REVIEW 2 cited by
Physics, Topology, Logic and Computation: A Rosetta Stone
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In physics, Feynman diagrams are used to reason about quantum processes. In the 1980s, it became clear that underlying these diagrams is a powerful analogy between quantum physics and topology: namely, a linear operator behaves very much like a "cobordism". Similar diagrams can be used to reason about logic, where they represent proofs, and computation, where they represent programs. With the rise of interest in quantum cryptography and quantum computation, it became clear that there is extensive network of analogies between physics, topology, logic and computation. In this expository paper, we make some of these analogies precise using the concept of "closed symmetric monoidal category". We assume no prior knowledge of category theory, proof theory or computer science.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Double Categories of Open Systems: the Cospan Approach
Structured and decorated cospan double categories for open systems have an exoskeleton/outer shell structure, and every object in them is a special symmetric Frobenius pseudomonoid.
-
The far side of the cube
An elementary presentation of the unrestricted (far-side) game model, where strategies are saturated and the usual constraints of innocence, bracketing, alternation, and determinism are all relaxed.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.