Comment on "Nernst effect in poor conductors and in the cuprate superconductors"
classification
❄️ cond-mat.str-el
cond-mat.supr-con
keywords
commentnernstalexandrovanomalousassumptionsauthorsconductorscuprate
read the original abstract
In a recent letter, Alexandrov and Zavaritsky propose a model to explain the anomalous Nernst signal observed in the normal state of hole-doped cuprates. The aim of this comment is to recall that one of the main assumptions of the authors regarding the experimental data is false.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.