On the Origin of the Violation of Hara's Theorem for Conserved Current

I elaborate on the argument that the violation of Hara's theorem for conserved current requires that the current is not sufficiently well localized. It is also stressed that whatever sign of asymmetry is measured in the $\Xi ^0 \to \Lambda \gamma $ decay, one of the following three statements must be incorrect: 1) Hara's theorem is satisfied, 2) vector meson dominance is applicable to weak radiative hyperon decays, and 3) basic structure of our quark-model description of nuclear parity-violation is correct.