Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 43 references

Controlled dynamics of a multi-component discrete-time quantum walker

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that a three-component discrete-time quantum walker with an SU(3) coin built from Gell-Mann rotations spreads ballistically for every parameter pair $(\beta,\gamma)$, with the slope of the wavefront and the left-right…

desk verdict A useful numerical transport map for a three-state quantum walk with pairwise SO(3) couplings, but the 'partial localization' claim is asserted without a measure and is contradicted by the paper's own text. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.13161 v1 pith:YUUNUK5I submitted 2026-08-13 quant-ph

Vikash Mittal , Tomasz Sowiński This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords discrete-timequantumwalkthree-stateSU(3)coinoperatorGell-Mannmatricesballistictransportpartiallocalizationdirectionalanisotropycontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a discrete-time quantum walk of a three-component particle (right, stay, left) on a line, with a coin operator built from rotations generated by three Gell-Mann matrices so that the angles $(\beta,\gamma)$, with $\alpha$ fixed at $\pi/4$, tune the pairwise couplings between the components. Its central claim is that transport is ballistic for every choice of $(\beta,\gamma)$: the position variance grows as $\sigma(t)=m(\beta,\gamma)\,t$, and the slope map $m(\beta,\gamma)$ is a smooth, robust function of the couplings. It further claims that side-resolved variance and mean-position ratios $R_\sigma$ and $R_X$ organize the parameter plane into extended regions of nearly symmetric spreading and of strong left-right anisotropy, including what the authors call strongly anisotropic dynamics with partial localization. A sympathetic reader would care because, if the claims hold, the coin angles become control knobs for engineering slow or fast ballistic spreading and directional bias in a clean one-dimensional system without disorder.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the coin operator $C(\alpha,\beta,\gamma)=\exp[-i(\beta\lambda_1+\alpha\lambda_4+\gamma\lambda_6)]$ in the SO(3) subgroup of SU(3), built from Gell-Mann matrices $\lambda_1$, $\lambda_4$, and $\lambda_6$ that respectively couple the $\{R,G\}$, $\{R,B\}$, and $\{G,B\}$ internal states, combined with the shift $S$ that moves $R$ right by one site, $B$ left by one site, and leaves $G$ in place. This construction makes the coupling to the stay state $G$ a direct dial: at $\beta=\gamma=0$ the coin reduces to a two-state rotation on $\{R,B\}$ with $G$ as a spectator, and turning on $\beta$ or $\gamma$ transfers amplitude into $G$, altering interference inside the light cone. The supporting diagnostics are the fitted variance slope $m(\beta,\gamma)$ from $\sigma(t)=m\,t$ and the side-resolved normalized distributions $p_L(x,t)$ and $p_R(x,t)$ with their means $X_L$, $X_R$ and variances $\sigma_L^2$, $\sigma_R^2$, combined into the ratios $R_\sigma$ and $R_X$. These quantities carry the argument because they convert the visual wave-packet structure into a quantitative map of spreading speed and directional bias.

What would settle it

At the special lines $\gamma=0$, $\beta\approx\pm\pi$ and $\gamma=\beta$, $\beta\approx\pm\pi/2$, evolve the walk to times well beyond $t=2000$ and measure the accumulated probability in a fixed window $|x|\le L$ around the origin (equivalently the return probability $P(0,t)$). Genuine localization requires this weight to saturate at a positive constant, while slow spreading would show it decaying roughly as $t^{-1/2}$; in parallel, refit $\sigma(t)=m\,t$ over successive windows $[t,2t]$ and check that $m$ stays positive and constant rather than drifting to zero.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the authors' own terms, the discovery is a two-parameter transport phase diagram for the three-component SU(3) walk. The paper asserts that even with couplings to the stay component switched on, no parameter pair destroys linear spreading: numerically, $\sigma(t)$ is a straight line for all $(\beta,\gamma)$, and the fitted slope $m(\beta,\gamma)$ varies smoothly over a disk of radius $\pi$, with minima along extended curves rather than at isolated fine-tuned points. Superimposed on this ballistic backdrop, the ratios $R_\sigma=\sigma_R^2/\sigma_L^2$ and $R_X=X_R/|X_L|$ show coordinated switches of the dominant side along smooth boundaries, and near the lines $\gamma=0$ with $\beta\approx\pm\pi$ and $\gamma=\beta$ with $\beta\approx\pm\pi/2$ the density piles up near the initial site, which the authors interpret as partial localization coexisting with two ballistic fronts. The paper is explicit that it does not yet fully understand the location and transport behavior of these special points, and it defers a spectral explanation to future work.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the probability piled up near the origin at the special parameter lines is genuinely trapped amplitude (partial localization) rather than an unusually slow ballistic front; the paper judges localization visually, gives no quantitative test, and its own text wavers on whether significant localization occurs.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The $m(\beta,\gamma)$ map gives an experimental dial: choose the coin angles to set the walker's light-cone opening speed anywhere in the observed range, including strongly suppressed spreading.
  • Because the minima of $m(\beta,\gamma)$ are extended curves, slow spreading is robust to small parameter drift rather than requiring fine-tuned angles.
  • The $R_\sigma$ and $R_X$ maps provide complementary left-right controls: some parameter regions give nearly symmetric transport, while others give strong, smoothly organized directional bias.
  • If the partial-localization reading is right, the walk offers disorder-free trapping: a coherent walker can retain significant probability near the origin for long times while ballistic fronts continue outward.
  • The diagnostics themselves are transferable, as the paper notes, to other coin constructions and initial states, so the same slope-and-ratio analysis can characterize a whole family of multicomponent walks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the smooth organization of transport boundaries suggests the two-parameter phase diagram may be governed by one or two invariant combinations of $\beta$ and $\gamma$; checking whether $R_\sigma$ and $R_X$ collapse onto one-parameter curves would sharpen the control recipe.
  • Beyond the paper, if the near-origin buildup is genuine localization, the spectral mechanism is likely a flat band or a momentum-independent eigenvector of the Floquet operator $U(\alpha,\beta,\gamma)$, so diagonalizing $U$ at the special parameter points would identify the trapped subspace exactly as the spectral analysis the paper leaves to future work.
  • Beyond the paper, since $\alpha$ is held fixed throughout, the same diagnostics applied over $\alpha$ would complete the three-angle control surface and could reveal regimes where the ballistic slope vanishes or changes character.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper studies a discrete-time quantum walk of a three-component particle on a one-dimensional lattice, with a coin operator C(alpha,beta,gamma)=exp[-i(beta lambda1 + alpha lambda4 + gamma lambda6)] generated by three Gell-Mann matrices. With alpha fixed to pi/4 and the initial state (|R>+|B>)/sqrt(2) at the origin, the authors evolve the walk numerically and report: (i) a linear growth of the position standard deviation sigma(t) for all sampled (beta,gamma), encoded in a slope map m(beta,gamma); (ii) fixed-time probability profiles at t=100 showing parameter-dependent interference and regions of visual concentration near the origin; and (iii) side-resolved ratios R_sigma and R_X of variances and mean positions between the right and left halves at t=500, which reveal smooth parameter-space boundaries and strongly anisotropic transport. The paper interprets the combined results as a rich transport phase diagram, including a partial-localization regime, and proposes the SU(3) coin as a control tool for spreading, trapping, and directional bias.

Significance. If the claimed transport maps are correct, the paper provides a useful systematic survey of a three-parameter SU(3)-coin family, and the side-resolved ratios offer compact diagnostics for directional transport in multicomponent walks. The numerical workflow is straightforward and reproducible: the evolution is a direct simulation, the slope and ratio maps are measured outputs rather than fits to a predetermined conclusion, and the data are deposited online. The main advertised physical conclusion, the existence of partial localization, is not yet established, because the evidence is visual finite-time concentration without a quantitative long-time or spectral diagnostic. The more modest results, namely the ballistic slope map and the side-resolved asymmetry maps, are likely sound and would remain valuable even if the localization language is removed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Secs. IV-VI] The abstract's headline claim of 'strongly anisotropic dynamics with partial localization' is not supported by the analysis as written. No quantitative definition or diagnostic of localization is provided. In Sec. IV the text first states that apart from a specific case 'we do not observe a significant localization across the lattice for any combination of the parameters' and later claims 'significant localization of the probability near the initial location' for gamma=beta near beta=+/-pi/2 and +/-pi; these statements are mutually inconsistent. Visual concentration of P(x,t) at finite time can be produced by a ballistic wave packet with a small group velocity, so it does not by itself distinguish a genuine localized component from slow spreading. The authors should define what they mean by partial localization and quantify it, for example by plotting P(0,t) versus t at candidate parameters, computing the probability in a fixed window around the origin as a function of t, using an inverse participation ratio of the position distribution, or computing the Floquet spectrum to identify flat bands or point spectrum. If no localized component survives in the long-time limit, the abstract and conclusion should be revised to refer to strongly suppressed but still ballistic spreading.
  2. [Sec. III and Fig. 1, Eq. (11)] The claim that 'transport is ballistic for any set of parameters (beta,gamma)' rests on fitting sigma(t)=m(beta,gamma) t within a single window t in [500,2000]. A finite-time linear fit is not by itself evidence of asymptotic ballisticity, especially in unitary walks with three internal components where transient sub-ballistic or oscillatory behavior can persist over long times. Please provide convergence evidence, for example by showing the fitted slope as a function of the start of the fitting window, plotting sigma(t)/t versus t for representative parameters, or showing a collapse of the rescaled distribution sigma(t)^{-1} P(x/sigma(t),t) at several times. Without such evidence, the 'any set' statement is stronger than the numerical data justify.
  3. [Sec. V, Eq. (16), Fig. 3] The side-resolved ratios R_sigma and R_X are evaluated at a single time t=500, with the statement that 'This time step is long enough to ensure the saturation of the ratios' but with no evidence shown for saturation. Because these maps are used to characterize directional transport regimes, the authors should display R_sigma(t) and R_X(t) for representative parameter points over an extended time range, or show that the t=500 maps are stable under changes in the observation time. This is needed to rule out that the reported boundaries are transient artifacts rather than features of the asymptotic transport.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'Our results indicates' should be 'Our results indicate.'
  2. [Sec. II, Eq. (7)] The probability P(x,t) is written as a sum of |psi_{x,sigma}|^2 without the time argument on the amplitudes; it should be |psi_{x,sigma}(t)|^2.
  3. [Sec. V, Eq. (16) and Fig. 3 caption] The definition R_X = X_R/|X_L| and the caption expression R_X = -X_R/X_L are equivalent only because X_L<0 by construction; the notation should be unified to avoid confusion.
  4. [Sec. V] The sentence about both the variance ratio and the mean-position ratio 'switching sign' is inaccurate because both ratios are positive by definition; the authors presumably mean that they cross unity or switch dominance.
  5. [Sec. I] The phrase 'Along the same line of though' contains a typo and should read 'Along the same line of thought.'
  6. [Fig. 2 caption] The statement that the dynamics is symmetric under the swap beta -> gamma, up to mirror reflection about x=0, is asserted without proof; if it is an exact symmetry of the evolution with the chosen initial state, a brief derivation or explanation would help.
  7. [Fig. 1] The bottom-right slope map would benefit from an explicit color bar and axis labels so that the dark and bright regions can be read quantitatively.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the transport diagnostics are direct numerical outputs of the specified unitary evolution, not fitted targets or self-citational conclusions.

full rationale

The paper defines a concrete evolution operator U(α,β,γ) = S C(α,β,γ) and a fixed initial state |Ψ(0)⟩, then numerically evolves |Ψ(t)⟩ = U^t |Ψ(0)⟩. All reported quantities—the variance σ(t), the fitted slope m(β,γ), and the side-resolved ratios R_σ and R_X—are computed directly from the resulting position probability distribution P(x,t). The only fit in the paper is σ(t) = m(β,γ)·t, used as a summary of the observed linear growth; m is a measured characterization of the simulation, not a parameter tuned to force a target conclusion, and it is not used to predict a separate dataset. The self-citations to the authors' own prior work (e.g., Refs. [11], [23], [42]) are contextual or data-availability references and do not carry the derivation. The asserted 'partial localization' regime is arguably under-supported—Sec. IV contains mutually inconsistent localization statements and Sec. V concedes the mechanism is not fully understood—but that is a correctness and evidence concern, not a circularity concern: the probability distributions are genuinely computed rather than being defined to produce the claimed regimes. No step in the derivation reduces to an input by construction or depends on an unverified self-citation. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger is dominated by modeling choices (α=π/4, the fit window, the initial state) rather than fitted constants. The paper introduces no new physical entities: the three-component walker with a stay state is the standard lazy walk. The notable interpretive item is the unquantified 'partial localization' reading of the data, carried here as an ad hoc assumption because the paper declines to define or verify it.

free parameters (3)
  • Coin angle α = π/4 (fixed by hand)
    Fixed in Sec. II to treat |R⟩ and |B⟩ on equal footing. The whole transport map is a 2D slice of the 3D coin space, so the claimed full control picture is not verified for other values of α.
  • Slope fit window = t = 500 to 2000 steps
    Sec. III fits σ(t)=m·t over this interval to avoid transients. The choice is qualitative; no fit uncertainty or residual check is reported.
  • Initial walker state = (|R⟩+|B⟩)/√2 at site x=0
    Eq. (9). All localization and asymmetry claims are computed from this one initial superposition with no G component; conclusions may depend on this choice.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The walk is a perfectly isolated single-particle unitary evolution with no decoherence, defects, or boundary effects.
    The evolution operator U=SC (Eq. 2) is applied exactly for up to 2000 steps on an effectively infinite lattice; all transport claims presuppose this idealization.
  • ad hoc to paper The three-parameter SO(3) subalgebra spanned by λ1, λ4, λ6 sufficiently represents the control possibilities of SU(3) coins.
    Sec. II restricts the general SU(3) coin (Eq. 4) to Eq. (5) to get pairwise couplings. There is no argument that the omitted Gell-Mann generators (complex couplings) would not give qualitatively different transport, so the claimed control framework is for this subfamily only.
  • ad hoc to paper σ(t)=m·t over t in [500,2000] equals the asymptotic spreading rate.
    Sec. III asserts the dynamics remain ballistic based on the straight-line appearance of σ(t) and the fit; the paper provides no spectral derivation of the group velocity to confirm the fitted slope is asymptotic.
  • ad hoc to paper Localization near the origin can be read off the visual probability maps without a quantitative definition.
    Secs. IV and V infer 'partial localization' from the appearance of P(x,t); no stationary-probability weight or decay length is defined, despite the abstract listing partial localization as a headline regime.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Controlled dynamics of a multi-component discrete-time quantum walker." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YUUNUK5I

@misc{pith2026260813161,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Controlled dynamics of a multi-component discrete-time quantum walker},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YUUNUK5I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13161}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate a discrete-time quantum walk of a three-component quantum particle on a one-dimensional lattice. As coin operators, we employ parameterized rotations generated by the Gell-Mann matrices, which enable systematic tuning of the couplings between the internal components. We analyze how these couplings influence and control the dynamics by systematically exploring the position-space probability distribution across a broad region of the parameter space. To quantify the impact of different inter-component couplings, we further examine the ratio of the mean position to the variance in each half of the lattice. Our results indicates that the system supports a rich variety of transport regimes, ranging from nearly symmetric, rapidly spreading walks to strongly anisotropic dynamics with partial localization. This framework thus provides a new avenue for engineering targeted spreading and trapping behavior in multicomponent discrete-time quantum walks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.13161 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (Top Row): The probability distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. ), highlights that these anisotropic regimes are or￾ganized along smooth curves in the (β, γ) plane, forming lobes where right and left side spreading dominate. FIG. 3. Ratio of variances Rσ = σ 2 R/σ2 L (Left) and the mean￾position RX = −XR/XL (Right) between the right and left halves of the lattice at fixed evolution time t = 500 as a function of the coin parameters (β, γ). The decoupling limit β = γ = 0 is nearly… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Ratio of variances [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    One contrasting feature is that the distribution remains symmetric aboutβ= 0, and the probability near the central region remains sig- nificantly low

    Comparing the two cases reveals how introducingγin a different way modifies theβ–dependence of the ballistic peaks and interference pattern. One contrasting feature is that the distribution remains symmetric aboutβ= 0, and the probability near the central region remains sig- nificantly low. Forγ/β= 1/8, the ballistic cones remain relatively symmetric, and...

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    C. Brif, R. Chakrabarti, and H. Rabitz, Control of quan- tum phenomena: past, present and future, New Journal of Physics12, 075008 (2010)

    2010

  3. [3]

    Altafini and F

    C. Altafini and F. Ticozzi, Modeling and control of quan- tum systems: An introduction, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control57, 1898 (2012). 7

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Aharonov, L

    Y. Aharonov, L. Davidovich, and N. Zagury, Quantum random walks, Phys. Rev. A48, 1687 (1993)

    1993

  5. [5]

    Nayak and A

    A. Nayak and A. Vishwanath, Quantum Walk on the Line, arXiv e-prints , quant-ph/0010117 (2000)

    arXiv 2000

  6. [6]

    Kempe, Quantum random walks: An introductory overview, Contemp

    J. Kempe, Quantum random walks: An introductory overview, Contemp. Phys.44, 307 (2003)

    2003

  7. [7]

    S. E. Venegas-Andraca, Quantum walks: a comprehen- sive review, Quantum Inf. Process.11, 1015 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Kadian, S

    K. Kadian, S. Garhwal, and A. Kumar, Quantum walk and its application domains: A systematic review, Com- puter Science Review41, 100419 (2021)

    2021

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    A. M. Childs and J. Goldstone, Spatial search by quan- tum walk, Phys. Rev. A70, 022314 (2004)

    2004

  2. [10]

    Shenvi, J

    N. Shenvi, J. Kempe, and K. B. Whaley, Quantum random-walk search algorithm, Phys. Rev. A67, 052307 (2003)

    2003

  3. [11]

    Portugal,Quantum Walks and Search Algorithms (Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2013)

    R. Portugal,Quantum Walks and Search Algorithms (Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2013)

    2013

  4. [12]

    Singh, V

    J. Singh, V. Mittal, and S. Bose, Deterministic gener- ation of hybrid entangled states using quantum walks, Quantum Information Processing24, 269 (2025)

    2025

  5. [13]

    Mittal and Y.-P

    V. Mittal and Y.-P. Huang, Quantum magic in discrete- time quantum walk, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 013124 (2026)

    2026

  6. [14]

    T. Chen, Y. Shang, C. Chen, and H. Fan, Entangle- ment distribution based on quantum walk in arbitrary quantum networks, Quantum Science and Technology 10, 035017 (2025)

    2025

  7. [15]

    Di Fidio, L

    C. Di Fidio, L. Ares, and J. Sperling, Quantum walks and entanglement in cavity networks, Phys. Rev. A110, 013705 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    A. M. Childs, Universal computation by quantum walk, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 180501 (2009)

    2009

  9. [17]

    A. M. Childs, D. Gosset, and Z. Webb, Universal compu- tation by multiparticle quantum walk, Science339, 791 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    Singh, P

    S. Singh, P. Chawla, A. Sarkar, and C. M. Chan- drashekar, Universal quantum computing using single- particle discrete-time quantum walk, Scientific Reports 11, 11551 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Mareˇ s, J

    J. Mareˇ s, J. Novotn´ y, M.ˇStefaˇ n´ ak, and I. Jex, Counter- intuitive role of geometry in transport by quantum walks, Phys. Rev. A101, 032113 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Di Molfetta,Quantum Walks, Limits, and Transport Equations, 2053-2563 (IOP Publishing, 2024)

    G. Di Molfetta,Quantum Walks, Limits, and Transport Equations, 2053-2563 (IOP Publishing, 2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Kitagawa, M

    T. Kitagawa, M. S. Rudner, E. Berg, and E. Demler, Exploring topological phases with quantum walks, Phys. Rev. A82, 033429 (2010)

    2010

  14. [22]

    Kitagawa, M

    T. Kitagawa, M. A. Broome, A. Fedrizzi, M. S. Rud- ner, E. Berg, I. Kassal, A. Aspuru-Guzik, E. Demler, and A. G. White, Observation of topologically protected bound states in photonic quantum walks, Nat. Commun. 3, 882 (2012)

    2012

  15. [23]

    S. K. Goyal and C. M. Chandrashekar, Spatial entan- glement using a quantum walk on a many-body system, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical43, 235303 (2010)

    2010

  16. [24]

    Mittal and T

    V. Mittal and T. Sowi´ nski, Discrete-time quantum walk of locally interacting walkers, Phys. Rev. A113, 012435 (2026)

    2026

  17. [25]

    A. M. Childs, R. Cleve, E. Deotto, E. Farhi, S. Gutmann, and D. A. Spielman, Exponential algorithmic speedup by a quantum walk, inProceedings of the Thirty-Fifth An- nual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’03 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 20...

    2003

  18. [26]

    Qiang, S

    X. Qiang, S. Ma, and H. Song, Quantum Walk Comput- ing: Theory, Implementation, and Application, Intelli- gent Computing3, 0097 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    N. Inui, N. Konno, and E. Segawa, One-dimensional three-state quantum walk, Phys. Rev. E72, 056112 (2005)

    2005

  20. [28]

    ˇStefaˇ n´ ak, I

    M. ˇStefaˇ n´ ak, I. Bezdˇ ekov´ a, and I. Jex, Continuous defor- mations of the grover walk preserving localization, The European Physical Journal D66, 142 (2012)

    2012

  21. [29]

    Sadowski, J

    P. Sadowski, J. A. Miszczak, and M. Ostaszewski, Lively quantum walks on cycles, Journal of Physics A: Mathe- matical and Theoretical49, 375302 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    Kawai, T

    H. Kawai, T. Komatsu, and N. Konno, Stationary measures of three-state quantum walks on the one- dimensional lattice, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1702.01523 (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  23. [31]

    A. Saha, S. B. Mandal, D. Saha, and A. Chakrabarti, One-dimensional lazy quantum walk in ternary system, IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering2, 1 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Kiumi, Localization of space-inhomogeneous three- state quantum walks, Journal of Physics A: Mathemati- cal and Theoretical55, 225205 (2022)

    C. Kiumi, Localization of space-inhomogeneous three- state quantum walks, Journal of Physics A: Mathemati- cal and Theoretical55, 225205 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    ˇStefaˇ n´ ak, I

    M. ˇStefaˇ n´ ak, I. Bezdˇ ekov´ a, and I. Jex, Limit distributions of three-state quantum walks: The role of coin eigen- states, Phys. Rev. A90, 012342 (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    Machida, Limit theorems of a 3-state quantum walk and its application for discrete uniform measures, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1404.1522 (2014)

    T. Machida, Limit theorems of a 3-state quantum walk and its application for discrete uniform measures, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1404.1522 (2014)

    2014 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Machida and C

    T. Machida and C. M. Chandrashekar, Localization and limit laws of a three-state alternate quantum walk on a two-dimensional lattice, Phys. Rev. A92, 062307 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    Mandal, R

    A. Mandal, R. S. Sarkar, S. Chakraborty, and B. Ad- hikari, Limit theorems and localization of three-state quantum walks on a line defined by generalized grover coins, Phys. Rev. A106, 042405 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    L. T. Tude and M. C. de Oliveira, Decoherence in the three-state quantum walk, Physica A: Statistical Me- chanics and its Applications605, 128012 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    L. T. Tude and M. C. de Oliveira, Temperature and en- tanglement of the three-state quantum walk, Quantum Science and Technology7, 035009 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Janiurek and V

    L. Janiurek and V. Kendon, Continuum limits of lazy open quantum walks, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical59, 215301 (2026)

    2026

  32. [40]

    J. K. Asb´ oth, Symmetries, topological phases, and bound states in the one-dimensional quantum walk, Phys. Rev. B86, 195414 (2012)

    2012

  33. [41]

    Jalali-Mola and O

    Z. Jalali-Mola and O. Hess, Dispersive topological bound states in the continuum for controllable quantum-state transport in three-state discrete-time quantum walks, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 013271 (2026)

    2026

  34. [42]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computa- tion and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edi- tion(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  35. [43]

    Controlled dynamics of a multi-component discrete- time quantum walker

    V. Mittal and T. Sowi´ nski, Supplemental material for “Controlled dynamics of a multi-component discrete- time quantum walker”, Zenodo (2026)

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.