Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Before sailing on a domain-wall sea

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv hep-lat/0411007 v3 pith:XZAQNUEZ submitted 2004-11-04 hep-lat

Before sailing on a domain-wall sea

classification hep-lat
keywords domain-wallactionsdifferentfermionmassesresidualsystematicvalence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We discuss the very different roles of the valence-quark and the sea-quark residual masses ($m_{res}^v$ and $m_{res}^s$) in dynamical domain-wall fermions simulations. Focusing on matrix elements of the effective weak hamiltonian containing a power divergence, we find that $m_{res}^v$ can be a source of a much bigger systematic error. To keep all systematic errors due to residual masses at the 1% level, we estimate that one needs $a m_{res}^s \le 10^{-3}$ and $a m_{res}^v \le 10^{-5}$, at a lattice spacing $a\sim 0.1$ fm. The practical implications are that (1) optimal use of computer resources calls for a mixed scheme with different domain-wall fermion actions for the valence and sea quarks; (2) better domain-wall fermion actions are needed for both the sea and the valence sectors.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.