pith. sign in

arxiv: physics/0610276 · v2 · submitted 2006-10-31 · ⚛️ physics.data-an

Studies of Stability and Robustness for Artificial Neural Networks and Boosted Decision Trees

classification ⚛️ physics.data-an
keywords testingvariablesartificialboosteddecisionidentificationnetworksneural
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this paper, we compare the performance, stability and robustness of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Boosted Decision Trees (BDT) using MiniBooNE Monte Carlo samples. These methods attempt to classify events given a number of identification variables. The BDT algorithm has been discussed by us in previous publications. Testing is done in this paper by smearing and shifting the input variables of testing samples. Based on these studies, BDT has better particle identification performance than ANN. The degradation of the classifications obtained by shifting or smearing variables of testing results is smaller for BDT than for ANN.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.