Comment on the "Comment by Schwab, Blencowe, Roukes, Cleland, Girvin, Milburn, and Ekinci: quant-ph/0503018"
classification
❄️ cond-mat.other
quant-ph
keywords
commentquant-phschwabargumentsblencoweclelandekincigirvin
read the original abstract
We show that arguments in the comment by Schwab et al. quant-ph/0503018 on our recent work are invalid.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.