Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Poisson and symplectic functions in Lie algebroid theory

Symplectic Geometry · Submitted 13 Nov 2007

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Emphasizing the role of Gerstenhaber algebras and of higher derived brackets in the theory of Lie algebroids, we show that the several Lie algebroid brackets which have been introduced in the recent literature can all be defined in terms of Poisson and pre-symplectic functions in the sense of Roytenberg and Terashima.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID0711.2043 (version 4)
Pith IDTGU4MVKO, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationYvette Kosmann-Schwarzbach. "Poisson and symplectic functions in Lie algebroid theory." arXiv:0711.2043 (2007). https://pith.science/paper/TGU4MVKO
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,072 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.06 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.18 · compares with prior results 0.43 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v4. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Emphasizing the role of Gerstenhaber algebras and of higher derived brackets in the theory of Lie algebroids, we show that the several Lie algebroid brackets which have been introduced in the recent literature can all be defined in terms of Poisson and pre-symplectic functions in the sense of Roytenberg and Terashima. We prove that in this very general framework there exists a one-to-one correspondence between non-degenerate Poisson functions and symplectic functions. We determine the differential associated to a Lie algebroid structure obtained by twisting a structure with background by both a Lie bialgebra action and a Poisson bivector.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Emphasizing the role of Gerstenhaber algebras and of higher derived brackets in the theory of Lie algebroids, we show that the several Lie algebroid brackets which have been introduced in the recent literature can all be defined in terms of Poisson and pre-symplectic functions in the sense of Roytenberg and Terashima. contribution 0.88 0.90 0.68 asserted 1.00
s1 We prove that in this very general framework there exists a one-to-one correspondence between non-degenerate Poisson functions and symplectic functions. result 1.00 0.95 0.34 asserted 1.00
s2 We determine the differential associated to a Lie algebroid structure obtained by twisting a structure with background by both a Lie bialgebra action and a Poisson bivector. result 0.80 0.94 0.10 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v4
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Emphasizing the role of Gerstenhaber algebras and of higher derived brackets in the theory of Lie algebroids, we show that the several Lie algebroid brackets which have been introduced in the recent literature can all be defined in terms of Poisson and pre-symplectic functions in the sense of Roytenberg and Terashima. We prove that in this very general framework there exists a one-to-one correspondence between non-degenerate Poisson functions and symplectic functions. We determine the differential associated to a Lie algebroid structure obtained by twisting a structure with background by both a Lie bialgebra action and a Poisson bivector.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

9 arXiv papers cite this in 18 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 13 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
  • The following proposition [ref] [ref] [ref] extends results of [ref] .

    Dirac pairs · Poisson and presymplectic functions on proto-bialgebroids · 0.99

Uses its method or tool 2 papers
  • Our description of Nijenhuis structures and related concepts relies on the use of Roytenberg's graded Poisson bracket on the minimal symplectic realization of a Courant algebroid [ref] , and on its interplay with the big bracket [ref] [ref] [ref] [ref] when the Courant algebroid is the double of a Lie bialgebroid, and, in particular, in the case of the generalized tangent bundle of a manifold.

    Nijenhuis structures on Courant algebroids · Introduction · 0.99

  • We use twisting of a homological function introduced by [ref] and analyzed in [ref] .

    Compatible $E$-Differential Forms on Lie Algebroids over (Pre-)Multisymplectic Manifolds · Twisting of homological functions and twisted QP-manifolds · 0.96

Cites it as background 2 papers

What it cites

Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.