Recognition: unknown
Andreev billiards
read the original abstract
This is a review of recent advances in our understanding of how Andreev reflection at a superconductor modifies the excitation spectrum of a quantum dot. The emphasis is on two-dimensional impurity-free structures in which the classical dynamics is chaotic. Such Andreev billiards differ in a fundamental way from their non-superconducting counterparts. Most notably, the difference between chaotic and integrable classical dynamics shows up already in the level density, instead of only in the level--level correlations. A chaotic billiard has a gap in the spectrum around the Fermi energy, while integrable billiards have a linearly vanishing density of states. The excitation gap E_gap corresponds to a time scale h/E_gap which is classical (h-independent, equal to the mean time t_dwell between Andreev reflections) if t_dwell is sufficiently large. There is a competing quantum time scale, the Ehrenfest time t_E, which depends logarithmically on h. Two phenomenological theories provide a consistent description of the t_E-dependence of the gap, given qualitatively by E_gap min(h/t_dwell,h/t_E). The analytical predictions have been tested by computer simulations but not yet experimentally.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.