Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 38 references

Joint spectral characterization of SPDC photon pairs near 2 $\mu$m in (Al)GaAs-on-insulator waveguides

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the first direct joint-spectral measurement of an integrated photon-pair source emitting near 2 µm, showing that GaAs- and AlGaAs-on-insulator waveguides produce broadband, strongly anti-correlated pairs centered at 1960

desk verdict First direct JSI of an integrated SPDC source at 2 µm, with a no-parameter model that nails the spectra; the absolute-efficiency miss and a thin calibration description are the real caveats. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.03950 v1 pith:TLGHUW6N submitted 2026-08-04 physics.optics quant-ph

Alexandre Z. Leger , Emil Z. Ulsig , Samuel E. Fontaine , Dileep V. Reddy , Eric J. Stanton , Lynden K. Shalm , Richard P. Mirin , Martin J. Stevens
show 3 more authors
J. E. Sipe Nicolas Volet Deny R. Hamel
This is my paper
classification physics.opticsquant-ph
keywords spontaneousparametricdown-conversionjointspectralintensity2µmwavelengthbandGaAs-on-insulatorwaveguidestime-of-flightspectroscopyheraldedsinglephotonsintegratedquantumphotonicsnonclassicalphotonpairs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that straight GaAs and AlGaAs-on-insulator ridge waveguides can act as bright, spectrally characterized sources of photon pairs in the 2 µm band, a region where integrated pair sources have been scarce. Its central experimental achievement is the first direct joint-spectral-intensity (JSI) measurement of an integrated SPDC source in this regime, obtained by routing pairs through a 500 m dispersive fiber and converting arrival-time delays into wavelength coordinates. The measured spectra show roughly 200 nm of emission centered near 1960 nm with strong signal–idler anti-correlations, and a heralded second-order correlation gH2(0) ≈ 0.06 at low pump power confirms nonclassical emission. A loss-inclusive numerical model reproduces the broadband spectral structure and predicts that longer waveguides—about 13.8 mm for GaAs and 6.6 mm for AlGaAs—would increase surviving-pair probability by factors of 6.8 and 2.3, respectively.

What carries the argument

The central object is the joint spectral intensity JSI(λs, λi) ∝ |φII(ωs, ωi)|², the squared biphoton wavefunction that records how signal and idler frequencies are correlated and therefore sets the heralded purity and entanglement character of the source. The measurement machinery is fiber-based time-of-flight spectroscopy: chromatic dispersion in 500 m of SM1950 fiber converts wavelength into arrival time, and a linear calibration—built from two bandpass-filtered reference wavelengths plus the pump—turns coincidence delay histograms into a joint spectrum. The theoretical machinery is a loss-inclusive SPDC model in which each guided mode carries a complex wavevector k_j + iκ_j; asymptotic-f

What would settle it

Acquire a table of arrival-time-to-wavelength calibration points across 1800–2100 nm from a supercontinuum source filtered by narrowband tunable filters, and compare the resulting mapping with the linear fit used here. If the residuals are more than the claimed 12 nm resolution, or if a known broadband spectrum reconstructed by the same time-of-flight scheme disagrees with a spectrometer reference, the JSI shapes in Fig. 7 would need to be re-derived with the nonlinear mapping.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that (Al)GaAs-on-insulator waveguides phase-matched near 1960 nm generate photon pairs whose joint spectrum is broadband and strongly anti-correlated, and that this joint spectrum can be measured directly by time-of-flight spectroscopy. Using superconducting nanowire detectors and a 500 m dispersive SM1950 fiber, the authors map coincidence delays to wavelengths through a linear calibration determined from three reference wavelengths. This yields the first direct JSI of an integrated SPDC source in the 2 µm band, spanning about 200 nm with tight energy-conserving anti-correlations. The same devices show heralded gH2(0) ≈ 0.06 at low pump power, a clear nonclassic

Load-bearing premise

The arrival-time-to-wavelength calibration assumes a linear relationship across the whole ~200 nm bandwidth, determined from only three reference wavelengths; if the 500 m fiber's dispersion is nonlinear over that range, the reported joint spectrum and anti-correlation width would be distorted.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Integrated (Al)GaAs-on-insulator waveguides become a viable chip-scale platform for photon-pair generation in the 2 µm band, with measured signal/idler propagation losses of 1.75–2.5 dB/cm near 1960 nm.
  • The roughly 200 nm anti-correlated bandwidth makes these sources naturally time-frequency entangled; they can serve quantum spectroscopy, metrology, and multi-spectral sensing, though the same correlations reduce heralded single-photon purity unless filtered or engineered factorable.
  • The loss-inclusive model predicts optimal waveguide lengths of about 13.8 mm (GaAs) and 6.6 mm (AlGaAs), with surviving-pair probability gains of 6.8× and 2.3× over the 1.678 mm devices measured here.
  • Heterogeneous bonding to silicon-on-insulator and on-chip 980 nm pump lasers, both already demonstrated separately, provide a concrete path to fully integrated 2 µm quantum photonic circuits.
  • The measured gH2(0) ≈ 0.06 at low pump power confirms that the nonclassical emission has low multi-pair contamination, useful for heralded single-photon applications.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A check the paper does not report: the linear three-point calibration of the fiber's arrival-time-to-wavelength mapping is assumed to hold across the full ~200 nm bandwidth. A multi-wavelength calibration would reveal whether residual dispersion curvature distorts the JSI shape and the reported anti-correlation width.
  • Because the stated resolution is 12 nm per photon, the measured anti-diagonal width is likely resolution-limited, not an intrinsic property of the source. The true joint spectrum could be considerably narrower in the anti-correlated direction than the displayed JSI suggests.
  • The very large inferred per-facet pump coupling losses (20–23 dB) leave room for an order-of-magnitude brightness gain through improved mode matching or adiabatic couplers; demonstrating such couplers would directly test the absolute-efficiency discrepancy with the model.
  • The broad anti-correlated spectrum suggests these devices could act as a multi-mode time-frequency entangled resource, e.g., for coherent Raman or fluorescence spectroscopy that interrogates many spectral modes at once—an application the paper mentions but does not quantify.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) in GaAs- and AlGaAs-on-insulator waveguides phase-matched near 1960 nm. The authors measure the joint spectral intensity (JSI) by time-of-flight spectroscopy in a 500 m SM1950 fiber, report a heralded second-order correlation gH(2)(0) ≈ 0.06 at low pump power and a coincidence-to-accidental ratio of 90, and develop a loss-inclusive numerical model with no fitted parameters. The model reproduces the measured phase-matching wavelengths to within 0.9 nm and the broadband anti-correlated spectral structure, while overpredicting absolute SPDC efficiencies by factors of ≈2.8 (GaAs) and ≈2.6 (AlGaAs), a discrepancy attributed to cutback-based pump coupling loss uncertainty.

Significance. If the JSI calibration is validated, this would be a notable first: a direct joint-spectral characterization of an integrated SPDC source near 2 µm, in a band relevant to free-space QKD, hollow-core fiber networks, and silicon photonics. The nonclassicality evidence (gH(2)(0) ≈ 0.06, CAR = 90) is independent of the spectral calibration and is solid. The model is a genuine strength: it uses measured losses, literature nonlinear coefficients, and mode-solver dispersion with no tuned parameters, and it correctly predicts the phase-matching wavelength. The authors also transparently disclose the residual efficiency discrepancy. However, the central JSI claim currently rests on a three-point linear calibration that is not adequately validated, and there are inconsistencies in the reported pump wavelengths that affect the efficiency comparison.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.2, Fig. 7] The JSI claim rests on a three-point linear time-to-wavelength calibration: 1900 nm and 2000 nm bandpass filters plus the 980 nm pump. The 980 nm anchor is far outside the operating range of SM1950, and in the JSI setup of Fig. 6 the pump is blocked by AR-coated Si before the 500 m fiber; if this reference is taken on a bypass path it does not calibrate the actual measurement path. No validation against a known broadband source, no quoted systematic error, and no check of group-delay linearity over 1850–2050 nm are provided. Because the reconstructed anti-correlation width and the Fig. 7 model comparison are both extracted through this mapping, a nonlinearity or anchor error directly threatens the headline spectral-correlation result. Please report the measured dispersion curve or calibration residuals, add a systematic uncertainty, and validate the mapping against a source with a known
  2. [§3.1 vs Table 2] The AlGaAs pump wavelength is inconsistent. §3.1 states the fixed CW pump was set to 975.3 nm, δ = 1.8 ± 0.3 nm below phase matching; Table 2 lists the AlGaAs experimental pump wavelength as 977.1 nm and the simulated phase-matching value as 976.2 nm. The detuning correction that reduces the AlGaAs efficiency discrepancy to ≈2.6 depends on this number. Please correct the table or the text and recompute the simulated efficiency and its uncertainty.
  3. [Fig. 3 vs §3.1 and Table 1] Fig. 3 states that a GaAs waveguide was pumped by a continuous-wave diode laser at 975 nm, whereas §3.1 and Table 1 state that the GaAs efficiency measurement used a pulsed Ti:sapphire laser at 980 nm (with CW used only for AlGaAs). This is not a cosmetic discrepancy: pulsed and CW excitation require different efficiency definitions (Eq. (5) versus Eq. (12)), and the pump wavelength affects the detuning and phase-matching comparison. Please clarify which pump source was used for the CAR = 90 and timing-jitter measurements and for the GaAs efficiency entry in Table 2, and correct the caption or text accordingly.
  4. [§4.2, Table 2] The simulated absolute SPDC efficiencies exceed the measured values by factors of ≈2.8 (GaAs) and ≈2.6 (AlGaAs), with uncertainty intervals that do not overlap. The paper attributes this to cutback-based pump coupling loss uncertainty. Since the model is promoted as a design tool, this attribution should be supported quantitatively—for example, by showing what coupling-loss error would bring the predictions into agreement, or by an independent estimate of on-chip pump power. Otherwise the non-overlap should be stated as a model limitation rather than a resolved discrepancy.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§3.2] The sentence describing the calibration says a linear fit was performed using three reference arrival times. It would help to state the residuals of this fit and the uncertainty of the slope/intercept, especially because the 980 nm reference is outside the band of interest.
  2. [§4.1, Eq. (5)] The quantity N_pump in Eq. (5) is used but not explicitly defined in the text. Please define it as the number of pump photons per pulse for the pulsed model.
  3. [Fig. 3] The caption says the histograms were measured with and without the 500 m dispersive fiber, but the text does not clearly state which measurement was used for the CAR = 90 value. Please make this explicit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: model uses no tuned parameters, JSI and gH(2) are external measurements, and self-citations provide independent support.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained against external measurements. The central results, the joint spectral intensity and the heralded gH(2)(0) about 0.06, are experimental data obtained by time-of-flight spectroscopy and three-detector correlation measurements, not outputs of the numerical model. The model (Eqs. 4 to 11) is explicitly stated and uses measured propagation losses (Table 2), literature values of chi(2), mode-solver dispersion, and the nominal design geometry; no parameter is fitted to the JSI or to the measured efficiency. The model's phase-matching wavelength is chosen at the TE00/TM00 index crossing and matches the independently measured pump wavelength (tuned to maximize coincidence) to within 0.9 nm. Because the devices were designed with the same solver, this is a fabrication-consistency check rather than a reduction of the measurement to the model. Self-citations provide prior peer-reviewed theory and independently measured material and geometric parameters; the theory equations are reproduced in the text, and no uniqueness theorem or fitted ansatz is imported. The skeptical concern about the three-point linear time-to-wavelength calibration is a measurement-accuracy issue: if valid, it would distort the experimental JSI, but it is not circular because the calibration is independent of the model and of the claimed spectral result. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted in this paper; measured losses, literature chi2 values, and the mode-crossing pump wavelength are inputs. The main quantitative risks are the transferability of cutback loss measurements to the measured devices and the reliability of the mode solver and material dispersion model.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The asymptotic-field Hamiltonian treatment of lossy waveguides (Refs. 21, 23) and the low-gain biphoton-wavefunction normalization (Ref. 22) correctly describe SPDC in these structures.
    Invoked in Section 4.1 to write Eqs. (4)-(8); the complex-wavevector loss model is explicitly stated to neglect broken pairs.
  • domain assumption The mode solver EMode and the Weber material dispersion model give accurate effective indices and group velocities for the fabricated cross-sections.
    Used in Section 4.2 to compute phase matching, effective areas, and JSIs; the no-tuned-parameters agreement depends on this.
  • domain assumption Propagation and coupling losses measured on paperclip structures on the same chip (Ref. 12) apply to the specific waveguides used, and all on-chip pump-power estimates derive from those cutback values.
    Section 3.1 and Table 2 use cutback losses to compute absolute SPDC efficiencies; the residual 2.6-2.8x model discrepancy hinges on this transfer.
  • domain assumption The chi2 nonlinear coefficients are 238 pm/V for GaAs and 210 pm/V for AlGaAs, taken from Ref. 12.
    Used in Eq. (8) to predict absolute pair-generation probabilities; treated as inputs from prior literature rather than measured here.
  • domain assumption The Klyshko method and Eq. (3) yield valid detector efficiencies and heralded g(2) without corrections for dark counts or wavelength-dependent detection efficiency.
    Section 3.1 uses Klyshko to derive eta1, eta2 and Eq. (3) for gH(2); no dark-count subtraction or spectral-efficiency correction is described.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Joint spectral characterization of SPDC photon pairs near 2 $\mu$m in (Al)GaAs-on-insulator waveguides." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TLGHUW6N

@misc{pith2026260803950,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Joint spectral characterization of SPDC photon pairs near 2 $\mu$m in (Al)GaAs-on-insulator waveguides},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TLGHUW6N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.03950}
}
abstract

Integrated photon-pair sources are a core component of chip-based quantum computing, communication, and metrology. Although such sources have been demonstrated at conventional telecom wavelengths, the 2 $\mu$m band remains comparatively less explored, despite offering advantages for free-space quantum communication, low-loss transmission in emerging fiber networks, and integration with silicon photonic platforms. In this paper, we demonstrate spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) in straight GaAs- and AlGaAs-on-insulator waveguides. This platform offers strong second-order nonlinearity and geometry-tunable dispersion, which are advantageous for efficient on-chip pair generation. Measurements of the joint spectral intensity and heralded second-order correlation function show broadband emission around 2 $\mu$m with strong spectral anti-correlations. To our knowledge, this is the first direct joint-spectral characterization of an integrated SPDC source in this wavelength regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.03950 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Cross-section of the (Al)GaAs-on-insulator ridge waveguide geometry. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Magnitude of the dominant electric-field component (a) for the fundamental [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Coincidence histograms of photon pairs from a GaAs waveguide pumped [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Setup used to measure the heralded second-order correlation function. A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Heralded second-order correlation function measured at different pump powers. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Experimental setup for time-of-flight spectral characterization of the generated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Joint-spectral intensities obtained from the time-of-flight experiment described [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Predicted surviving-pair probability (SPDC probability per pump photon) as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution,

    S.-K. Liao, W.-Q. Cai, W.-Y. Liu,et al., “Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution,” Nature549, 43–47 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Two-photon quantum interference and entanglement at 2.1𝜇m,

    S. Prabhakar, T. Shields, A. C. Dada,et al., “Two-photon quantum interference and entanglement at 2.1𝜇m,” Sci. Adv.6, eaay5195 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Hollow-Core NANF for High-Fidelity and Low-Latency Transmission at 2-Micron Waveband,

    X. Zhang, J. Du, P. Li,et al., “Hollow-Core NANF for High-Fidelity and Low-Latency Transmission at 2-Micron Waveband,” J. Light. Technol.42, 8093–8101 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Mid-infrared integrated photonics on silicon: A perspective,

    H. Lin, Z. Luo, T. Gu,et al., “Mid-infrared integrated photonics on silicon: A perspective,” Nanophotonics7, 393–420 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Silicon-Based Photonic Integration Beyond the Telecommunication Wavelength Range,

    G. Roelkens, U. D. Dave, A. Gassenq,et al., “Silicon-Based Photonic Integration Beyond the Telecommunication Wavelength Range,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.20, 394–404 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    A silicon source of heralded single photons at 2𝜇m,

    S. Signorini, M. Sanna, S. Piccione,et al., “A silicon source of heralded single photons at 2𝜇m,” APL Photonics6, 126103 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Ultrashort pulse biphoton source in lithium niobate nanophotonics at 2 𝜇m,

    J. Williams, R. Nehra, E. Sendonaris,et al., “Ultrashort pulse biphoton source in lithium niobate nanophotonics at 2 𝜇m,” Nanophotonics13, 3535–3544 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Ultrabroadband Entangled Photons on a Nanophotonic Chip,

    U. A. Javid, J. Ling, J. Staffa,et al., “Ultrabroadband Entangled Photons on a Nanophotonic Chip,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 183601 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    Nonlinear integrated quantum photonics with AlGaAs,

    F. Baboux, G. Moody, and S. Ducci, “Nonlinear integrated quantum photonics with AlGaAs,” Optica10, 917–931 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    GaAs integrated quantum photonics: Towards compact and multi-functional quantum photonic integrated circuits,

    C. P. Dietrich, A. Fiore, M. G. Thompson,et al., “GaAs integrated quantum photonics: Towards compact and multi-functional quantum photonic integrated circuits,” Laser & Photonics Rev.10, 870–894 (2016)

    2016

  3. [11]

    III-V photonic integrated circuit with waveguide-coupled light-emitting diodes and WSi superconducting single-photon detectors,

    C. McDonald, G. Moody, S. W. Nam,et al., “III-V photonic integrated circuit with waveguide-coupled light-emitting diodes and WSi superconducting single-photon detectors,” Appl. Phys. Lett.115, 081105 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Efficient and widely tunable mid-infrared sources using GaAs and AlGaAs integrated platforms for second-order frequency conversion,

    E. Z. Ulsig, M. L. Madsen, E. J. Stanton,et al., “Efficient and widely tunable mid-infrared sources using GaAs and AlGaAs integrated platforms for second-order frequency conversion,” Opt. Express32, 36986–37000 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Efficient second harmonic generation in nanophotonic GaAs-on-insulator waveguides,

    E. J. Stanton, J. Chiles, N. Nader,et al., “Efficient second harmonic generation in nanophotonic GaAs-on-insulator waveguides,” Opt. Express28, 9521–9532 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Telecom-Band Spontaneous Parametric Down-Conversion in AlGaAs-on- Insulator Waveguides,

    M. Placke, J. Schlegel, F. Mann,et al., “Telecom-Band Spontaneous Parametric Down-Conversion in AlGaAs-on- Insulator Waveguides,” Laser & Photonics Rev.18, 2301293 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Biphoton state generation and engineering with bright hybrid III–V/silicon photonic devices,

    L. Lazzari, J. Schuhmann, O. Meskine,et al., “Biphoton state generation and engineering with bright hybrid III–V/silicon photonic devices,” Opt. Quantum4, 55–62 (2026)

    2026

  8. [16]

    Joint spectral characterization of photon-pair sources,

    K. Zielnicki, K. Garay-Palmett, D. Cruz-Delgado,et al., “Joint spectral characterization of photon-pair sources,” J. Mod. Opt.65, 1141–1160 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    EMode Photonix,https://www.emodephotonix.com/(2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Broadband polarization insensitivity and high detection efficiency in high-fill-factor superconducting microwire single-photon detectors,

    D. V. Reddy, N. Otrooshi, S. W. Nam,et al., “Broadband polarization insensitivity and high detection efficiency in high-fill-factor superconducting microwire single-photon detectors,” APL Photonics7, 051302 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Useoftwo-photonlightforabsolutecalibrationofphotoelectricdetectors,

    D.N.Klyshko,“Useoftwo-photonlightforabsolutecalibrationofphotoelectricdetectors,”Sov.J.QuantumElectron. 10, 1112 (1980)

    1980

  12. [20]

    Proposal for low-noise heralded single photons from cascaded downconversion,

    P. F. Poitras, E. Meyer-Scott, and D. R. Hamel, “Proposal for low-noise heralded single photons from cascaded downconversion,” Opt. Express26, 12930 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Two strategies for modeling nonlinear optics in lossy integrated photonic structures,

    M. Banic, L. Zatti, M. Liscidini, and J. E. Sipe, “Two strategies for modeling nonlinear optics in lossy integrated photonic structures,” Phys. Rev. A106, 043707 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Beyond photon pairs—nonlinear quantum photonics in the high-gain regime: A tutorial,

    N. Quesada, L. G. Helt, M. Menotti,et al., “Beyond photon pairs—nonlinear quantum photonics in the high-gain regime: A tutorial,” Adv. Opt. Photonics14, 291–403 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Asymptotic fields for a Hamiltonian treatment of nonlinear electromagnetic phenomena,

    M. Liscidini, L. G. Helt, and J. E. Sipe, “Asymptotic fields for a Hamiltonian treatment of nonlinear electromagnetic phenomena,” Phys. Rev. A85, 013833 (2012)

    2012

  16. [24]

    Photon-pairgenerationviadown-conversioninIII-Vsemiconductor microrings: Modal dispersion and quasi-phase-matching,

    S.E.Fontaine,C.Vendromin,T.J.Steiner,et al.,“Photon-pairgenerationviadown-conversioninIII-Vsemiconductor microrings: Modal dispersion and quasi-phase-matching,” Phys. Rev. A111, 023705 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Propagation of Light in Periodic Structures: Application to the Surface-Emitting Laser-Diode,

    J.-P. Weber, “Propagation of Light in Periodic Structures: Application to the Surface-Emitting Laser-Diode,” Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley (1990)

    1990

  18. [26]

    InGaP𝜒(2) integrated photonics platform for broadband, ultra-efficient nonlinear conversion and entangled photon generation,

    J. Akin, Y. Zhao, Y. Misra,et al., “InGaP𝜒(2) integrated photonics platform for broadband, ultra-efficient nonlinear conversion and entangled photon generation,” Light. Sci. & Appl.13, 290 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Wafer-scale fabrication of InGaP-on-insulator for nonlinear and quantum photonic applications,

    L. Thiel, J. E. Castro, T. J. Steiner,et al., “Wafer-scale fabrication of InGaP-on-insulator for nonlinear and quantum photonic applications,” Appl. Phys. Lett.125, 131102 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Second-order nonlinear frequency conversion in InGaP-on-insulator waveguides,

    L. C. Ahler, E. Z. Ulsig, E. J. Stanton,et al., “Second-order nonlinear frequency conversion in InGaP-on-insulator waveguides,” Opt. Lett.50, 3652–3655 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    Low-loss InGaP-on-insulator waveguides for high-efficiency entangled pair generation and nonlinear photonics,

    L. C. Ahler, L. Wang, L. Thiel,et al., “Low-loss InGaP-on-insulator waveguides for high-efficiency entangled pair generation and nonlinear photonics,” Optica13, 1447–1453 (2026)

    2026

  22. [30]

    Eliminating frequency and space-time correlations in multiphoton states,

    W. P. Grice, A. B. U’Ren, and I. A. Walmsley, “Eliminating frequency and space-time correlations in multiphoton states,” Phys. Rev. A64, 063815 (2001)

    2001

  23. [31]

    Heralded Generation of Ultrafast Single Photons in Pure Quantum States,

    P. J. Mosley, J. S. Lundeen, B. J. Smith,et al., “Heralded Generation of Ultrafast Single Photons in Pure Quantum States,” Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 133601 (2008)

    2008

  24. [32]

    Heralded generation of high-purity ultrashort single photons in programmable temporal shapes,

    V. Ansari, E. Roccia, M. Santandrea,et al., “Heralded generation of high-purity ultrashort single photons in programmable temporal shapes,” Opt. Express26, 2764–2774 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Loophole-Free Bell Test Based on Local Precertification of Photon’s Presence,

    A. Cabello and F. Sciarrino, “Loophole-Free Bell Test Based on Local Precertification of Photon’s Presence,” Phys. Rev. X2, 021010 (2012)

    2012

  26. [34]

    Certifying the Presence of a Photonic Qubit by Splitting It in Two,

    E. Meyer-Scott, D. McCloskey, K. Gołos,et al., “Certifying the Presence of a Photonic Qubit by Splitting It in Two,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 070501 (2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    Infrared spectroscopy with visible light,

    D. A. Kalashnikov, A. V. Paterova, S. P. Kulik, and L. A. Krivitsky, “Infrared spectroscopy with visible light,” Nat. Photonics10, 98–101 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    Advances in photonic quantum sensing,

    S. Pirandola, B. R. Bardhan, T. Gehring,et al., “Advances in photonic quantum sensing,” Nat. Photonics12, 724–733 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Entangled photons enabled time-frequency-resolved coherent Raman spectroscopy and applications to electronic coherences at femtosecond scale,

    Z. Zhang, T. Peng, X. Nie,et al., “Entangled photons enabled time-frequency-resolved coherent Raman spectroscopy and applications to electronic coherences at femtosecond scale,” Light. Sci. & Appl.11, 274 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    Heterogeneous tantala photonic integrated circuits for sub-micron wavelength applications,

    N. Nader, E. J. Stanton, G. M. Brodnik,et al., “Heterogeneous tantala photonic integrated circuits for sub-micron wavelength applications,” Optica12, 585–593 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.