pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: gr-qc/0304004 · v3 · submitted 2003-04-01 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Comments on the 2001 run of the EXPLORER/NAUTILUS gravitational wave experiment

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords coincidencedataexplorergravitationalnautiluspublishedsearchwave
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The recently published analysis of the coincidences between the EXPLORER and NAUTILUS gravitational wave detectors in the year 2001 (Astone et al. 2002) has drawn some criticism (Finn 2003). We do not hold with these objections, even if we agree that no claim can be made with our data. The paper we published reports data of unprecedented quality and sets a new procedure for the coincidence search, which can be repeated again by us and by other groups in order to search for signature of possible signals. About the reported coincidence excess, we remark that it is not destined to remain an intriguing observation for long: it will be confirmed or denied soon by interferometers and bars operating at their expected sensitivity.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.