Recognition: unknown
Absence of static phase separation in the high-Tc cuprate YBa₂Cu₃O_{6+y}
classification
❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
cond-mat.str-el
keywords
phaseseparationstaticdistributionholeabsencebi2212content
read the original abstract
We use 89Y NMR in $YBa_{2}Cu_{3}O_{6+y}$ in order to evaluate with high sensitivity the distribution of hole content p in the CuO2 planes. For y=1 and y=0.6, this hole doping distribution is found narrow with a full width at half maximum smaller than Delta p=0.025. This rules out any large static phase separation between underdoped and optimally doped regions in contrast with the one observed by STM in Bi2212 and by NQR in LaSrCuO. This establishes that static electronic phase separation is not a generic feature of the cuprates.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.