Classical information and Mermin's non-technical proof of the theorem of Bell
classification
🪐 quant-ph
keywords
proofmerminnon-technicalrefutationaccountbellbell-typeclassical
read the original abstract
We show that Mermin's reasoning against our refutation of his non-technical proof for Bell-type inequalities is of limited significance or contains mathematical inconsistencies that, when taken into account, do not permit his proof to go forward. Our refutation therefore stands.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.