pith. sign in

arxiv: nucl-th/9706073 · v1 · submitted 1997-06-26 · ⚛️ nucl-th

Are There Low-Lying Intruder States in ⁸Be?

classification ⚛️ nucl-th
keywords intruderstatesexcitationslow-lyinghbarinteractionsomegaallow
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We allow up to $4 \hbar\omega$ excitations in $^8Be$ relative to the basic configuration $(0s)^4(0p)^4$ in order to see if there are low-lying intruder states in $^8Be$. We use three interactions $-\chi Q \cdot Q, -\chi Q \cdot Q$ + spin-orbit, and a realistic (x,y) interaction, where for $x=1,y=1$ one gets values for the spin-orbit and tensor interactions which correspond closely to those of a non-relativistic $G$ matrix such as Bonn A. For the three interactions considered, if we allow up to $2 \hbar \omega$ excitations we get the energy of the lowest $J=0^+$ intruder state to be at 32.1 MeV, 30.1 MeV and 33.8 MeV, respectively. If we allow up to $4 \hbar\omega$ excitations the corresponding values are 26.5 MeV, 26.5 MeV and 28.7 MeV. We thus support the statement made by E. Warburton in his 1986 $R$ matrix analysis of the $\beta^{\mp}$-delayed alpha spectra from the decay of $^8Li$ and $^8B$ that ``satisfactory fits are obtained without introducing intruder states below 26-MeV excitations'' (Phys. Rev. C 33, 303(1986)). In $^{10}Be$ however, with the first two ``$Q \cdot Q$'' interactions, we get (with up to $2 \hbar \omega$ excitations) low-lying intruder states at 9.7 MeV and 11.9 MeV respectively. Thus the presence of low-lying intruder states in $^{10}Be$ (the $0^+_2$ state at 6.179 MeV may or may not be an intruder) does not imply that there are low-lying intruder states in $^8Be$.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.