pith. sign in

arxiv: hep-ex/9703001 · v2 · pith:STPZHTB7new · submitted 1997-03-01 · ✦ hep-ex · hep-ph

Signal Confidence Limits from a Neural Network Data Analysis

classification ✦ hep-ex hep-ph
keywords datasignalsignalsboundslikelihoodanalysisapplyingbackground
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This paper deals with a situation of some importance for the analysis of experimental data via Neural Network (NN) or similar devices: Let $N$ data be given, such that $N=N_s+N_b$, where $N_s$ is the number of signals, $N_b$ the number of background events, both unknown. Assume that a NN has been trained, such that it will tag signals with efficiency $F_s$, $(0<F_s<1)$ and background data with $F_b$, $(0<F_b<1)$. Applying the NN yields $N^Y$ tagged events. We demonstrate that the knowledge of $N^Y$ is sufficient to calculate confidence bounds for the signal likelihood, which have the same statistical interpretation as the Clopper-Pearson bounds for the well-studied case of direct signal observation. Subsequently, we discuss rigorous bounds for the a-posteriori distribution function of the signal probability, as well as for the (closely related) likelihood that there are $N_s$ signals in the data. We compare them with results obtained by starting off with a maximum entropy type assumption for the a-priori likelihood that there are $N_s$ signals in the data and applying the Bayesian theorem. Difficulties are encountered with the latter method.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.