Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Dynamical NNLO parton distributions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0810.4274 v2 pith:3IMJLTGC submitted 2008-10-23 hep-ph

classification hep-ph
keywords nnlodistributionsdynamicalstandardalphaapproachdataeffects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Utilizing recent DIS measurements (\sigma_r, F_{2,3,L}) and data on hadronic dilepton production we determine at NNLO (3-loop) of QCD the dynamical parton distributions of the nucleon generated radiatively from valencelike positive input distributions at an optimally chosen low resolution scale (Q_0^2 < 1 GeV^2). These are compared with `standard' NNLO distributions generated from positive input distributions at some fixed and higher resolution scale (Q_0^2 > 1 GeV^2). Although the NNLO corrections imply in both approaches an improved value of \chi^2, typically \chi^2_{NNLO} \simeq 0.9 \chi^2_{NLO}, present DIS data are still not sufficiently accurate to distinguish between NLO results and the minute NNLO effects of a few percent, despite of the fact that the dynamical NNLO uncertainties are somewhat smaller than the NLO ones and both are, as expected, smaller than those of their `standard' counterparts. The dynamical predictions for F_L(x,Q^2) become perturbatively stable already at Q^2 = 2-3 GeV^2 where precision measurements could even delineate NNLO effects in the very small-x region. This is in contrast to the common `standard' approach but NNLO/NLO differences are here less distinguishable due to the much larger 1\sigma uncertainty bands. Within the dynamical approach we obtain \alpha_s(M_Z^2)=0.1124 \pm 0.0020, whereas the somewhat less constrained `standard' fit gives \alpha_s(M_Z^2)=0.1158 \pm 0.0035.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MATRIX HAWAII: PineAPPL interpolation grids with MATRIX

    hep-ph 2025-06 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Matrix Hawaii provides a public interface between PineAPPL and MATRIX that generates interpolation grids at NNLO QCD + NLO EW accuracy for a range of LHC processes, with sub-permille interpolation errors.

Pith tools