Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Transition from Anti-Parallel to Component Magnetic Reconnection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv physics/0503064 v1 pith:FXT2XRBY submitted 2005-03-08 physics.space-ph astro-ph

classification physics.space-phastro-ph
keywords fieldelectronguidemagneticreconnectionchangesstrongx-line
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the transition between anti-parallel and component collisionless magnetic reconnection with 2D particle-in-cell simulations. The primary finding is that a guide field \approx 0.1 times as strong as the asymptotic reconnecting field -- roughly the field strength at which the electron Larmor radius is comparable to the width of the electron current layer -- is sufficient to magnetize the electrons in the vicinity of the x-line, thus causing significant changes to the structure of the electron dissipation region. This implies that great care should be exercised before concluding that magnetospheric reconnection is antiparallel. We also find that even for such weak guide fields strong inward-flowing electron beams form in the vicinity of the magnetic separatrices and Buneman-unstable distribution functions arise at the x-line itself. As in the calculations of {\it Hesse et al.} [2002] and {\it Yin and Winske} [2003], the non-gyrotropic elements of the electron pressure tensor play the dominant role in decoupling the electrons from the magnetic field at the x-line, regardless of the magnitude of the guide field and the associated strong variations in the pressure tensor's spatial structure. Despite these changes, and consistent with previous work, the reconnection rate does not vary appreciably with the strength of the guide field as it changes between 0 and a value equal to the asymptotic reversed field.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools