Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Should you believe that this coin is fair?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv q-bio/0508044 v1 pith:MTP2NHPU submitted 2005-08-30 q-bio.NC q-bio.QM

classification q-bio.NCq-bio.QM
keywords coinrandomeventsfairhighprobabilitysequencesamount
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Faced with a sequence of N binary events, such as coin flips (or Ising spins), it is natural to ask whether these events reflect some underlying dynamic signals or are just random. Plausible models for the dynamics of hidden biases lead to surprisingly high probabilities of misidentifying random sequences as biased. In particular, this probability decays as N^(-1/4), so that no reasonable amount of data would be sufficient to induce the concept of a fair coin with high probability. I suggest that these theoretical results may be relevant to understanding experiments on the apparent misperception of random sequences by human observers.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools