Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Quantum Number Fractionization in Cuprates: U(1) RVB Gauge Theory and Senthil Fisher Constructions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv cond-mat/0008324 v2 pith:7LPSYTDL submitted 2000-08-22 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con

Quantum Number Fractionization in Cuprates: U(1) RVB Gauge Theory and Senthil Fisher Constructions

classification cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con
keywords cupratesfisherfractionizationlocalnumberquantumsenthilsymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We critically look at Senthil Fisher constructions of quantum number fractionization in cuprates. The first construction, while mathematically correct is of limited relevance to cuprates. The second one has a missing local U(1) symmetry. Once this aspect is repaired, it reveals itself as the U(1) RVB gauge theory construction of quantum number fractionization. An approximate local $Z_2$ symmetry arises in the spin sector for a reason very different from Senthil and Fisher's. The charge sector continues to have the local U(1) symmetry and the metallic spin gap phase of the 2d cuprates may, in principle, carry (irrational) fractional charge $e^* \neq e$ obeying Haldane's fractional exclusion statistics like the 1d models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.