pith. sign in

arxiv: 0809.1480 · v3 · submitted 2008-09-09 · 🌀 gr-qc

Black hole complementarity with local horizons and Horowitz-Maldacena's proposal

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords complementarityblackholehorizonhorizonsprincipleassumptionshorowitz-maldacena
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

To implement the consistent black hole complementarity principle, we need two assumptions: first, there exists a singularity near the center, and second, global horizons are the same as local horizons. However, these assumptions are not true in general. In this paper, the authors study a charged black hole in which the second assumption may not hold. From the previous simulations, we have argued that the event horizon is quite close to the outer horizon, and it seems not harmful to black hole complementarity; however, the Cauchy horizon can be different from the inner horizon, and a violation of complementarity will be possible. To maintain complementarity, we need to assume a selection principle between the singularity and the Hawking radiation generating surface; we suggest that Horowitz-Maldacena's proposal can be useful for this purpose. Finally, we discussed some conditions under which the selection principle may not work.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.