pith. sign in

arxiv: cond-mat/0001217 · v1 · submitted 2000-01-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.supr-con

Stripes: Why hole rich lines are antiphase domain walls?

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con
keywords domainwallholeanti-phasedeltafillingfractionstripes
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

For stripes of hole rich lines in doped antiferromagnets, we investigate the competition between anti-phase and in-phase domain wall ground state configurations. We argue that a phase transition must occure as a function of the electron/hole filling fraction of the domain wall. Due to {\em transverse} kinetic hole fluctuations, empty domain walls are always anti-phase. At arbitrary electron filling fraction ($\delta $) of the domain wall (and in particular for $\delta \approx 1/4$ as in LaNdSrCuO), it is essential to account also for the transverse magnetic interactions of the electrons and their mobility {\em along} the domain wall. We find that the transition from anti-phase to in-phase stripe domain wall occurs at a critical filling fraction $0.28<\delta_{c}<0.30$, for any value of $\frac{J}{t}<{1/3}$. We further use our model to estimate the spin-wave velocity in a stripe system. Finally, relate the results of our microscopic model to previous Landau theory approach to stripes.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.