pith. sign in

arxiv: hep-ph/0011054 · v3 · submitted 2000-11-03 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

(3+1)-spectrum of neutrino masses: A chance for LSND?

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords schemeneutrinolsndatmosphericdisappearanceneutrinosactivebounds
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

If active to active neutrino transitions are dominant modes of the atmospheric ($\nu_{\mu} \to \nu_{\tau}$) and the solar neutrino oscillations ($\nu_{e}\to \nu_{\mu}/\nu_{\tau}$), as is indicated by recent data, the favoured scheme which accommodates the LSND result - the so called (2+2)-scheme - should be discarded. We introduce the parameters $\eta_s^{atm}$ and $\eta_s^{sun}$ which quantify an involvement of the sterile component in the solar and atmospheric neutrino oscillations. The (2+2)-scheme predicts $\eta_s^{atm} + \eta_s^{sun} = 1$ and the experimental proof of deviation from this equality will discriminate the scheme. In this connection the (3+1)-scheme is revisited in which the fourth (predominantly sterile) neutrino is isolated from a block of three flavour neutrinos by the mass gap $\Delta m^2_{LSND} \sim (0.4-10)$ eV$^2$. We find that in the (3+1)-scheme the LSND result can be reconciled with existing bounds on $\nu_e$- and $\nu_{\mu}$ - disappearance at 95-99 % C.L.. The generic prediction of the scheme is the $\nu_e$- and $\nu_{\mu}$ - disappearance probabilities at the level of present experimental bounds. The possibility to strengthen the bound on $\nu_{\mu}$- disappearance in the KEK - front detector experiment is studied. We consider phenomenology of the (3 + 1)-scheme, in particular, its implications for the atmospheric neutrinos, neutrinoless double beta decay searches, supernova neutrinos and primordial nucleosynthesis.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.