Strengths and Weaknesses of Quantum Computing
read the original abstract
Recently a great deal of attention has focused on quantum computation following a sequence of results suggesting that quantum computers are more powerful than classical probabilistic computers. Following Shor's result that factoring and the extraction of discrete logarithms are both solvable in quantum polynomial time, it is natural to ask whether all of NP can be efficiently solved in quantum polynomial time. In this paper, we address this question by proving that relative to an oracle chosen uniformly at random, with probability 1, the class NP cannot be solved on a quantum Turing machine in time $o(2^{n/2})$. We also show that relative to a permutation oracle chosen uniformly at random, with probability 1, the class $NP \cap coNP$ cannot be solved on a quantum Turing machine in time $o(2^{n/3})$. The former bound is tight since recent work of Grover shows how to accept the class NP relative to any oracle on a quantum computer in time $O(2^{n/2})$.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Stabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction
The stabilizer code formalism is presented as a powerful group-theoretic tool for quantum error correction, enabling code construction, analysis of quantum channel capacity, bounds on codes, and fault-tolerant computation.
-
Pseudorandom Dynamics in the SYK Model and Cryptographic Censorship in JT Gravity
SYK disorder is shown to be an approximate unitary k-design for poly(N) k; under the planted-SYK hardness conjecture this yields gravitationally pseudorandom unitaries, implying cryptographic censorship in JT gravity ...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.