FYST: Design and testing of the MKID focal plane,” Manuscript in preparation (2026)

    2026

Show all 22 references
  1. [9]

    CCAT: Design and characterization of the 350 GHz instrument module,

    Keller, B., Wheeler, J., Duell, C., Patel, D., Austermann, J. E., Freundt, R. G., Lin, L. T., Middleton, A., Niemack, M. D., Patel, T. M., Vaskuri, A., Vavagiakis, E. M., Walker, S., and Wang, Y., “CCAT: Design and characterization of the 350 GHz instrument module,” Manuscript...

    2026

  2. [10]

    Basic wavefront aberration theory for optical metrology,

    Wyant, J. C. and Creath, K., “Basic wavefront aberration theory for optical metrology,” in [Applied Optics and Optical Engineering], Shannon, R. R. and Wyant, J. C., eds.,11, 1–53, Academic Press (1992)

    1992

  3. [11]

    Cold optical design for the large aperture Simons Observatory telescope,

    Dicker, S. R., Gallardo, P. A., Gudmundsson, J. E., Mauskopf, P. D., Ali, A., Ashton, P. C., Coppi, G., Devlin, M. J., Galitzki, N., Ho, S.-P., Hill, C. A., Hubmayr, J., Keating, B., Lee, A. T., Limon, M., Matsuda, F., McMahon, J., Niemack, M. D., Orlowski-Scherer, J. L., Picc...

    2018

  4. [12]

    Systematic uncertainties in the Simons Observatory: Optical effects and sensitivity considerations,

    Gallardo, P. A., Gudmundsson, J. E., Koopman, B. J., Matsuda, F. T., Simon, S. M., Ali, A., Bryan, S., Chinone, Y., Coppi, G., Cothard, N. F., Devlin, M. J., Dicker, S. R., Fabbian, G., Galitzki, N., Hill, C. A., Keating, B., Kusaka, A., Lashner, J., Lee, A. T., Limon, M., Mau...

    2018

  5. [13]

    Huber, Z. B.,Constraining Time-Dependent Parity Violation with ACT and Developing Next-Generation Microwave Observatories, phd dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States (Aug. 2025)

    2025

  6. [14]

    CCAT-prime: Optical and cryogenic design of the 850 GHz module for Prime-Cam,

    Huber, A. I., Chapman, S. C., Sinclair, A. K., Spencer, L. D., Austermann, J. E., Choi, S. K., Devina, J., Gallardo, P. A., Henke, D., Huber, Z. B., Keller, B., Li, Y., Lin, L. T., Niemack, M. D., Rossi, K. M., Vav- agiakis, E. M., and Wheeler, J. D., “CCAT-prime: Optical and ...

    2022

  7. [15]

    CCAT-prime: Design of the Mod-Cam receiver and 280 GHz MKID instrument module,

    Vavagiakis, E. M., Duell, C. J., Austermann, J., Beall, J., Bhandarkar, T., Chapman, S. C., Choi, S. K., Coppi, G., Dicker, S., Devlin, M., Freundt, R. G., Gao, J., Groppi, C., Herter, T. L., Huber, Z. B., Hubmayr, J., Johnstone, D., Keller, B., Kofman, A. M., Li, Y., Mauskopf...

    2022

  8. [16]

    I.,Optical, Mechanical, and Detector Developments for the Prime-Cam 850 GHz Module, phd dissertation, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada (2024)

    Huber, A. I.,Optical, Mechanical, and Detector Developments for the Prime-Cam 850 GHz Module, phd dissertation, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    CCAT-prime: The 850 GHz camera for Prime-Cam on FYST,

    Chapman, S. C., Huber, A. I., Sinclair, A. K., Wheeler, J. D., Austermann, J. E., Beall, J., Burgoyne, J., Choi, S. K., Crites, A., Duell, C. J., Devina, J., Gao, J., Fich, M., Henke, D., Herter, T., Johnstone, D., Knee, L. B. G., Niemack, M. D., Rossi, K. M., Stacey, G. J., T...

    2022

  10. [18]

    CCAT: A status update on the EoR-Spec instrument module for Prime-Cam,

    Freundt, R. G., Li, Y., Henke, D., Austermann, J., Burgoyne, J. R., Chapman, S. C., Choi, S. K., Duell, C. J., Huber, Z. B., Niemack, M. D., Nikola, T., Lin, L. T., Riechers, D. A., Stacey, G. J., Vaskuri, A. K., Vavagiakis, E. M., Wheeler, J., and Zou, B., “CCAT: A status upd...

    2024

  11. [19]

    The epoch-of-reionization spectrometer, EoR-Spec: A spectrometer instrument module for Prime-Cam on FYST,

    Nikola, T., Choi, S. K., Duell, C. J., Freundt, R. G., Huber, Z. B., Li, Y., Malavalli, K., Niemack, M. D., Rossi, K. M., Stacey, G. J., Vavagiakis, E. M., Zou, B., Cothard, N. F., Austermann, J., Wheeler, J. D., Gao, J., Vissers, M. R., Hubmayr, J., Beall, J., and Ullom, J., ...

    2023

  12. [20]

    CCAT-prime: The optical design for the epoch of reionization spectrometer,

    Huber, Z. B., Choi, S. K., Duell, C. J., Freundt, R. G., Gallardo, P. A., Keller, B., Li, Y., Lin, L. T., Niemack, M. D., Nikola, T., Riechers, D. A., Stacey, G. J., Vavagiakis, E. M., and Zou, B., “CCAT-prime: The optical design for the epoch of reionization spectrometer,” in...

    2022

  13. [21]

    What is the difference between the FFT and Huygens PSF?

    Ansys, Inc., “What is the difference between the FFT and Huygens PSF?.”https://optics.ansys.com/ hc/en-us/articles/42661795535251-What-is-the-difference-between-the-FFT-and-Huygens-PSF (2026). Accessed 2026-07-21

    2026

  14. [22]

    Strehl ratio for primary aberrations in terms of their aberration variance,

    Mahajan, V. N., “Strehl ratio for primary aberrations in terms of their aberration variance,”Journal of the Optical Society of America73, 860–861 (June 1983)

    1983

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.